Chomsky Reflects on His Life...
Byrnzie
Posts: 21,037
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/ma ... hing-alone
Noam Chomsky: 'No individual changes anything alone'
Noam Chomsky is one of the world's most controversial thinkers. Now 84, he reflects on his life's work, on current events in Syria and Israel, and on the love of his life – his wife
Aida Edemariam
The Guardian, Friday 22 March 2011
'...Does he think that in all these years of talking and arguing and writing, he has ever changed one specific thing? "I don't think any individual changes anything alone. Martin Luther King was an important figure but he couldn't have said: 'This is what I changed.' He came to prominence on a groundswell that was created by mostly young people acting on the ground. In the early years of the antiwar movement we were all doing organising and writing and speaking and gradually certain people could do certain things more easily and effectively, so I pretty much dropped out of organising – I thought the teaching and writing was more effective. Others, friends of mine, did the opposite. But they're not less influential. Just not known."
In the cavernous Friends' House, the last words of his speech are: "Unless the powerful are capable of learning to respect the dignity of their victims … impassable barriers will remain, and the world will be doomed to violence, cruelty and bitter suffering." It's a gloomy coda, but he leaves to a standing ovation.'
Noam Chomsky: 'No individual changes anything alone'
Noam Chomsky is one of the world's most controversial thinkers. Now 84, he reflects on his life's work, on current events in Syria and Israel, and on the love of his life – his wife
Aida Edemariam
The Guardian, Friday 22 March 2011
'...Does he think that in all these years of talking and arguing and writing, he has ever changed one specific thing? "I don't think any individual changes anything alone. Martin Luther King was an important figure but he couldn't have said: 'This is what I changed.' He came to prominence on a groundswell that was created by mostly young people acting on the ground. In the early years of the antiwar movement we were all doing organising and writing and speaking and gradually certain people could do certain things more easily and effectively, so I pretty much dropped out of organising – I thought the teaching and writing was more effective. Others, friends of mine, did the opposite. But they're not less influential. Just not known."
In the cavernous Friends' House, the last words of his speech are: "Unless the powerful are capable of learning to respect the dignity of their victims … impassable barriers will remain, and the world will be doomed to violence, cruelty and bitter suffering." It's a gloomy coda, but he leaves to a standing ovation.'
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
Thanks for posting it, Byrnzie.
-Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
My pleasure, dude.
84.....ugh. can we clone him somehow? I don't like reading the words "chomsky reflects on his life" :(
who picks up the torch when he leaves us?
+1
I hope he's not planning on leaving us any time soon.
How Noam Chomsky is discussed
The more one dissents from political orthodoxies, the more the attacks focus on personality, style and character
Glenn Greenwald
guardian.co.uk, Saturday 23 March 2013
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... ersonality
Looks like Glenn Greenwald agrees with you on this point:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... ersonality
'But the strangest attack on Chomsky is the insinuation that he has changed nothing. Aside from the metrics demonstrating that he has more reach and influence than virtually any public intellectual in the world, some of which Edemariam cites, I'd say that there is no living political writer who has more radically changed how more people think in more parts of the world about political issues than he. If you accept the premise (as I do) that the key to political change is to convince people of pervasive injustice and the need to act, then it's virtually laughable to depict him as inconsequential. Washington power-brokers and their media courtiers do not discuss him, and he does not make frequent (or any) appearances on US cable news outlets, but outside of those narrow and insular corridors - meaning around the world - few if any political thinkers are as well-known, influential or admired (to its credit, the Guardian, like some US liberal outlets, does periodically publish Chomsky's essays).'
Plus, the changes great thinkers instill spread out over time. Chomsky's may well reverberate for centuries.
-Eddie Vedder, "Smile"