Who Wrote The New Army Manual? NAMBLA?

aerial

What good would it be to make them hate the enemy if most of the time they are not even allowed to defend themselves? Seems it's just away to get rid of our Americans that will stand up for their country! Obama needs to keep is word and get them home. Right now being over there is suicide!

dimitrispearljam

aerial wrote:

What good would it be to make them hate the enemy if most of the time they are not even allowed to defend themselves? Seems it's just away to get rid of our Americans that will stand up for their country! Obama needs to keep is word and get them home. Right now being over there is suicide!

how can u shoot to kill someone if u like them??
defend themselfs??why they are there in the first place
how the local people feel seeing usa marines with guns walking in their cities?
how would u feel tomorrow if u see China army at your hometown streets doing patrol with rifles
and say to you are there for save you??
i agree..they need to be back home..all..but who sent them there??
can u name me one president of usa that never be to a war the last 50 years?

Bentleyspop

aerial wrote:

A new Army manual that warns American soldiers in Afghanistan to avoid talking about certain topics has unwittingly acknowledged that Western taboos such as pedophilia are an inherent part of Islamic culture.

“By mentioning that pedophilia and women’s rights and saying that soldiers should not mention such things they are tacitly admitting that those things are indeed part of Islam,” said Robert Spencer, founder of Jihad Watch.


According to the Wall Street Journal, a new 75-page Army manual suggests U.S. soldiers are to blame for the large number of deadly attacks on them by Afghan security forces.

Donnelly noted the example of Navy Lt. Florence Choe, who was shot by an Afghan guard in 2009 for wearing shorts while jogging along the perimeter of the base.

The Army manual also advises soldiers to avoid “any criticism of pedophilia” or “mentioning homosexuality and homosexual conduct.”


the ban on criticizing pedophilia has put the military in a difficult position. By attempting to show cultural sensitivity, it is forced to acknowledge that pedophilia is an inherent part of Islamic teaching.
http://www.wnd.com/2012/12/army-acknowledges-pedophilia-part-of-islam/


This can not be denied any more...........

Seriously Aerial.....are you really a Pearl Jam fan?

aerial

Bentleyspop wrote:

aerial wrote:

A new Army manual that warns American soldiers in Afghanistan to avoid talking about certain topics has unwittingly acknowledged that Western taboos such as pedophilia are an inherent part of Islamic culture.

“By mentioning that pedophilia and women’s rights and saying that soldiers should not mention such things they are tacitly admitting that those things are indeed part of Islam,” said Robert Spencer, founder of Jihad Watch.


According to the Wall Street Journal, a new 75-page Army manual suggests U.S. soldiers are to blame for the large number of deadly attacks on them by Afghan security forces.

Donnelly noted the example of Navy Lt. Florence Choe, who was shot by an Afghan guard in 2009 for wearing shorts while jogging along the perimeter of the base.

The Army manual also advises soldiers to avoid “any criticism of pedophilia” or “mentioning homosexuality and homosexual conduct.”


the ban on criticizing pedophilia has put the military in a difficult position. By attempting to show cultural sensitivity, it is forced to acknowledge that pedophilia is an inherent part of Islamic teaching.
http://www.wnd.com/2012/12/army-acknowledges-pedophilia-part-of-islam/


This can not be denied any more...........

Seriously Aerial.....are you really a Pearl Jam fan?

I did not write the book....understand?

Byrnzie

aerial wrote:

I did not write the book....understand?

After a mere cursory glance at some of the finer details of the article you posted in support of your hatred of Muslims, I came up with the following:

Your reference here is to a book that you haven't seen, and that the editors of the website you got this bullshit article from also haven't seen. Also, the references to Muslims being pedophiles don't come from this alleged military handbook. These accusations come from spokespersons from both 'Jihad Watch' and 'The Center for Military Readiness', two organizations riddled with racism and homophobia:

'WND contacted the Army to request a copy of the manual. Army spokesman Ray Harp responded by saying it would not release a copy, for security reasons. He explained the Army wished to avoid detailing specific tactics, techniques and procedures outlined in the handbook.'

You also posted selected snippets from this Mickey Mouse website while omitting others, in order to try and strengthen your 'argument'.

