Gun Appreciation Day Sponsored By White Supremacist Group

Cosmo

Question: Why do you need a weapon that is capable of keeping a small police force at bay?
I mean... are people planning on barricading themselves and their families in their homes?
Who or what are they protecting their families from?
...
These are legitimate questions that I would like to know so I have a better understanding of the view point that is opposite of mine.

gimmesometruth27

Cosmo wrote:

Question: Why do you need a weapon that is capable of keeping a small police force at bay?
I mean... are people planning on barricading themselves and their families in their homes?
Who or what are they protecting their families from?
...
These are legitimate questions that I would like to know so I have a better understanding of the view point that is opposite of mine.

for some reason people believe that they can own a combat ready assault rifle to protect themselves from a government of tyrants that is coming to take their guns away. they fail to realize that the government will send in heavily armed swat teams/paramilitary police, the fbi, the national guard, and the american military with tanks, artillery, armored hummers, heavily armored infantry, battleships and aircraft carriers, and armed predator drones to face the people who have the assault rifles. might as well be shooting spit wads at a tank, because that is what it would be like.

they think that they are "free"....but with a government that has those tools and is willing to use them on their own people, you are not free. you are a victim.

sorry to go bursting bubbles again, but it is kinda what i do

Hugh Freaking Dillon

aerial wrote:

Hugh Freaking Dillon wrote:

unsung wrote:

My guns didn't kill anyone AGAIN last night. Maybe they are defective. :roll:

neither did about a million lines of coke all over the world. and thousands of needles full of heroin. should we make those readily available to the public too?

They all ready are.........

where? at the Qwik E Mart?

and what constitutional amendments intending to allow people to smoke pot in peace keep these hard drugs in the hands of the "responsible drug user" because it's "in the constitution"? :fp:

I don't know where you live, but there are NO laws where I'm from that allow anyone to have those in their possession, much less go out and buy them in a store with no background check or mental health exam.

Cosmo

gimmesometruth27 wrote:

Cosmo wrote:

Question: Why do you need a weapon that is capable of keeping a small police force at bay?
I mean... are people planning on barricading themselves and their families in their homes?
Who or what are they protecting their families from?
...
These are legitimate questions that I would like to know so I have a better understanding of the view point that is opposite of mine.

for some reason people believe that they can own a combat ready assault rifle to protect themselves from a government of tyrants that is coming to take their guns away. they fail to realize that the government will send in heavily armed swat teams/paramilitary police, the fbi, the national guard, and the american military with tanks, artillery, armored hummers, heavily armored infantry, battleships and aircraft carriers, and armed predator drones to face the people who have the assault rifles. might as well be shooting spit wads at a tank, because that is what it would be like.

they think that they are "free"....but with a government that has those tools and is willing to use them on their own people, you are not free. you are a victim.

sorry to go bursting bubbles again, but it is kinda what i do

...
If people think that a rack of AR-15 (even if illegally modified to full auto capabilities) is going to stop the U.S. Military... they are dreaming. They will need something to stop an GBU-28 dropped from the belly of an F-15E at 10,000 feet... and an AR-15 ain't gonna cut it. Look at what they did at Waco, TX... and all they needed was a bulldozer with a boom attachment to level the place.

aerial

Hugh Freaking Dillon wrote:.......where? at the Qwik E Mart?

and what constitutional amendments intending to allow people to smoke pot in peace keep these hard drugs in the hands of the "responsible drug user" because it's "in the constitution"? :fp:

I don't know where you live, but there are NO laws where I'm from that allow anyone to have those in their possession, much less go out and buy them in a store with no background check or mental health exam.

[/quote]

just because there are laws against the use of drugs does not stop the law breakers from getting drugs.....and they are available if you know where to go......

Cosmo

aerial wrote:

Hugh Freaking Dillon wrote:.......where? at the Qwik E Mart?

and what constitutional amendments intending to allow people to smoke pot in peace keep these hard drugs in the hands of the "responsible drug user" because it's "in the constitution"? :fp:

I don't know where you live, but there are NO laws where I'm from that allow anyone to have those in their possession, much less go out and buy them in a store with no background check or mental health exam.

just because there are laws against the use of drugs does not stop the law breakers from getting drugs.....and they are available if you know where to go......

...
Ummmm... so, are you saying that if guns were illegal... they would still be available?
If so... who would be selling those guns? And more importantly, who would be buying them? I mean, wouldn't people like Ted Nugent STILL be buying guns if they were illegal?