Happy Inauguration Day!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

CH156378CH156378 Posts: 1,539
edited January 2013 in A Moving Train
:clap: :thumbup: :-D
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • JeanwahJeanwah Posts: 6,363
    I've been thinking about this. This is nothing personal to Obama, but The idea of spending loads of money on a RE-inauguration doesn't make. Sense. Why not take all that money being spent on another party (when in reality, the president simply kept his job) and spend it (or save it) on things that matter? Just thinking fiscally, since we're so much in debt...
  • ZosoZoso Posts: 6,425
    Jeanwah wrote:
    I've been thinking about this. This is nothing personal to Obama, but The idea of spending loads of money on a RE-inauguration doesn't make. Sense. Why not take all that money being spent on another party (when in reality, the president simply kept his job) and spend it (or save it) on things that matter? Just thinking fiscally, since we're so much in debt...

    i didn't even know they had one for a second term... what's the point.
    I'm just flying around the other side of the world to say I love you

    Sha la la la i'm in love with a jersey girl

    I love you forever and forever :)

    Adel 03 Melb 1 03 LA 2 06 Santa Barbara 06 Gorge 1 06 Gorge 2 06 Adel 1 06 Adel 2 06 Camden 1 08 Camden 2 08 Washington DC 08 Hartford 08
  • CH156378CH156378 Posts: 1,539
    Jeanwah wrote:
    I've been thinking about this. This is nothing personal to Obama, but The idea of spending loads of money on a RE-inauguration doesn't make. Sense. Why not take all that money being spent on another party (when in reality, the president simply kept his job) and spend it (or save it) on things that matter? Just thinking fiscally, since we're so much in debt...

    I understand your point. I also understand that this inauguration will be toned down quite a bit from years past. I could be wrong but I don’t think they are even doing a parade. I read somewhere that they are only doing three balls compared to ten in 2009 and one is a military ball which I think sounds nice considering Obama is Commander in Chief. I personally like the spectacle of the whole thing as well as the tradition and history of it. And I always look forward to a good speech. Just out of curiosity have you or anyone in your family ever benefitted from any spending or entitlement programs. If so I hope there wasn’t any wasteful spending on your part considering the debt we are in.
    I'm also sure that many businesses and workers are will be benefitting greatly from the spending.

    Plus my guy won! LOL!
  • Dirtie_FrankDirtie_Frank Posts: 1,348
    I was talking to my wife and a few friends about this. I did not understand it when W was reelected either. It seems like a waste you have the job already. I also do not think there should of been massive parties since we still have 7.8% or whatever the figure is, unemployed. Hey, but that is just my .02.
    96 Randall's Island II
    98 CAA
    00 Virginia Beach;Camden I; Jones Beach III
    05 Borgata Night I; Wachovia Center
    06 Letterman Show; Webcast (guy in blue shirt), Camden I; DC
    08 Camden I; Camden II; DC
    09 Phillie III
    10 MSG II
    13 Wrigley Field
    16 Phillie II
  • JeanwahJeanwah Posts: 6,363
    CH156378 wrote:
    Jeanwah wrote:
    I've been thinking about this. This is nothing personal to Obama, but The idea of spending loads of money on a RE-inauguration doesn't make. Sense. Why not take all that money being spent on another party (when in reality, the president simply kept his job) and spend it (or save it) on things that matter? Just thinking fiscally, since we're so much in debt...

    I understand your point. I also understand that this inauguration will be toned down quite a bit from years past. I could be wrong but I don’t think they are even doing a parade. I read somewhere that they are only doing three balls compared to ten in 2009 and one is a military ball which I think sounds nice considering Obama is Commander in Chief. I personally like the spectacle of the whole thing as well as the tradition and history of it. And I always look forward to a good speech. Just out of curiosity have you or anyone in your family ever benefitted from any spending or entitlement programs. If so I hope there wasn’t any wasteful spending on your part considering the debt we are in.
    I'm also sure that many businesses and workers are will be benefitting greatly from the spending.

    Plus my guy won! LOL!

    Super. My point is like I said before though, I don't understand the need for any "re"-inaguration party. Simple as that. I'm not the the kind of person that's angry at Obama. It was a simple thought.
  • CH156378CH156378 Posts: 1,539
    Jeanwah wrote:
    CH156378 wrote:
    Jeanwah wrote:
    I've been thinking about this. This is nothing personal to Obama, but The idea of spending loads of money on a RE-inauguration doesn't make. Sense. Why not take all that money being spent on another party (when in reality, the president simply kept his job) and spend it (or save it) on things that matter? Just thinking fiscally, since we're so much in debt...

