Hillary En Fuego

13»

Comments

  • badbrains wrote:
    This administration is hiding something BIG and if the facts were all out, im sure there would be some major firings or Impeachements!

    Dude, EVERY administration hides BIG shit! Come on man, don't play dumb and blame one fucken side. Ever ask yourself, 44 presidents and NOT 1 had there own ideas or policies? Same shit every time just different name.[/quot

    Well where is the CHANGE? Where is the Transparency? You were sold a bill of goods and you bought them! You OVERPAID for them! How you feel now?
    Theres no time like the present

    A man that stands for nothing....will fall for anything!

    All people need to do more on every level!
  • callencallen Posts: 6,388
    badbrains wrote:
    This administration is hiding something BIG and if the facts were all out, im sure there would be some major firings or Impeachements!

    Dude, EVERY administration hides BIG shit! Come on man, don't play dumb and blame one fucken side. Ever ask yourself, 44 presidents and NOT 1 had there own ideas or policies? Same shit every time just different name.[/quot

    Well where is the CHANGE? Where is the Transparency? You were sold a bill of goods and you bought them! You OVERPAID for them! How you feel now?
    Lying to us about shit to get us into iraq >not correctly describing what motivated people to attack our embasy

    Change+ equal rights for homosexuals and women. Not sending troops into conflict (lybia). Not going after Colorado dope smokers, as Ashcroft would have done. Obama is mucho change from previous Halliburton/Cheney administration.
    10-18-2000 Houston, 04-06-2003 Houston, 6-25-2003 Toronto, 10-8-2004 Kissimmee, 9-4-2005 Calgary, 12-3-05 Sao Paulo, 7-2-2006 Denver, 7-22-06 Gorge, 7-23-2006 Gorge, 9-13-2006 Bern, 6-22-2008 DC, 6-24-2008 MSG, 6-25-2008 MSG
  • JimmyV wrote:
    I am somewhat of an Andrew Sullivan fan and was curious why he did not blog about the hearings yesterday. He explains:

    "Just to remind readers who asked why we didn't cover the hearings yesterday, even though they had some great TV moments: we don't cover non-stories. We have covered the legitimate issue that there was not enough security in Benghazi, that there should have been, and that the State Department failed in its foresight and planning. But we are not going to cover a spectacle created entirely by a fake cable news network as a way to save a losing election campaign. Hillary's face yesterday said all we needed to."

    http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com ... ghazi.html

    Yes, that sounds about right.

    But... but... it was the biggest tragedy since 9/11!

    Right wing radio listeners are the most gullible group of people that I've ever met. They remind me of abused spouses. They are lied to over and over again, fed fear over and over again, and even when they can clearly see that they were told lies or that there was really nothing to fear about, instead of being mad, they just fall for the next thing.
    My whole life
    was like a picture
    of a sunny day
    “We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
    ― Abraham Lincoln
  • JimmyVJimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 19,183
    JimmyV wrote:
    I am somewhat of an Andrew Sullivan fan and was curious why he did not blog about the hearings yesterday. He explains:

    "Just to remind readers who asked why we didn't cover the hearings yesterday, even though they had some great TV moments: we don't cover non-stories. We have covered the legitimate issue that there was not enough security in Benghazi, that there should have been, and that the State Department failed in its foresight and planning. But we are not going to cover a spectacle created entirely by a fake cable news network as a way to save a losing election campaign. Hillary's face yesterday said all we needed to."

    http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com ... ghazi.html

    Yes, that sounds about right.

    But... but... it was the biggest tragedy since 9/11!

    Right wing radio listeners are the most gullible group of people that I've ever met. They remind me of abused spouses. They are lied to over and over again, fed fear over and over again, and even when they can clearly see that they were told lies or that there was really nothing to fear about, instead of being mad, they just fall for the next thing.

    If having pundits like Dick Morris openly admit that they slanted his election predictions towards Mitt Romney because they felt that was their job didn't clue these people in that they are being lied to, nothing will.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • Gern BlanstenGern Blansten Mar-A-Lago Posts: 20,352
    It's interesting that some prominent republicans are starting (finally) to be more vocal about how moronic their party is.

    Jindal, Christie, Powell, etc. have all made recent public comments as to how insane the GOP is becoming.

    Obama is a moderate. There is starting to be no distinction between moderate dems and moderate GOP. Both agree to a certain level of government. Both tend to be pro choice, favor some 2nd amendment restrictions, pro gay marriage, etc.

    There is simply no need for a republican party anymore. Good riddance.
    Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
    The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)

    1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
    2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
    2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
    2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
    2020: Oakland, Oakland:  2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
    2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
    2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
  • mikepegg44mikepegg44 Posts: 3,353
    JimmyV wrote:
    I am far from her biggest fan but do give her credit for standing her ground.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ ... video.html


    I like Clinton. I think she is a solid politician and a very smart woman. I am not sure what all the hoopla surrounding her performance was, she answered some questions and ignored some others.

    I am most annoyed about every GOP senator/rep basically saying Clinton was personally responsible for ordering the attacks, and the Dem senator/reps saying she basically had the grace of Jackie O, was infallible, and gushing to the point that their questions were meaningless. I am surprised someone didn't ask her favorite color crayon...I peg her for a burnt sienna woman

    It really was too bad, there could have been some really solid and positive policy discussion yesterday instead, both sides took the time to pimp their respective side in the argument of who is at fault...

