Home› A Moving Train

worst bunch of candidates EVER??

WobbieWobbie Posts: 30,438
edited December 2011 in A Moving Train
The republicans have had mental midget perry, womanizer cain, corrupt newt and flip flopper mitt trading places as their "front runners." IMO, only mitt is even marginally electable....and the dems will kill him on his position changes and the more conservative republicans don't like him either.

the best republican candidate is jon huntsman....and he's polling at about 1%.

really? this is the best we can do??
If I had known then what I know now...

Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14
Philly I & II, 16
Denver 22
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • Electric_DeltaElectric_Delta Posts: 977
    No, Herman Cain is the best they can do, and he's being smeared Soviet-style as a result.

    I wouldn't worry too much, though, if I were a liberal. Mitt Romney will be elected and the Bush1-Clinton-Bush2-Obama agenda will continue without exception.
    Bristow, VA (5/13/10)
  • mikepegg44mikepegg44 Posts: 3,353
    imalive wrote:
    The republicans have had mental midget perry, womanizer cain, corrupt newt and flip flopper mitt trading places as their "front runners." IMO, only mitt is even marginally electable....and the dems will kill him on his position changes and the more conservative republicans don't like him either.

    the best republican candidate is jon huntsman....and he's polling at about 1%.

    really? this is the best we can do??

    the best republican candidate is Ron Paul :)

    huntsman is really interesting though...i think the low poll numbers for him, gary johnson, and ron paul show that republicans aren't that interested in actually being conservative, rather they are more interested in sounding conservative
    that’s right! Can’t we all just get together and focus on our real enemies: monogamous gays and stem cells… - Ned Flanders
    It is terrifying when you are too stupid to know who is dumb
    - Joe Rogan
  • WobbieWobbie Posts: 30,438
    Electric_Delta wrote:
    No, Herman Cain is the best they can do, and he's being smeared Soviet-style as a result.

    I wouldn't worry too much, though, if I were a liberal. Mitt Romney will be elected and the Bush1-Clinton-Bush2-Obama agenda will continue without exception.

    I don't think Mitt can win.....even with his good hair ;)
    mikepegg44 wrote:

    the best republican candidate is Ron Paul :)

    huntsman is really interesting though...i think the low poll numbers for him, gary johnson, and ron paul show that republicans aren't that interested in actually being conservative, rather they are more interested in sounding conservative

    you may be right, but he'll never get the nomination.
    If I had known then what I know now...

    Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
    VIC 07
    EV LA1 08
    Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
    Columbus 10
    EV LA 11
    Vancouver 11
    Missoula 12
    Portland 13, Spokane 13
    St. Paul 14, Denver 14
    Philly I & II, 16
    Denver 22
  • Who PrincessWho Princess out here in the fields Posts: 7,305
    imalive wrote:
    The republicans have had mental midget perry, womanizer cain, corrupt newt and flip flopper mitt trading places as their "front runners." IMO, only mitt is even marginally electable....and the dems will kill him on his position changes and the more conservative republicans don't like him either.

    the best republican candidate is jon huntsman....and he's polling at about 1%.

    really? this is the best we can do??
    I think the options in 2008 were pretty ho hum as well, other than there were Dems thrown into the mix. I used to really enjoy politics, now it just makes me tired.
    "The stars are all connected to the brain."
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    it has been entertaining to say the least. i am convinced that the smart people don't run for office, they get hired on as advisors.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • mikepegg44mikepegg44 Posts: 3,353
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    it has been entertaining to say the least. i am convinced that the smart people don't run for office, they get hired on as advisors.


    I think you just called Sarah Palin smart :lol:
    that’s right! Can’t we all just get together and focus on our real enemies: monogamous gays and stem cells… - Ned Flanders
    It is terrifying when you are too stupid to know who is dumb
    - Joe Rogan
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    mikepegg44 wrote:
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    it has been entertaining to say the least. i am convinced that the smart people don't run for office, they get hired on as advisors.


    I think you just called Sarah Palin smart :lol:
    no she is a talking head and media whore, not an advisor :lol:

    what would she advise? how to leave your office early at the first signs of investigation? :lol:
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • Jason PJason P Posts: 19,156
    I'd say the Democratic 2004 presidential candidates were even worse. Even Herman Cain can't touch the scum-baggery of John Edwards. Kerry was the best-of-the-best and he got beat by an unpopular George W. Bush.

