Is it wrong of me to recommend firing this girl?

pjfan31pjfan31 Posts: 7,331
edited May 2011 in All Encompassing Trip
I am studying to be a teacher, love working with kids, and I run a before and after school care centre for you guessed it... school aged kids. A month and a half ago we hired someone as my 2.I.C on a 3 month trial. Now the people who I answer to are a committee with numerous stakeholders in it who all along have said to me 'if you don't like her, don't get on with her.... blah blah we won't renew her' So basically they are working around what I want which is good to have, but puts me in an awkward position...

So this girl is 18 going on 65 (know it all).... but then has completely normal 18 year old behaviour (which we all know what that is like :roll: ). She is incredibly hard to talk to. I will always say 'hows your weekend, day', blah blah, and she will always answer, but never ask me, so conversation is extremely difficult.

She is due for more surgery soon that occurred from a car accident. So if she has significant time off, I don't have the staff to replace her. Can I use this as a negative in my reasoning? I don't want to use her physical ability against her, but it prevents her from doing parts of her job. The injury was was not sustained at work, and it may mean she has to have a lengthy period of time off.

She acts like she has been out of school for ever (only last year), had several jobs (starting to see why)The list can go on and on.... She is a good/ok worker, but that is it. She does not differentiate herself ahead of others, and she gets paid more, gets holiday benefits (12 wks a year) and an in-charge rate if I am not there.

Another reason is I genuinely love my work... The kids, the community, the holidays... but I want the best for it, and I don't think she can be the best for this place. I have been there 5 years and I just want the place to continue to flourish....

I have asked staff who work there to raise any issues with me. I would never bitch infront of staff(thats why Im doing it here :lol: ) just asking how she works when I am not there and they have expressed concerns...

and one last thing that pissed me off... She put like 2L of milk in the bin today... when I went to empty it, it had leaked all through the bag, the bin, went all over the floor and my shoe... I was PISSED off...

So basically it all comes down to my recommendation. Surely I can't fire her on whether Iike her or not..... or can I.... I am in a serious pickle, this decision won't be made lightly. The head of the committee and I have a review meeting tomorrow...

Cheers,
Sydney 11/02/2003
Sydney 14/02/2003
Sydney 07/11/2006
Sydney 18/11/2006
Sydney 22/11/2009
EV Sydney 18/03/2011
EV Sydney 19/03/2011
EV Sydney 20/03/2011
Melbourne 24/01/2014
Sydney 26/01/2014
EV Sydney 13/02/2014
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • Digital TwilightDigital Twilight Posts: 5,642
    The reason you have these trials is to work out if the potential employee is suitable for the position. If she isn't suitable then don't renew. You can't let your 'guilt' cloud your judgement over what is best for these kids and the school. It seems the other members of staff have concerns too. The best thing you could do is not renew her contract it seems but have the decency to point out where she needs improving in her work and maybe her attitude if that is also a problem.

    No I don't think you will be able to use her surgery against her either and shouldn't even be mentioned again.
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    You say she's a good worker.

    It sounds to me like your reasons are mostly personality differences to me.

    I wouldn't recommend she be fired.
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • pjfan31pjfan31 Posts: 7,331
    yes I am not denying that personality is playing a big role. But I have been told if I don't like her we don't have to renew... But I must also stress, that there are other things (work related) that are also affecting my judgement. Yes I think she is a good/ok worker, and I think I would offer her a role in a lower capacity... She also has leaves 1hr45mins early twice a week which affects us big time...

    The reason I pointed out about her injury are the following: when she was hired, her injury was known to us, but it was to get better. She said it would not affect her work after the first couple of weeks. Which it has. Now she mentions she is going in for more surgery. If she has time off, I have no one to replace her with for weeks/month... Her injury was not sustained as a result of a workplace incident. If it was, that would be whole new ball game. And I recently had a staff member take indefinite time off as she is not well. So one more staff down.