    I cannot stand watching those hearings, the gal from New York rivals Rand as the worst...
    I have always thought Hillary would make a solid president, but the other days performance has nothing to do with it and will be forgotten as fast as Chris Matthews comes up with ridiculous hyperbole.
    that’s right! Can’t we all just get together and focus on our real enemies: monogamous gays and stem cells… - Ned Flanders
    It is terrifying when you are too stupid to know who is dumb
    - Joe Rogan
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    It's interesting that some prominent republicans are starting (finally) to be more vocal about how moronic their party is.

    Jindal, Christie, Powell, etc. have all made recent public comments as to how insane the GOP is becoming.

    Obama is a moderate. There is starting to be no distinction between moderate dems and moderate GOP. Both agree to a certain level of government. Both tend to be pro choice, favor some 2nd amendment restrictions, pro gay marriage, etc.

    There is simply no need for a republican party anymore. Good riddance.
    interesting. jindal and christie are early front runners for the '16 nomination. they are testing the waters in the more moderate area of the spectrum. we all know that they are not the moderates that they portray now. case in point, see jindal's rebuttal to obama's state of the union address a couple of years ago.

    these guys are in the party of rand paul, the party of mitch mcconnell, the party of michele bachmann, the party of marco rubio, the party of herman cain, the party of mitt romney, the party of rick santorum, and the party of rush limbaugh, sean hannity, glen beck, and ted nugent, etc. true moderates have been phased out of the gop.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • JimmyVJimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 19,183
    mikepegg44 wrote:
    JimmyV wrote:
    I am far from her biggest fan but do give her credit for standing her ground.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ ... video.html


    I like Clinton. I think she is a solid politician and a very smart woman. I am not sure what all the hoopla surrounding her performance was, she answered some questions and ignored some others.

    I am most annoyed about every GOP senator/rep basically saying Clinton was personally responsible for ordering the attacks, and the Dem senator/reps saying she basically had the grace of Jackie O, was infallible, and gushing to the point that their questions were meaningless. I am surprised someone didn't ask her favorite color crayon...I peg her for a burnt sienna woman

    It really was too bad, there could have been some really solid and positive policy discussion yesterday instead, both sides took the time to pimp their respective side in the argument of who is at fault...

    I cannot stand watching those hearings, the gal from New York rivals Rand as the worst...
    I have always thought Hillary would make a solid president, but the other days performance has nothing to do with it and will be forgotten as fast as Chris Matthews comes up with ridiculous hyperbole.

    If she runs, the clip of her firing back at Johnson will live on. It seems like given the right spin it could be used both for and against her. Plus, if anything she said yesterday turns out to be false you know it will come back at her in 2016.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • mikepegg44mikepegg44 Posts: 3,353
    JimmyV wrote:

    If she runs, the clip of her firing back at Johnson will live on. It seems like given the right spin it could be used both for and against her. Plus, if anything she said yesterday turns out to be false you know it will come back at her in 2016.

    that is the crazy part, both sides somehow view this as ammo...fucking crazy game
    that’s right! Can’t we all just get together and focus on our real enemies: monogamous gays and stem cells… - Ned Flanders
    It is terrifying when you are too stupid to know who is dumb
    - Joe Rogan
  • mikepegg44 wrote:
    JimmyV wrote:

    If she runs, the clip of her firing back at Johnson will live on. It seems like given the right spin it could be used both for and against her. Plus, if anything she said yesterday turns out to be false you know it will come back at her in 2016.

    that is the crazy part, both sides somehow view this as ammo...fucking crazy game

    And therein lies the problem with Washington. It's more about "winning the game", then governing.
    My whole life
    was like a picture
    of a sunny day
    “We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
    ― Abraham Lincoln
  • unsungunsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    monica_zps29e020be.jpg
  • JimmyVJimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 19,183
    unsung wrote:
    monica_zps29e020be.jpg

    And that's why Bill was a great President! So hard working that the best thing he had time to pick up was that.

    Thanks, Mr. President. We owe you better.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    unsung wrote:
    monica_zps29e020be.jpg
    what difference does it make?

    serious question.

    $47 million in taxpayer dollars spent for a failed impreachment attempt.

    i thought republicans would be more fiscally responsible in their witch hunts but i guess fiscal responsibility only matters when the democrats hold the white house..

    by the way, where is your gingrich meme?? you know, because he was cheating on his wife at the exact same time he was going after clinton...
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • unsungunsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    :lol::lol: Gingrich? How would I know? I'm not a Republican, tear him to pieces too.
  • badbrainsbadbrains Posts: 10,255
    badbrains wrote:
    This administration is hiding something BIG and if the facts were all out, im sure there would be some major firings or Impeachements!

    Dude, EVERY administration hides BIG shit! Come on man, don't play dumb and blame one fucken side. Ever ask yourself, 44 presidents and NOT 1 had there own ideas or policies? Same shit every time just different name.[/quot

    Well where is the CHANGE? Where is the Transparency? You were sold a bill of goods and you bought them! You OVERPAID for them! How you feel now?

    I wasn't sold or bought any of that shit. You def got me mistaken of someone else. Before you go around screaming about shit, know what the fuck you're screaming about. Do yourself a favor and read between the lines.
Sign In or Register to comment.