    Whoever wins the republican nomination (Romney) can use the economy to bash Obama and stands a fair chance to beat him. Obama vs. Romney would be interesting although the GOP would have to ignore the healthcare issue which is like a pitcher losing his curveball.
    Be Excellent To Each Other
    Party On, Dudes!
  • mikepegg44mikepegg44 Posts: 3,353
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    mikepegg44 wrote:
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    it has been entertaining to say the least. i am convinced that the smart people don't run for office, they get hired on as advisors.


    I think you just called Sarah Palin smart :lol:
    no she is a talking head and media whore, not an advisor :lol:

    what would she advise? how to leave your office early at the first signs of investigation? :lol:


    probably the best advice any of these people could take!!
    that’s right! Can’t we all just get together and focus on our real enemies: monogamous gays and stem cells… - Ned Flanders
    It is terrifying when you are too stupid to know who is dumb
    - Joe Rogan
  • JeanwahJeanwah Posts: 6,363
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    it has been entertaining to say the least. i am convinced that the smart people don't run for office, they get hired on as advisors.
    Are you calling Karl Rove smart?? Well, perhaps he is, but.... :?
  • mikepegg44mikepegg44 Posts: 3,353
    Jason P wrote:
    I'd say the Democratic 2004 presidential candidates were even worse. Even Herman Cain can't touch the scum-baggery of John Edwards. Kerry was the best-of-the-best and he got beat by an unpopular George W. Bush.

    Whoever wins the republican nomination (Romney) can use the economy to bash Obama and stands a fair chance to beat him. Obama vs. Romney would be interesting although the GOP would have to ignore the healthcare issue which is like a pitcher losing his curveball.


    not really ignore it...they would just change the issue to a state's rights thing. which isn't nearly as strong an argument because most people don't care about it
    that’s right! Can’t we all just get together and focus on our real enemies: monogamous gays and stem cells… - Ned Flanders
    It is terrifying when you are too stupid to know who is dumb
    - Joe Rogan
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    Jeanwah wrote:
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    it has been entertaining to say the least. i am convinced that the smart people don't run for office, they get hired on as advisors.
    Are you calling Karl Rove smart?? Well, perhaps he is, but.... :?
    karl rove has been a political genius for a long time. he was what they call a "kingmaker".
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    My belief is that Mitt Romney is the only candidate that has a chance of beating President Obama in the General Election. But, right now... The Republican party has to deal with their own demons, The Tea Party and the Christian Coalition (which are similar, to a point). That is why the slew of Republican Candidates are all over the map.
    Come time for the Republican convention... their electorate will vote for Romney.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • Halifax2TheMaxHalifax2TheMax Posts: 39,545
    Jeanwah wrote:
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    it has been entertaining to say the least. i am convinced that the smart people don't run for office, they get hired on as advisors.
    Are you calling Karl Rove smart?? Well, perhaps he is, but.... :?

    Don't you mean "TurdBlossom"? :lol::lol::lol:
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • ledveddermanledvedderman Posts: 7,761
    Karl Rove IS a political genius. I hate his guts, but that man knows POLITICS, not POLICY.
    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
  • Go BeaversGo Beavers Posts: 9,192
    Electric_Delta wrote:
    No, Herman Cain is the best they can do, and he's being smeared Soviet-style as a result.

    I wouldn't worry too much, though, if I were a liberal. Mitt Romney will be elected and the Bush1-Clinton-Bush2-Obama agenda will continue without exception.

    Why so confident Mitt will get elected?
  • WobbieWobbie Posts: 30,438
    Go Beavers wrote:
    Electric_Delta wrote:
    No, Herman Cain is the best they can do, and he's being smeared Soviet-style as a result.

    I wouldn't worry too much, though, if I were a liberal. Mitt Romney will be elected and the Bush1-Clinton-Bush2-Obama agenda will continue without exception.

    Why so confident Mitt will get elected?
    I don't thnk mitt can win....his own party doesn't really like him....and, then, there's that "mormon thing"
    If I had known then what I know now...

    Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
    VIC 07
    EV LA1 08
    Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
    Columbus 10
    EV LA 11
    Vancouver 11
    Missoula 12
    Portland 13, Spokane 13
    St. Paul 14, Denver 14
    Philly I & II, 16
    Denver 22
  • Go BeaversGo Beavers Posts: 9,192
    imalive wrote:
    .and, then, there's that "mormon thing"

    Not that there's anything wrong with it :lol:
  • WobbieWobbie Posts: 30,438
    Go Beavers wrote:
    imalive wrote:
    .and, then, there's that "mormon thing"

    Not that there's anything wrong with it :lol:
    well....there kinda is. I live amongst them :lol:
    If I had known then what I know now...

    Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
    VIC 07
    EV LA1 08
    Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
    Columbus 10
    EV LA 11
    Vancouver 11
    Missoula 12
    Portland 13, Spokane 13
    St. Paul 14, Denver 14
    Philly I & II, 16
    Denver 22
  • Electric_DeltaElectric_Delta Posts: 977
    Go Beavers wrote:
    Electric_Delta wrote:
    No, Herman Cain is the best they can do, and he's being smeared Soviet-style as a result.

    I wouldn't worry too much, though, if I were a liberal. Mitt Romney will be elected and the Bush1-Clinton-Bush2-Obama agenda will continue without exception.

    Why so confident Mitt will get elected?

    I am a believer in the idea of how the media will ultimately pick the candidate by swaying popular opinion. Things come out about presidential candidates that would NEVER come out if they were seeking a lesser political appointment. Politics are dirty as hell at this level. People on your side of the aisle tear you apart...whether their accusations are true or not.

    Aside from cynicism influencing my belief, I believe independents will decide this election. The hardline conservatives, for the most part, will unite behind the GOP pick out of their sheer hatred for Barack Obama. I do not believe the stories about the Tea Party witholding it's support at large for a progressive like Mitt Romney. They will still show up. The independents (and undecided Dems and Republicans) will rally behind his positions easier than a Michelle Bachmann because the biggest voting block of this nation is still center. Maybe slightly center right, but that's debatable.

    I would maintain the position that Barack Obama won in 2008 because his message SEEMED good for the economy and John McCain did nothing to distance himself from George W. Bush, but that's probably because he was no different in the first place.
    Bristow, VA (5/13/10)
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    Electric_Delta wrote:
    I am a believer in the idea of how the media will ultimately pick the candidate by swaying popular opinion. Things come out about presidential candidates that would NEVER come out if they were seeking a lesser political appointment. Politics are dirty as hell at this level. People on your side of the aisle tear you apart...whether their accusations are true or not.

    Aside from cynicism influencing my belief, I believe independents will decide this election. The hardline conservatives, for the most part, will unite behind the GOP pick out of their sheer hatred for Barack Obama. I do not believe the stories about the Tea Party witholding it's support at large for a progressive like Mitt Romney. They will still show up. The independents (and undecided Dems and Republicans) will rally behind his positions easier than a Michelle Bachmann because the biggest voting block of this nation is still center. Maybe slightly center right, but that's debatable.

    I would maintain the position that Barack Obama won in 2008 because his message SEEMED good for the economy and John McCain did nothing to distance himself from George W. Bush, but that's probably because he was no different in the first place.
    ...
    It's the political parties that will decide who runs. The Republicans are worried most about someone like Ron Paul running as an Independent because they remember what Perot did to them in 1992.
    Right now... it's time to play to the Republican base.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • Electric_DeltaElectric_Delta Posts: 977
    Cosmo wrote:
    Electric_Delta wrote:
    I am a believer in the idea of how the media will ultimately pick the candidate by swaying popular opinion. Things come out about presidential candidates that would NEVER come out if they were seeking a lesser political appointment. Politics are dirty as hell at this level. People on your side of the aisle tear you apart...whether their accusations are true or not.

    Aside from cynicism influencing my belief, I believe independents will decide this election. The hardline conservatives, for the most part, will unite behind the GOP pick out of their sheer hatred for Barack Obama. I do not believe the stories about the Tea Party witholding it's support at large for a progressive like Mitt Romney. They will still show up. The independents (and undecided Dems and Republicans) will rally behind his positions easier than a Michelle Bachmann because the biggest voting block of this nation is still center. Maybe slightly center right, but that's debatable.