    Thankyou for your input... This is extremely hard
    Sydney 11/02/2003
    Sydney 14/02/2003
    Sydney 07/11/2006
    Sydney 18/11/2006
    Sydney 22/11/2009
    EV Sydney 18/03/2011
    EV Sydney 19/03/2011
    EV Sydney 20/03/2011
    Melbourne 24/01/2014
    Sydney 26/01/2014
    EV Sydney 13/02/2014
  • release23420release23420 Posts: 1,176
    i am calling you out mate, as jammer friend, you like her bro, an she isnt giving you tha attention you want not cool to fire her over that,, just show her the way at work yo, an some of things that seem to bug you,,seem to ber personalty but hey we are who we are ,, :mrgreen:
  • BigdaBigda Posts: 469
    mentioning her surgery would be the lowest of all plays. dont do it.

    if she is ok worker (what kind of concerns do other people have?) but just doesnt feel the need/pleasure of getting into "how was your weekend?" conversations, doesnt mean you cant talk to her about anything else. maybe she is focused on work which would be positive, or your topics are too random for her to even bother.

    on the other hand, if you feel she'd be rotten apple in your basket, you should part your ways.

    you need to ask yourself a lot of questions first.

    and also: do kids like her?
    _____________________________
    Prague '95 (w/Neil Young), Warsaw '96, Seattle '98, Katowice x2 '00, Berlin '00, Berlin '06, Katowice '07, Copenhagen '07, Belfast '10, Berlin '10, Amsterdam '12, Prague'12, Berlin x2 '12, Vienna '14, Berlin '14..
  • release23420release23420 Posts: 1,176
    pjfan31 wrote:
    yes I am not denying that personality is playing a big role. But I have been told if I don't like her we don't have to renew... But I must also stress, that there are other things (work related) that are also affecting my judgement. Yes I think she is a good/ok worker, and I think I would offer her a role in a lower capacity... She also has leaves 1hr45mins early twice a week which affects us big time...

    The reason I pointed out about her injury are the following: when she was hired, her injury was known to us, but it was to get better. She said it would not affect her work after the first couple of weeks. Which it has. Now she mentions she is going in for more surgery. If she has time off, I have no one to replace her with for weeks/month... Her injury was not sustained as a result of a workplace incident. If it was, that would be whole new ball game. And I recently had a staff member take indefinite time off as she is not well. So one more staff down.

    Thankyou for your input... This is extremely hard



    there no way to work with injury, find things she do til it fully heals
  • pjfan31pjfan31 Posts: 7,331
    The kids don't mind her. Some have trouble responding to her...

    I can't work tuesday mornings, and for the 2nd tuesday in a row a kid has played up. Last week he headbutted a kid and this week he got in a fight. This is a huge factor for me, as soon I will be having more time off as I have to do practical placements for my teaching degree. This was the whole purpose of hiring her. There have been instances where children have been playing unsupervised (which I spoke to her about).

    Alright, surgery is out, I will not mention it, but it is still a concern... because we will be under-staffed which is illegal when working with children.

    and no way do I like her :lol::lol: I am chasing some other honey atm ;) But speaking of conflicts, I've had this girl who is studying to be a teacher ask for a job... Now this girl I had a fling with... and then we were going to go for round two, but she threw up, so I put her in a taxi and sent her home... :lol: Now that will be my next thread... should I give this girl a job?

    I also want to re-iterate. This is not just a job for me... I put hours in on the side there, volunteer my time to raise money for it do other things on the side because it is the kind of job that looks after its workers. Like they fully support my education and me needing time off for practical placements, they give me 12 weeks paid holidays a year, I get a healthy christmas bonus... so I want the best for this place...
    Sydney 11/02/2003
    Sydney 14/02/2003
    Sydney 07/11/2006
    Sydney 18/11/2006
    Sydney 22/11/2009
    EV Sydney 18/03/2011
    EV Sydney 19/03/2011
    EV Sydney 20/03/2011
    Melbourne 24/01/2014
    Sydney 26/01/2014
    EV Sydney 13/02/2014
  • HeavyHandsHeavyHands Posts: 2,130
    As a manager, if you can quantify/qualify your reasons for firing her, that is all a steering committee/board will really care about. Did she have work performance issues? Are they habitual? Are they in scope and scale so as to affect the operational goals of the business? Is she a liability? Did you discuss those points with her and give her the opportunity to rectify them? Did you properly document her failings/successes?

