Please remind me again....

pjradiopjradio Posts: 6,704
edited January 2012 in Other Music
....why I should hate Nickleback?....I just watched the Nickleback Live @ Sturgis DVD & I have to say, they are a Really Tight Band...I know I'm gonna take some shit from this board but, I can't complain/bitch about them...They sounded really good!!!! Why all the hate?
aqo2t.jpg
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • mookeywrenchmookeywrench Posts: 5,911
    Uninspiring, one dimensional, cock-rock. Not my bag.


    Full disclosure: I do like AC/DC...but they have a lot more grit in their style.

    AC/DC : Whisky :: Nickleback : Smirnoff Ice
    350x700px-LL-d2f49cb4_vinyl-needle-scu-e1356666258495.jpeg
  • ive always had a theory that the bands who you can tell want to be rock stars are despised by fans. i think thats what drives alot of the kings of leon hate. i think for whatever reason, our generation grew up with something pretty rare. a bunch of bands who shunned the spotlight, refused to give interviews, live in fairly modest homes, and arent out with groupies and living it up blowing money on drugs and gambling and a bentley and rolls. in fact maybe the most important musician of our generation killed himself, because the fame was too much for him. and it nearly took out ed.

    i think thats rare and unique. 40 years ago, you started a band to get rich, and to get girls. to be famous.

    I think people are fascinated by the lifestyle these people live, but when it gets too in your face or too blatant, kanye's another example, people are turned off by it. Just look at how alot of press reacted to the kanye and jayz album this summer. nearly every reviewer lambasted them for flaunting their incredible wealth in the current recession.

    i think chad and the guys live it up. theyve made bank. they are certainly one of the most famous bands in the world. i used to be a fan. when i was an impressionable teen, in high school, i used to listen to the local modern rock/alt rock station, and thats when how you remind me and too bad came out.

    i think people especially in 2012 are weary and leery of anyone who flaunts wealth and "the good life". im not sure why the general populace dislikes that, but our generation has been raised and shown a clear picture of what a band is supposed to act like, from pearl jam, to nirvana, to fugazi, alot of the indie bands like the shins and death cab, decemberists, modest mouse, spoon, fleet foxes and the like, they make a good living and are all critically and commercially respected, but they live in portland, in modest houses, none are hanging out with groupies nor are their wild stories of any of these bands in their tour bus, or on tour. if any of them do drugs, its never been reported on by fans or the press. thats what a rock star is to most people in 2012. bands that would make an appearance on portlandia.

    and i think when bands dont fit that paradigm it makes people uncomfortable
  • pjradiopjradio Posts: 6,704
    ive always had a theory that the bands who you can tell want to be rock stars are despised by fans. i think thats what drives alot of the kings of leon hate. i think for whatever reason, our generation grew up with something pretty rare. a bunch of bands who shunned the spotlight, refused to give interviews, live in fairly modest homes, and arent out with groupies and living it up blowing money on drugs and gambling and a bentley and rolls. in fact maybe the most important musician of our generation killed himself, because the fame was too much for him. and it nearly took out ed.

    i think thats rare and unique. 40 years ago, you started a band to get rich, and to get girls. to be famous.

    I think people are fascinated by the lifestyle these people live, but when it gets too in your face or too blatant, kanye's another example, people are turned off by it. Just look at how alot of press reacted to the kanye and jayz album this summer. nearly every reviewer lambasted them for flaunting their incredible wealth in the current recession.

    i think chad and the guys live it up. theyve made bank. they are certainly one of the most famous bands in the world. i used to be a fan. when i was an impressionable teen, in high school, i used to listen to the local modern rock/alt rock station, and thats when how you remind me and too bad came out.

