what has Obama done wrong ?
Godfather.
Posts: 12,504
http://www.cnn.com/2011/OPINION/08/29/f ... ?hpt=hp_t2
just read this on CNN,kinda interseting.
Godfather.
just read this on CNN,kinda interseting.
Godfather.
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
Godfather.
(The BIGGEST SCAM in American history was the election of B.H.O. orchestrated by George Soros!)
President May be in Deep Trouble
This will be an interesting turn of events if it does come to the surface.
Obama May Be In Deep Trouble...with Chief Justice John Roberts, U.S. Supreme Court.
According to sources who watch the inner workings of the federal government, a smack-down of Barack Obama by the U.S. Supreme Court may be inevitable.
Ever since Obama assumed the office of President, critics have hammered him on a number of Constitutional issues. Critics have complained that much, if not all of Obama's major initiatives run headlong into Constitutional roadblocks on the power of the federal government. Obama certainly did not help himself in the eyes of the Court when he used the venue of the State of the Union address early in the year to publicly flog the Court over its ruling that the First Amendment grants the right to various organizations to run political ads during the time of an election. The tongue-lashing clearly did not sit well with the Court, as demonstrated by Justice Sam Alito, who publicly shook his head and stated under his breath, 'That's not true,' when Obama told a flat-out lie concerning the Court's ruling. As it has turned out, this was a watershed moment in the relationship between the executive and the judicial branches of the federal government. Obama publicly declared war on the court, even as he blatantly continued to propose legislation that flies in the face of every known Constitutional principle upon which this nation has stood for over 200 years.
Obama has even identified Chief Justice John Roberts as his number one enemy, that is, apart from Fox News and Rush Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, and so on. And it is no accident that the one swing-vote on the court, Justice Anthony Kennedy, stated recently that he has no intention of retiring until 'Obama is gone.' Apparently, the Court has had enough. The Roberts Court has signaled, in a very subtle manner, of course, that it intends to address the issues about which Obama critics have been screaming to high heaven. A ruling against Obama on any one of these important issues could potentially cripple the Administration. Such a thing would be long overdue.
First, there is ObamaCare, which violates the Constitutional principle barring the federal government from forcing citizens to purchase something. And no, this is not the same thing as states requiring drivers to purchase car insurance, as some of the intellectually-impaired claim. The Constitution limits FEDERAL government, not state governments, from such things, and further, not everyone has to drive, and thus, a citizen could opt not to purchase car insurance by simply deciding not to drive a vehicle. In the ObamaCare world, however, no citizen can 'opt out.'
Second, sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted information concerning discrepancies in Obama's history that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President. The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue. This information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii .
And that is only the tip of the iceberg.
Third, several cases involving possible criminal activity, conflicts of interest, and pay-for-play cronyism could potentially land many Administration officials, if not Obama himself, in hot water with the Court. Frankly, in the years this writer has observed politics, nothing comes close to comparing with the rampant corruption of this Administration, not even during the Nixon years. Nixon and the Watergate conspirators look like choirboys compared to the jokers that populate this Administration.
In addition, the Court will eventually be forced to rule on the dreadful decision of the Obama DOJ suing the state of Arizona. That, too, could send the Obama doctrine of open borders to an early grave, given that the Administration refuses to enforce federal law on illegal aliens.
And finally, the biggie that could potentially send the entire house of cards tumbling in a free-fall is the latest revelation concerning the Obama-Holder Department of Justice and its refusal to pursue the New Black Panther Party. The group was caught on tape committing felonies by attempting to intimidate Caucasian voters into staying away from the polls. A whistle-blower who resigned from the DOJ is now charging Holder with the deliberate refusal to pursue cases against Blacks, particularly those who are involved in radical hate-groups, such as the New Black Panthers, who have been caught on tape calling for the murder of white people and their babies. This one is a biggie that could send the entire Administration crumbling--that is, if the Justices have the guts to draw a line in the sand at the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
keep the change
just sayin'
Where I'm not ugly and you're lookin' at me
Well he just got a DUI...