    If you did all of these things and she is still a problem then you should be in the clear to fire her. You need only to make your case to the steering committee/board and present your documentation. If you have not properly documented these things then typically you have little-to-no merit to plead your case with.

    Make a point to document things. At the end of each day take a look at each day's occurrences. Ask yourself "Was this thing really that bad? Is it only bothering me, or others too (this includes staff and children)? Is it affecting the bottom line?" If you find that the list is populated with personality-based things you disagree with that's one thing. If you are finding actual infractions then that's another.

    Here's the thing though... If her behavior/attitude/performance is affecting the overall work environment to such a degree that operational goals run the risk of not being met, then recommend to the steering committee/board that she be fired. There's nothing wrong with saying someone's personality doesn't fit and they need to go. Jim Collins makes that point rather convincingly in his book Good To Great. From the sound of things they will support your decision. Building an organization with the right people is essential to it's success.

    The point about her needing to take medical leave is a delicate topic. I tend to agree with what people have said above - That it is primarily wrong (and most likely illegal) to fire someone because you are aware of them needing to take time off for medical purposes. In that respect it should be left alone. However if what you said about staffing numbers and legal compliance is true, that definitely needs to be addressed. You should tell the board that at some point in the future in order to maintain compliance they will have to authorize the temporary hiring of an employee to cover for someone going on medical leave.

    If they do authorize the hiring of a temp, use that time as a dry run to see if they are a better fit. If they are, and are interested in the job permanently, fire the original worker after she gets back from med leave. It's a completely legitimate argument to say that the organization runs better with someone else and she's no longer needed.

    I've seen a few situations like yours up close over the past few years. If the proper justification is there, rip the band-aid off and fire her sooner rather than later. You'll be thankful you did.
    "A lot more people are capable of being big out there that just don't give themselves a chance." -Stone Gossard
  • PureandEasyPureandEasy Posts: 5,799
    Well first of all, her injury limits her ability to do her job as specified. Right there, you have a reason not to keep her. She has not been on the job long enough that as the employer you are required to guarantee her job protection (through FML or whatever they may have there in Oz).

    You need to sit down and review everything, her performance, her attendance, her interaction with the kids and co-workers, then make your decision. Don’t bring your personal feelings into it, they don’t matter.
  • pandorapandora Posts: 21,855
    gosh... she's 18? she has a lot of growing up to do...
    the human brain is not fully developed until 25!

    My daughter had a serious forklift accident not unlike car accident injuries.
    That has very much humbled her and helped her to feel the pain of others,
    two mature qualities for her young years.

    Firing someone is very hard to do if you are a caring person,
    it actually can make you physically ill.

    I don't envy your position...

    above all else it is what is good for your kids and you know this. If she is or has the potential to be good for the kids, take the time to help this young girl be all she can... if not let her find a job that will.
  • DewieCoxDewieCox Posts: 11,425
    Get rid of her. You say she's neglected the children, she sounds hard to teach, and it sounds like she has a history of under performing for her job that's carried to her current position.

    Don't fire her b/c you dislike her, but don't keep her b/c you think your disliking her is clouding your judgment.

    As a PIC don't you want to work with people that are as committed as you.
  • pjfan31pjfan31 Posts: 7,331
    Thank you from everyone I really appreciate it.

    We had a meeting with her and the president of the committee today.

    First up she was asked how she is going where she then proceeded to point things out that was 'wrong' with our centre. She raised about 4 or 5 points, of which maybe one was valid. She bought up points about other staff which were not necessary and to be frank annoyed me. As I noted, if she has concerns to raise them with me, rather than wait to do so in a forum such as this. In my opinion, she was trying to get one over me.