    i think people especially in 2012 are weary and leery of anyone who flaunts wealth and "the good life". im not sure why the general populace dislikes that, but our generation has been raised and shown a clear picture of what a band is supposed to act like, from pearl jam, to nirvana, to fugazi, alot of the indie bands like the shins and death cab, decemberists, modest mouse, spoon, fleet foxes and the like, they make a good living and are all critically and commercially respected, but they live in portland, in modest houses, none are hanging out with groupies nor are their wild stories of any of these bands in their tour bus, or on tour. if any of them do drugs, its never been reported on by fans or the press. thats what a rock star is to most people in 2012. bands that would make an appearance on portlandia.

    and i think when bands dont fit that paradigm it makes people uncomfortable
    Well said..VERY well said...I.was never a fan of them as an "impressionable teen"...too old for that. I just watched that dvd & thought it sounded pretty good...musically...not gonna buy a shirt, not gonna buy a poster, not gonna join the fan club. Just wondering why all the hate.
    Uninspiring, one dimensional, cock-rock. Not my bag.

    What does "one dimensional" mean anyway? Whatever....sounded good to me
    aqo2t.jpg
  • mookeywrenchmookeywrench Posts: 5,911
    lacking depth, samey, narrow scope, not dynamic.
    350x700px-LL-d2f49cb4_vinyl-needle-scu-e1356666258495.jpeg
  • pjradiopjradio Posts: 6,704
    lacking depth, samey, narrow scope, not dynamic, Uninspiring, one dimensional, cock-rock

    I'm guessing you do NOT like Nickelback

    well, who is/has:

    depth, anti-"samey", a WIDE scope, dynamic, INspiring, Multi-dimensional, Coc....errr...well, you got me on the "Cock-Rock" thing..
    aqo2t.jpg
  • uninnocent-uninnocent- Posts: 5,959
    You're not supposed to hate them. Everyone's allowed to like who they like. For me personally I can't get into their music, none of their songs really speak to me, and the band just doesn't have a sound I enjoy. To each his own.
  • mookeywrenchmookeywrench Posts: 5,911
    pjradio wrote:
    lacking depth, samey, narrow scope, not dynamic, Uninspiring, one dimensional, cock-rock

    I'm guessing you do NOT like Nickelback

    well, who is/has:

    depth, anti-"samey", a WIDE scope, dynamic, INspiring, Multi-dimensional, Coc....errr...well, you got me on the "Cock-Rock" thing..

    Wilco would be a quick answer, but there's plenty more out there.
    350x700px-LL-d2f49cb4_vinyl-needle-scu-e1356666258495.jpeg
  • josevolutionjosevolution Posts: 29,605
    I've never understood Hate being associated with music at all i mean noone can make you listen to anything that you don't wan't to listen to correct :?: ....I never say i Hate that music or this artist i just don't listen to that particular artist/band ....
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • normnorm Posts: 31,146
    I've never understood Hate being associated with music at all i mean noone can make you listen to anything that you don't wan't to listen to correct :?: ....I never say i Hate that music or this artist i just don't listen to that particular artist/band ....

    :clap::clap::clap::clap::clap:
  • normnorm Posts: 31,146
    i have heard nickleback before but i couldn't pick one of their songs if i was listening to it...one day i was listening to the lithium channel on sirius...i had it on for background music and wasn't really paying attention to what was playing...so this song is playing and it's starting to annoy me...so i looked at the display and it was a nickleback song...that has happened with other bands as well
  • djklambakedjklambake PHX, AZ Posts: 2,522
    My two cents.

    I don't like Nickelback. The only song of theirs I've ever enjoyed is "Far Away"... and that's primarily due to a cross-country trip that took 34 hours and listening to radio stations that played it no less than five times a day.

    Nickelback's music is shallow. It is rock music played to the lowest common denominator. There's no soul in any of their songs.

    The music that really resonates with me usually has some decent hooks, but even more, it has roots in deeper places than "Hey kids, wanna be a rock star?!" or "Y'know this world isn't nice sometimes, and it makes my band sad when we see sad people, so let's do our own version of We Are the World and remind people how sad we think things can be, but first I'm gonna finish this beer and sing a song for the Spider-Man soundtrack."

