Did you know?

PJ_Soul

afroannnie wrote:

PJ_Soul wrote:

JonnyPistachio wrote:

I believe they were totally separate, but I dont remember for sure. I think they both worked, but only one peed and ejaculated. I think it was one set of nuts. his was probably 1998 in Gainesville florida, so the details are sketchy. But the doctor was/is my best friend.. very credible dude. I'll ask him again (just texted him), see if he remembers.

If one of them couldn't pee or ejaculate, in what sense did it "work"? :think: It simply got an erection and then eventually got blue balls? Seriously curious. It's science.

Maybe there was blood flow to that one, but the urethra wasn't connected to the prostate, seminal vesicle, and bladder?

Erection with no pay off at the end seems like a real pain in the groin to me. :P

JonnyPistachio

afroannnie wrote:

:think: Interesting stuff...Yes, tell him inquiring minds want to know...

He texted me back, but was working, so he was vague. He only said that the guy definitely had two, both got erections. He said he was a mexican fella.

PJ_Soul wrote:

If one of them couldn't pee or ejaculate, in what sense did it "work"? :think: It simply got an erection and then eventually got blue balls? Seriously curious. It's science.

Well, I figured in a sense that it "works" meant getting wood. That other shit dont matter! :P
But I doubt he'd get blue balls since they shared one set of jewels. I cant believe im going this in depth about it. I have no clue really

81

did you know....no? good...lets keep it that way.