    I understand your point. I also understand that this inauguration will be toned down quite a bit from years past. I could be wrong but I don’t think they are even doing a parade. I read somewhere that they are only doing three balls compared to ten in 2009 and one is a military ball which I think sounds nice considering Obama is Commander in Chief. I personally like the spectacle of the whole thing as well as the tradition and history of it. And I always look forward to a good speech. Just out of curiosity have you or anyone in your family ever benefitted from any spending or entitlement programs. If so I hope there wasn’t any wasteful spending on your part considering the debt we are in.
    I'm also sure that many businesses and workers are will be benefitting greatly from the spending.

    Plus my guy won! LOL!

    Super. My point is like I said before though, I don't understand the need for any "re"-inaguration party. Simple as that. I'm not the the kind of person that's angry at Obama. It was a simple thought.

    Thank You. Enjoy the speech. :lol:
  • CH156378CH156378 Posts: 1,539
    :fp:

    The longest inaugural address was delivered by William Henry Harrison. It was 8,445 words, nearly two hours long and -- if that wasn't bad enough -- likely killed him. In April 1841, one month after he was sworn in, Harrison died of pneumonia, believed to have been brought on by exposure to the elements on a cold and rainy Inauguration Day.
  • mickeyratmickeyrat Posts: 38,717
    C Cornell is performing at The CiC ball and Soundgarden is performing at the Inaugural ball. Among many others.

    This kind of thing is already written in to the budget. Its good he's reduced them to three this time.Down from 10 in 2009.


    Perhaps Congress foregoing their pay and paying out of pocket for their own healthcare along with NO pension is a better more sustainable thing for the debt.
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • CH156378CH156378 Posts: 1,539
    http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01 ... about?lite

    “Inaugurations are about more than just celebrating, they’re about coming together to make our country a better place,” Obama said in a video message encouraging people to sign up to serve their communities on Saturday.

    Thousands of volunteers in all 50 states are slated to participate this year.

    •In Washington, D.C., volunteers will prepare more than 10,000 care packages for soldiers, veterans and first responders.
    •In New York, Mayor Michael Bloomberg and city agencies will be engaging in service projects in communities affected by Superstorm Sandy.
    •Volunteers who signed up in California will give food and winter coats to the homeless.
    •In Chicago, service members will gather at Navy Pier to write letters and put together care packages for service members overseas.
    •Sixty-two AmeriCorps members in Oklahoma will travel to a neighborhood once segregated by Jim Crow laws to repair homes for low-income families.
  • aerialaerial Posts: 2,319
    :silent: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown:
    “We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.” Abraham Lincoln
  • mickeyrat wrote:

    This kind of thing is already written in to the budget.

    What budget?
    Sorry. The world doesn't work the way you tell it to.
  • mickeyratmickeyrat Posts: 38,717
    mickeyrat wrote:

    This kind of thing is already written in to the budget.

    What budget?

    Seems its public and private footing the bill.
    http://www.12newsnow.com/story/20629463 ... ag-unclear
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • mickeyrat wrote:
    mickeyrat wrote:

    This kind of thing is already written in to the budget.

    What budget?

    Seems its public and private footing the bill.
    http://www.12newsnow.com/story/20629463 ... ag-unclear

    I'm aware of that. I have the Internet, too.

    You referred to a budget. What budget were you referring to?
    Sorry. The world doesn't work the way you tell it to.
  • JimmyVJimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 19,183
    It isn't just the second inauguration that is unnecessary. It is the entire process of reelection. The presidency is the highest office in the land and pandering for reelection is beneath it. A single six year term is what every president should serve.

    But since those aren't the rules...congratulations to the best President since Clinton!
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • mickeyratmickeyrat Posts: 38,717
    mickeyrat wrote:
    What budget?

    Seems its public and private footing the bill.
    http://www.12newsnow.com/story/20629463 ... ag-unclear

    I'm aware of that. I have the Internet, too.

    You referred to a budget. What budget were you referring to?
    the one thats been extended time after time because party politics are far more important than working for the american people who foot the bill.

    How else is the gov able to function without a new one?
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • CH156378CH156378 Posts: 1,539
    http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/20/politics/ ... ?hpt=hp_t1

    It's official! Nice to see John Roberts didn't flub the oath this time. I'm glad Obama gave him a second chance. It was the least he could do considering Roberts favorable decision on Obamacare.
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    Jeanwah wrote:
    I've been thinking about this. This is nothing personal to Obama, but The idea of spending loads of money on a RE-inauguration doesn't make. Sense. Why not take all that money being spent on another party (when in reality, the president simply kept his job) and spend it (or save it) on things that matter? Just thinking fiscally, since we're so much in debt...

