2025-2026 NHL Offseason

Options
1406407409411412485

Comments

  • Elimination game Vasy is automatic. Like 2004-2007 era Federer, forget about it, don't even bother playing haha.

    (2000) Mansfield I, Mansfield II (2003) Montreal (2005) Montreal, Ottawa (2006) Albany (2008) Montreal I + II (EV) (2022) Québec City


  • pjhawks
    pjhawks Posts: 12,907
    If the Lightning win it all again it's one of the most impressive feats in sports in a long long time. They will have basically won 3 cups in like 20 months since the 1st one was in Sept. of 2020.
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,542
    pjhawks said:
    If the Lightning win it all again it's one of the most impressive feats in sports in a long long time. They will have basically won 3 cups in like 20 months since the 1st one was in Sept. of 2020.
    Dynasty! 
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    Lightning are killers
  • Johnny Abruzzo
    Johnny Abruzzo Philly Posts: 12,352
    Happy the Panthers lost. They practically ruined hockey in 1996 and yeah I still hold a grudge.
    Spectrum 10/27/09; New Orleans JazzFest 5/1/10; Made in America 9/2/12; Phila, PA 10/21/13; Phila,  PA 10/22/13; Baltimore Arena 10/27/13; Phila, PA 4/28/16; Phila, PA 4/29/16; Fenway Park 8/7/16; Fenway Park 9/2/18; Asbury Park 9/18/21; Camden 9/14/22; Las Vegas 5/16/24; Las Vegas 5/18/24; Phila, PA 9/7/24; Phila, PA 9/9/24; Baltimore Arena 9/12/24; Pittsburgh 5/16/25; Pittsburgh 5/18/25

    Tres Mtns - TLA 3/23/11; EV - Tower Theatre 6/25/11; Temple of the Dog - Tower Theatre 11/5/16
  • mpedone
    mpedone 540xxx - Manchester, NH Posts: 1,961
    pjhawks said:
    If the Lightning win it all again it's one of the most impressive feats in sports in a long long time. They will have basically won 3 cups in like 20 months since the 1st one was in Sept. of 2020.

    And Pat *ing Maroon will cap off a run of 4 in a row. Dude's now won 14 consecutive playoff series.
    "I'm a lucky man, to count on both hands the [shows I've done]. Some folks just have one, others they got none..."

    Hartford 10.02.96 | Mansfield 2 09.16.98 | Mansfield 1 08.29.00 | Mansfield 1 07.02.03 | Mansfield 3 07.11.03 | Boston 2 05.25.06 | Tampa 04.11.16 | Fenway 1 08.05.16 | Fenway 2 08.07.16 | Fenway 1 09.02.18 | Fenway 2 09.04.18 | Baltimore 03.28.20 | Hamilton 09.06.22 | Toronto 09.08.22 | Nashville 09.16.22 | St Louis 09.18.22 | Baltimore 09.12.24 | Fenway 1 09.15.24 | Fenway 2 09.17.24

    "He made the deal with the devil, we get to play with him.
    He goes to hell, of course. We're going to heaven."
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    mpedone said:
    pjhawks said:
    If the Lightning win it all again it's one of the most impressive feats in sports in a long long time. They will have basically won 3 cups in like 20 months since the 1st one was in Sept. of 2020.

    And Pat *ing Maroon will cap off a run of 4 in a row. Dude's now won 14 consecutive playoff series.
    And scored the winning goal last night. 
  • mpedone
    mpedone 540xxx - Manchester, NH Posts: 1,961
    mrussel1 said:
    mpedone said:
    pjhawks said:
    If the Lightning win it all again it's one of the most impressive feats in sports in a long long time. They will have basically won 3 cups in like 20 months since the 1st one was in Sept. of 2020.

    And Pat *ing Maroon will cap off a run of 4 in a row. Dude's now won 14 consecutive playoff series.
    And scored the winning goal last night. 
    And a beauty, too! Well, not so much a beautiful goal as a heads up play to both not interfere with Bobrovsky and to hit the puck below the crossbar. He got some luck, but that's just Pat Maroon. It will be interesting to see if the Pat Maroon Magic is enough to overcome the Corey Perry Curse (I know he has a Cup, but if they make the finals, we'll either see a guy win 4 in a row, or a guy lose 3 in a row).
    "I'm a lucky man, to count on both hands the [shows I've done]. Some folks just have one, others they got none..."

