Obama supports terrorists

aerial

The official WH Facebook and the page Barack Obama has been bombarded for days now by angry Egyptians.

This planned and flawlessly executed effort is part of an anti-propaganda campaign on the part of Egyptians against the Muslim Brotherhood as a warning to us .

They are fully aware that BHO had much to do with Morsi coming into power and that he is "punishing" Egypt for the people rising up against him.

Commenting that Obama supports terrorists, telling firsthand accounts of the targeting by the MB of Christians, among other atrocities.

The most important warning for us in this assault on those pages?!

They are warning Americans that he is part of the MB and is dangerous. There are, between both pages, hundreds of thousands of comments from Egyptians speaking to him and to America.

As Americans, you should not be able to believe this hasn't gotten any press.

You should also realize we are a country with virtually NO press.

This truth posted where you can all view it is s huge warning to you all as well. Even Egyptians know they must warn us of who and what is in charge here and how much danger we are in as they warn of what faces us all.


https://www.facebook.com/WhiteHouse

rustneversleeps

hahahaha

Guitar92player

Please tell me you did not just say Obama is part of the Muslim Brotherhood...


If so... :fp:

If not, reword your sentence please.

Gern Blansten

He said "BHO"....that's an indicator

JimmyV

Crazier and crazier becomes the discourse on the Right...

JonnyPistachio

Everyone is a terrorist in someone's eyes.

brianlux

I clicked on the link for the White House facebook and saw a lot of pictures of the new dog. Is that the terrorist you're referring to?

Bentleyspop

Took this picture yesterday morning as I was cycling from Alamosa, CO to Del Norte, CO and back.
It was enough to make me stop and take the picture .....

Guitar92player

brianlux wrote:

I clicked on the link for the White House facebook and saw a lot of pictures of the new dog. Is that the terrorist you're referring to?

It's gonna give us all fleas and we'll all itch to death!!!!

dustinpardue

I don't know how President Obama puts up with this garbage every single day and doesn't lose his cool. I would have years ago!
It would be great if as soon as the next president is sworn in to office in jan 2017 if he just said publicly, 'ok I'm not president anymore so I can this.....fuck all of you.' That would be hilarious.

badbrains

law21 wrote:

hahahaha

I see your hahahaha and raise you hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!

g under p

dustinpardue wrote:

I don't know how President Obama puts up with this garbage every single day and doesn't lose his cool. I would have years ago!
It would be great if as soon as the next president is sworn in to office in jan 2017 if he just said publicly, 'ok I'm not president anymore so I can this.....fuck all of you.' That would be hilarious.

I think he does or he would lose his cool except I think he understands half this country can't stand everything about him including the color of the dog he chooses. Also to add to your quote..."fuck all of you bitches" at some news conference. His speaking engagement fees would certainly skyrocket.

Peace

Jason P

Bentleyspop wrote:

Took this picture yesterday morning as I was cycling from Alamosa, CO to Del Norte, CO and back.
It was enough to make me stop and take the picture .....

So it must be true then after seeing this indisputable evidence!

gimmesometruth27

:fp: :fp: :fp: :fp: :fp: :fp:


anyone hear the dogwhistle?

gimmesometruth27

Gern Blansten wrote:

He said "BHO"....that's an indicator

yeah when that happens you automatically lose credibility. just as if he would have thrown out the nazi word...

Hugh Freaking Dillon

Cosmo

See.. it's stuff like this that brings down the literacy averages for the rest of our nation.

unsung

It's US law to cut off aid when a country that has a democratically elected govt overthrown. Why is the Senate and Obama administration refusing to cut off this foreign welfare?

Cosmo

unsung wrote:

It's US law to cut off aid when a country that has a democratically elected govt overthrown. We is the Senate and Obama administration refusing to cut off this foreign welfare?

...
I agree, aid should be cut and President Obama should just deal with the morons who would view suspension of military aid to the Egyptian Milirary as support of the ousted Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood.
...
Because you KNOW that the Republicans and FOX News would spin it in that direction.

unsung

Honestly I don't care how its spun, I also favor ending ALL foreign aid regardless of country. I realize my opinion is in the minority.

Guitar92player

unsung wrote:

Honestly I don't care how its spun, I also favor ending ALL foreign aid regardless of country. I realize my opinion is in the minority.

Granted I don't agree with all your opinions, but this one I agree with. Why give aid to countries (regardless of where they are on Earth) where the people of the country hate the US? It's stupid.

I know there is no country where all the people hate the US, so that is the only sad part about cutting aid.

jethrojam420

I have deleted 7 responses that I typed in, so Kat doesn't ban me from the forum.



So I will just say this:
62,615,406 > 59,142,004

Last-12-Exit

unsung wrote:

Honestly I don't care how its spun, I also favor ending ALL foreign aid regardless of country. I realize my opinion is in the minority.