Here's what you posted:

aerial wrote:

According to the Wall Street Journal, a new 75-page Army manual suggests U.S. soldiers are to blame for the large number of deadly attacks on them by Afghan security forces.

And here's the full paragraph:

'According to the Wall Street Journal, a new 75-page Army manual suggests U.S. soldiers are to blame for the large number of deadly attacks on them by Afghan security forces. The manual reportedly says the soldiers may have brought the attacks on themselves because of insensitivity towards Islamic culture.'


Aerial, why do you keep posting hateful, bigoted attacks against Muslims on this message board? Do you really think you're convincing anybody here by continually posting articles from far-right, anti-Muslim hatemongers and racists? What is your point exactly?

Cosmo

aerial wrote:

A new Army manual that warns American soldiers in Afghanistan to avoid talking about certain topics has unwittingly acknowledged that Western taboos such as pedophilia are an inherent part of Islamic culture.

“By mentioning that pedophilia and women’s rights and saying that soldiers should not mention such things they are tacitly admitting that those things are indeed part of Islam,” said Robert Spencer, founder of Jihad Watch.


According to the Wall Street Journal, a new 75-page Army manual suggests U.S. soldiers are to blame for the large number of deadly attacks on them by Afghan security forces.

Donnelly noted the example of Navy Lt. Florence Choe, who was shot by an Afghan guard in 2009 for wearing shorts while jogging along the perimeter of the base.

The Army manual also advises soldiers to avoid “any criticism of pedophilia” or “mentioning homosexuality and homosexual conduct.”


the ban on criticizing pedophilia has put the military in a difficult position. By attempting to show cultural sensitivity, it is forced to acknowledge that pedophilia is an inherent part of Islamic teaching.
http://www.wnd.com/2012/12/army-acknowledges-pedophilia-part-of-islam/


This can not be denied any more...........

...
Maybe... if we WEREN'T IN FUCKING AFGHANISTAN... we wouldn't have to worry about their language and culture. We are in THEIR home... not the other way around. WE... are the intruders.
Remember, Afghanistan is NOT part of Kentucky... no matter how much you pretend it is.

aerial

Byrnzie wrote:

aerial wrote:

I did not write the book....understand?

After a mere cursory glance at some of the finer details of the article you posted in support of your hatred of Muslims, I came up with the following:

Your reference here is to a book that you haven't seen, and that the editors of the website you got this bullshit article from also haven't seen. Also, the references to Muslims being pedophiles don't come from this alleged military handbook. These accusations come from spokespersons from both 'Jihad Watch' and 'The Center for Military Readiness', two organizations riddled with racism and homophobia:

'WND contacted the Army to request a copy of the manual. Army spokesman Ray Harp responded by saying it would not release a copy, for security reasons. He explained the Army wished to avoid detailing specific tactics, techniques and procedures outlined in the handbook.'

You also posted selected snippets from this Mickey Mouse website while omitting others, in order to try and strengthen your 'argument'.

Here's what you posted:

aerial wrote:

According to the Wall Street Journal, a new 75-page Army manual suggests U.S. soldiers are to blame for the large number of deadly attacks on them by Afghan security forces.

And here's the full paragraph:

'According to the Wall Street Journal, a new 75-page Army manual suggests U.S. soldiers are to blame for the large number of deadly attacks on them by Afghan security forces. The manual reportedly says the soldiers may have brought the attacks on themselves because of insensitivity towards Islamic culture.'


Aerial, why do you keep posting hateful, bigoted attacks against Muslims on this message board? Do you really think you're convincing anybody here by continually posting articles from far-right, anti-Muslim hatemongers and racists? What is your point exactly?

Learn the meaning of the words you use such as bigot, racist and hateful please....
Are you saying the Army manual does not say what I posted? if so please hit me with a link......

mickeyrat

Definition of BIGOT


: a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially: one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance

this one definition seems to apply to some things I've seen posted in regards to Islam.


Not all , in fact, the vast majority of Muslims are against the jihadists. Seenms the actions of the Jihad run counter to Islamic teachings? Go figure.

aerial

mickeyrat wrote:

Definition of BIGOT


: a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially: one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance

this one definition seems to apply to some things I've seen posted in regards to Islam.


