This Madness Has To Stop

1235»

Comments

  • DS1119DS1119 Posts: 33,497
    DS1119 wrote:

    I read the entire article, and you see things quite differently than I do. I see the interlocking devices working. Are all offenders getting them installed in their vehicle when ordered to do so? Nope. But if they don't, they take their car off the road, or sell it. THAT MEANS THEY AREN'T DRIVING. And if they have a friend dumb enough to enable them to drink and drive, there are laws put in place to prosecute them as well.

    any law that is new is going to have speed bumps. But if it has the potential to save one life (which it obviously does), then it's worth it.

    it's unbelievable to me that someone would be opposed to something like this.


    On the first highlighted point...it doesn't keep them from driving.

    On the second highlighted point...shouldn't all cars be banned then? I mean that would at least save one life If we did that correct? :lol:

    it keeps them from driving THEIR CAR. Do I have to spell everything out for you?

    again with the fucking car anology. CARS WERE NOT INVENTED TO KILL. I'LL AGREE WITH THIS ANALOGY WHEN I SEE SOMEONE RIDING THEIR SEMI-AUTOMATIC TO WORK.


    No it doesn't keep them from driving their car. It stops them from maybe starting their car. Doesn't keep them from driving that car however. What happens if they own two cars? Three cars? A spouses car? A rental car? A co-workers car? Their buddies car? A girlfriend or boyfriend's car?

    Also, guns were not designed to kill...they were designed to hunt and protect. Also, anything can be used as a weapon. I could use a spoon to kill someone...was a spoon designed to kill? I just googled "car used as weapon" and there's way too many links to start posting those. :lol:
Sign In or Register to comment.