I agree with you 100%

Edit: I agree with this statement 100%.

Drowned Out

Oh aerial…. your threads are always their own little microcosm of our political culture.  Talk about losing the message in the presentation. Its an important message, so its frustrating to see it ignored, and everyone jumping on you instead of discussing the topic.  But there are reasons for that.  LOTS of them.  If you want your voice to be heard and influential (which, at root, is the point to sharing our beliefs with others, no?), you need to be viewed as a credible source of information by your peers.  Judging by prose, you didn’t write this, and haven’t credited the author  (yup, googled a line from it – its from a blog you’ve copied from before – the ‘barracudabrigade’….takin cues from a person who dedicates their journalistic ambition to Sarah Palin?…..lol)…You will not gain any credibility by plagiarizing divisive, sensationalist drivel like this.. How can I take this seriously if the first thing I notice is that its stolen, and you are too embarrassed by the source to link to it? Why can’t you take the basic message conveyed, and find a decent source to copy/paste, or just type out your own thoughts, instead of discrediting the whole topic by passing this crap off as yours? ‬


“Obama supports terrorists”….yes, he does.  So does pretty much every government, and the definition of ‘terrorist’ is so ambiguous that anyone with a brain should recognizes it as a flag that the writer is trying to manipulate your opinion.  Anyone with NO brain recognizes it as ‘angry muslims’.  I think we all know readers of this blog see the latter.  Still, it’s important to point out the hypocrisy of the US government in their ‘war on terror’.  Too bad that conversation will not be had when language like this is used.  It’s the same trick the government uses to justify their policies and leave no room for debate –  journalists/bloggers/you are no better when doing the same. If indeed there was a coordinated effort (not an “attack”), by ‘hundreds of thousands’ of Egyptian citizens, to raise awareness of US actions in Egypt, it IS newsworthy…but that point is lost in hysterical rhetoric.  Why do teaparty types always say they’re ‘against big government’ in general, then so easily fall into partisan bullshit by attacking the figurehead – BHO - specifically? ‬

Also want to say that I agree that foreign aid is a joke…saying it should be stopped because the people in that country hate the US anyway is missing the point.  Foreign aid is used to buy influence, almost always from corrupt dictators in nations needed to support US interests.  Read: countries that are resource rich, in important strategic military locations, or along shipping/transport corridors.    This is pretty much universally accepted….until someone criticizes US policy, then its paraded out that the US is the ‘worlds biggest donor to foreign aid’   :roll:  Egypt controls the Suez and is vital to Israel’s security….so no fuckin way aid to that country stops,  no matter who is running it.‪‪‬‪‬‪‪‬

polaris_x

Guitar92player wrote:

unsung wrote:

Honestly I don't care how its spun, I also favor ending ALL foreign aid regardless of country. I realize my opinion is in the minority.

Granted I don't agree with all your opinions, but this one I agree with. Why give aid to countries (regardless of where they are on Earth) where the people of the country hate the US? It's stupid.

I know there is no country where all the people hate the US, so that is the only sad part about cutting aid.

because it's part of the military industrial complex ...

the US gov't primary purpose is to serve corporations and their interests ... this is part of the war profiteering mandate ... how else do you explain the percentage of foreign aid that comes in the form of military sales!??

dignin

Drowned Out wrote:

Oh aerial…. your threads are always their own little microcosm of our political culture.  Talk about losing the message in the presentation. Its an important message, so its frustrating to see it ignored, and everyone jumping on you instead of discussing the topic.  But there are reasons for that.  LOTS of them.  If you want your voice to be heard and influential (which, at root, is the point to sharing our beliefs with others, no?), you need to be viewed as a credible source of information by your peers.  Judging by prose, you didn’t write this, and haven’t credited the author  (yup, googled a line from it – its from a blog you’ve copied from before – the ‘barracudabrigade’….takin cues from a person who dedicates their journalistic ambition to Sarah Palin?…..lol)…You will not gain any credibility by plagiarizing divisive, sensationalist drivel like this.. How can I take this seriously if the first thing I notice is that its stolen, and you are too embarrassed by the source to link to it? Why can’t you take the basic message conveyed, and find a decent source to copy/paste, or just type out your own thoughts, instead of discrediting the whole topic by passing this crap off as yours? ‬