    I don't picture these guys ever having a hard time doing anything or struggling with something or living through something that we can all relate to. As time goes on and band evolve - so does the sound of the band. Nickelback's new stuff sounds like it could be from their first album. This band has not changed at all. I'm sure some fans think that's great, but not for people who thought they sucked in the first place. It's just more grist for the mill.

    Nickelback's music feels like the soundtrack to the current GOP race (and - i'm being serious here - I am deeply sorry if I offend any staunch Republicans with this statement, and I don't really want to turn this into a political rant) - it's as out of touch as Romney and Gingrich are with the American populace.

    This is just my own opinion about the band.

    I don't think it's fair to attack fans of Nickelback for liking them for whatever reason. A Nickelback song means something different to someone else. Maybe a song of theirs was enough inspiration to keep from committing suicide, or helped them get through a really rough break up or the divorce of their parents. Maybe a Nickelback song reminds them of better times - first dates, parties, old friends. Like I mentioned up front, I kind of like their song "Far Away" - but it reminds me of the long-ass trip it took for me to get back home to where I needed to be. If it wasn't for the trip and the incessant radio play, I'd have no connection to that song whatsoever. If you dig Nickelback, that's great. Life is short and fuck everyone else who says you ought to think otherwise.
    6/27/98 - East Troy, WI
    6/29/06 - Milwaukee, WI
    9/25/11 - Vancouver, BC
    11/4/12 - (Eddie Vedder) Phoenix, AZ
    11/1/13 - New Orleans, LA
    11/19/13 - Phoenix, AZ
    11/21/13 - San Diego, CA
    10/12/14 - Austin, TX
    10/22/14 - Denver, CO
    8/22/16 - Chicago, IL (Wrigley 2)
    5/9/22 - Glendale, AZ
    5/18/24 - Las Vegas, NV
  • pjradio wrote:
    ....why I should hate Nickleback?....I just watched the Nickleback Live @ Sturgis DVD & I have to say, they are a Really Tight Band...I know I'm gonna take some shit from this board but, I can't complain/bitch about them...They sounded really good!!!! Why all the hate?

    I don't like/dislike a band because of their tightness live or lack thereof. if the music speaks to me, it speaks to me. if you like Nickelback, more power to you.

    a buddy of mine who I no longer go to shows with (you'll see why) complained constantly after the Chili Pepper's show about the snare drum sounding too tinny for him to enjoy it.

    :?

    people like that ruin the experience.
    Gimli 1993
    Fargo 2003
    Winnipeg 2005
    Winnipeg 2011
    St. Paul 2014
  • people make/made fun of me for liking PJ, just as others make fun of people who like Nickelback. Back when PJ were big in the early 90's, there was a HUGE hatred for the "whiney rock" that they sang. it's really no different, whether we like to believe so or not.
    Gimli 1993
    Fargo 2003
    Winnipeg 2005
    Winnipeg 2011
    St. Paul 2014
  • It's funny though, everybody hates Nickelback yet they still sell records and concerts, so somebody out there obviously likes them. Are people just too ashamed to admit it now because so many people talk shit about them?
    * Cincinnati, OH 8.20.2000 *
    * Cincinnati, OH 6.24.2006 *
    * Columbus, OH 5.6.2010 * Noblesville, IN 5.7.2010 *
    * East Troy, MI 9.4.2011 * East Troy, MI 9.5.2011 *
    * Pittsburgh, PA 10.11.2013 *
  • I have over 3000 songs on my iPhone with lots of Bob, Neil, Joni, Ryan Adams, Pearl Jam, Led Zep, Beatles but also goodness knows how many artists in total. If I just pick "E" for example three artists in a row are Elvis Presley, Eminem and Emmylou Harris. I also have music from Nine Inch Nails through to Roy Orbison and even some Monty Python. For many artists I only have one or two songs because that is all I like of theirs, but they were worth including and hearing occasionally. I also have a separate iPod filled with Beethoven which I escape into every now and then.

