Waters v. Gilmore

mookeywrenchmookeywrench Posts: 5,911
edited June 2012 in Other Music
Casual fan of Pink Floyd here...

I was talking about the Wall Tour with someone who's been a Floyd fan since the 60's and they said, I would never pay money to see Roger Waters, I can't stand him.

Obviously there was the breakup between the band that I know about on a surface level, but what's making people take extreme sides between the two?
350x700px-LL-d2f49cb4_vinyl-needle-scu-e1356666258495.jpeg
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • SatansFutonSatansFuton Posts: 5,399
    Other than the break-up, there was some other drama surrounding Pink Floyd's demise. I think Roger tried to sue Gilmour and Co. to keep them from using the name Pink Floyd.

    Also, the latter days of the band might leave a bad taste in some people's mouths, the way Roger took more and more control to the point that by "The Final Cut" it's was basically just Roger Waters solo with members of the band playing on only some tracks. In fact I think Mason was only paid as a session musician for the album.
    "See a broad to get dat booty yak 'em, leg 'er down, a smack 'em yak 'em!"
  • FenwayFaithfulFenwayFaithful Posts: 8,626
    Gilmore every day of every week
    "FF, I've heard the droning about the Sawx being the baby dolls. Yeah, I get it, you guys invented baseball and suffered forever. I get it." -JearlPam0925
  • stargirl69stargirl69 Posts: 6,387
    Other than the break-up, there was some other drama surrounding Pink Floyd's demise. I think Roger tried to sue Gilmour and Co. to keep them from using the name Pink Floyd.

    Also, the latter days of the band might leave a bad taste in some people's mouths, the way Roger took more and more control to the point that by "The Final Cut" it's was basically just Roger Waters solo with members of the band playing on only some tracks. In fact I think Mason was only paid as a session musician for the album.

    Spot on with your info from what I know.
    “There should be a place where only the things you want to happen, happen”
  • PHATJPHATJ Posts: 348
    Better Songwriter - Waters

    Better Musician - Gilmour

    Better Singer - Gilmour is a vastly superior singer technically and I do love his voice. Waters voice is very unique and although he isn't a technically strong singer, his voice fits the mood of Floyd's music very well.

    Better Solo Career - Waters. The Amused to Death album is spectacular. I love Gilmour's On An Island album, but Waters' is slightly better. Radio K.A.O.S. and The Pros and Cons of Hitchhiking are better efforts then early Gilmour solo material as well.


    Conclusion: I love them both. Pink Floyd is the greatest band of all time.
    "I'll Ride the wave where it takes me. I'll Hold the pain. RELEASE ME!"

  • keeponrockinkeeponrockin Posts: 7,446
    Creatively, I'd give it to Roger Waters.

    As a musician/singer/performer, it's got to be Gilmour.

    There is no price I wouldn't pay to see them play a full concert together.
    Believe me, when I was growin up, I thought the worst thing you could turn out to be was normal, So I say freaks in the most complementary way. Here's a song by a fellow freak - E.V
  • Brisk.Brisk. Posts: 11,561
    edited June 2012
    Pfttttttt

    Gilmour!!
    Post edited by Brisk. on
  • dimitrispearljamdimitrispearljam Posts: 139,720
    Gilmore every day of every week
    "...Dimitri...He talks to me...'.."The Ghost of Greece..".
    "..That's One Happy Fuckin Ghost.."
    “..That came up on the Pillow Case...This is for the Greek, With Our Apologies.....”
  • PHATJPHATJ Posts: 348
    You people can't even spell Gilmour correctly. :nono: What could you possibly know?
    "I'll Ride the wave where it takes me. I'll Hold the pain. RELEASE ME!"

  • oona leftoona left Posts: 1,677
    PHATJ wrote:
    Better Songwriter - Waters

    Better Musician - Gilmour

    Better Singer - Gilmour is a vastly superior singer technically and I do love his voice. Waters voice is very unique and although he isn't a technically strong singer, his voice fits the mood of Floyd's music very well.

    Better Solo Career - Waters. The Amused to Death album is spectacular. I love Gilmour's On An Island album, but Waters' is slightly better. Radio K.A.O.S. and The Pros and Cons of Hitchhiking are better efforts then early Gilmour solo material as well.


    Conclusion: I love them both. Pink Floyd is the greatest band of all time.

