Chomsky Criticizes Chávez

ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
edited May 2013 in A Moving Train
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/ju ... -democracy

Noam Chomsky denounces old friend Hugo Chávez for 'assault' on democracy

Renowned American intellectual accuses the Venezuelan leader of concentrating too much power in his own hands


Rory Carroll in Caracas
The Observer, Sunday 3 July 2011



Hugo Chávez has long considered Noam Chomsky one of his best friends in the west. He has basked in the renowned scholar's praise for Venezuela's socialist revolution and echoed his denunciations of US imperialism.

Venezuela's president, who hasrevealed that he has had surgery in Cuba to remove a cancerous tumour, turned one of Chomsky's books into an overnight bestseller after brandishing it during a UN speech. He hosted Chomsky in Caracas with smiles and pomp. Earlier this year Chávez even suggested Washington make Chomsky the US ambassador to Venezuela.

The president may be about to have second thoughts about that, because his favourite intellectual has now turned his guns on Chávez.

Speaking to the Observer last week, Chomsky has accused the socialist leader of amassing too much power and of making an "assault" on Venezuela's democracy.

"Concentration of executive power, unless it's very temporary and for specific circumstances, such as fighting world war two, is an assault on democracy. You can debate whether [Venezuela's] circumstances require it: internal circumstances and the external threat of attack, that's a legitimate debate. But my own judgment in that debate is that it does not."

Chomsky, a linguistics professor at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, spoke on the eve of publishing an open letter (see below) that accuses Venezuela's authorities of "cruelty" in the case of a jailed judge.

The self-described libertarian socialist says the plight of María Lourdes Afiuni is a "glaring exception" in a time of worldwide cries for freedom. He urges Chávez to release her in "a gesture of clemency" for the sake of justice and human rights.

Chomsky reveals he has lobbied Venezuela's government behind the scenes since late last year after being approached by the Carr centre for human rights policy at Harvard University. Afiuni earned Chávez's ire in December 2009 by freeing Eligio Cedeño, a prominent banker facing corruption charges. Cedeño promptly fled the country.

In a televised broadcast the president, who had taken a close interest in the case, called the judge a criminal and demanded she be jailed for 30 years. "That judge has to pay for what she has done."

Afiuni, 47, a single mother with cancer, spent just over a year in jail, where she was assaulted by other prisoners. In January, authorities softened her confinement to house arrest pending trial for corruption, which she denies.

"Judge Afiuni has suffered enough," states Chomsky's letter. "She has been subject to acts of violence and humiliations to undermine her human dignity. I am convinced that she must be set free."

Amnesty International and the European parliament, among others, have condemned the judge's treatment but the intervention of a scholar considered a friend of the Bolivarian revolution, which is named after the hero of Venezuelan independence, Simón Bolívar, is likely to sting even more.

Speaking from his home in Boston, Chomsky said Chávez, who has been in power for 12 years, appeared to have intimidated the judicial system. "I'm sceptical that [Afiuni] could receive a fair trial. It's striking that, as far as I understand, other judges have not come out in support of her … that suggests an atmosphere of intimidation."

He also faulted Chávez for adopting enabling powers to circumvent the national assembly. "Anywhere in Latin America there is a potential threat of the pathology of caudillismo [authoritarianism] and it has to be guarded against. Whether it's over too far in that direction in Venezuela I'm not sure, but I think perhaps it is. A trend has developed towards the centralisation of power in the executive which I don't think is a healthy development."

Chomsky expressed concern over Chávez's cancer and wished the president a full and prompt recovery.

Chomsky's book Hegemony or Survival: America's Quest for Global Dominance became a publishing sensation after Chávez waved a copy during a UN address in 2006 famous for his denunciation of President George W Bush as a devil.

Its author remains fiercely critical of the US, which he said had tortured Bradley Manning, alleged source of the diplomatic cables exposed by WikiLeaks, and continued to wage a "vicious, unremitting" campaign against Venezuela.

The Chávez government deserved credit for sharply reducing poverty and for its policies of promoting self-governing communities and Latin American unity, Chomsky said. "It's hard to judge how successful they are, but if they are successful they would be seeds of a better world."

Leonardo Vivas, co-ordinator of Latin American initiatives at the Carr Centre, said that Afiuni's case was the most prominent example of the erosion of justice in several Latin American countries. The centre hoped that Caracas would now heed Chomsky.

"He is one of the most important public intellectuals in the US and is respected by the Venezuelan government."

The decision to lobby publicly was taken because quiet diplomacy had limits, said Vivas.

Chávez, who is convalescing in Cuba, has a reputation for lashing back at criticism, raising the risk that the Afiuni initative could backfire.

"That could happen," said Vivas. "But that would mean recognition of the problem."

