Does this mean Republicans ?

klusterfuk

81 wrote:

unlost dogs wrote:

81 wrote:

Mitt? Really? That was the best they could come up with?

Hey, we already had our share of him in Massachusetts. It's one of his "home states," you know.

home states...don't know that...just thankful my ohio friends came to their senses

Ohio is where its at.

pureoc

81 wrote:

unlost dogs wrote:

81 wrote:

Mitt? Really? That was the best they could come up with?

Hey, we already had our share of him in Massachusetts. It's one of his "home states," you know.

home states...don't know that...just thankful my ohio friends came to their senses

Bout time your state did something right!!

brianlux

I know someone who tried that when Bush II was elected. They still live in the US today and tell me Canada definitely is not open to the idea.

peacefrompaul

gimmesometruth27 wrote:

DS1119 wrote:

No. Just block any of those idiot policies Barack tries to pass over the next four years.

no, the jig is up.

this was an electoral beatdown.

you guys have to start playing ball for the good of the country.

They won't

cincybearcat

gimmesometruth27 wrote:

DS1119 wrote:

No. Just block any of those idiot policies Barack tries to pass over the next four years.

no, the jig is up.

this was an electoral beatdown.

you guys have to start playing ball for the good of the country.

Ahhh "you guys" you keep on keepin on don't you?

gimmesometruth27

cincybearcat wrote:

gimmesometruth27 wrote:

DS1119 wrote:

No. Just block any of those idiot policies Barack tries to pass over the next four years.

no, the jig is up.

this was an electoral beatdown.

you guys have to start playing ball for the good of the country.

Ahhh "you guys" you keep on keepin on don't you?

"you guys" was directed at congressional republicans who have been stonewalling everything the last 4 years to the detriment of the country. you are smart enough and have read enough of my posts to know what i meant.


it was an electoral beatdown. the american people patently rejected the republican platform. they chewed it up, tasted it, and spit it out because it was too cold. it is time to do what is good for the country.

Prince Of Dorkness

No..

1) In Canada.. Fox News is illegal. There is a law that you can't lie while delivering the news in Canada and Fox News is the only network that refused to abide by that law.

2) Canada will take refugees from other countries happily. We're a multicultural country and love diversity. We see it as a positive thing. But we don't take people from other countries just because they don't like their elected leader. That doesn't make you a refugee. That makes you a racist sore loser and we don't want you.

3) Fred Phelps isn't allowed in Canada. Why do you think we'll take the Tea Brewers?

4) You're from Alabama, Mississippi and Kansas, you little wuss. You think you can take a Canadian winter? Because you can't. You'd make it to about January 15th before you were begging that handsome, strapping lumberjack to marry you, make you his bitch and cuddle you by the fire all night. And if you don't know how to cook Moosemeat and Maple Syrup... he doesn't want you.

Bennyorr4

Prince Of Dorkness wrote:

No..

1) In Canada.. Fox News is illegal. There is a law that you can't lie while delivering the news in Canada and Fox News is the only network that refused to abide by that law.

2) Canada will take refugees from other countries happily. We're a multicultural country and love diversity. We see it as a positive thing. But we don't take people from other countries just because they don't like their elected leader. That doesn't make you a refugee. That makes you a racist sore loser and we don't want you.


Well said Prince

dignin

Prince Of Dorkness wrote:

No..

1) In Canada.. Fox News is illegal. There is a law that you can't lie while delivering the news in Canada and Fox News is the only network that refused to abide by that law.

2) Canada will take refugees from other countries happily. We're a multicultural country and love diversity. We see it as a positive thing. But we don't take people from other countries just because they don't like their elected leader. That doesn't make you a refugee. That makes you a racist sore loser and we don't want you.

3) Fred Phelps isn't allowed in Canada. Why do you think we'll take the Tea Brewers?

4) You're from Alabama, Mississippi and Kansas, you little wuss. You think you can take a Canadian winter? Because you can't. You'd make it to about January 15th before you were begging that handsome, strapping lumberjack to marry you, make you his bitch and cuddle you by the fire all night. And if you don't know how to cook Moosemeat and Maple Syrup... he doesn't want you.

