Anyone have Virgin Mobile?

LukinFan

Is it any good? I'm reading mixed reviews online.

Snakeduck

A car that won't get you laid... interesting strategy.

Snakeduck

LukinFan

Snakeduck wrote:

I meant the mobile phone company

LukinFan

any one?

81

what's the goal of the cell phone?

pre paid....our reserach showed t mobile was the cheapeast....and while we had them, they were solid.


post paid....our research showed sprint had the best package....and we have been happy with service/coverage

LukinFan

81 wrote:

what's the goal of the cell phone?

pre paid....our reserach showed t mobile was the cheapeast....and while we had them, they were solid.


post paid....our research showed sprint had the best package....and we have been happy with service/coverage

They do use Sprint's towers, but from what I've read online it's still hit or miss. Some people say it's perfect and others say it's crap.

For $35 a month for unlimited data and texting, and I think 1200 or 1300 min a month for calling - it's hard to pass up, but I don't want crappy service.

81

LukinFan wrote:

81 wrote:

what's the goal of the cell phone?

pre paid....our reserach showed t mobile was the cheapeast....and while we had them, they were solid.


post paid....our research showed sprint had the best package....and we have been happy with service/coverage

They do use Sprint's towers, but from what I've read online it's still hit or miss. Some people say it's perfect and others say it's crap.

For $35 a month for unlimited data and texting, and I think 1200 or 1300 min a month for calling - it's hard to pass up, but I don't want crappy service.

i've been all over the country and not had any sprint issues. only service issues were up in bfe VT and NH where sprint didn't have coverage. chicago, san fran, along the NE coast, SC, GA, and all roads in between, we've had zero issues.

if there is no contract, for 35 it's worth checking out.

LukinFan

81 wrote:

LukinFan wrote:

81 wrote:

what's the goal of the cell phone?

pre paid....our reserach showed t mobile was the cheapeast....and while we had them, they were solid.


post paid....our research showed sprint had the best package....and we have been happy with service/coverage

They do use Sprint's towers, but from what I've read online it's still hit or miss. Some people say it's perfect and others say it's crap.

For $35 a month for unlimited data and texting, and I think 1200 or 1300 min a month for calling - it's hard to pass up, but I don't want crappy service.

i've been all over the country and not had any sprint issues. only service issues were up in bfe VT and NH where sprint didn't have coverage. chicago, san fran, along the NE coast, SC, GA, and all roads in between, we've had zero issues.

if there is no contract, for 35 it's worth checking out.

Yeah, that's what I'm thinking. Worth case scenario, I have a new phone. I appreciate it

bowerymission

I've had it, the price was right but you get what you pay for, the reception was spotty and really annoying. you couldn't pay me to put an iPhone on that plan, but if you've got a budget phone and want a budget plan it works.

LukinFan

bowerymission wrote:

I've had it, the price was right but you get what you pay for, the reception was spotty and really annoying. you couldn't pay me to put an iPhone on that plan, but if you've got a budget phone and want a budget plan it works.

that's what I've been hearing. Do you live in a big city?

bowerymission

yes, i live in NYC and there are tons of cell towers on buildings and it was still iffy

LukinFan