Gibson Explorer - is it just for metal?
gimpy_boy89
Posts: 64
I just wanted to get a feel for what others thought. I play a Gibson Explorer, but it seems like everyone associates it with metal and nothing else. I find it to be quite an expressive piece of wood and wires, with anything from bluesy tones right up to kick-you-in-the-face rock tones. Any guitarists have any thoughts?
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
http://www.lauzonmusic.com/guitars/products.aspx?id=589
PJ: 2011-09-03 2011-09-04
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
Sure am. I take it you are too?
That's too bad for us, but good for you! What's your band name? I'll keep an eye out!
It's pretty good, but not as big as the pics online would have you believe. We pretty much had it maxed out with 60-70 people there when we played last month... hopefully we get that kind of turnout again though! Solo acoustic set must be nerve wracking, no?
Really, it isn't the Gibson Explorer that earned the metal reputation; it's all the copies by Hamer, Jackson, Ibanez, Dean, and ESP. Take the basic silhouette of the Explorer and add some jagged edges or sharper points to it, drop some active EMG's into the cavities, fit a Floyd Rose to the bridge and nut, and you've got yourself a metal guitar.
Really, the standard Gibson Explorer is closer tonally to an SG or an LP Junior, just a pair of humbuckers and a mahogany body. TOM bridge, stop tail, can't get much simpler than that. There have been so many variations, though, that the Explorer can really be anything you'd like it to be. Just think of how many speed metal enthusiasts (Vai, Satriani, and their ilk) play a guitar that, in silhouette, is a variation on a Strat.
Personally, I got into Explorers when I saw The Edge playing one (he's had his since their first visit to the US in the 80's), and then when Dave Grohl got into them. They're just kind of a badass, slightly flamboyant, but really tonally rich, guitar. If someone gives you shit for playing one, I'd just ask if it sounded bad, since tone is #1. And most Explorers have good tone.
Actually, I also became interested in Explorers when I saw Dave Grohl using one. That, and I wanted the punchy tone that a slab of mahogany can give without the neck-heaviness of an SG. So it came down to an Explorer or a Junior, and I went with the explorer because it just seemed fuller, not to mention it was an even bigger slab of mahogany (in my mind, bigger slab of wood = more resonance and character). I also like to pick with dynamics and frequently that means picking hard, and with the stock pickups in the Explorer it just beats the crap out of my preamp - I love it. Makes for a beautiful punk rock tone.
Solo acoustic is interesting, but I just go into it viewing it as a big campfire. Tends to work okay!
Yeah man, when you put it in those terms it wouldn't be so bad. I thought the Bassline gig last month was gonna be more nerve wracking than what it turned out to be because it was my first time in front of a crowd, but I loved every minute of it. I can't wait to get back up in front of people this weekend (with the Explorer) and we've thrown Rockin' in the Free World into our set along with a few others for this show so it should be a good time!
Yep, thats actually his main guitar, and how he gets his signature song. I think they sound great personally.
Very versatile guitars
2008: Camden 2, Hartford
2010: Hartford
2013: Wrigley, Worcester x2, Hartford
2015: NYC
2016: Philly 2, MSG x2, Boston 2, (TOTD Philly 2, MSG)
2018: Prague, Krakow, Berlin, Boston x2
2022: San Diego, Sacramento, Las Vegas