Bill and Ted 3

HughFreakingDillon

mace1229 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

mace1229 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

MayDay10 said:

Wasnt Rufus sent back in time to make sure it happened because it was somehow in danger of not happening if they didn't ace their project?

In terms of time travel stories, they could have easily squashed a bug in one of the first two movies which led to Biff Tannen getting the almanac, thus snuffing out the careers of the Wyld Stallyns 

yes, very true. they could literally put any spin on it, since you can do virtually anything with a time travel story and be plausible. 

To be fair, I think when you introduce time travel into a movie like this, most viewers are not looking for plausibility. 

I know. I just mean time travel as a subject is something you can do anything with, when I say "plausible", I mean believable since it doesn't exist. there are no laws governing the subject. 

I get you. It just makes me laugh when watching the Walking Dead and someone says "how would they drive cars, the gas would have gone bad?" But they are totally okay with the zombie thing. I throw plausibility out in a lot of genres. 

I actually have the same issue with some things about TWD (like the fuel thing-not just gone bad, but they would eventually run out of cars to siphon). Yes, you accept a certain level of implausibility with science fiction shows, but the little details should still retain some believability. 

PJ_Soul

mace1229 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

mace1229 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

MayDay10 said:

Wasnt Rufus sent back in time to make sure it happened because it was somehow in danger of not happening if they didn't ace their project?

In terms of time travel stories, they could have easily squashed a bug in one of the first two movies which led to Biff Tannen getting the almanac, thus snuffing out the careers of the Wyld Stallyns 

yes, very true. they could literally put any spin on it, since you can do virtually anything with a time travel story and be plausible. 

To be fair, I think when you introduce time travel into a movie like this, most viewers are not looking for plausibility. 

I know. I just mean time travel as a subject is something you can do anything with, when I say "plausible", I mean believable since it doesn't exist. there are no laws governing the subject. 

I get you. It just makes me laugh when watching the Walking Dead and someone says "how would they drive cars, the gas would have gone bad?" But they are totally okay with the zombie thing. I throw plausibility out in a lot of genres. 

I'm not kidding - someone in this horror group on facebook attempted to discuss a zombie apocalypse with me as though he truly thought it was real, lol. I was all, "yeah sure, I could survive a slow zombie apocalypse, but not a fast zombie one, har har. I'd fish and hunt and forage and use water filters, lol". His reply was seriously like, "Hey idiot, if you didn't even MENTION farming of any kind, you obviously do not have the know-how to survive this - pull your head out of your ass or else you're going to die within a couple of months." Ummmm OH. We're talking about  the very REAL impending zombie apocalypse apparently. I had no clue, LOL.

PJ_Soul

HughFreakingDillon said:

mace1229 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

mace1229 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

MayDay10 said:

Wasnt Rufus sent back in time to make sure it happened because it was somehow in danger of not happening if they didn't ace their project?

In terms of time travel stories, they could have easily squashed a bug in one of the first two movies which led to Biff Tannen getting the almanac, thus snuffing out the careers of the Wyld Stallyns 

yes, very true. they could literally put any spin on it, since you can do virtually anything with a time travel story and be plausible. 

To be fair, I think when you introduce time travel into a movie like this, most viewers are not looking for plausibility. 

I know. I just mean time travel as a subject is something you can do anything with, when I say "plausible", I mean believable since it doesn't exist. there are no laws governing the subject. 

I get you. It just makes me laugh when watching the Walking Dead and someone says "how would they drive cars, the gas would have gone bad?" But they are totally okay with the zombie thing. I throw plausibility out in a lot of genres. 

I actually have the same issue with some things about TWD (like the fuel thing-not just gone bad, but they would eventually run out of cars to siphon). Yes, you accept a certain level of implausibility with science fiction shows, but the little details should still retain some believability. 

That gas thing is a problem in almost all post-apocalypitc movies. The only time I've seen it addressed on any screen was in that TV show The Last Man On Earth. Everyone else is just driving around indefinitely.

eddiec

PJ_Soul said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

mace1229 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

mace1229 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

MayDay10 said:

Wasnt Rufus sent back in time to make sure it happened because it was somehow in danger of not happening if they didn't ace their project?

In terms of time travel stories, they could have easily squashed a bug in one of the first two movies which led to Biff Tannen getting the almanac, thus snuffing out the careers of the Wyld Stallyns 

yes, very true. they could literally put any spin on it, since you can do virtually anything with a time travel story and be plausible. 

To be fair, I think when you introduce time travel into a movie like this, most viewers are not looking for plausibility. 

I know. I just mean time travel as a subject is something you can do anything with, when I say "plausible", I mean believable since it doesn't exist. there are no laws governing the subject. 

