Suicide kills more soldiers than Afghanistan war in 2012

blackredyellowblackredyellow Posts: 5,889
edited January 2013 in A Moving Train
2012 MILITARY SUICIDES HIT RECORD HIGH OF 349
BY ROBERT BURNS
AP NATIONAL SECURITY WRITER

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Associated Press has learned that suicides in the U.S. military surged to a record 349 last year.

That far exceeds the 295 American combat deaths in Afghanistan in 2012 and compares with 301 military suicides in 2011.

Some private experts predict that the trend will worsen this year.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and others have called military suicides an epidemic.

The Army had the highest number of suicides among active-duty troops last year at 182, but the Marine Corps had the largest percentage increase - up 50 percent to 48.

The Air Force recorded 59 suicides and the Navy had 60.
My whole life
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • JimmyVJimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 19,183
    Sad...
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • USARAYUSARAY Posts: 517
    every 40seconds someone commits suicidehow we doing on our mental healthcare
  • Cliffy6745Cliffy6745 Posts: 33,841
    This is really fucking sickening and is something I have thought a lot about over the last couple years. It is so sickening that our country is able to send people to war, but not help them after to the point where they are killing themselves at this rate . I don't know the solution, but the fact that these numbers are true is really fucking depressing.

    This needs to get a lot more attention than it is.
  • JonnyPistachioJonnyPistachio Florida Posts: 10,219
    Cliffy6745 wrote:
    This is really fucking sickening and is something I have thought a lot about over the last couple years. It is so sickening that our country is able to send people to war, but not help them after to the point where they are killing themselves at this rate . I don't know the solution, but the fact that these numbers are true is really fucking depressing.

    This needs to get a lot more attention than it is.

    its really a shame. Did you see that doc that Ed did the song for? Body of War?
    There was a veteran form the vietnam war and Thomas form the IRaq war...they both had the same injuries and the guy from back in Nam got tons of more medical attention decades ago...how have we gone backwards?

    Ed talked about this during the Ft.Lauderdale show: http://www.woundedwarriorproject.org
    Pick up my debut novel here on amazon: Jonny Bails Floatin (in paperback) (also available on Kindle for $2.99)
  • Cliffy6745Cliffy6745 Posts: 33,841
    Cliffy6745 wrote:
    This is really fucking sickening and is something I have thought a lot about over the last couple years. It is so sickening that our country is able to send people to war, but not help them after to the point where they are killing themselves at this rate . I don't know the solution, but the fact that these numbers are true is really fucking depressing.

    This needs to get a lot more attention than it is.

    its really a shame. Did you see that doc that Ed did the song for? Body of War?
    There was a veteran form the vietnam war and Thomas form the IRaq war...they both had the same injuries and the guy from back in Nam got tons of more medical attention decades ago...how have we gone backwards?

    Ed talked about this during the Ft.Lauderdale show: http://www.woundedwarriorproject.org

    I didn't, I have meant to though. I will check it out soon.

    There was a good segement on 60 minutes recently about a judge who is trying to help veterans who come back and get into trouble rather than just lock them up. It was a great approach.
  • peacefrompaulpeacefrompaul Posts: 25,293
    It was so nice to see my good friend back over the holidays... had some more horrible war stories to tell me... but he seemed strong. I'm glad he's staying strong.
  • SmellymanSmellyman Asia Posts: 4,524
    First to go to war........ Congressman's family.

    If they are certain they are "fighting for our freedom" they should be proud.

    bam. no more war.
  • peacefrompaulpeacefrompaul Posts: 25,293
    Smellyman wrote:
    First to go to war........ Congressman's family.

    If they are certain they are "fighting for our freedom" they should be proud.

    bam. no more war.

    heh heh heh. I like that
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    This is a good example of why people should take more time investigating the ramifications of voluntarily joining the military...especially in times of war.
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • Kel VarnsenKel Varnsen Posts: 1,952
    Interesting article. Although I would be curious how to know how the rate of suicide among soldiers compares to the rate among the general population. I mean unless you know that it is hard to draw any conclusions.
  • Interesting article. Although I would be curious how to know how the rate of suicide among soldiers compares to the rate among the general population. I mean unless you know that it is hard to draw any conclusions.

    Quick (and probably not completely accurate) numbers.

    Suicide rate in the US is 12 per every 100,000 in 2009
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_co ... icide_rate

    Number of active personel in the armed forces: 1,456,862
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Armed_Forces

    So, 1,456,862/100,000 = 14.57

    14.57 x 12 = 174.84 (number of suicides if you combine US suicide rate with number in military)

    Last year's number of active duty suicides is almost exactly double (359) of what the "normal" rate would be.


    Did I do the math right? Not my strong suit lol
    My whole life
    was like a picture
    of a sunny day
    “We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
    ― Abraham Lincoln
  • Kel VarnsenKel Varnsen Posts: 1,952
    Interesting article. Although I would be curious how to know how the rate of suicide among soldiers compares to the rate among the general population. I mean unless you know that it is hard to draw any conclusions.

    Quick (and probably not completely accurate) numbers.

    Suicide rate in the US is 12 per every 100,000 in 2009
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_co ... icide_rate

    Number of active personel in the armed forces: 1,456,862
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Armed_Forces

    So, 1,456,862/100,000 = 14.57

    14.57 x 12 = 174.84 (number of suicides if you combine US suicide rate with number in military)

    Last year's number of active duty suicides is almost exactly double (359) of what the "normal" rate would be.