    Fantastic summary.
  • FenwayFaithfulFenwayFaithful Posts: 8,626
    PHATJ wrote:
    You people can't even spell Gilmour correctly. :nono: What could you possibly know?
    I always confuse him with Happy.
    "FF, I've heard the droning about the Sawx being the baby dolls. Yeah, I get it, you guys invented baseball and suffered forever. I get it." -JearlPam0925
  • lockedlocked Boston Posts: 4,039
    Gilmore every day of every week
    This!
    "This here's a REQUEST!"
    EV intro to Chloe Dancer / Crown of Thorns
    10/25/13 Hartford
  • dimitrispearljamdimitrispearljam Posts: 139,720
    PHATJ wrote:
    You people can't even spell Gilmour correctly. :nono: What could you possibly know?
    I always confuse him with Happy.
    his father was Greek,this is the right way to call him in greek.ill allow it. :mrgreen:
    "...Dimitri...He talks to me...'.."The Ghost of Greece..".
    "..That's One Happy Fuckin Ghost.."
    “..That came up on the Pillow Case...This is for the Greek, With Our Apologies.....”
  • dcfaithfuldcfaithful Posts: 13,076
    PHATJ wrote:
    You people can't even spell Gilmour correctly. :nono: What could you possibly know?
    I always confuse him with Happy.

    Next up, Happy Gilmore.

    *under breath* Who the hell is Happy Gilmore?
    7/2/06 - Denver, CO
    6/12/08 - Tampa, FL
    8/23/09 - Chicago, IL
    9/28/09 - Salt Lake City, UT (11 years too long!!!)
    9/03/11 - East Troy, WI - PJ20 - Night 1
    9/04/11 - East Troy, WI - PJ20 - Night 2
  • pjl44pjl44 Posts: 9,481
    stargirl69 wrote:
    Other than the break-up, there was some other drama surrounding Pink Floyd's demise. I think Roger tried to sue Gilmour and Co. to keep them from using the name Pink Floyd.

    Also, the latter days of the band might leave a bad taste in some people's mouths, the way Roger took more and more control to the point that by "The Final Cut" it's was basically just Roger Waters solo with members of the band playing on only some tracks. In fact I think Mason was only paid as a session musician for the album.

    Spot on with your info from what I know.

    Yup. That's a great summary of the situation.
  • pjl44pjl44 Posts: 9,481
    PHATJ wrote:
    Better Songwriter - Waters

    Better Musician - Gilmour

    Better Singer - Gilmour is a vastly superior singer technically and I do love his voice. Waters voice is very unique and although he isn't a technically strong singer, his voice fits the mood of Floyd's music very well.

    Better Solo Career - Waters. The Amused to Death album is spectacular. I love Gilmour's On An Island album, but Waters' is slightly better. Radio K.A.O.S. and The Pros and Cons of Hitchhiking are better efforts then early Gilmour solo material as well.


    Conclusion: I love them both. Pink Floyd is the greatest band of all time.

    Another great summary. There's some high level Floyd expertise around these parts.
  • PJRock75PJRock75 Posts: 869
    I guess I'm in the minority here but I will take team Waters any day. He was the dark and disturbed personality of PF and that just makes more interesting music.
    "If you want a friend, feed any animal." - JA
    "Don't let it get you down, you know, still give your love, just give it away...I love singin' that part." - EV
  • DewieCoxDewieCox Posts: 11,429
    PJRock75 wrote:
    I guess I'm in the minority here but I will take team Waters any day. He was the dark and disturbed personality of PF and that just makes more interesting music.

    Not when you don't have the musical ability to be that interesting.
  • pearljimpearljim Posts: 1,312
    DewieCox wrote:
    PJRock75 wrote:
    I guess I'm in the minority here but I will take team Waters any day. He was the dark and disturbed personality of PF and that just makes more interesting music.

    Not when you don't have the musical ability to be that interesting.

    Dewie - I generally agree with your posts but not here. Roger has come out with some fantastic material and what he is doing with The Wall tour is simply amazing. Amused to Death is A+ stuff. I have seen Floyd (The Wall 1980), I have seen all Roger solo tours, all Gilmour solo tours, Pink Floyd after Roger and The Wall 2010 -2012. Without Syd there is no Floyd. After Syd there is no Floyd without Roger. Gilmour enhanced and there is no Floyd as we know now without the combined talents of either man. Enjoy the two individuals for who they are and what they were when together.
    If you have a chance to make life better for others, and fail to do so, you are wasting your time on this earth.

    Roberto Clemente.
  • HorosHoros Posts: 4,518
    It was actually Wright who was out then paid as a touring musician.

    Watersless Floyd is less than spectacular.
    #FHP
  • bindy123bindy123 Posts: 210
    Horos wrote:
    It was actually Wright who was out then paid as a touring musician.

    Watersless Floyd is less than spectacular.