    I am satisfied that her injury will play no part in the decision as the actual surgery will not affect the running of the centre. My biggest concern was that we have 1 staff member to 15 kids. We don't have a lot of staff on the books and it makes it difficult to cater for periods of absence.

    She seems to be full of little excuses as to why she doesn't do something. It is quite frustrating that she will attribute it to something else. This is a problem.

    This morning she and the children were talking about a place called the blue mountains. She proceeded to say 'it is beautiful, but I guarantee you, nearly everytime you go there, there will be police and ambulances there' She was about to launch in to how it is a place for people to suicide until I said 'no, don't go there' so she heard me (she was in closer proximity to me than the children)... the kids were like 'why? why? why?' so I had to come up with something. The last thing we need is young children infatuated with suicide/scared of death.

    Again I was told by the president if there is a personal conflict we don't have to renew her contract. I guess they see me as Kobe Bryant and they're happy to build a team around me. I find it hard to justify not hiring her on the merits of whether I like her or not, but it does make my time at a place I love harder.

    After the meeting, I spoke with the president, and she was of the same opinion as me. If she doesn't improve in the next month, we will most likely offer her a position as a casual worker.

    This is hard, and something I haven't dealt with before... So I thank you for your discussion

    (a serious discussion on AET without being derailed... who would have thought aye?)

    P.s, she hasn't even heard of pearl Jam... I was ready to get rid of her on the spot....
    Sydney 11/02/2003
    Sydney 14/02/2003
    Sydney 07/11/2006
    Sydney 18/11/2006
    Sydney 22/11/2009
    EV Sydney 18/03/2011
    EV Sydney 19/03/2011
    EV Sydney 20/03/2011
    Melbourne 24/01/2014
    Sydney 26/01/2014
    EV Sydney 13/02/2014
  • pandorapandora Posts: 21,855
    The only other point I have to make is...
    my kids are absolutely nothing like they were when they were 18,
    entirely different people now in their mid twenties...
    night and day difference.

    In her defense, the way you describe her she seems to be a girl of 18.
    I would think to work with the kids you'd want someone with some continuing education
    or a few years of job experience.

    It takes a more mature personality ... one with patience and hindsight,
    who is devoted and unselfish to be a good role model for children.

    These traits some very young people have but may not be the general rule
    without more life experience and growth. Many are still kids themselves.

    Makes me wonder why she would have been considered in the first place. :?
  • threefish10threefish10 Posts: 7,392
    but is she good looking :|


    This should have been the very 1st question.

    If yes, will she sleep with you to keep her jorb??
    condescending and sarcastic since 1980
  • pjfan31pjfan31 Posts: 7,331
    Boys, the answer is a resounding no....

    pandora, A few of us sat in on the interview. WE voted 2-1 to give her a 3 month trial. The two of us (me being one of them) and the other being the principal of the school who is fantastic. She is great and I would love to one day model my teaching/interactions with the kids on her. The two of us thought that she could grow into the role. Yes 3 months is not long, but sufficient enough to say it isn't working.

    Last night, she came up to me in front of one of the parents of a child saying something we were doing wrong(minor, just redtape stuff). In front of the parent.... You would I've worked in customer service for a long time, and you would never say anything negative about workplace infront of a customer.

    Ii said 'next time you have something to say like that, please, do not say it in front of a parent as it is extremely unproffessional' Another cross next to her name...
    Sydney 11/02/2003
    Sydney 14/02/2003
    Sydney 07/11/2006
    Sydney 18/11/2006
    Sydney 22/11/2009
    EV Sydney 18/03/2011
    EV Sydney 19/03/2011
    EV Sydney 20/03/2011
    Melbourne 24/01/2014
    Sydney 26/01/2014
    EV Sydney 13/02/2014
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    This girl will never succeed in your eyes. You simply do not like her. What if roles were reversed and she had some power over your job and she didn't like you?
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • pandorapandora Posts: 21,855
    pjfan31 wrote:
    Boys, the answer is a resounding no....

    pandora, A few of us sat in on the interview. WE voted 2-1 to give her a 3 month trial. The two of us (me being one of them) and the other being the principal of the school who is fantastic. She is great and I would love to one day model my teaching/interactions with the kids on her. The two of us thought that she could grow into the role. Yes 3 months is not long, but sufficient enough to say it isn't working.