"I think i will call the White House"
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/obam ... 10803.html
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
Where I'm not ugly and you're lookin' at me
Gee whiz. I guess :? we were talking about another Obama.
So.... those are three grivences you have with President Obama? Great. Those are the things you should hold him responsible for... the consequences of his actions and/or decisions. And NOT:
A Socialist
A Fascist
A Communist
That he wasn't born an American
That he isn't a Muslim (that should matter, just as it shouldn't matter if he is a Jew, Mormon, Christian, Catholic, etc...)
That he tried to indoctrinate kids during a welcome back to school broadcast
And all of those other made up crazy shit that only looney conspiracy theorists in tin foil hats come up with.
Hail, Hail!!!
Yeah right. Sorry man, we get what you were after. :?
-Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
1. Not getting the word out about peak oil and the coming energy crisis (one that will make the '70's look like a cake walk).
2. Not coming down harder on the Wall St. crooks who have made a mess of things.
3. Not bringing our troops home and ending useless wars.
But then I never said Obama was God either and most of the above would take an act of God- or at least a committe of very strong willed people. And don't forget about the shit-storm of trouble that preceeded the man's term in office.
-Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
pay attention Cosmo..."just read this on CNN,kinda interseting." you don't need to add words to my post,
ya know you guy's had soooo much fun bashing other politicans and when I post anything slightly negitive about your "bringer of change" obama ya'll get butt hurt and blame his mistakes on everyone but him...
"he was left with a mess" whaaaaaa ! so what president in the last 50 years wassn't ? as far as I'm concerned you all got suckered by a smooth talking non politition who ran for president and after reading post after post sense he got elected you guy's think he's "nice guy"who got shafted...wake up man we got shafted and most of you voted for him and believed his bullshit about "change you can believe in" and look at the country now..it's only gotten worse ! there is your change...
Godfather.
yes or no?
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
I've said it before and I will say it again "Obama has no business being president" it's not a nail it's just fact he has too little political experiance and lacks the balls to do what he said he would do.
Godfather.
2 wars
unemployment over 8%
wall street collapse
collpse of the housing market
a nation with a completely low morale
corporations in record numbers shipping jobs overseas
etc etc
none of this shit was his fault. and with an increasingly hostile and childish uncompromising congress the man is hamstrung. he can't get anyting done at all. if people can not see that then they are not paying attention.
we all know that you are not the non-partison, or that you are not "undecided" on obama like you have said you were in the past.
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
Sorry, but your nation voted for him and you'll have to live with him. This "no business being president" nonsense is absurd. Your electorate put him in office, just like they put Bush and Clinton in office prior to that. I don't follow American politics all that closely, but the way I see things it doesn't look like any President can do much of anything. It seems like your government has become so partisan that people look forward to seeing the other side fail, even if it costs you your very way of life. When Bush was in power, democrats reveled at his every misstep. Now the tables have turned and Republicans cheer on Obama's failures. Who cares that your wars have put your nation on the verge of financial disaster or that nobody has done anything to solve your high unemployment numbers.
If it makes you feel better, in 2012 you'll probably have a new failure on your hands and the fiscal crisis the US is in will probably be considerably worse. That's what America wants, isn't it?
Not perfect, but George W. Bush inherited a pretty good situation from Clinton, and he pretty much fucked that up in a short 8 years. Think back to 1998-2000. Then think of 2008. Waahooo, that was a fun lesson wasnt it?
Godfather.
http://www.survivingthefuture.com/ron-paul-predicts-housing-bubble-5-years-before-it-burst.html
Could it be considered FDR's fault for social security problems today? how far is the cut off? Could NAFTA be considered part of the cause of unemployment now? Decisions are made by presidents. Some work out and some don't. They have lasting implications that cannot always be foreseen. The thing you hope for in a president is that their leadership is more on than off...
