Home› All Encompassing Trip

Quiz: Who would you kill?

normnorm Posts: 31,146
edited April 2011 in All Encompassing Trip
a little mindfuck for ya

http://www.pbs.org/wnet/need-to-know/cu ... quiz/8315/
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • FifthelementFifthelement Posts: 6,958
    Hmm, by the end, I was like, kill the four fuckers, just for being stupid enough to keep being caught in the same situation ;):lol::mrgreen:

    What does that say about my moral compass? What did you do Norm?
    "What the CANUCK happened?!? - Esquimalt Barber Shop
  • AzWickerAzWicker Posts: 1,162
    I let the train run flipping no switches, why should the guy who was NOT on an active track have to die for the 4 idiot hikers. Darwin!
    Ed: 2011-07-09 2012-11-04
    PJ: 2011-09-03 2011-09-04
  • Who PrincessWho Princess Posts: 7,305
    Why can't Steve just yell at everybody to get out of the way? :P
    "The stars are all connected to the brain."
  • Thorns2010Thorns2010 Posts: 2,200
    BS questions!

    I chose to kill the 1 person each time, but, I would call a foul in the basketball game.

    Why? Because they are totally UNRELATED!!! Killing 1 vs 4 is vastly different then calling a foul on a play that doesn't end up with someone being killed.

    So TAKE THAT! stupid quiz!
  • stipe19stipe19 Posts: 237
    In the basketball game I call the foul on Lebron. Cause FUCK Lebron
  • rafierafie Posts: 2,160
    I let the 4 guys die in all the scenarios. What about the people on the train who might die if the train collided with a boulder? What if the alternate track had another train on it filled with people and the crash would kill everyone? Who is to say that the lives of the 4 hikers are worth more than that of the single guy? What if instead of a grown man on the track it was a baby, would you still kill the baby in order to save the 4 hikers? Maybe the hikers wanted to commit suicide.
    We are not God and should not decide who lives or dies.
    Still can't believe I met Mike Mccready at the Guggenheim and got a pic with him!!!!!

    2010: 9/7/10 - Bilbao
    2012: 26-27/6/12 - Amsterdam ~~ 29/6/12 - Werchter ~~ 4-5/7/12 - Berlin
    2014: 25/6/14 - Vienna ~~ 26/6/14 - Berlin
  • normnorm Posts: 31,146
    first, Steve sure does get in a lot of sticky situations with trains

    b) wouldn't one need one of those fats guys they cut out of homes to push in front of the train?
  • zarocatzarocat Posts: 1,901
    norm wrote:
    first, Steve sure does get in a lot of sticky situations with trains
    :lol::lol::lol:

    “a guy large enough that if dropped in front of a speeding locomotive, would definitely stop it” ... lol ...

    That was good though, thanks for the post.
    1996: Toronto
    1998: Barrie
    2000: Montreal, Toronto, Auburn Hills
    2003: Cleveland, Buffalo, Toronto, Montreal
    2004: Boston X2, Grand Rapids
    2005: Kitchener, London, Hamilton, Montreal, Ottawa, Toronto
    2006: Toronto X2
    2009: Toronto
    2011: PJ20, Montreal, Toronto X2, Hamilton
    2012: Manchester X2, Amsterdam X2, Prague, Berlin X2, Philadelphia, Missoula
    2013: Pittsburg, Buffalo
    2014: Milan, Trieste, Vienna, Berlin, Stockholm, Oslo, Detroit
    2016: Ottawa, Toronto X2
    2018: Padova, Rome, Prague, Krakow, Berlin, Barcelona
    2022: Ottawa, Hamilton, Toronto
    2023: Chicago X2
    2024: New York X2
  • Who PrincessWho Princess Posts: 7,305
    norm wrote:
    first, Steve sure does get in a lot of sticky situations with trains
    My thought exactly. I kept looking for the option to kill Steve or where Steve throws himself in front of the train to save everyone.
    "The stars are all connected to the brain."
  • Who PrincessWho Princess Posts: 7,305
    rafie wrote:
    I let the 4 guys die in all the scenarios. What about the people on the train who might die if the train collided with a boulder? What if the alternate track had another train on it filled with people and the crash would kill everyone? Who is to say that the lives of the 4 hikers are worth more than that of the single guy? What if instead of a grown man on the track it was a baby, would you still kill the baby in order to save the 4 hikers? Maybe the hikers wanted to commit suicide.
    Considering what it takes to actually stop a train, throwing a fat guy or a big rock in front of it is pretty ludicrous. I think the laws of physics aren't supposed to apply in these scenarios. :ugeek:

    Part of the reason why it's hard to take the whole thing seriously. :roll: :lol:
    "The stars are all connected to the brain."
  • normnorm Posts: 31,146
    whoprincess wrote:
    norm wrote:
    first, Steve sure does get in a lot of sticky situations with trains
    My thought exactly. I kept looking for the option to kill Steve or where Steve throws himself in front of the train to save everyone.

    :lol::lol:
  • Get_RightGet_Right Posts: 12,848
    That was nowhere near as interesting as I had hoped.
Sign In or Register to comment.