    My point is that to me there are two types of music, music I like and music I don't. You need to make up your own mind. I regularly go through the forum here and that is how I became a big fan of Ryan Adams. At the same time I have listened to some other artists that are getting raved about and can't understand the fuss. Be guided by what's on here but not led because if you just follow everyone else you may miss out on some great (in your opinion) music from sources you don't expect.
    Now I'm livin' out here on the beach,
    but those seagulls are still out of reach.
  • It's funny though, everybody hates Nickelback yet they still sell records and concerts, so somebody out there obviously likes them. Are people just too ashamed to admit it now because so many people talk shit about them?

    nope. I know many people who like them (and Default and the like) and are fine about admitting it. they don't really think they are "admitting" anything. the same as I don't think I'm "admitting" that I love PJ.

    be proud of the music you love!
    Gimli 1993
    Fargo 2003
    Winnipeg 2005
    Winnipeg 2011
    St. Paul 2014
  • 12345AGNST112345AGNST1 Posts: 4,906
    They are the toyota camry of rock bands.

    They are a toaster in human form.

    Their songs are just as mass produced as that big mac you ate last tuesday.

    They have the soul and passion of a dead sheep.

    They have the creativity of a 60 year old right wing politician.

    They are puppets to the music industry.

    They are everything that is wrong with todays music and its industry.

    thats why.
    5/28/06, 6/27/08, 10/28/09, 5/18/10, 5/21/10
    8/7/08, 6/9/09
  • thefixer9thefixer9 Posts: 9,376
    I like some of their music...I admit it. Nothing wrong with that!
    Tres Mts- 3/16/2011
    Eddie Vedder- 7/16/11
    Brad- 4/21/12 (RSD Performance), 4/27/12, 8/10/12
    Flight To Mars- 5/23/12
    RNDM- 11/27/12

    PEARL JAM- 12/6/13 I have finally seen Pearl Jam live!
  • i think people, who arent teenyboppers generally dislike, or claim to dislike hooky, poppy music. theres no denying songs like far away, or how you remind me are catchy as hell. and that certainly takes some talent, to make and craft a song that gets stuck in peoples heads. its an art.

    im sticking by what i said before, u2, kings of leon, nickelback. all these bands seem to be hated for various reasons, but all are among the most popular bands in the world, and all write and craft catchy as hell songs.

    I think generally people are embarassed to admit liking pop music once they reach college years. high school is all about fitting in, and that usually means listening to bands popular at the school or popular with friends, not seeking out adventurous sounds.

    pop music is looked at as a lesser art form. and i think thats unfair.

    im not a listener or fan of nickelback, but i dont think its just as simple as "they are disliked because their music is trash". there are deeper reasons. they are a multimillion dollar selling band, they are rock stars in every sense of the word and flaunt it, the songs arent experimental and as has been said, their formula has pretty much stayed the same for over a decade, the hard rocker songs and the sensitive ballad songs coexist peacefully. and the lyrics are viewed as not addressing much beyond relationships. And they write songs that are popular on top 40 stations
  • keeponrockinkeeponrockin Posts: 7,446
    One dimensional with terrible lyrics. No depth to the lyrics, very 'what you see is what you get'...

    They're my girlfriend's favourite band.
    Believe me, when I was growin up, I thought the worst thing you could turn out to be was normal, So I say freaks in the most complementary way. Here's a song by a fellow freak - E.V
  • One dimensional with terrible lyrics. No depth to the lyrics, very 'what you see is what you get'...

    They're my girlfriend's favourite band.

    if I wanted to compare them, I'd say they are Motley Crue without the hair and makeup.
    Gimli 1993
    Fargo 2003
    Winnipeg 2005
    Winnipeg 2011
    St. Paul 2014
  • DewieCoxDewieCox Posts: 11,429
    Their music is repetitive and in a style that I think is annoying and conducive to boredom. Mostly, I think it's a combination everything on that list that somebody put earlier in this thread. The sort of bands that they've helped allow on the airwaves by way of their success is another thing I have against them....5 Finger Douche Punch(and their horrid cover of Bad Company) and Theory of a Dead Man are probably even worse. And not that 3 Doors Down was ever great to begin with, but I found them much less offensive till they took on alot of Nickelback qualities.