    Wright was definately paid as a hired musician after been put out of the band...I dont know about Waters, not that I know of, but there is much I dont know!!!
    My understanding is that after Waters left the band he did everything he could to stop the name of Pink Floyd ever being used...all sorts of legal action and threats...criticised everything they did. I read a story that said he paid a heap of money to get a huge number of toilet rolls made, with prints of Dave Gilmours face on each square...when asked about it Waters denied it, but said he thought it a great idea! :)

    I only really discovered their music in the ninetees, but then got all their albums...to me Dave Gilmour is Pink Floyd, and always will be
    "God created surfing and Pearl Jam so that the truely gifted, talented and most intelligent people wouldnt rule the world"...adapted from my bumper sticker
  • DavieBDavieB Posts: 222
    I think the latter years of Pink Floyd, along with Waters' attempts to prevent Pink Floyd from continuing without him are what leave fans with a bad impression of him.

    It was well known that there was a lot of in-fighting, but the way he treated the other members (Wright, in particular) sounds quite shocking. Wright's confidence took constant batterings from Waters, to the point where he was fired from the band during the recording of The Wall (by whom, I'm not sure.)

    Funny fact actually - because, on The Wall tour, he was hired as a session musician, he was the only one out of the band to make any money from it – the rest of them lost a lot due to the cost to produce the shows!

    I started off by favouring Gilmour. I really like latter day Floyd (probably because P.U.L.S.E. is what introduced me to the band), and disliked Waters even more when I heard he had given Gilmour a rather nasty response at the suggestion they let bygones-be-bygones… (Covered in the song “Poles Apart”, I think…)

    However, I have come round to Waters since then, after I watched his “In The Flesh” tour DVD, which is fantastic. He seems to have changed a lot recently, and seems like a much nicer human being… Albeit still retaining what makes him… him!

    I’ve been lucky enough to see all of them in concert at some point, alas, not all 4 of them together (Waters/Mason, Gilmour/Wright, Gilmour/Waters/Mason). Unfortunately, there will never be another Pink Floyd reunion without Wright, in my opinion.

    I don’t think I could choose between them nowadays. I WOULD probably say Gilmour, but only if he makes a re-appearance with some new music, or a new tour or something! :-)
  • FinsburyParkCarrotsFinsburyParkCarrots Seattle, WA Posts: 12,223
    Barrett
  • DewieCoxDewieCox Posts: 11,429
    pearljim wrote:
    DewieCox wrote:
    PJRock75 wrote:
    I guess I'm in the minority here but I will take team Waters any day. He was the dark and disturbed personality of PF and that just makes more interesting music.

    Not when you don't have the musical ability to be that interesting.

    Dewie - I generally agree with your posts but not here. Roger has come out with some fantastic material and what he is doing with The Wall tour is simply amazing. Amused to Death is A+ stuff. I have seen Floyd (The Wall 1980), I have seen all Roger solo tours, all Gilmour solo tours, Pink Floyd after Roger and The Wall 2010 -2012. Without Syd there is no Floyd. After Syd there is no Floyd without Roger. Gilmour enhanced and there is no Floyd as we know now without the combined talents of either man. Enjoy the two individuals for who they are and what they were when together.


    Gilmour/Wright is the Pink Floyd sound to me and most likely any other fan of the classic Floyd lineup. I realize Waters is a the chief songwriter and visionary and a highly talented individual. You may be right, No Syd/Roger, no Floyd but I probably wouldn't care if there was a Floyd without Gilmour and Wright. When I think of Floyd I think Gilmour's guitar and voice, then all those great textures and melodies from Wright.
  • Mamasan23Mamasan23 Posts: 16,388
    Barrett

    Winner!!

    Honestly though I couldn't compare Gilmour to Waters...I love them both for completely different reasons. I think that they both have had amazing solo careers. If you're into grand and epic theme records, Waters is your guy. He's amazing at concept records...I think Radio K.A.O.S. is pure genius. Gilmour has also written some beautiful songs and is an incredibly talented guitar player. In terms of Floyd records, I love them all for what they are. I've seen both of them live and have to say they that both of their shows are up there in my top 5 of all time. They're both brilliant - and they know it. Too much ego in one band was just recipe for disaster, but when they were on, they were fucking on!

    I have to admit though that the solo records I listen to most from any Floyd member are Barrett's.
    WI '98,  WI '99 (EV),  WI '00,  Chgo '00,  MO '00,  Champaign '03,  Chgo '03,  WI '03,  IN '03,  MI '04,  Chgo '06:N1 & 2,  WI '06,  Chgo '07,  Chgo '08 (EV:N1),  Chgo '09:N1 & 2,  Chgo '11 (EV:N1),  WI '11:N1 & 2,  Philly '12,  Wrigley '13,  Pitt '13,  Buff '13, Detroit '14, MKE '14, Wrigley '16: N1 & N2, Seattle '18 N2, Wrigley '18: N1 & N2, Fenway '18 N1, STL '22, St Paul '23 N2, Chgo '23: N1 & N2
Sign In or Register to comment.