“Obama supports terrorists”….yes, he does.  So does pretty much every government, and the definition of ‘terrorist’ is so ambiguous that anyone with a brain should recognizes it as a flag that the writer is trying to manipulate your opinion.  Anyone with NO brain recognizes it as ‘angry muslims’.  I think we all know readers of this blog see the latter.  Still, it’s important to point out the hypocrisy of the US government in their ‘war on terror’.  Too bad that conversation will not be had when language like this is used.  It’s the same trick the government uses to justify their policies and leave no room for debate –  journalists/bloggers/you are no better when doing the same. If indeed there was a coordinated effort (not an “attack”), by ‘hundreds of thousands’ of Egyptian citizens, to raise awareness of US actions in Egypt, it IS newsworthy…but that point is lost in hysterical rhetoric.  Why do teaparty types always say they’re ‘against big government’ in general, then so easily fall into partisan bullshit by attacking the figurehead – BHO - specifically? ‬

Also want to say that I agree that foreign aid is a joke…saying it should be stopped because the people in that country hate the US anyway is missing the point.  Foreign aid is used to buy influence, almost always from corrupt dictators in nations needed to support US interests.  Read: countries that are resource rich, in important strategic military locations, or along shipping/transport corridors.    This is pretty much universally accepted….until someone criticizes US policy, then its paraded out that the US is the ‘worlds biggest donor to foreign aid’   :roll:  Egypt controls the Suez and is vital to Israel’s security….so no fuckin way aid to that country stops,  no matter who is running it.‪‪‬‪‬‪‪‬

Great post

satansbed

unsung wrote:

Honestly I don't care how its spun, I also favor ending ALL foreign aid regardless of country. I realize my opinion is in the minority.

To help people get past the sound bites

http://www.economist.com/blogs/democrac ... oreign-aid

http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/dtingley/files/enp.pdf

http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/crs/98-916.pdf

http://sites.tufts.edu/jha/archives/75

JimmyV

Drowned Out wrote:

Oh aerial…. your threads are always their own little microcosm of our political culture.  Talk about losing the message in the presentation. Its an important message, so its frustrating to see it ignored, and everyone jumping on you instead of discussing the topic.  But there are reasons for that.  LOTS of them.  If you want your voice to be heard and influential (which, at root, is the point to sharing our beliefs with others, no?), you need to be viewed as a credible source of information by your peers.  Judging by prose, you didn’t write this, and haven’t credited the author  (yup, googled a line from it – its from a blog you’ve copied from before – the ‘barracudabrigade’….takin cues from a person who dedicates their journalistic ambition to Sarah Palin?…..lol)…You will not gain any credibility by plagiarizing divisive, sensationalist drivel like this.. How can I take this seriously if the first thing I notice is that its stolen, and you are too embarrassed by the source to link to it? Why can’t you take the basic message conveyed, and find a decent source to copy/paste, or just type out your own thoughts, instead of discrediting the whole topic by passing this crap off as yours? ‬


“Obama supports terrorists”….yes, he does.  So does pretty much every government, and the definition of ‘terrorist’ is so ambiguous that anyone with a brain should recognizes it as a flag that the writer is trying to manipulate your opinion.  Anyone with NO brain recognizes it as ‘angry muslims’.  I think we all know readers of this blog see the latter.  Still, it’s important to point out the hypocrisy of the US government in their ‘war on terror’.  Too bad that conversation will not be had when language like this is used.  It’s the same trick the government uses to justify their policies and leave no room for debate –  journalists/bloggers/you are no better when doing the same. If indeed there was a coordinated effort (not an “attack”), by ‘hundreds of thousands’ of Egyptian citizens, to raise awareness of US actions in Egypt, it IS newsworthy…but that point is lost in hysterical rhetoric.  Why do teaparty types always say they’re ‘against big government’ in general, then so easily fall into partisan bullshit by attacking the figurehead – BHO - specifically? ‬

Also want to say that I agree that foreign aid is a joke…saying it should be stopped because the people in that country hate the US anyway is missing the point.  Foreign aid is used to buy influence, almost always from corrupt dictators in nations needed to support US interests.  Read: countries that are resource rich, in important strategic military locations, or along shipping/transport corridors.    This is pretty much universally accepted….until someone criticizes US policy, then its paraded out that the US is the ‘worlds biggest donor to foreign aid’   :roll:  Egypt controls the Suez and is vital to Israel’s security….so no fuckin way aid to that country stops,  no matter who is running it.‪‪‬‪‬‪‪‬

Well said. The bit at the end is sad and infuriating...but very true.