This is the best. I raise a glass to you my friend.

pandora

bootlegger10 wrote:

BinauralJam wrote:

Will move to Canada?

In all honesty, we are probably less than a decade from a significant number of people leaving the country. The ones that build companies and produce jobs. Eventually the governments' money will run out and I don't want to know what will happen then.

I guess we can live off the movie stars, musicians, college professors, nonprofiteers ...

I'm signing up for food stamps immediately

Godfather.

well.......four more years of lies and other bullshit but the country will survive Obama and we will move on then the train can move on to other topics.

Godfather.

EdsonNascimento

gimmesometruth27 wrote:

DS1119 wrote:

No. Just block any of those idiot policies Barack tries to pass over the next four years.

no, the jig is up.

this was an electoral beatdown.

you guys have to start playing ball for the good of the country.

But didn't the House become MORE Republican? I'm confused. The single body that's been accused of stonewalling the President (one perspective) became MORE Republican? If anything, this election cemented/confirmed that folks are ok with the last 2 years - Senate got MORE Democratic, House got MORE Republican and Executive Branch saw no change.

How do you interpret that as the jig being up? It looks like the country just voted for MORE of the same.

pandora

EdsonNascimento wrote:

gimmesometruth27 wrote:

DS1119 wrote:

No. Just block any of those idiot policies Barack tries to pass over the next four years.

no, the jig is up.

this was an electoral beatdown.

you guys have to start playing ball for the good of the country.

But didn't the House become MORE Republican? I'm confused. The single body that's been accused of stonewalling the President (one perspective) became MORE Republican? If anything, this election cemented/confirmed that folks are ok with the last 2 years - Senate got MORE Democratic, House got MORE Republican and Executive Branch saw no change.

How do you interpret that as the jig being up? It looks like the country just voted for MORE of the same.

Are we sure they really voted

Cosmo

Here's a question for our Republican friends...
Do you think that every American should have access to affordable Health Care Services?
I'm guessing you are saying, 'Yes'.
So, HOW would YOU go about doing this?
Why not try to modify the existing Health Care Act... maybe to install parts of the Romney Plan he set up in Massachusetts?
Maybe... instead of constantly trying to repeal it (which is going to take monsterous amounts of time, effort and money we should be using elsewhere), you try to modify it to look more like the way you want it to look.
...
Because this childish gridlock is doing NOTHING for us... but, your Reperesentatives are STILL getting paid their salaries. They do nothing... but, still get paid. How does that help you?

mickeyrat

Cosmo wrote:

Here's a question for our Republican friends...
Do you think that every American should have access to affordable Health Care Services?
I'm guessing you are saying, 'Yes'.
So, HOW would YOU go about doing this?
Why not try to modify the existing Health Care Act... maybe to install parts of the Romney Plan he set up in Massachusetts?
Maybe... instead of constantly trying to repeal it (which is going to take monsterous amounts of time, effort and money we should be using elsewhere), you try to modify it to look more like the way you want it to look.
...
Because this childish gridlock is doing NOTHING for us... but, your Reperesentatives are STILL getting paid their salaries. They do nothing... but, still get paid. How does that help you?

with better heathcare than you too.

Jason P

I could stand for settling in Vancouver ... The rest of Canada can take off, eh!

ryph raph

gimmesometruth27 wrote:

ryph raph wrote:

DS1119 wrote:

No. Just block any of those idiot policies Barack tries to pass over the next four years.

TREASON !

seriously. we have had 4 years of obstructionism. their party platform got rejected. it is time to play ball and put country over party.

Exactly !!!!

ryph raph

81 wrote:

unlost dogs wrote:

81 wrote:

Mitt? Really? That was the best they could come up with?

Hey, we already had our share of him in Massachusetts. It's one of his "home states," you know.

home states...don't know that...just thankful my ohio friends came to their senses

Your Welcome !

- Play Ohio in 2013 -

ryph raph

Godfather. wrote:

well.......four more years of lies and other bullshit but the country will survive Obama and we will move on then the train can move on to other topics.

Godfather.

8 Years of bush & cheney ? Lies & Bullshit ? This administration is still digging " bushit " out of the white house.

PJ_Soul

BinauralJam wrote:

Will move to Canada?

:shock: Don't even joke about that. We don't want them.