!!!!!!!!!ELECTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!

fear4freedom

Hey fellow PJ fans! I know you are relieved and happy to be past this election and so am I! Congratulations to you Dems out there that are happy to have Obama for 4 more years! I feel as if Mitt would have been a much better choice but hey, the demographic has changed!

I want to say that we as conservatives, dont want dirty air and dirty water, we dont want to put more CO2 in the air than you do! We just want everyone to do well! We want everyone to have a better job that pays more. We want all of us to be active, productive, working, and independent. I cant speak for everyone, but hey we are not evil, we are not terrorists, we are not crazy!

I dont know how anyone can think that printing and spending past this election is even sane whatsoever! Ok Ill meet you half way....lets say we needed to print and spend to get our way out of Geoge Bush's mess, but when does the blame end for GW and begin for O? Also, when can we stop printing and spending? Just last night during Obamas victory speech, the first thing he said to do was to reduce the deficit. Do you think he will? Do you really think he can cut back and hold off on the printing press? He loves to print out money and spend it! Think of how fun it is to roll into a Vegas casino with a wad and just have fun! Being conservative is not fun.....but its logical! We as conservatives are rational thinkers, while liberals are emotional thinkers! Dont you think that acting on emotion will get us in trouble someday? There has to be a line in the sand! A line somewhere....I mean seriously...when will we put forth a budget, cut spending and get our house in fiscal order? Ok God bless this great nation and AMT!

Byrnzie

fear4freedom wrote:

I feel as if Mitt would have been a much better choice but hey, the demographic has changed!

You mean there are now more black people in America than there were 10 years ago?

fear4freedom

Byrnzie wrote:

fear4freedom wrote:

I feel as if Mitt would have been a much better choice but hey, the demographic has changed!

You mean there are now more black people in America than there were 10 years ago?

blacks , latinos, pull heavy for O:

Thirty Bills Unpaid

fear4freedom wrote:

Byrnzie wrote:

fear4freedom wrote:

I feel as if Mitt would have been a much better choice but hey, the demographic has changed!

You mean there are now more black people in America than there were 10 years ago?

blacks , latinos, pull heavy for O:

Are you saying blacks and latinos have more common sense than whites?

Cosmo

Hey we agree. We're happy this election is FINALLY OVER!!!
Elections suck. i hate all of the lies and bullshit... all of the crap that fill my mailbox... all of the fucking robo-calls on my answering machine... all of the billions of dollars wasted on campaigns.
...
And I agree... we need to move forward and try to get this thing rolling again. We need to figure out the best way to advance our nation. That is not going to happen as long as we have this massive deficit on our backs. We need to lighten it up so we can move on.
Now... in order to do so... we have tough choices to make. If we aren't going to print money... we still need to take in money. Stop spending... which means no more defense spending... cuts in Social Security... reductions in Medicare. Those are the big three... the heavy hitters we can no longer pretend have no effect on our spending.
And... we HAVE to raise taxes. I know, not popular, but if we are not going to print money, we have to bring it in. The only way to do so... taxes.
...
So, that it... print money and feel no pain by letting the problem grow bigger and bigger... or feel the pain of having to cut spending on a large scale and take a hit in taxes (where the mega wealthy... the ones whose annual gift allowance is twice as much as you house is worth... pay more that 13% of their earnings... not wages... earnings on stock markets and investments).
...
And throughout the entire Bush terms... I sure as hell didn't like what he was doing, but I, personally, still respected his office as the President on my country.

JC29856

you talk as if there exists a stark difference between Ds and Rs... do you really think Rs are "conservative"? maybe i need your definition or criteria of conservative? maybe an example of a truly conservative elected official?

Byrnzie

JC29856 wrote:

you talk as if there exists a stark difference between Ds and Rs... do you really think Rs are "conservative"? maybe i need your definition or criteria of conservative? maybe an example of a truly conservative elected official?

No, he's saying that ethnic minorities have taken over the country.

JC29856

i know what he is insinuating...that minority votes are somehow subordinate to whites, that the white demographic should hold more weight than minorities, he is disrespecting the minority vote. winning with the minority vote is somehow less dignified.

fear4freedom

Byrnzie wrote:

JC29856 wrote:

you talk as if there exists a stark difference between Ds and Rs... do you really think Rs are "conservative"? maybe i need your definition or criteria of conservative? maybe an example of a truly conservative elected official?

No, he's saying that ethnic minorities have taken over the country.

Hey bud, get with it....demographics is not just race cards! Romney said that %47 of all people wouldnt vote for him....thats a demographic of dependents or just pissed off people at Romney! Either way....its a group that is defined as a group! Also, women is a demographic.....not all women....but the majority that Dems win over in a fabricated war on women! Then there are also race demographics....latinos, blacks and others

Then there are also gay demographics which were energized! Also, energized the entire youth vote, even if they werent gay! Maybe their friend is gay...and they got energized for them!

Marijauna demographic in Colorado and Washington.....voted Dem no matter what! Energized them!

Got it now?

fear4freedom

JC29856 wrote:

you talk as if there exists a stark difference between Ds and Rs... do you really think Rs are "conservative"? maybe i need your definition or criteria of conservative? maybe an example of a truly conservative elected official?

If there were a true conservative who ran against a big spending liberal, would you vote for them? Not a Republican....a conservative?