I get you. It just makes me laugh when watching the Walking Dead and someone says "how would they drive cars, the gas would have gone bad?" But they are totally okay with the zombie thing. I throw plausibility out in a lot of genres. 

I actually have the same issue with some things about TWD (like the fuel thing-not just gone bad, but they would eventually run out of cars to siphon). Yes, you accept a certain level of implausibility with science fiction shows, but the little details should still retain some believability. 

That gas thing is a problem in almost all post-apocalypitc movies. The only time I've seen it addressed on any screen was in that TV show The Last Man On Earth. Everyone else is just driving around indefinitely.

That's what was great about 'The Road Warrior', it was all about fuel.

dankind

eddiec said:

PJ_Soul said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

mace1229 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

mace1229 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

MayDay10 said:

Wasnt Rufus sent back in time to make sure it happened because it was somehow in danger of not happening if they didn't ace their project?

In terms of time travel stories, they could have easily squashed a bug in one of the first two movies which led to Biff Tannen getting the almanac, thus snuffing out the careers of the Wyld Stallyns 

yes, very true. they could literally put any spin on it, since you can do virtually anything with a time travel story and be plausible. 

To be fair, I think when you introduce time travel into a movie like this, most viewers are not looking for plausibility. 

I know. I just mean time travel as a subject is something you can do anything with, when I say "plausible", I mean believable since it doesn't exist. there are no laws governing the subject. 

I get you. It just makes me laugh when watching the Walking Dead and someone says "how would they drive cars, the gas would have gone bad?" But they are totally okay with the zombie thing. I throw plausibility out in a lot of genres. 

I actually have the same issue with some things about TWD (like the fuel thing-not just gone bad, but they would eventually run out of cars to siphon). Yes, you accept a certain level of implausibility with science fiction shows, but the little details should still retain some believability. 

That gas thing is a problem in almost all post-apocalypitc movies. The only time I've seen it addressed on any screen was in that TV show The Last Man On Earth. Everyone else is just driving around indefinitely.

That's what was great about 'The Road Warrior', it was all about fuel.

Another great thing about that extraordinary film: Emil Minty as the Feral Kid.

eeriepadave

William Sadler to reprise is role as "Death" in the third movie

Ledbetterman10

eeriepadave said:

William Sadler to reprise is role as "Death" in the third movie

I had a feeling this might happen!

"You may be king or a little street sweeper but sooner or later, you dance with the reaper"

eeriepadave

Ledbetterman10 said:

eeriepadave said:

William Sadler to reprise is role as "Death" in the third movie

I had a feeling this might happen!

"You may be king or a little street sweeper but sooner or later, you dance with the reaper"

lol:

"You have sank my battleship"

Ledbetterman10

eeriepadave said:

Ledbetterman10 said:

eeriepadave said:

William Sadler to reprise is role as "Death" in the third movie

I had a feeling this might happen!

"You may be king or a little street sweeper but sooner or later, you dance with the reaper"

lol:

"You have sank my battleship"

igotid88

eeriepadave

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3uCiKXqhGBc

Ledbetterman10

Can't wait. 

Ledbetterman10

tempo_n_groove

https://www.billboard.com/articles/news/movies/9398651/bill-ted-face-the-music-first-trailer!

Spiritual_Chaos

Never seen these films. And don't remember anyone talking about them growing up. Don't know if I was slightly to young at the time, or if they didn't catch on in Sweden (like Waynes World and other comedies did).

dankind

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Never seen these films. And don't remember anyone talking about them growing up. Don't know if I was slightly to young at the time, or if they didn't catch on in Sweden (like Waynes World and other comedies did).

The second one is a cheap homage to Bergman.

Poncier

tempo_n_groove said:

https://www.billboard.com/articles/news/movies/9398651/bill-ted-face-the-music-first-trailer!

I wonder if writers put sentences like this in subconsciously:

So, they tap their daughters

tempo_n_groove

Poncier said:

tempo_n_groove said:

https://www.billboard.com/articles/news/movies/9398651/bill-ted-face-the-music-first-trailer!

I wonder if writers put sentences like this in subconsciously:

So, they tap their daughters

hahahahahahahaha!!!!  I expect this from @dankind

dankind

tempo_n_groove said:

Poncier said:

tempo_n_groove said:

https://www.billboard.com/articles/news/movies/9398651/bill-ted-face-the-music-first-trailer!

I wonder if writers put sentences like this in subconsciously:

So, they tap their daughters

hahahahahahahaha!!!!  I expect this from @dankind

Why insult @Poncier like that?

Spiritual_Chaos

dankind said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Never seen these films. And don't remember anyone talking about them growing up. Don't know if I was slightly to young at the time, or if they didn't catch on in Sweden (like Waynes World and other comedies did).

The second one is a cheap homage to Bergman.

You mean, similiar to The Last Action Hero