Weiner Rising

13»

Comments

  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    unsung said:

    I don't care. I only care that Clinton is never going to be President.

    Spoken like a rational, sane, person for sure!
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • rssesq
    rssesq Fairfield County Posts: 3,299
    he doesnt look like a pedo to me

  • unsung
    unsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    CM189191 said:

    Gtilley8 said:

    unsung said:

    CM189191 said:

    unsung said:

    He should be in jail.

    On what charges?

    I think the whole thing was a ruse to 'legally' 'discover' what the FBI already knew: Huma was borrowing her husband's computer to email her boss.
    Yeah, a ruse sexting a teenager. Sure.
    Dude. GFY. You might be the biggest idiot on this board. In fact, I'd love to meet you some time in Detroit. Let me know when you come to town.
    Don't go getting yourself banned just because unsung doesn't have critical thinking skills. You can fight idiocy with facts, although I recommend lots of simple pictures and graphs so it can be easily absorbed.

    Citing actual court precedent could be a lot for some people to digest, but may be necessary at times. For example:
    UNITED STATES v. GAGLIARDI
    Defendant-Appellant Frank Gagliardi appeals from his conviction on one count of attempting to entice a minor to engage in prohibited sexual activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b).  He argues that § 2422(b) requires an actual minor victim and is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad.   In the instant case, the targets of Gagliardi's attempted enticement were not actual minors but adults posing as minors.   We now join several other circuits in holding that 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) does not require that the enticement victim be an actual “individual who has not attained the age of 18 years” and is neither unconstitutionally vague nor overbroad.   Because Gagliardi's other arguments challenging his conviction are without merit, we affirm the judgment of conviction.

    But then again, maybe unsung thinks pedophilia laws are just another example of big government getting all up in your face with their arbitrary rules and forced morality.
    You prove my point exactly, thanks.

  • CM189191
    CM189191 Posts: 6,927
    unsung said:

    CM189191 said:

    Gtilley8 said:

    unsung said:

    CM189191 said:

    unsung said:

    He should be in jail.

    On what charges?

    I think the whole thing was a ruse to 'legally' 'discover' what the FBI already knew: Huma was borrowing her husband's computer to email her boss.
    Yeah, a ruse sexting a teenager. Sure.
    Dude. GFY. You might be the biggest idiot on this board. In fact, I'd love to meet you some time in Detroit. Let me know when you come to town.
    Don't go getting yourself banned just because unsung doesn't have critical thinking skills. You can fight idiocy with facts, although I recommend lots of simple pictures and graphs so it can be easily absorbed.

    Citing actual court precedent could be a lot for some people to digest, but may be necessary at times. For example:
    UNITED STATES v. GAGLIARDI
    Defendant-Appellant Frank Gagliardi appeals from his conviction on one count of attempting to entice a minor to engage in prohibited sexual activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b).  He argues that § 2422(b) requires an actual minor victim and is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad.   In the instant case, the targets of Gagliardi's attempted enticement were not actual minors but adults posing as minors.   We now join several other circuits in holding that 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) does not require that the enticement victim be an actual “individual who has not attained the age of 18 years” and is neither unconstitutionally vague nor overbroad.   Because Gagliardi's other arguments challenging his conviction are without merit, we affirm the judgment of conviction.

    But then again, maybe unsung thinks pedophilia laws are just another example of big government getting all up in your face with their arbitrary rules and forced morality.
    You prove my point exactly, thanks.

    how so?
  • jeffbr
    jeffbr Seattle Posts: 7,177
    edited April 2017
    Gtilley8 said:

    unsung said:

    CM189191 said:

    unsung said:

    He should be in jail.

    On what charges?

    I think the whole thing was a ruse to 'legally' 'discover' what the FBI already knew: Huma was borrowing her husband's computer to email her boss.
    Yeah, a ruse sexting a teenager. Sure.
    Dude. GFY. You might be the biggest idiot on this board. In fact, I'd love to meet you some time in Detroit. Let me know when you come to town.
    :lol: Yay for Internet tough guys. Watch out! Keyboard Rambo has boarded the train.
    Post edited by jeffbr on
    "I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/08
  • Jason P
    Jason P Posts: 19,327
    The last Weiner debacle with Hillary clearly in the lead was the NFL equivalent of Atlanta calling 2 pass plays in a row while within FG range while up 28 - 3. The beginning of the end.
    Gtilley8 said:

    unsung said:

    CM189191 said:

    unsung said:

    He should be in jail.

    On what charges?

    I think the whole thing was a ruse to 'legally' 'discover' what the FBI already knew: Huma was borrowing her husband's computer to email her boss.
    Yeah, a ruse sexting a teenager. Sure.
    Dude. GFY. You might be the biggest idiot on this board. In fact, I'd love to meet you some time in Detroit. Let me know when you come to town.
    3 pm in the Quads! FIGHT!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjLqimENb1A
    Be Excellent To Each Other
    Party On, Dudes!
  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,657
    Jason P said:

    The last Weiner debacle with Hillary clearly in the lead was the NFL equivalent of Atlanta calling 2 pass plays in a row while within FG range while up 28 - 3. The beginning of the end.

    Gtilley8 said:

    unsung said:

    CM189191 said:

    unsung said:

    He should be in jail.

    On what charges?

    I think the whole thing was a ruse to 'legally' 'discover' what the FBI already knew: Huma was borrowing her husband's computer to email her boss.
    Yeah, a ruse sexting a teenager. Sure.
    Dude. GFY. You might be the biggest idiot on this board. In fact, I'd love to meet you some time in Detroit. Let me know when you come to town.
    3 pm in the Quads! FIGHT!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjLqimENb1A
    If only some portion of Bill and Jonathan Kraft's intelligence would wear off on Trump.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • rssesq
    rssesq Fairfield County Posts: 3,299
    edited April 2017
    mods pay no attention to the unveiled threats. its a libby gonna beat up a mean old conservative so no need to intervene or get alarmed about some ones safety. good job!
  • unsung
    unsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    rssesq said:

    mods pay no attention to the unveiled threats. its a libby gonna beat up a mean old conservative so no need to intervene or get alarmed about some ones safety. good job!

    No worries, I can handle myself lol. As much as we all sometimes disagree I am never going to threaten anyone here like that. I'd rather have a beer with someone.

    But I'm still not going to that sh**hole Detroit!!!
  • rssesq
    rssesq Fairfield County Posts: 3,299
    most people that say they live in the "d" really live in sterling or dearborn heights.
    Me personally, EAST SIDE BRIDGEPORT proper; WARREN HARDING HIGH proper. and neva caught a bad one! meet ups are cool wit me. :D

Categories