Chomsky's letter
Judge María Lourdes Afiuni has suffered enough


With this public letter I want to express my open support of the liberty of judge María Lourdes Afiuni, detained in Venezuela since December 2009. In November of last year I was informed of her situation by the Latin American initiative of the Carr Centre for human rights policy at Harvard University. Ever since, I have been directly involved in mediation efforts with the Venezuelan government, with the purpose of releasing her from prison through a gesture of clemency by President Chávez.

Judge Afiuni had my sympathy and solidarity from the very beginning. The way she was detained, the inadequate conditions of her imprisonment, the degrading treatment she suffered in the Instituto Nacional de Orientación Femenina, the dramatic erosion of her health and the cruelty displayed against her, all duly documented, left me greatly worried about her physical and psychological wellbeing, as well as about her personal safety.

Those reasons motivated me in December 2010 to address, jointly with the Carr Centre, a petition for an official pardon from the president in the context of the yearly presidential amnesties.

In January I received with relief the news that Venezuela's attorney general had suggested house arrest for judge Afiuni given her fragile health condition, which ended up with emergency surgery. Being in her house with her family and with adequate medical attention has been without doubt a significant improvement of her situation.

However, judge Afiuni has suffered enough. She has been subject to acts of violence and humiliations to undermine her human dignity. I am convinced that she must be set free, not only due to her physical and psychological health conditions, but in conformance with the human dignity the Bolivarian revolution presents as a goal. In times of worldwide cries for freedom, the detention of María Lourdes Afiuni stands out as a glaring exception that should be remedied quickly, for the sake of justice and human rights generally and for affirming an honourable role for Venezuela in these struggles.

For the above reasons I want Venezuelans to be aware of my total solidarity with judge Afiuni, while I affirm my unwavering commitment with the efforts advanced by the Carr Centre in Harvard University to release her from imprisonment. At the same time, I shall keep high hopes that President Chávez will consider a humanitarian act that will end the judge's detention.
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • arqarq Posts: 8,033
    Sadly Chomsky believed in Chavez' lies at the beginning, but Chavez have been a dictator since day one, and Venezuela it's been on a downward spiral before he even took power but he accelerated the process 100 fold.
    "The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it"
    Neil deGrasse Tyson

    Why not (V) (°,,,,°) (V) ?
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    arq wrote:
    Sadly Chomsky believed in Chavez' lies at the beginning, but Chavez have been a dictator since day one, and Venezuela it's been on a downward spiral before he even took power but he accelerated the process 100 fold.

    Not exactly. He's simply saying that Chavez is now extending his power a bit too far. And venezuela hasn't been on a downward spiral since he took power - in fact, the exact opposite has been the case.
  • arqarq Posts: 8,033
    Byrnzie wrote:
    arq wrote:
    Sadly Chomsky believed in Chavez' lies at the beginning, but Chavez have been a dictator since day one, and Venezuela it's been on a downward spiral before he even took power but he accelerated the process 100 fold.

    Not exactly. He's simply saying that Chavez is now extending his power a bit too far. And Venezuela hasn't been on a downward spiral since he took power - in fact, the exact opposite has been the case.

    I'm not going to start a back and forward about Chavez, you are far from affected from what's happening in Venezuela, so you can said and believe whatever you want about it, but I'm here thanks to Chavez and my family still lives there and have to suffer all his crap.
    "The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it"
    Neil deGrasse Tyson

    Why not (V) (°,,,,°) (V) ?
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    arq wrote:
    I'm not going to start a back and forward about Chavez, you are far from affected from what's happening in Venezuela, so you can said and believe whatever you want about it, but I'm here thanks to Chavez and my family still lives there and have to suffer all his crap.

    Your experience doesn't apply to everyone in Venezuela, hence why he continues being re-elected and cheered by the majority of your compatriots:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/ju ... er-surgery


    Chávez returns to Venezuela after tumour removed in Cuba


    Thousands pack streets of central Caracas to celebrate return of populist president following month abroad


    Tom Phillips and Virginia Lopez in Cararcas
    The Guardian, Tuesday 5 July 2011



    Venezuela's showman president Hugo Chávez made a dramatic return home yesterday, addressing thousands of ecstatic supporters in Caracas with the battle-cry: "The return has begun".

    Hordes of Chávez supporters had flocked onto the streets outside the city's Miraflores Palace to welcome back their leader, following his surprise return from Cuba in the early hours of Monday.

    At just after 5.35pm local time a sea of red-clad supporters erupted in cheers and applause as Chávez stepped out onto the Palace's "balcón del pueblo" or "people's balcony" wearing a red beret and green army uniform.