    Last night, she came up to me in front of one of the parents of a child saying something we were doing wrong(minor, just redtape stuff). In front of the parent.... You would I've worked in customer service for a long time, and you would never say anything negative about workplace infront of a customer.

    Ii said 'next time you have something to say like that, please, do not say it in front of a parent as it is extremely unproffessional' Another cross next to her name...
    Does she now suspect she is canned? Perhaps.

    Yes I thought it was not your sole decision to hire but I still wonder
    about taking a young person straight out of high school to fill a position of such responsibility.
    Perhaps wage is a consideration... the need to keep it low/ perhaps minimum wage
    and those with experience or continuing education may require a better salary.

    Also I thought to work with kids there needs to be a license involved.
    This license requiring a certain amount of hours in early childhood education.

    My other question was did she work with kids before?
    Perhaps she is experienced this being why she was chosen.
    maybe a mothers helper.
    So young, most of the kids I know worked part time,
    fast food type summer jobs when they were in high school, often switching jobs.

    If it was purely an opportunity given for someone so young I hope she can rise above this failure and not take it to heart because it appears she is probably out of there.

    I hope she finds something more suited and her surgeries go well.
    I admire her strength and this but one character builder on her path in life.
    I'd like to see how she's doing in 10 years... I hope she rocks it! :D
  • redrockredrock Posts: 18,341
    pjfan31 wrote:
    After the meeting, I spoke with the president, and she was of the same opinion as me. If she doesn't improve in the next month, we will most likely offer her a position as a casual worker..

    What you need to ensure is that proper training/counseling/support, etc. is given to enable her to improve.
  • catefrancescatefrances Posts: 29,003
    she was hired on a 3 month trial... if your reasons for terminating are legitimate, then get rid of her.

    maybe her age is relevant... maybe its not... maybe shes just not suited to the role she was hired for.
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • Thoughts_ArriveThoughts_Arrive Posts: 15,165
    Liquidate her.

    drevil.jpg
    Adelaide 17/11/2009, Melbourne 20/11/2009, Sydney 22/11/2009, Melbourne (Big Day Out Festival) 24/01/2014
  • pjfan31pjfan31 Posts: 7,331
    pandora wrote:
    pjfan31 wrote:
    Boys, the answer is a resounding no....

    pandora, A few of us sat in on the interview. WE voted 2-1 to give her a 3 month trial. The two of us (me being one of them) and the other being the principal of the school who is fantastic. She is great and I would love to one day model my teaching/interactions with the kids on her. The two of us thought that she could grow into the role. Yes 3 months is not long, but sufficient enough to say it isn't working.

    Last night, she came up to me in front of one of the parents of a child saying something we were doing wrong(minor, just redtape stuff). In front of the parent.... You would I've worked in customer service for a long time, and you would never say anything negative about workplace infront of a customer.

    Ii said 'next time you have something to say like that, please, do not say it in front of a parent as it is extremely unproffessional' Another cross next to her name...
    Does she now suspect she is canned? Perhaps.

    Yes I thought it was not your sole decision to hire but I still wonder
    about taking a young person straight out of high school to fill a position of such responsibility.
    Perhaps wage is a consideration... the need to keep it low/ perhaps minimum wage
    and those with experience or continuing education may require a better salary.

    Also I thought to work with kids there needs to be a license involved.
    This license requiring a certain amount of hours in early childhood education.