Hugh Freaking Dillon

fear4freedom wrote:

Being conservative is not fun.....but its logical! We as conservatives are rational thinkers, while liberals are emotional thinkers! Dont you think that acting on emotion will get us in trouble someday?

and hey, you get to start logical wars!

fear4freedom

Hugh Freaking Dillon wrote:

fear4freedom wrote:

Being conservative is not fun.....but its logical! We as conservatives are rational thinkers, while liberals are emotional thinkers! Dont you think that acting on emotion will get us in trouble someday?

and hey, you get to start logical wars!

I guess you are referring to the war in Iraq, well your side did just as bad on Libya! Also, war in Iraq was supported by many Dems!

How much money did the war in Iraq cost? About 2 trillion? Well, I believe we just printed out a trillion and it led to nothing! I also think Obamacare will cost more than that and lead to nothing good!

JC29856

fear4freedom wrote:

JC29856 wrote:

you talk as if there exists a stark difference between Ds and Rs... do you really think Rs are "conservative"? maybe i need your definition or criteria of conservative? maybe an example of a truly conservative elected official?

If there were a true conservative who ran against a big spending liberal, would you vote for them? Not a Republican....a conservative?

my criteria for someone earning my vote is simple, as i vote FOR someone with my heart and mind, regardless of the label attached, democrat, socialist, limo liberal, neo- and etc...do they most often speak truth.

btw...the fed reserve prints money, congress and the president have ZERO say as to what the fed does, zero.

Cosmo

fear4freedom wrote:

I also think Obamacare will cost more than that and lead to nothing good!

...
Except saving American citizens lives. That can't be good... I guess.

fear4freedom

JC29856 wrote:

fear4freedom wrote:

JC29856 wrote:

you talk as if there exists a stark difference between Ds and Rs... do you really think Rs are "conservative"? maybe i need your definition or criteria of conservative? maybe an example of a truly conservative elected official?

If there were a true conservative who ran against a big spending liberal, would you vote for them? Not a Republican....a conservative?

my criteria for someone earning my vote is simple, as i vote FOR someone with my heart and mind, regardless of the label attached, democrat, socialist, limo liberal, neo- and etc...do they most often speak truth.

btw...the fed reserve prints money, congress and the president have ZERO say as to what the fed does, zero.

Obama has zero say as to what Bernanke does huh? You really believe that?

JC29856

if you dont know eustace mullins, do yourself a favor and get to know him.

Byrnzie

fear4freedom wrote:

Hey bud, get with it....demographics is not just race cards! Romney said that %47 of all people wouldnt vote for him....thats a demographic of dependents or just pissed off people at Romney! Either way....its a group that is defined as a group! Also, women is a demographic.....not all women....but the majority that Dems win over in a fabricated war on women! Then there are also race demographics....latinos, blacks and others

Then there are also gay demographics which were energized! Also, energized the entire youth vote, even if they werent gay! Maybe their friend is gay...and they got energized for them!

Marijauna demographic in Colorado and Washington.....voted Dem no matter what! Energized them!

Got it now?

Thanks for educating me. I had no idea what 'demographics' meant until you filled me in on the details. Good job you're here to teach me all about these things. :roll:

I know exactly what you meant.

Byrnzie

fear4freedom wrote:

I guess you are referring to the war in Iraq, well your side did just as bad on Libya!

Were over a million Libyans killed? Nope.
Were over 5 million Libyans made refugees? Nope.

Seems like you need to brush up on the meaning of 'logic', my friend.

fear4freedom

Byrnzie wrote:

fear4freedom wrote:

I guess you are referring to the war in Iraq, well your side did just as bad on Libya!

Were over a million Libyans killed? Nope.
Were over 5 million Libyans made refugees? Nope.

Seems like you need to brush up on the meaning of 'logic', my friend.

iraqis are thanking us now! They are thriving!

fear4freedom

Byrnzie wrote:

fear4freedom wrote:

Hey bud, get with it....demographics is not just race cards! Romney said that %47 of all people wouldnt vote for him....thats a demographic of dependents or just pissed off people at Romney! Either way....its a group that is defined as a group! Also, women is a demographic.....not all women....but the majority that Dems win over in a fabricated war on women! Then there are also race demographics....latinos, blacks and others

Then there are also gay demographics which were energized! Also, energized the entire youth vote, even if they werent gay! Maybe their friend is gay...and they got energized for them!

Marijauna demographic in Colorado and Washington.....voted Dem no matter what! Energized them!

Got it now?

good, cause for a minute there i thought you were a racist! I didnt want that!

Thanks for educating me. I had no idea what 'demographics' meant until you filled me in on the details. Good job you're here to teach me all about these things. :roll:

I know exactly what you meant.

fear4freedom

fear4freedom wrote:

Byrnzie wrote:

fear4freedom wrote:

Hey bud, get with it....demographics is not just race cards! Romney said that %47 of all people wouldnt vote for him....thats a demographic of dependents or just pissed off people at Romney! Either way....its a group that is defined as a group! Also, women is a demographic.....not all women....but the majority that Dems win over in a fabricated war on women! Then there are also race demographics....latinos, blacks and others

Then there are also gay demographics which were energized! Also, energized the entire youth vote, even if they werent gay! Maybe their friend is gay...and they got energized for them!

Marijauna demographic in Colorado and Washington.....voted Dem no matter what! Energized them!

Got it now?

good, cause for a minute there i thought you were a racist! I didnt want that!

Thanks for educating me. I had no idea what 'demographics' meant until you filled me in on the details. Good job you're here to teach me all about these things. :roll:

I know exactly what you meant.

good cause i thought you were a racist there for a moment and I didnt want that !!