Home› A Moving Train

House passes $649B Defense spending bill

unsungunsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
edited July 2011 in A Moving Train
http://www.opencongress.org/vote/2011/h/532


RON PAUL voted NAY.
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • brandon10brandon10 Posts: 1,114
    Michelle Bachmann voted yes...
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    only 12 republicans voted no. every other no vote was from a democrat.....
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • SmellymanSmellyman Asia Posts: 4,524
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    only 12 republicans voted no. every other no vote was from a democrat.....

    They are serious about the debt!!!

    As long as the cuts only affect people in the US and especially the poor and brown people.
  • MotoDCMotoDC Posts: 947
    Even a libertarian must agree that the gov't should provide for security. Does he disagree with the size of the defense bill or that there is one to begin with?

    Smelly -- keeping the brownies in line is expensive, dontchaknow.
  • brandon10brandon10 Posts: 1,114
    MotoDC wrote:
    Even a libertarian must agree that the gov't should provide for security. Does he disagree with the size of the defense bill or that there is one to begin with?

    Smelly -- keeping the brownies in line is expensive, dontchaknow.

    I'm pretty sure he disagrees with the size of it. And the fact that it's being used on needless wars overseas instead of simply being used for security purposes at home.
  • unsungunsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    brandon10 wrote:
    Michelle Bachmann voted yes...


    It sickens me what the TEA Party has become, it sickens me that she and Palin are supported. What started as a good idea sure got hijacked.
  • FlaggFlagg Posts: 5,856
    brandon10 wrote:
    MotoDC wrote:
    Even a libertarian must agree that the gov't should provide for security. Does he disagree with the size of the defense bill or that there is one to begin with?

    Smelly -- keeping the brownies in line is expensive, dontchaknow.

    I'm pretty sure he disagrees with the size of it. And the fact that it's being used on needless wars overseas instead of simply being used for security purposes at home.

    Pretty sure Libertarians are OK with spending on defense. It is the staggering size of the spending bill that is insulting though. The Tea Party screams and cries about wasteful spending but has no problems appropriating the funds for that 12th nuclear powered carrier right? You know, because we need 12 of them.
    DAL-7/5/98,10/17/00,6/9/03,11/15/13
    BOS-9/28/04,9/29/04,6/28/08,6/30/08, 9/5/16, 9/7/16, 9/2/18
    MTL-9/15/05, OTT-9/16/05
    PHL-5/27/06,5/28/06,10/30/09,10/31/09
    CHI-8/2/07,8/5/07,8/23/09,8/24/09
    HTFD-6/27/08
    ATX-10/4/09, 10/12/14
    KC-5/3/2010,STL-5/4/2010
    Bridge School-10/23/2010,10/24/2010
    PJ20-9/3/2011,9/4/2011
    OKC-11/16/13
    SEA-12/6/13
    TUL-10/8/14
  • shadowcastshadowcast Posts: 2,231
    unsung wrote:
    http://www.opencongress.org/vote/2011/h/532


    RON PAUL voted NAY.
    Does the main stream news ever report on things like this? This is huge news if you ask me. Where is the debate?
  • Go BeaversGo Beavers Posts: 9,196
    shadowcast wrote:
    unsung wrote:
    http://www.opencongress.org/vote/2011/h/532


    RON PAUL voted NAY.
    Does the main stream news ever report on things like this? This is huge news if you ask me. Where is the debate?

    It's the liberal media doing its thing!
  • ParachuteParachute Posts: 409
    Its a nice start.

    Too bad China spends about 10x that.

    And to any Google grads that would post "facts" regarding that statement- China doesn't publish what they really spend.... It's classified.
  • Drowned OutDrowned Out Posts: 6,056
    Parachute wrote:
    Its a nice start.

    Too bad China spends about 10x that.

    And to any Google grads that would post "facts" regarding that statement- China doesn't publish what they really spend.... It's classified.
    So obviously you're talking out your ass then, too?
  • ParachuteParachute Posts: 409
    Drowned Out wrote:
    Parachute wrote:
    Its a nice start.

    Too bad China spends about 10x that.

    And to any Google grads that would post "facts" regarding that statement- China doesn't publish what they really spend.... It's classified.
    So obviously you're talking out your ass then, too?


    haha. fair enuf.

    But, the US guestimates based on what we DO know- experts on the subject have stated that it is of great concern, because the only other country to comparatively spend like this was pre-WWII Germany.

    It looks like they are getting ready for evrything but peace.

    Just sayin...
Sign In or Register to comment.