    My other question was did she work with kids before?
    Perhaps she is experienced this being why she was chosen.
    maybe a mothers helper.
    So young, most of the kids I know worked part time,
    fast food type summer jobs when they were in high school, often switching jobs.

    If it was purely an opportunity given for someone so young I hope she can rise above this failure and not take it to heart because it appears she is probably out of there.

    I hope she finds something more suited and her surgeries go well.
    I admire her strength and this but one character builder on her path in life.
    I'd like to see how she's doing in 10 years... I hope she rocks it! :D

    She has worked at a centre before, and also has some qualifications and is continuing to go to TAFE (which is like a college for not so smart people :p)

    As for workers, they can't have a criminal record/ crime against children (obviously). Also, we also try to do training days and stuff. You can get qualified through TAFE, which I have never done. But as I am doing a teaching degree, it surpasses that.

    I don't think she knows yet, I think she is starting to put an effort in. I also question how the other staff interact with someone who is younger than them (not by much mind you, I am the oldest staff member there at 25) and who is in more power (even though she fails to show).

    I too hope for the best for her. I do not dislike her, despite what has been written, but it is just hard...
    Sydney 11/02/2003
    Sydney 14/02/2003
    Sydney 07/11/2006
    Sydney 18/11/2006
    Sydney 22/11/2009
    EV Sydney 18/03/2011
    EV Sydney 19/03/2011
    EV Sydney 20/03/2011
    Melbourne 24/01/2014
    Sydney 26/01/2014
    EV Sydney 13/02/2014
  • moemoemoemoe Posts: 72
    pjfan31 wrote:
    pandora wrote:
    pjfan31 wrote:
    Boys, the answer is a resounding no....

    pandora, A few of us sat in on the interview. WE voted 2-1 to give her a 3 month trial. The two of us (me being one of them) and the other being the principal of the school who is fantastic. She is great and I would love to one day model my teaching/interactions with the kids on her. The two of us thought that she could grow into the role. Yes 3 months is not long, but sufficient enough to say it isn't working.

    Last night, she came up to me in front of one of the parents of a child saying something we were doing wrong(minor, just redtape stuff). In front of the parent.... You would I've worked in customer service for a long time, and you would never say anything negative about workplace infront of a customer.

    Ii said 'next time you have something to say like that, please, do not say it in front of a parent as it is extremely unproffessional' Another cross next to her name...
    Does she now suspect she is canned? Perhaps.

    Yes I thought it was not your sole decision to hire but I still wonder
    about taking a young person straight out of high school to fill a position of such responsibility.
    Perhaps wage is a consideration... the need to keep it low/ perhaps minimum wage
    and those with experience or continuing education may require a better salary.

    Also I thought to work with kids there needs to be a license involved.
    This license requiring a certain amount of hours in early childhood education.

    My other question was did she work with kids before?
    Perhaps she is experienced this being why she was chosen.
    maybe a mothers helper.
    So young, most of the kids I know worked part time,
    fast food type summer jobs when they were in high school, often switching jobs.

    If it was purely an opportunity given for someone so young I hope she can rise above this failure and not take it to heart because it appears she is probably out of there.

    I hope she finds something more suited and her surgeries go well.
    I admire her strength and this but one character builder on her path in life.
    I'd like to see how she's doing in 10 years... I hope she rocks it! :D

    She has worked at a centre before, and also has some qualifications and is continuing to go to TAFE (which is like a college for not so smart people :p)

    As for workers, they can't have a criminal record/ crime against children (obviously). Also, we also try to do training days and stuff. You can get qualified through TAFE, which I have never done. But as I am doing a teaching degree, it surpasses that.

    I don't think she knows yet, I think she is starting to put an effort in. I also question how the other staff interact with someone who is younger than them (not by much mind you, I am the oldest staff member there at 25) and who is in more power (even though she fails to show).

    I too hope for the best for her. I do not dislike her, despite what has been written, but it is just hard...


    TAFE is like a college for not so smart people? If you were kidding about this...... har de har har.