    Hartford 10.02.96 | Mansfield 2 09.16.98 | Mansfield 1 08.29.00 | Mansfield 1 07.02.03 | Mansfield 3 07.11.03 | Boston 2 05.25.06 | Tampa 04.11.16 | Fenway 1 08.05.16 | Fenway 2 08.07.16 | Fenway 1 09.02.18 | Fenway 2 09.04.18 | Baltimore 03.28.20 | Hamilton 09.06.22 | Toronto 09.08.22 | Nashville 09.16.22 | St Louis 09.18.22 | Baltimore 09.12.24 | Fenway 1 09.15.24 | Fenway 2 09.17.24

    "He made the deal with the devil, we get to play with him.
    He goes to hell, of course. We're going to heaven."
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,449
    why are people so upset about Kadri's "I can't hear you" taunt to the crowd? the guy and his family have been getting racist threats and Ron McLean decides to blame Kadri for taunting "an already hostile crowd"? really?
    Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall




  • a5pj
    a5pj Hershey PA Posts: 3,975
    why are people so upset about Kadri's "I can't hear you" taunt to the crowd? the guy and his family have been getting racist threats and Ron McLean decides to blame Kadri for taunting "an already hostile crowd"? really?
    Don't know much about this situation, but I always felt that taunting the crowd was in poor taste.
    Racist threats, no place for them anywhere...
    Wouldn't it be funny if the world ended in 2010, with lots of fire?



  • mpedone
    mpedone 540xxx - Manchester, NH Posts: 1,961
    why are people so upset about Kadri's "I can't hear you" taunt to the crowd? the guy and his family have been getting racist threats and Ron McLean decides to blame Kadri for taunting "an already hostile crowd"? really?
    Even had there been no racist/threatening tweets, you boo a guy every time he touches the puck because of an unfortunate play, he's going to respond. Given everything else (including Blues players targeting him all game), McLean should be praising Kadri for his restraint.
    "I'm a lucky man, to count on both hands the [shows I've done]. Some folks just have one, others they got none..."

    Hartford 10.02.96 | Mansfield 2 09.16.98 | Mansfield 1 08.29.00 | Mansfield 1 07.02.03 | Mansfield 3 07.11.03 | Boston 2 05.25.06 | Tampa 04.11.16 | Fenway 1 08.05.16 | Fenway 2 08.07.16 | Fenway 1 09.02.18 | Fenway 2 09.04.18 | Baltimore 03.28.20 | Hamilton 09.06.22 | Toronto 09.08.22 | Nashville 09.16.22 | St Louis 09.18.22 | Baltimore 09.12.24 | Fenway 1 09.15.24 | Fenway 2 09.17.24

    "He made the deal with the devil, we get to play with him.
    He goes to hell, of course. We're going to heaven."
  • nautical_disaster
    nautical_disaster Posts: 348
    edited May 2022
    I have no idea what will happen in that series. They both got out of the first round after years of disappointing results. They will both want to take advantage of this opportunity. I prefer the flames goaltending in this one, so you might be right!
    This didn't age well lol. What's funny is that Smith has been solid in the series. Mostly. The times where he wasn't (game 1 and that hilarious 3rd goal last night)...he really wasn't. The Pat Maroon series stat is insane.

    (2000) Mansfield I, Mansfield II (2003) Montreal (2005) Montreal, Ottawa (2006) Albany (2008) Montreal I + II (EV) (2022) Québec City


  • F Me In The Brain
    F Me In The Brain this knows everybody from other commets Posts: 31,800
    Yeah I thought Calgary would thrash Edmonton. 
    Wrong!!!
    The love he receives is the love that is saved
  • pjhawks
    pjhawks Posts: 12,907
    This Calgary Edmonton series is wild.  Fastest 4 goals in nhl playoff history tonight,  4 goals in just over a minute.  Nuts 
  • I'm no hockey expert, but I don't know how you can call that a "no goal"

    (2000) Mansfield I, Mansfield II (2003) Montreal (2005) Montreal, Ottawa (2006) Albany (2008) Montreal I + II (EV) (2022) Québec City


  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    I'm no hockey expert, but I don't know how you can call that a "no goal"
    Do you mean Coleman's kick? 

    I think it probably was,  but I don't think the evidence was clear enough.  I feel like Toronto is really taking liberties and making decisions based on what it thinks happened rather than what the evidence clearly shows.   In game 4 of the lighting panthers series, they called back a goal because they said it went into the mesh right before.  It probably did,  but you NEVER saw it.  And it wasn't called on the ice.  Very different than football reviews. 
  • Yeah that's my problem with it, the evidence is shaky at best. If he's not making that motion with his skate AKA stopping, he's flying into the net. And i'm saying this as a neutral fan that has no stakes in Calgary or Edmonton.

    (2000) Mansfield I, Mansfield II (2003) Montreal (2005) Montreal, Ottawa (2006) Albany (2008) Montreal I + II (EV) (2022) Québec City


  • mpedone
    mpedone 540xxx - Manchester, NH Posts: 1,961
    mrussel1 said:
    I'm no hockey expert, but I don't know how you can call that a "no goal"
    Do you mean Coleman's kick? 