Fault is not the thing we need to assess when talking about a president. The only thing we need to do is judge them on what they have done since being in office. The problems he inherited should be considered absolute zero...he either can stay at absolute zero or move up...If you are happy with how he has handled the economy since taking office, if you are happy with his foreign policy since taking office, if you are happy with the way he has handled states rights issues... by all means vote for the man...if you are unhappy with what he has done to solve the problems(cause or fault is unnecessary to assess here)..don't vote for him. Simple as that. But the idea that he gets a pass for the way he has handled things because the guys before him fucked up...well join the line...there are about a million dead people that are before him in the line to complain about Bush.
It is terrifying when you are too stupid to know who is dumb
- Joe Rogan
I like the president, but he needed to be stronger leader and not give in just to be the "nice guy"- he need to be a bruiser
national healthcare is a fantastic thing. Just about every nation on earth does it.
Actually, W inherited a pretty sweet economy that had a surplus and a country that wasn't at war but managed to fuck that up over the course of 8 years. Just sayin.
9/29/04 Boston, 6/28/08 Mansfield, 8/23/09 Chicago, 5/15/10 Hartford
5/17/10 Boston, 10/15/13 Worcester, 10/16/13 Worcester, 10/25/13 Hartford
8/5/16 Fenway, 8/7/16 Fenway
EV Solo: 6/16/11 Boston, 6/18/11 Hartford,
no one man can be held accountable for the misdeads of a government. and yes, both bushes and clinton and everyone else before and after included.
Not many people blame Bush personally. at least not the informed do. he was an asshole and an idiot, but no one man has absolute power in a democratic system. they blame the Bush ADMINISTRATION. all you do is rag on one man. you recently said "I don't know much about politics" and admitted you have probably the least amount of political knowledge on the train, yet you continue to do this. why?
your lack of peripheral vision with your obama hate is becoming tiresome. you can't even come up with your own ideas either, you just say "obama sucks" again and again, telling everyone they are obamasheep, post articles without any insight of your own, doing nothing but fanning flames.
there are many people on here that hold your same opinion on the matter, and I can respect their opinion because they can actually make a point on their own.
yes, he promised change. HELLO? what politician in his right mind would use a slogan like "status quo all the way!" for their election campaign? He has tried, and he has failed in many respects, but again, to blame it on one guy is extremely short sighted.
do some research and post an independent thought and maybe you'll get some respect.
Fargo 2003
Winnipeg 2005
Winnipeg 2011
St. Paul 2014
On a side note some of you like to blame Bush,but what you are forgetting is that the Democrats had control of both houses during the last 2 years of his term. Every budget he tried to pass was DOA. let's not leave out the facts.
http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/obama-u ... /id/409588
Godfather.
Another lie from commander ACORN
Barack Hussein Obama Sr. (Obama's father) Born: 4/4/36 Died: 11/24/82 at the age of 46. He was 5 years old when WW II started, and less than 9 1/2 yrs old when it ended.
Lolo Soetoro (Obama's step father) Born: January 2,1935 Died: 3/2/87 at the age of 52. He was 6 years old when WW II started, and 10 years old when it ended.
Maybe he was talking about his grandpa? How many fathers does he have?
A lie? This kind of accusation is a stretch at best. Techincally speaking, Obama did speak inaccurately. Calling it a lie is probably overkill. His grandfather, Stanley Dunham, who served as Obama's father figure and male role model during his childhood, did serve in WWII. Call it bad telepromper reading? Sure. A lie? I seriously doubt it.
-Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
THREE?? Lucky guy!
-Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
I did pay attentiion. I said that the 3 points made were legitimate grivences with reasoned arguments supporting them. That is a good thing in political debate, expressing a point with solid reasoning to support them.
What needs to be avoided is unsupported arguements, like that ridiculous birthing thing, that is only supported with "I believe" that only the wackiest of the conspiricy theorists come up with. People who come up with that ceazy shit just sound... well, stupid.
Hail, Hail!!!