    If you weren't, then um, shame on you. I returned to study at TAFE after a long break raising four kids. I completed a Cert IV in Science first, to re-quaint myself with study and prepare for the concepts I'd be covering in my degree. I then went on to Uni and completed my degree and am now working in my chosen feild. TAFE isn't exactly a college for not so smart people, it's simply an alternative pathway for career goals. None of the people studying in my class were dumbarses, quite the opposite in fact. Most were mature age students who were returning to study to either enhance their current occupation, or to move in a completely different direction from their current one.

    Aside from that...... in order for any organization to run smoothly, especially where children are concerned, you need the right people. If this girl isn't up to the standard expected, then gently let her go. I do question the sensibility of employing someone so young for a job (2 IC) with such responsibility though. Even if she looked great on paper, personally I would have started her in a less demanding role and allowed her to work her way up to that responsibility.

    Again, if you were kidding on the TAFE comment, har de har har! ;)
  • so02seeso02see Posts: 238
    I dont know about your employment law but in UK if you fire someone and there is any hint that it is becasue of a health issue that you were warned about before you took them on, then you could be taken to court for unfair dismissal and she would be entitled to compensation.
    If she only has a short term contract, you could just let it finish and send her on her way, no explaination needed.
    I agree with the other guys, attitude and respect to colleagues and customers is just as much of a job requirement as doing the other day to day tasks. If she can't /won't behave in a professional manner and you keep notes of instances when she acts or speaks out of turn, you have every right to let her go.
    I have been in similar situations and dealt with it by having regular weekly one to one discussions with the person about what they think is acceptable and I fed back when I or other team members thought they had contradicted themselves. It might be uncomfortable for you but its part of being in charge of others and trust me, it's worth it and it works.
    I'm assuming she wants this job. Not that she wants A job but that she actually wants the job she is doing. If she's going through the motions that might be why she doesnt take it seriously and a chat should bring this to light. You might be doing her a favour to send her off to persue her real interests.
    Manchester 2000. Leeds 2006. Wembley 2007
    SBE/O2 London/Manchester UK/Seattle 2/LA 2/Philadelphia 2/3/4 2009
    MSG 1 & 2 2010. Dublin / Belfast / Hyde Park 2010
    Eddie solo NY 1 & 2 2011
    PJ20 weekend & My Birthday party 4th Sept
  • WildsWilds Posts: 4,329
    As someone who has worked in HR for the past ten years and dealt with terminations, you only have one choice.

    You must let her go.

    You are displaying all of the traits of someone who has all the answers, but won't pull the trigger.


    Here is how I handle all employees who are in their trial run. If I was starting my own company, would I hire this person.

    'Yes' - she stays
    'No' - she goes

    Personality is one of the biggest factors for a close working relationship. If she doesn't fit in with you, and especially the expectations of the other board members, THEN STOP TRYING TO MAKE EXCUSES TO KEEP HER.

    (In fact what you are doing is making excuses to fire her, which is worse)

    Your term has absolutely nothing to do with her injury, you just want to add on as much crap so you don't feel bad.

    Guess what, firing people sucks. It feels bad. But sometimes it is the right thing to do for yourself and the organization.

    The uppers have made it clear how they feel. You have made it clear how you feel. She is only there on a trial.

    She did not pass the trial period.

    I would move to immediate separation.
  • pjfan31pjfan31 Posts: 7,331
    Thanks guys... this has been really helpful this discussion....

    AS for TAFE, I spent two years at TAFE. IMO, it was no where near the standard of uni. Students, teachers, courses, attitudes everything. I went to TAFE before uni, and I went into uni completely lost and under-prepared. We were told several times 'basically, if you turn up you will pass.'

    Teachers would often cancel their classes at no notice. SO after traveling two hours there just to return home was a joke. Teachers often left mid-term leaving the course incomplete and students twiddling their thumbs. Classes were changed last minute. And the curriculum was no good.