    I think it probably was,  but I don't think the evidence was clear enough.  I feel like Toronto is really taking liberties and making decisions based on what it thinks happened rather than what the evidence clearly shows.   In game 4 of the lighting panthers series, they called back a goal because they said it went into the mesh right before.  It probably did,  but you NEVER saw it.  And it wasn't called on the ice.  Very different than football reviews. 
    That call was odd. I do wonder if Toronto has access to other camera angles; I'm 99% sure it hit the netting just based on Palat's body language, but that's not conclusive evidence. Part of me also wonders if someone making these decisions is too worried about backlash; it's almost as if they've been instructed that if it's close, just call the play back. It doesn't make sense (as you then get outrage from the other side), but then again, neither do some of these calls.
    "I'm a lucky man, to count on both hands the [shows I've done]. Some folks just have one, others they got none..."

    Hartford 10.02.96 | Mansfield 2 09.16.98 | Mansfield 1 08.29.00 | Mansfield 1 07.02.03 | Mansfield 3 07.11.03 | Boston 2 05.25.06 | Tampa 04.11.16 | Fenway 1 08.05.16 | Fenway 2 08.07.16 | Fenway 1 09.02.18 | Fenway 2 09.04.18 | Baltimore 03.28.20 | Hamilton 09.06.22 | Toronto 09.08.22 | Nashville 09.16.22 | St Louis 09.18.22 | Baltimore 09.12.24 | Fenway 1 09.15.24 | Fenway 2 09.17.24

    "He made the deal with the devil, we get to play with him.
    He goes to hell, of course. We're going to heaven."
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    mpedone said:
    mrussel1 said:
    I'm no hockey expert, but I don't know how you can call that a "no goal"
    Do you mean Coleman's kick? 

    I think it probably was,  but I don't think the evidence was clear enough.  I feel like Toronto is really taking liberties and making decisions based on what it thinks happened rather than what the evidence clearly shows.   In game 4 of the lighting panthers series, they called back a goal because they said it went into the mesh right before.  It probably did,  but you NEVER saw it.  And it wasn't called on the ice.  Very different than football reviews. 
    That call was odd. I do wonder if Toronto has access to other camera angles; I'm 99% sure it hit the netting just based on Palat's body language, but that's not conclusive evidence. Part of me also wonders if someone making these decisions is too worried about backlash; it's almost as if they've been instructed that if it's close, just call the play back. It doesn't make sense (as you then get outrage from the other side), but then again, neither do some of these calls.
    I think Palat's did as well, but we didn't see it.  Maybe they have extra angles, but it almost as if their charge is to re-officiate the play from teh booth, using judgment (like the on ice official).  Maybe someone knows if that's the case.  In football and baseball, the replay must be indisputable.  Maybe that isn't the bar in hockey replays and I just never noticed. 
  • mpedone
    mpedone 540xxx - Manchester, NH Posts: 1,961
    mrussel1 said:
    mpedone said:
    mrussel1 said:
    I'm no hockey expert, but I don't know how you can call that a "no goal"
    Do you mean Coleman's kick? 

    I think it probably was,  but I don't think the evidence was clear enough.  I feel like Toronto is really taking liberties and making decisions based on what it thinks happened rather than what the evidence clearly shows.   In game 4 of the lighting panthers series, they called back a goal because they said it went into the mesh right before.  It probably did,  but you NEVER saw it.  And it wasn't called on the ice.  Very different than football reviews. 
    That call was odd. I do wonder if Toronto has access to other camera angles; I'm 99% sure it hit the netting just based on Palat's body language, but that's not conclusive evidence. Part of me also wonders if someone making these decisions is too worried about backlash; it's almost as if they've been instructed that if it's close, just call the play back. It doesn't make sense (as you then get outrage from the other side), but then again, neither do some of these calls.
    I think Palat's did as well, but we didn't see it.  Maybe they have extra angles, but it almost as if their charge is to re-officiate the play from teh booth, using judgment (like the on ice official).  Maybe someone knows if that's the case.  In football and baseball, the replay must be indisputable.  Maybe that isn't the bar in hockey replays and I just never noticed. 
    The announcers always say that's the rule, but I'm not sure. I know on goals the refs have the leeway of "intent to blow the whistle" (which I used to detest, now I kinda get), so I wonder if there is some aspect of that at play? The ref realizes he should have blown the play dead, even though it's not 100% clear?
    "I'm a lucky man, to count on both hands the [shows I've done]. Some folks just have one, others they got none..."

    Hartford 10.02.96 | Mansfield 2 09.16.98 | Mansfield 1 08.29.00 | Mansfield 1 07.02.03 | Mansfield 3 07.11.03 | Boston 2 05.25.06 | Tampa 04.11.16 | Fenway 1 08.05.16 | Fenway 2 08.07.16 | Fenway 1 09.02.18 | Fenway 2 09.04.18 | Baltimore 03.28.20 | Hamilton 09.06.22 | Toronto 09.08.22 | Nashville 09.16.22 | St Louis 09.18.22 | Baltimore 09.12.24 | Fenway 1 09.15.24 | Fenway 2 09.17.24

    "He made the deal with the devil, we get to play with him.
    He goes to hell, of course. We're going to heaven."