Idris

Drowned Out wrote:

Oh aerial…. your threads are always their own little microcosm of our political culture.  Talk about losing the message in the presentation. Its an important message, so its frustrating to see it ignored, and everyone jumping on you instead of discussing the topic.  But there are reasons for that.  LOTS of them.  If you want your voice to be heard and influential (which, at root, is the point to sharing our beliefs with others, no?), you need to be viewed as a credible source of information by your peers.  Judging by prose, you didn’t write this, and haven’t credited the author  (yup, googled a line from it – its from a blog you’ve copied from before – the ‘barracudabrigade’….takin cues from a person who dedicates their journalistic ambition to Sarah Palin?…..lol)…You will not gain any credibility by plagiarizing divisive, sensationalist drivel like this.. How can I take this seriously if the first thing I notice is that its stolen, and you are too embarrassed by the source to link to it? Why can’t you take the basic message conveyed, and find a decent source to copy/paste, or just type out your own thoughts, instead of discrediting the whole topic by passing this crap off as yours? ‬


“Obama supports terrorists”….yes, he does.  So does pretty much every government, and the definition of ‘terrorist’ is so ambiguous that anyone with a brain should recognizes it as a flag that the writer is trying to manipulate your opinion.  Anyone with NO brain recognizes it as ‘angry muslims’.  I think we all know readers of this blog see the latter.  Still, it’s important to point out the hypocrisy of the US government in their ‘war on terror’.  Too bad that conversation will not be had when language like this is used.  It’s the same trick the government uses to justify their policies and leave no room for debate –  journalists/bloggers/you are no better when doing the same. If indeed there was a coordinated effort (not an “attack”), by ‘hundreds of thousands’ of Egyptian citizens, to raise awareness of US actions in Egypt, it IS newsworthy…but that point is lost in hysterical rhetoric.  Why do teaparty types always say they’re ‘against big government’ in general, then so easily fall into partisan bullshit by attacking the figurehead – BHO - specifically? ‬

Also want to say that I agree that foreign aid is a joke…saying it should be stopped because the people in that country hate the US anyway is missing the point.  Foreign aid is used to buy influence, almost always from corrupt dictators in nations needed to support US interests.  Read: countries that are resource rich, in important strategic military locations, or along shipping/transport corridors.    This is pretty much universally accepted….until someone criticizes US policy, then its paraded out that the US is the ‘worlds biggest donor to foreign aid’   :roll:  Egypt controls the Suez and is vital to Israel’s security….so no fuckin way aid to that country stops,  no matter who is running it.‪‪‬‪‬‪‪‬

Now that's a solid post,

Cosmo

Drowned Out wrote:

Oh aerial…. your threads are always their own little microcosm of our political culture.  Talk about losing the message in the presentation. Its an important message, so its frustrating to see it ignored, and everyone jumping on you instead of discussing the topic.  But there are reasons for that.  LOTS of them.  If you want your voice to be heard and influential (which, at root, is the point to sharing our beliefs with others, no?), you need to be viewed as a credible source of information by your peers.  Judging by prose, you didn’t write this, and haven’t credited the author  (yup, googled a line from it – its from a blog you’ve copied from before – the ‘barracudabrigade’….takin cues from a person who dedicates their journalistic ambition to Sarah Palin?…..lol)…You will not gain any credibility by plagiarizing divisive, sensationalist drivel like this.. How can I take this seriously if the first thing I notice is that its stolen, and you are too embarrassed by the source to link to it? Why can’t you take the basic message conveyed, and find a decent source to copy/paste, or just type out your own thoughts, instead of discrediting the whole topic by passing this crap off as yours? ‬


“Obama supports terrorists”….yes, he does.  So does pretty much every government, and the definition of ‘terrorist’ is so ambiguous that anyone with a brain should recognizes it as a flag that the writer is trying to manipulate your opinion.  Anyone with NO brain recognizes it as ‘angry muslims’.  I think we all know readers of this blog see the latter.  Still, it’s important to point out the hypocrisy of the US government in their ‘war on terror’.  Too bad that conversation will not be had when language like this is used.  It’s the same trick the government uses to justify their policies and leave no room for debate –  journalists/bloggers/you are no better when doing the same. If indeed there was a coordinated effort (not an “attack”), by ‘hundreds of thousands’ of Egyptian citizens, to raise awareness of US actions in Egypt, it IS newsworthy…but that point is lost in hysterical rhetoric.  Why do teaparty types always say they’re ‘against big government’ in general, then so easily fall into partisan bullshit by attacking the figurehead – BHO - specifically? ‬

Also want to say that I agree that foreign aid is a joke…saying it should be stopped because the people in that country hate the US anyway is missing the point.  Foreign aid is used to buy influence, almost always from corrupt dictators in nations needed to support US interests.  Read: countries that are resource rich, in important strategic military locations, or along shipping/transport corridors.    This is pretty much universally accepted….until someone criticizes US policy, then its paraded out that the US is the ‘worlds biggest donor to foreign aid’   :roll:  Egypt controls the Suez and is vital to Israel’s security….so no fuckin way aid to that country stops,  no matter who is running it.‪‪‬‪‬‪‪‬

...
You're a socialist.
...
(whatever that means).

Godfather.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tTjKWq9Gges

this song about sumes it up.....BTW check out this guitar player he rocks !

Godfather.