    Another thing I once read a "60 Minutes" in a Guitar World magazine done by the singer, where he picked an hour of his favorite music.....Under one song by Metallica or Pantera, don't remember which, he wrote "when I sit down to write a riff I think one of 2 things...Hetfield or Dimbebag" I just have to ask, what the hell is he hearing when he listens to those bands that is comparable to the stuff he writes? He's either a poser or has the inability to differentiate between virtually any style of music...He may as well have said Bob Hope and Lindsay Lohan in Freaky Friday.


    I don't totally subscribe to the "they're so hated b/c they're so loved" argument either. The other bands mentioned that are like that(U2, KoL) also have other really annoying things about them and still aren't viewed as nearly the joke that Nickelback are. There's plenty of hugely successful bands that have gotten or get overplayed that don't have the backlash that they have.
  • mookeywrenchmookeywrench Posts: 5,911
    DewieCox wrote:
    Their music is repetitive and in a style that I think is annoying and conducive to boredom.

    Yup, there's just nothing interesting about them good or bad. Complete middle of the road mediocrity.
    350x700px-LL-d2f49cb4_vinyl-needle-scu-e1356666258495.jpeg
  • One dimensional with terrible lyrics. No depth to the lyrics, very 'what you see is what you get'...

    They're my girlfriend's favourite band.

    if I wanted to compare them, I'd say they are Motley Crue without the hair and makeup.

    I disagree - Motley Crue was at least entertaining if nothing else. Nickelback is boring as hell.
  • Drowned OutDrowned Out Posts: 6,056
    One dimensional with terrible lyrics. No depth to the lyrics, very 'what you see is what you get'...

    They're my girlfriend's favourite band.

    if I wanted to compare them, I'd say they are Motley Crue without the hair and makeup.

    I disagree - Motley Crue was at least entertaining if nothing else. Nickelback is boring as hell.
    Motley Crue were leaders, trendsetters in their genre. If you don't like the genre, you don't like Crue. They borrowed from a few influences to create something relatively new (or at least new to the commercial market)....
    Nickelback rode the second wave of grunge wannabe's...they immitated the sound of bands who were immitating the sound of other bands....derivative of a derivative....zero innovation, zero originality. It's the same argument that I came up with to justify why I defend AC/DC against accusations of being one-dimensional, while not defending Nickelback for the same.

    That said...I do find myself turning the radio up to some of their more upbeat songs while driving...IF I'm in a really good mood and feel like doing ironic rockstar fist pumps.

    If you really need a reason to hate Nickelback, here it is:

    Harper_nickelback.jpg
  • DewieCoxDewieCox Posts: 11,429
    One dimensional with terrible lyrics. No depth to the lyrics, very 'what you see is what you get'...

    They're my girlfriend's favourite band.

    if I wanted to compare them, I'd say they are Motley Crue without the hair and makeup.

    I disagree - Motley Crue was at least entertaining if nothing else. Nickelback is boring as hell.

    And MC could play the hell outta their instruments.
  • It's rock music for people who don't particularly like rock music. The only thing they've got going for them is that they know how to write really catchy songs. But it's all cliched, unimaginative and soulless.

    I'm listening to Mark Lanegan's new record as I type this - now this is a real artist. He knows he's not going to sell millions of copies, yet you can tell he's put an incredible amount of thought and effort into creating these songs. Nickelback on the other hand have been peddling the same tired music for years - boring, cliched lyrics, big cheesy chorus - sung by a guy who's trying to mimic the vocal stylings of the Seattle/90's vocalists before him - people who actually had something to say.

    I don't hate them, I just think their music is boring and lazy.
Sign In or Register to comment.