Joshua Chellew
ajedigecko
Posts: 2,430
Heard of this hate crime victim?
live and let live...unless it violates the pearligious doctrine.
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
http://www.myfoxtwincities.com/story/22 ... eton-fatal
a white man beat to death by 4 or 5 black men that's why it's not a the media blitz and as far as riot goes....I'll just leave that one alone. and only white people comit hate crimes right ?
Godfather.
...there is no money to be made, off this murder.
no stupid ability to stalk and kill someone and call it self defence.
That said, the fact remains that far more hate crimes are committed by whites against blacks as opposed to the other way around. According the the FBI, 70% of hate crimes are committed against blacks:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/1 ... 95465.html
In any case, all hate crimes are despicably wrong.
Things?
It is just a simple term i use to describe a large mass of carbon and atoms that commit evil of this level.
6/7/2003 (***1/2)
7/9/2006 (****1/2)
7/13/2006 (**** )
4/10/2008 EV Solo (****1/2)
6/25/2008 MSG II (*****)
10/1/2009 LA II (****)
10/6/2009 LA III (***** Cornell!!!)
I think many of us see the real issue here. It's an excuse for the usual suspects on here to run around and scream "white people are the victims of crime too". Nobody disputes this fact, but their incessant bleating and attempts to reframe history, away from the oppression of minorities by our race wears a little thin at times.
The fact that a thread needs to be created when one of these people fumbles across a story between Fox News being in an add break and waiting for their Glenn beck video to load up is quite telling.
Happy Saturday everyone
For me the issue is the lack of media outrage. I understand i should not be - as there is no money to be made and the usual black voices are silent.
And my disappointment is aimed at the conservative news as well.
And moonpig....please use my name instead of "one of these". I do not mind.
I came back to this website because discussion on facebook sucked.
Godfather.
It's ok godfather, you not understanding is up to you to remedy.
And I actually agree, it is what it is, a crime for which the perpetrators should be punished, nothing more. Attempts to compare this to recent events are laughable.
I will use your name directly when I make a comment to you directly, my comment was directed at more than one, hence my use of language
Godfather.
Well I don't know what posts your reading, I haven't seen anyone justifying the crime on the grounds of racial history. It's a crime, people need to be punished for it, why the need to split hairs?
When a white kills a black guy in a convenience store robbery, or a drug deal gone bad, or for running a red light and crashing into his car, or just a falling out among some criminal buddies, it's not a hate crime. It's a reprehensible taking of another's life, but it's not hate-motivated.
But when said white guy goes out looking for trouble and decides he will visit it upon someone because they are black, Asian, Latino, gay, Sikh or Muslim and therefore inferior to him and deserving of ill treatment, it becomes a hate crime.
Many hate crimes are not reported or prosecuted as such. The majority of them are assaults and it's easier to investigate, prosecute and convict someone of simple assault rather than as a hate crime. It makes it easier for hate crimes to occur and to go unreported if they aren't going to be treated as such and it limits public awareness of many of these crimes.
Godfather.
This is wrong.
I know it makes no mention.
It was your use if the word that started the debate.
fair enough.
Godfather.