Did Iran have Nukes as Bush said ?

Godfather.Godfather. Posts: 12,504
edited September 2011 in A Moving Train
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • No, they don't (and didn't).

    Did he say that Iran had nukes? I don't remember that.

    They are definitely developing the capability to produce a nuclear warhead or three. But since we (the US) have like 9,000 and Israel has a few dozen... why wouldn't they?

    It seems like the sensible thing to do if I'm Iran.
    Everything not forbidden is compulsory and eveything not compulsory is forbidden. You are free... free to do what the government says you can do.
  • Godfather.Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    No, they don't (and didn't).

    Did he say that Iran had nukes? I don't remember that.

    They are definitely developing the capability to produce a nuclear warhead or three. But since we (the US) have like 9,000 and Israel has a few dozen... why wouldn't they?

    It seems like the sensible thing to do if I'm Iran.

    ummmm....o.k


    Godfather.
  • Godfather. wrote:
    No, they don't (and didn't).

    Did he say that Iran had nukes? I don't remember that.

    They are definitely developing the capability to produce a nuclear warhead or three. But since we (the US) have like 9,000 and Israel has a few dozen... why wouldn't they?

    It seems like the sensible thing to do if I'm Iran.

    ummmm....o.k


    Godfather.

    errrrmmmmm.... huh

    he still stands.
    Everything not forbidden is compulsory and eveything not compulsory is forbidden. You are free... free to do what the government says you can do.
  • BinauralJamBinauralJam Posts: 14,158
    I Hope So :thumbup: We need a new country to invade, Iraq and Afganistan are SOoooo 2010.
  • Godfather.Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    Godfather. wrote:
    No, they don't (and didn't).

    Did he say that Iran had nukes? I don't remember that.

    They are definitely developing the capability to produce a nuclear warhead or three. But since we (the US) have like 9,000 and Israel has a few dozen... why wouldn't they?

    It seems like the sensible thing to do if I'm Iran.

    ummmm....o.k


    Godfather.

    errrrmmmmm.... huh

    he still stands.


    in what ?


    Godfather.
  • Godfather.Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    I Hope So :thumbup: We need a new country to invade, Iraq and Afganistan are SOoooo 2010.


    nahhh if you can't keep them what's the point :lol:


    Godfather.
  • tybirdtybird Posts: 17,388
    No, they don't (and didn't).

    Did he say that Iran had nukes? I don't remember that.

    They are definitely developing the capability to produce a nuclear warhead or three. But since we (the US) have like 9,000 and Israel has a few dozen... why wouldn't they?

    It seems like the sensible thing to do if I'm Iran.
    I agree with one statement here....I do believe that our former Prez only stated that Iran was lusting for and working at weapons of a nuclear nature.

    I would hate to see a theocracy, such as Iran, possess WMDs such as these. When you feel that you are at a military disadvantage, your trigger finger can be a little happy.
    All the world will be your enemy, Prince with a thousand enemies, and whenever they catch you, they will kill you. But first they must catch you, digger, listener, runner, prince with the swift warning. Be cunning and full of tricks and your people shall never be destroyed.
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    tybird wrote:
    I do believe that our former Prez only stated that Iran was lusting for and working at weapons of a nuclear nature.

    Which they weren't, and aren't.

    So it was a lie. Period.
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    They are definitely developing the capability to produce a nuclear warhead or three.

    http://articles.latimes.com/2007/dec/04/world/fg-iran4

    'U.S. intelligence agencies have concluded that Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003 and that international pressure has compelled the Islamic Republic to back away from its pursuit of the bomb.

    ...The assessment, which represents the consensus of the 16 U.S. intelligence agencies, including the CIA and the National Security Agency, is expected to have major implications for the ongoing debate over whether to confront Iran militarily or through diplomatic means, an issue that has been a source of friction within the Bush administration and with some members of the international community.'
Sign In or Register to comment.