Not all , in fact, the vast majority of Muslims are against the jihadists. Seenms the actions of the Jihad run counter to Islamic teachings? Go figure.

Are you cool with Pedophilia and no equality for women ......it's there culture....I didn't make this up....have you ever heard of "Dancing Boys"?

badbrains

aerial wrote:

mickeyrat wrote:

Definition of BIGOT


: a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially: one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance

this one definition seems to apply to some things I've seen posted in regards to Islam.


Not all , in fact, the vast majority of Muslims are against the jihadists. Seenms the actions of the Jihad run counter to Islamic teachings? Go figure.

Are you cool with Pedophilia and no equality for women ......it's there culture....I didn't make this up....have you ever heard of "Dancing Boys"?

No but I've heard of dancing Larry...... :fp:
You are unreal? I cannot believe there are people in the world who think like you. Wow

Cosmo

I heard of, 'Dancin' Days are here again.. the la la la tee dah... I got my flower, i got my power in the nude aye la nah dee dah...'

Byrnzie

aerial wrote:

Are you saying the Army manual does not say what I posted? if so please hit me with a link......

There are no quotations from the army manual in the article you posted. NONE WHATSOEVER. You don't know what the manual says because you haven't seen it, and neither have the hateful bigots on the Mickey Mouse website you got the article from.

Prince Of Dorkness

aerial wrote:

Are you cool with Pedophilia and no equality for women ......it's there culture....I didn't make this up....have you ever heard of "Dancing Boys"?

Aerial...

you may not have made it up but the wingnuts at WND did. That's simply not true.

Thirty Bills Unpaid

Prince Of Dorkness wrote:

aerial wrote:

Are you cool with Pedophilia and no equality for women ......it's there culture....I didn't make this up....have you ever heard of "Dancing Boys"?

Aerial...

you may not have made it up but the wingnuts at WND did. That's simply not true.

A sighting. LOL.

Welcome back Prince.

Prince Of Dorkness

Thirty Bills Unpaid wrote:

A sighting. LOL.

Welcome back Prince.

thanks... oddly enough I got like 4 private messages this week asking where I was. Answer is that I've been finishing up, releasing and promoting my movie and immediately jumped into a new production that I wrapped two days ago and i've been sleeping since then.

So I was unaware of how desperately you needed my brand of caustic humor.

Thirty Bills Unpaid

Prince Of Dorkness wrote:

Thirty Bills Unpaid wrote:

A sighting. LOL.

Welcome back Prince.

thanks... oddly enough I got like 4 private messages this week asking where I was. Answer is that I've been finishing up, releasing and promoting my movie and immediately jumped into a new production that I wrapped two days ago and i've been sleeping since then.

So I was unaware of how desperately you needed my brand of caustic humor.

Well, at a very minimum, you know you are appreciated! Nice to see your words.

aerial

Byrnzie wrote:

aerial wrote:

Are you saying the Army manual does not say what I posted? if so please hit me with a link......

There are no quotations from the army manual in the article you posted. NONE WHATSOEVER. You don't know what the manual says because you haven't seen it, and neither have the hateful bigots on the Mickey Mouse website you got the article from.

Is this your proof....name calling? You only have hateful words that prove nothing. How about some facts?

Prince Of Dorkness

aerial wrote:

How about some facts?

OK, sorry. No.

You are in NO position to ask for "facts" after using World News Daily as a source for your rant filled with anti-Islam slander.

aerial

badbrains wrote:

aerial wrote:

mickeyrat wrote:

Definition of BIGOT


: a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially: one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance

this one definition seems to apply to some things I've seen posted in regards to Islam.


Not all , in fact, the vast majority of Muslims are against the jihadists. Seenms the actions of the Jihad run counter to Islamic teachings? Go figure.

Are you cool with Pedophilia and no equality for women ......it's there culture....I didn't make this up....have you ever heard of "Dancing Boys"?

No but I've heard of dancing Larry...... :fp:
You are unreal? I cannot believe there are people in the world who think like you. Wow

Have you researched this subject at ALL.

aerial

Prince Of Dorkness wrote:

aerial wrote:

How about some facts?

OK, sorry. No.

You are in NO position to ask for "facts" after using World News Daily as a source for your rant filled with anti-Islam slander.

When did facts become slander?