Dems propose 'Reasonable Profits Board' to regulate oil comp

WaveCameCrashinWaveCameCrashin Posts: 2,929
edited January 2012 in A Moving Train
Dems propose 'Reasonable Profits Board' to regulate oil company profits


http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/h ... ny-profits



By Pete Kasperowicz - 01/19/12 10:20 AM ET




Six House Democrats, led by Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio), want to set up a "Reasonable Profits Board" to control gas profits. 

The Democrats, worried about higher gas prices, want to set up a board that would apply a "windfall profit tax" as high as 100 percent on the sale of oil and gas, according to their legislation. The bill provides no specific guidance for how the board would determine what constitutes a reasonable profit. 

The Gas Price Spike Act, H.R. 3784, would apply a windfall tax on the sale of oil and gas that ranges from 50 percent to 100 percent on all surplus earnings exceeding "a reasonable profit." It would set up a Reasonable Profits Board made up of three presidential nominees that will serve three-year terms. Unlike other bills setting up advisory boards, the Reasonable Profits Board would not be made up of any nominees from Congress.

The bill would also seem to exclude industry representatives from the board, as it says members "shall have no financial interests in any of the businesses for which reasonable profits are determined by the Board."
According to the bill, a windfall tax of 50 percent would be applied when the sale of oil or gas leads to a profit of between 100 percent and 102 percent of a reasonable profit. The windfall tax would jump to 75 percent when the profit is between 102 and 105 percent of a reasonable profit, and above that, the windfall tax would be 100 percent. The bill also specifies that the oil-and-gas companies, as the seller, would have to pay this tax.

Kucinich said these tax revenues would be used to fund alternative transportation programs when oil-and-gas prices spike.

"Gas prices continue to rise, creating a hardship for the American people," he said. "At the same time, oil companies are making record profits gouging their customers. This bill would tax only the excess profits and create forward-thinking transportation alternatives."

Specifically, he said the money would be used to fund a tax credit on the purchase of fuel-efficient cars and set up a grant program for mass transit programs when oil-and-gas prices are high.

The bill does not estimate the size of these grants or the amount of money that might be collected through the tax. 

Co-sponsoring the bill are five other Democrats: Reps. John Conyers Jr. (Mich.), Bob Filner (Calif.), Marcia Fudge (Ohio), Jim Langevin (R.I.), and Lynn Woolsey (Calif.).
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • cincybearcatcincybearcat Posts: 16,495
    And so it begins.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • peacefrompaulpeacefrompaul Posts: 25,293
    booooo
  • markin ballmarkin ball Posts: 1,075
    My gut reaction was that this was bad because I don't like the precedent it sets regarding telling someone how much money they can make. But then I remembered that oil and gas prices are not exactly a result of "free market" forces anyway, so, maybe what's good for the goose...turnabout is fair play...tit for tat...I'll show you mine if you show me your's...etc.

    Whether market regulations are good or not in the end, I can't tell you, but what seems to be true is that as soon as you introduce the first law, regulation, manipulation, or "correction" into a system, you'r gong to need more laws, regulations, manipulations andcorrections to balance it somewhere, and the spiral begins.
    "First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win ."

    "With our thoughts we make the world"
  • Straight out of Atlas Shrugged
Sign In or Register to comment.