    Did I do the math right? Not my strong suit lol


    I think I get what you are doing, I would have done it like this though:

    (349/4,456,862)*100,000= 23.69 suicides per 100,000. It is a significantly higher number, and considering it took like 5 minutes to figure out I am surprised it wasn't included in the story. Seems like lazy journalism to me.

    Although even comparing those two numbers doesn't give you the full picture. I mean the 12 number for the US population takes into account everyone. Probably not a lot of infants or toddlers or even very many young kids committing suicide (the number for senior citizens are probably lower than average too). So all of those numbers are going to skew the results to make it lower. It would be interesting to see how the military number compares to a number for adults not in the military that are of the age where they could be serving in the military. That would be a more accurate comparison since the rate for the general population would most likely go up.

    Also with regards to the military number I would be curious to find out the percentage of those 349 people were actually served in war zones, and how many of them have never left the US. But again not looking at this kind of thing just seems like a reporter being lazy. I mean just because you are a member of the military and you killed yourself, doesn't mean you killed yourself because of your job.
  • Interesting article. Although I would be curious how to know how the rate of suicide among soldiers compares to the rate among the general population. I mean unless you know that it is hard to draw any conclusions.

    Quick (and probably not completely accurate) numbers.

    Suicide rate in the US is 12 per every 100,000 in 2009
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_co ... icide_rate

    Number of active personel in the armed forces: 1,456,862
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Armed_Forces

    So, 1,456,862/100,000 = 14.57

    14.57 x 12 = 174.84 (number of suicides if you combine US suicide rate with number in military)

    Last year's number of active duty suicides is almost exactly double (359) of what the "normal" rate would be.


    Did I do the math right? Not my strong suit lol


    I think I get what you are doing, I would have done it like this though:

    (349/4,456,862)*100,000= 23.69 suicides per 100,000. It is a significantly higher number, and considering it took like 5 minutes to figure out I am surprised it wasn't included in the story. Seems like lazy journalism to me.

    Although even comparing those two numbers doesn't give you the full picture. I mean the 12 number for the US population takes into account everyone. Probably not a lot of infants or toddlers or even very many young kids committing suicide (the number for senior citizens are probably lower than average too). So all of those numbers are going to skew the results to make it lower. It would be interesting to see how the military number compares to a number for adults not in the military that are of the age where they could be serving in the military. That would be a more accurate comparison since the rate for the general population would most likely go up.

    Also with regards to the military number I would be curious to find out the percentage of those 349 people were actually served in war zones, and how many of them have never left the US. But again not looking at this kind of thing just seems like a reporter being lazy. I mean just because you are a member of the military and you killed yourself, doesn't mean you killed yourself because of your job.

    Yeah, there are so many missing pieces that could help paint a clearer picture.

    One thing I did notice was that the 349 was only "active duty". I would be interested to know the number and suicide rate of soldiers who spent time in combat who have since been returned to the reserves or have been discharged. You seem to hear a lot of those stories of people who commit suicide after coming home and trying to go back to "normal" life.
    My whole life
    was like a picture
    of a sunny day
    “We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
    ― Abraham Lincoln
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    sometimes i feel like bin laden may have won.

    we have a whole generation of our young people who are affected by this war and occupation and they will be dealing with it for the rest of their lives... so many hundreds of thousands of cases of ptsd and depression, and more than that unreported. so many suicides. and this is still going on a year and a half after bin laden's death.

    how sad.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • BinauralJamBinauralJam Posts: 14,158
    sometimes i feel like bin laden may have won.

    we have a whole generation of our young people who are affected by this war and occupation and they will be dealing with it for the rest of their lives... so many hundreds of thousands of cases of ptsd and depression, and more than that unreported. so many suicides. and this is still going on a year and a half after bin laden's death.

    how sad.

    He absolutely won, between ^^^, Patroit Act, T.S.A., Guantanamo Bay, Etc... the sad part is how easy it was for him to tear us apart, well we did most of it to ourselves. Changed us forever.
  • JimmyVJimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 19,183
    sometimes i feel like bin laden may have won.

    we have a whole generation of our young people who are affected by this war and occupation and they will be dealing with it for the rest of their lives... so many hundreds of thousands of cases of ptsd and depression, and more than that unreported. so many suicides. and this is still going on a year and a half after bin laden's death.

    how sad.

    He absolutely won, between ^^^, Patroit Act, T.S.A., Guantanamo Bay, Etc... the sad part is how easy it was for him to tear us apart, well we did most of it to ourselves. Changed us forever.

    But changing us forever was not his goal. We are still here. These suicides are a tragedy but they are not evidence that Bin Laden "won".
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • JonnyPistachioJonnyPistachio Florida Posts: 10,219
    JimmyV wrote:
    sometimes i feel like bin laden may have won.

    we have a whole generation of our young people who are affected by this war and occupation and they will be dealing with it for the rest of their lives... so many hundreds of thousands of cases of ptsd and depression, and more than that unreported. so many suicides. and this is still going on a year and a half after bin laden's death.

    how sad.

    He absolutely won, between ^^^, Patroit Act, T.S.A., Guantanamo Bay, Etc... the sad part is how easy it was for him to tear us apart, well we did most of it to ourselves. Changed us forever.

    But changing us forever was not his goal. We are still here. These suicides are a tragedy but they are not evidence that Bin Laden "won".

    He definitely threw a monkeywrench in our plans.
    Pick up my debut novel here on amazon: Jonny Bails Floatin (in paperback) (also available on Kindle for $2.99)
Sign In or Register to comment.