Ron Paul...

2»

Comments

  • It's very close right now with romney and Obama. Who's leading the polls right now depends on which polls you read. USA Today/Gallup has them tied 47-47. Reuters has Romney leading 44-43. ABC News/Washington Post has Romney leading 47-46. NBC News/Wall St. Journal has Obama leading 49-43. There are enough polls out there that anyone can look at them and point out that their preferred candidate is leading. Until a Republican winds the party's nomination and we are closer to Election Day 2012 there's no way to tell where anyone really stands in the polls and I think it's a bit optimistic on your part to call it a definite win for Obama if Romney is nominated considering he's leading or tied in 3 polls released within the past few days.
    Go Beavers wrote:
    Obama's ahead of all the Republican's in the polls, with Romney being the closest. And if Romney's nominated, it's a definate win for Obama. All Obama needs is an economic trickle where unemployment is on a downward trend. The more support that Ron Paul gets, the more his agenda will be incorporated into the other candidates agenda's, which makes it even less likely Paul gets nominated.
  • Go BeaversGo Beavers Posts: 9,193
    It's very close right now with romney and Obama. Who's leading the polls right now depends on which polls you read. USA Today/Gallup has them tied 47-47. Reuters has Romney leading 44-43. ABC News/Washington Post has Romney leading 47-46. NBC News/Wall St. Journal has Obama leading 49-43. There are enough polls out there that anyone can look at them and point out that their preferred candidate is leading. Until a Republican winds the party's nomination and we are closer to Election Day 2012 there's no way to tell where anyone really stands in the polls and I think it's a bit optimistic on your part to call it a definite win for Obama if Romney is nominated considering he's leading or tied in 3 polls released within the past few days.

    No Republican has a statistically significant lead, and the polls obviously show where people are at currently. My point anyway was to counter inlet's overconfidence in Obama losing. I mentioned it before, but I think Romney loses against Obama because all that would be needed is some ads about him being an LDS and that's a good 3 or 4 point swing.
  • polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    inlet13 wrote:
    Not going to say the Republican party is flawless... they are filled with flaws... so, yes, they are responsible for a lot of the problems he loathes. But, from Paul's perspective to equate them with the Democrats is laughable.

    I don't think he'd run as an independent because I think he really does understand he would basically re-elect Obama by doing so.

    To me, there's only a few things that could re-elect Obama. A solid libertarian candidate, like Paul is one. The other is the beginnings of a World War. The third is an economic bounce like none we've ever seen.

    Out of the three options, I think the first is the most likely... but, I don't see it happening.

    i think most people who think partisanship is problematic and also a joke would say the two party system is perpetuating the same problems over and over again ...

    either way - ron paul is doing what politicians do ... which is sell themselves to gain power ... i mean the dude actually said he only watches abc news in that interview ... obviously, i hope it was a joke but it does re-iterate that he is part of the entity that is most tied with the military industrial complex ...
Sign In or Register to comment.