    I would maintain the position that Barack Obama won in 2008 because his message SEEMED good for the economy and John McCain did nothing to distance himself from George W. Bush, but that's probably because he was no different in the first place.
    ...
    It's the political parties that will decide who runs. The Republicans are worried most about someone like Ron Paul running as an Independent because they remember what Perot did to them in 1992.
    Right now... it's time to play to the Republican base.

    I see no clear distinction between the media and the actual party establishments themselves. It's all one single, horrible, liberty-killing juggernaut.

    The Republicans are no longer Conservative at all. Hence, their decision to prop up a Mitt Romney or a Newt Gingrich.
    Bristow, VA (5/13/10)
  • WobbieWobbie Posts: 30,438
    and now, trump is getting involved :roll: .

    fuck me.
    If I had known then what I know now...

    Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
    VIC 07
    EV LA1 08
    Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
    Columbus 10
    EV LA 11
    Vancouver 11
    Missoula 12
    Portland 13, Spokane 13
    St. Paul 14, Denver 14
    Philly I & II, 16
    Denver 22
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    imalive wrote:
    and now, trump is getting involved :roll: .

    fuck me.
    ...
    ... and the carnival ride continues.
    ...
    ADD: A Presidential Candidate... that is moderated by Donald Trump?
    Come on... not even the writers of 'The Hangover' could have come up with something this crazy.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • LikeAnOceanLikeAnOcean Posts: 7,718
    They're definitely no George W. :lol:
  • Better DanBetter Dan Posts: 5,684
    What is the deal with the republican candidates and Trump? Thtat guy is a joke!
    2003: San Antonio, Houston, Dallas, Seattle; 2005: Monterrey; 2006: Chicago 1 & 2, Grand Rapids, Cleveland, Detroit; 2008: West Palm Beach, Tampa; 2009: Austin, LA 3 & 4, San Diego; 2010: Kansas City, St. Louis, Columbus, Indianapolis; 2011: PJ20 1 & 2; 2012: Missoula; 2013: Dallas, Oklahoma City, Seattle; 2014: Tulsa; 2016: Columbia, New York City 1 & 2; 2018: London, Seattle 1 & 2; 2021: Ohana; 2022: Oklahoma City
  • WobbieWobbie Posts: 30,438
    Better Dan wrote:
    What is the deal with the republican candidates and Trump? Thtat guy is a joke!
    he is a joke......but, sadly, not to everyone. Some people think he would make a good president. That's how fucked up our system has become.
    If I had known then what I know now...

    Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
    VIC 07
    EV LA1 08
    Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
    Columbus 10
    EV LA 11
    Vancouver 11
    Missoula 12
    Portland 13, Spokane 13
    St. Paul 14, Denver 14
    Philly I & II, 16
    Denver 22
  • CallawayCallaway Posts: 635
    You could say that about every republican candidate for any office any year. They try to hold the middle class and poor down the entire time they hold the office and try to make their friends as many millions as possible. They also have this thing where they think they should decide who a person should be attracted to and try to tell woman what to do with there bodies....just to name a few.
  • WobbieWobbie Posts: 30,438
    Wink wrote:
    You could say that about every republican candidate for any office any year. They try to hold the middle class and poor down the entire time they hold the office and try to make their friends as many millions as possible. They also have this thing where they think they should decide who a person should be attracted to and try to tell woman what to do with there bodies....just to name a few.
    not EVERY republican candidate......only the ones who can "speak to the base" and get the nomination :x
    If I had known then what I know now...

    Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
    VIC 07
    EV LA1 08
    Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
    Columbus 10
    EV LA 11
    Vancouver 11
    Missoula 12
    Portland 13, Spokane 13
    St. Paul 14, Denver 14
    Philly I & II, 16
    Denver 22
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    Better Dan wrote:
    What is the deal with the republican candidates and Trump? That guy is a joke!
    ...
    I heard that after the Donald Trump moderated debate... the winner has to marry one of the Kardashian sisters.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
Sign In or Register to comment.