    I do recognise that everyones TAFE experience is not like mine. But how we construct our view on the world is through personal experience. And, what I said above is my experience. TAFE is an institution that needs a lot of work. It does not compare to uni at all.

    However, I do recognise its importance in furthering someones education. And of course, it is the place to go if you want a trade... So, I was only slightly knocking it...
    Sydney 11/02/2003
    Sydney 14/02/2003
    Sydney 07/11/2006
    Sydney 18/11/2006
    Sydney 22/11/2009
    EV Sydney 18/03/2011
    EV Sydney 19/03/2011
    EV Sydney 20/03/2011
    Melbourne 24/01/2014
    Sydney 26/01/2014
    EV Sydney 13/02/2014
  • threefish10threefish10 Posts: 7,392
    pjfan31 wrote:
    Thanks guys... this has been really helpful this discussion....

    AS for TAFE, I spent two years at TAFE. IMO, it was no where near the standard of uni. Students, teachers, courses, attitudes everything. I went to TAFE before uni, and I went into uni completely lost and under-prepared. We were told several times 'basically, if you turn up you will pass.


    tafe was the drunkest 3 months of my life.
    condescending and sarcastic since 1980
  • Thoughts_ArriveThoughts_Arrive Posts: 15,165
    pjfan31 wrote:
    AS for TAFE, I spent two years at TAFE. IMO, it was no where near the standard of uni. Students, teachers, courses, attitudes everything. I went to TAFE before uni, and I went into uni completely lost and under-prepared. We were told several times 'basically, if you turn up you will pass.

    haha same here, two years in TAFE, so many idiots there so that they didn't have to work and collect youth allowance from Centerlink.
    It was funny seeing them drop like flies, by the end there were a small group of us left.
    Then I failed 3/4 of my subjects in my first semester in uni, it was so different to uni and a shock to me.
    I didn't treat it seriously enough and was not prepared. I then pulled my socks up and aced it :mrgreen:
    Adelaide 17/11/2009, Melbourne 20/11/2009, Sydney 22/11/2009, Melbourne (Big Day Out Festival) 24/01/2014
  • pjfan31pjfan31 Posts: 7,331
    pjfan31 wrote:
    AS for TAFE, I spent two years at TAFE. IMO, it was no where near the standard of uni. Students, teachers, courses, attitudes everything. I went to TAFE before uni, and I went into uni completely lost and under-prepared. We were told several times 'basically, if you turn up you will pass.

    haha same here, two years in TAFE, so many idiots there so that they didn't have to work and collect youth allowance from Centerlink.
    It was funny seeing them drop like flies, by the end there were a small group of us left.
    Then I failed 3/4 of my subjects in my first semester in uni, it was so different to uni and a shock to me.
    I didn't treat it seriously enough and was not prepared. I then pulled my socks up and aced it :mrgreen:


    Fair dinkum, this is almost identical to me. However, I passed my subjects. Only just... Nowadays its better.

    Getting marks on a wide spectrum, Passes, credits, distinctions, got my 2nd HD in 3 and a half years of uni this week :D
    Sydney 11/02/2003
    Sydney 14/02/2003
    Sydney 07/11/2006
    Sydney 18/11/2006
    Sydney 22/11/2009
    EV Sydney 18/03/2011
    EV Sydney 19/03/2011
    EV Sydney 20/03/2011
    Melbourne 24/01/2014
    Sydney 26/01/2014
    EV Sydney 13/02/2014
  • capability means nothing in a job if there is personal conflict. if the person doesn't fit with others, get rid of her, before it's too late! believe me, my company went through that not long ago. This woman was a NIGHTMARE. My manager asked two of my co workers at the time (before her probation was up) how she was doing. They hated her, but didn't want to be mean and say so. Boy, did we all pay for that. Two full years later of her absolute fucking HELL and they finally canned her ass.

    And it had absolutely nothing to do with her work performance.
    Gimli 1993
    Fargo 2003
    Winnipeg 2005
    Winnipeg 2011
    St. Paul 2014
Sign In or Register to comment.