    I totally agree. It's a slap in the face for Americans who are forced to donate every penny to keep the government running that they have a symbolic, meaningless party.
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    mickeyrat wrote:
    the one thats been extended time after time because party politics are far more important than working for the american people who foot the bill.

    How else is the gov able to function without a new one?

    I think the government gave up doing budgets a few years ago.

    And if it were in the budget, it shouldn't be.

    And if private funding is accepted, that should be put toward the deficit.

    Let's face it, if any citizens ran their lives at such a deficit, they would be in serious trouble and would be doing every thing they can to turn things around. Our government sets a poor example in that it is making almost no effort to enact meaningful change.

    I would stand up and applaud this President or any other who said that the government would be skipping the inauguration as an example to all citizens who've had to tighten their belts in these tough economic times.

    But does it do that? Sadly no.
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • USARAYUSARAY Posts: 517
    fat chance the richfolk are goingn to ever stop throwing partiesfor themselves with other peoples money
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    The government's EXISTENCE is based upon the fact that it can lawfully mandate its income be donated from the citizenry.

    It should be doing EVERYTHING in it's power to be a frugal and wise steward of the money it takes from its people.

    Instead, it is the complete opposite.
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • hedonisthedonist Posts: 24,524
    know1 wrote:
    Let's face it, if any citizens ran their lives at such a deficit, they would be in serious trouble and would be doing every thing they can to turn things around. Our government sets a poor example in that it is making almost no effort to enact meaningful change.
    I've been saying this for awhile now. It''s impossible (not to mention irresponsible) to do otherwise.

    And on your last post - "It should be doing EVERYTHING in it's power to be a frugal and wise steward of the money it takes from its people."

    Agreed.
  • CH156378CH156378 Posts: 1,539
    Just got home from work and looking Forward. to catching up on todays festivities. I am right on time for the parade which is a extra bonus considering I didn't think they were going to have one. I was able to hear the official"public" swearing in at lunch today and the begining of his Obamas speech. I was just checking the weather channel and it seems Obama mentioned climate change in his speech. Thats nice. What a great day to be an American. Go Obama!
  • CH156378CH156378 Posts: 1,539
    What a beutiful scene with the sunset over the parade. I liked watching Obama chat it up with the Tuskegee Airmen in the Presidential viewing area. Also the diversity of the people walking in the parade. So nice to see. Did anyone see the Montana delegation in the parade. I know Max Baucus was riding a horse. Was Tester?
  • Attaway77Attaway77 Posts: 3,164
    I was in the parade today..... Pretty cool experience.
    1998 Dallas (7/5) 2006 San Fran (7/15,7/16) 2009 San Fran (8/28) 2010 Bristow (5/13) NY (5/21) 2011 Alpine Valley (9/3,9/4)
    2012 Missoula (9/30) 2013 Chicago (7/19) Pittsburgh (10/11) Buffalo (10/12) Baltimore (10/27) Dallas (11/15)
    2014 Austin (10/12) Memphis (10/14) St. Paul (10/19) Milwaukee (10/20) Denver (10/22)
    2016 Ft. Lauderdale (4/8) Miami (4/9) Hampton (4/18) Philly (4/28,4/29) NY (5/1,5/2) 2018 Seattle (8/10) Missoula (8/13) 2022 Nashville (9/16)

    E.V. - 2008 Berkeley (4/8) 2012 Austin (11/9,11/12)
    Temple of the Dog - 2016 Upper Darby



  • JeanwahJeanwah Posts: 6,363
    So my father-in-law, who is a devout Fox News viewer, says to us "...I just watched the inauguration just now, and I didn't even vote for him!" It didn't even occur to him to possibly either change the channel (they refuse to watch any other news, not even the local weather) or even to just shut off the tv...
  • JimmyVJimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 19,183
    There can be no debate...Al Roker won Inauguration Day.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • Jason PJason P Posts: 19,138
    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR6z2SdT77X-6I-WiN0U2KxiXkauZsI3wpE5BHJj1e1PUwoB28n
  • unsungunsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    Can't wait for more drone attacks on brown people!!!!

    Plus he gets to wear his Nobel Peace Prize some more while doing so!!!!

    :roll:
Sign In or Register to comment.