    Hoisting his country's red, blue and yellow flag into the air, Chávez launched into a rendition of the Venezuelan national anthem before shouting: "Viva Venezuela! Viva the Bolivarian Revolution! Viva the Venezuelan People… Viva life! Viva Chávez!"

    "We will win this battle for life, for the fatherland and for the revolution," Chávez told thousands of flag-waving supporters, speaking just days after admitting he was being treated for cancer in Cuba.

    "We will overcome all of these difficulties," he added from the iconic veranda, the setting for numerous key addresses since he came to power in 1999.

    Chávez's sudden return, nearly one month after he left the country, came on the eve of Venezuela's independence celebrations that kick off on Tuesday.

    Within hours of Chávez setting foot on Venezuelan soil, allies from his United Socialist Party (PSUV) were appearing on television urging supporters to gather outside the city's Miraflores Palace.

    "We have so much to celebrate," said Blanca Eekhout, the vice-president of Venezuela's National Assembly. "Let's celebrate independence and the happiness of having our president back." Chávez was now "recovering and preparing for the battles ahead," she added.

    Throughout Monday, state-controlled television churned out infomercials for the afternoon address, accompanied by a chirpy pop-rock soundtrack and the catch-line "pa'lante comandante" – "onwards, commander".

    "Welcome back president," bellowed the commercial's voiceover. "The whole of Venezuela receives you with happiness."

    Across town the refrain was repeated, as faithful Chavistas celebrated their president's "resurrection".

    "I feel great joy because Chávez is back in his country," said Iris Teran, a 27-year-old secretary who was among the crowds. "We've come to show him our revolutionary support. We have all prayed so that he can continue in his Bolivarian revolution".

    Nelson Leon, a 68-year-old headmaster, added his voice to the chorus. "My wife woke me up to tell me he was back, but I thought she was lying. I feel the same joy as all my compatriots to see our president back and in good health."

    Rafael Leonides, 51, said he had prayed for Chávez's return. "We were feeling orphaned."


    Political analysts had harboured suspicions that Chávez might attempt a high-profile homecoming to coincide with Venezuela's independence celebrations on Tuesday – although those chances appeared to have faded last Thursday following Chávez's admission he had been diagnosed with an unspecified form of cancer.

    Javier Corrales, a Venezuela expert from Amherst College in Massachusetts, described Monday's dramatic, pre-dawn return as "typical Chávez."

    "He is a micro-manager par excellence, convinced of his own indispensability. Thus a premature return is less surprising from Chávez than a prolonged absence," said Corrales.

    "Governance in Venezuela might not necessarily improve with an ailing president back in residence, but at least the internal confusion and posturing within his ruling party will ease, for now," he added.

    With a 2012 presidential election looming on the horizon and domestic headaches growing, Chávez needs to recover, and fast.

    Corrales said Chávez faced "a tough scenario" back home, with an ongoing energy crisis and economic woes presenting a treacherous run-up to the election.

    "Until his health improves, Chávez's best hope to prevail in the forthcoming elections may be to win enough sympathy votes," Corrales said.
  • Jason PJason P Posts: 19,138
    According to Dan Rather, Chavez only has a few months to live.

    Report: Chavez's cancer has 'entered the end stage'

    This reporter has been told that Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez has metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma, an aggressive cancer that has "entered the end stage". The information and the quote come from a highly respected source close to Chavez and who is in a position to know his medical condition and history. This source says the prognosis is dire and that Chavez is now not expected to live "more than a couple of months at most." Chavez is running for re-elec tion in Venezuela but several sources--including the one who revealed the exact kind of cancer-- have told me that they believe it is doubtful the dictator will live to see the results.

    Voting is scheduled for October 7th. Chavez has been treated three times in Cuba but the exact kind of cancer has been a closely guarded state secret.


    http://news.yahoo.com/report--chavez-s-cancer-has--entered-the-end-stage-.html
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    arq wrote:
    Sadly Chomsky believed in Chavez' lies at the beginning, but Chavez have been a dictator since day one, and Venezuela it's been on a downward spiral before he even took power but he accelerated the process 100 fold.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/ju ... -venezuela

    We reported on Sunday that Noam Chomsky had accused Hugo Chávez of amassing too much power and making an "assault" on Venezuela's democracy.

    The article was based on a telephone interview with the scholar on the eve of Chomsky publishing an open letter which criticised the jailing of a Venezuelan judge, Maria Lourdes Afiuni, after she made a ruling which angered Chávez.

    Chomsky subsequently told a blogger that the article was "dishonest" and "deceptive", an accusation that has been reported elsewhere.

    Below is a transcript of the original interview between the reporter, Rory Carroll, and Chomsky: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/ju ... -venezuela
Sign In or Register to comment.