Home› The Porch

question for future PJ albums

bigbadbillbigbadbill Posts: 1,758
edited September 2008 in The Porch
It seems 13 has been the lucky number (# of tracks) on half of their studio albums - No Code, Yield, Binaural, Pearl Jam. Do you think they'll go higher or lower for the new one they're working on? I'd like to see an album with 16 or 17 tracks.
11/6/95, 11/18/97, 7/13/98, 7/14/98, 10/24/00, 10/25/00, 10/28/00, 6/2/03, 6/3/03, 6/5/03, 7/6/06, 7/7/06, 7/9/06, 7/10/06, 7/13/06, 7/15/06, 7/16/06, 7/18/06, 10/21/06, 4/10/08, 4/13/08, 9/30/09, 10/1/09, 10/6/09, 10/7/09, 10/9/09
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • LONGRDLONGRD Posts: 6,036
    nah....12-13 is a good number of tracks for CDs. when artists put more 13 they usually just put halfass fillers in there.

    they can make a 10-track album for all i care as long as all 10 are excellent songs.
    PJ- 04/29/2003.06/24,25,27,28,30/2008.10/27,28,30,31/2009
    EV- 08/09,10/2008.06/08,09/2009
  • youngsteryoungster Boston Posts: 6,576
    I agree. I don't need a "bugs" or "heyfoxymophandlemamaitsme" on their new album.
    He who forgets will be destined to remember.

    9/29/04 Boston, 6/28/08 Mansfield, 8/23/09 Chicago, 5/15/10 Hartford
    5/17/10 Boston, 10/15/13 Worcester, 10/16/13 Worcester, 10/25/13 Hartford
    8/5/16 Fenway, 8/7/16 Fenway
    EV Solo: 6/16/11 Boston, 6/18/11 Hartford,
  • smile05smile05 Posts: 600
    16-17 is 4-5 to many
    1:Black 2:Corduroy 3:All Those Yesterdays 4:I Got ID 5:Smile

    They can buy but cant put on my clothes
    Throw down my ace in the hole~~~~~~

    Let's go for three in a row, no sorry i can't think of anything thats not funny. - Paul Merton

    London96,Manchester00,Berlin06,London07
Sign In or Register to comment.