Home› A Moving Train

killer wants to donate his organs

Godfather.Godfather. Posts: 12,504
edited March 2011 in A Moving Train
why not ?

Godfather.

http://www.katu.com/news/local/118152519.html
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • keeponrockinkeeponrockin Posts: 7,446
    I don't see why not either. I'm a big supporter of donation, my family knows/filled out the card, if I die, open me up! I won't need my kidneys/liver/whatever else anymore.
    Believe me, when I was growin up, I thought the worst thing you could turn out to be was normal, So I say freaks in the most complementary way. Here's a song by a fellow freak - E.V
  • dimitrispearljamdimitrispearljam Posts: 139,721
    exactly..why not...seems ok to me
    "...Dimitri...He talks to me...'.."The Ghost of Greece..".
    "..That's One Happy Fuckin Ghost.."
    “..That came up on the Pillow Case...This is for the Greek, With Our Apologies.....”
  • JeanwahJeanwah Posts: 6,363
    I don't see what the big deal is. Let him donate! I know I will be.
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    i am kind of torn on this one. the article says the 3 drug cocktail used ruins organs. if the 3 drugs ruin organs, why does the single drug not do the same? either way the victim is poisoned so in my mind i am thinking that the organ might be ruined because the drugs work systematically, meaining on particular systems of the body so i am guessing that the organs involved in that particular system only would be ruined.

    i read somewhere that there is possibly a phenomenon caled "cellular memory" where the people who receive transplanted organs have at times taken on characteristics of the donor. like if the donor was an alcoholic the recipient takes on those same characteristics. i am wondering if the same can be possible in people with a violent past...

    http://hubpages.com/hub/Cellular-Memori ... Recipients

    http://bobsnewheart.wordpress.com/2008/ ... -of-donor/

    http://bobsnewheart.wordpress.com/2009/ ... ality-too/
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • The Waiting Trophy ManThe Waiting Trophy Man Niagara region, Ontario, Canada Posts: 12,158
    I'll take this one step further and say that murderers, especially the hardcore ones, like child murderers and serial rapists should be 'put down' and their organs donated with or without consent. That is how they can repay society instead of sitting in jail and living off taxpayer dollars. But good on him for doing this. I guess it's the least he can do.
    Another habit says it's in love with you
    Another habit says its long overdue
    Another habit like an unwanted friend
    I'm so happy with my righteous self
  • Godfather.Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    i am kind of torn on this one. the article says the 3 drug cocktail used ruins organs. if the 3 drugs ruin organs, why does the single drug not do the same? either way the victim is poisoned so in my mind i am thinking that the organ might be ruined because the drugs work systematically, meaining on particular systems of the body so i am guessing that the organs involved in that particular system only would be ruined.

    i read somewhere that there is possibly a phenomenon caled "cellular memory" where the people who receive transplanted organs have at times taken on characteristics of the donor. like if the donor was an alcoholic the recipient takes on those same characteristics. i am wondering if the same can be possible in people with a violent past...

    http://hubpages.com/hub/Cellular-Memori ... Recipients

    http://bobsnewheart.wordpress.com/2008/ ... -of-donor/

    http://bobsnewheart.wordpress.com/2009/ ... ality-too/

    put em out carve em up take the goods then administer the final dose :D
    but the cellular memory thing is a tough one, a good bro of mine had a heart transplant and died a little over a year later but he never mentioned anything like that cellular memory stuff, if I need a organ to save my life I think I would take the chance.

    Godfather.
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    The Waiting Trophy Man wrote:
    I'll take this one step further and say that murderers, especially the hardcore ones, like child murderers and serial rapists should be 'put down' and their organs donated with or without consent. That is how they can repay society instead of sitting in jail and living off taxpayer dollars. But good on him for doing this. I guess it's the least he can do.
    i believe that what you are proposing would require a surgeon to harvest the organs in the midst of an execution. and no surgeon in his right mind and operating within the scope of his license or hippocratic oath would stoop to stealing organs. this hypthetical situation is highly unethical because a surgeon's task is to "do no harm", and harvesting vital organs from a person who is living is tantamount to attempted murder, and taking them from a dead person without consent is stealing.

    also there are religious implications involved with this. some faiths require the body to be complete and undissected when it is prepared for burial, cremation, etc. taking organs from those people would violate their religious rights.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • __ Posts: 6,651
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    The Waiting Trophy Man wrote:
    I'll take this one step further and say that murderers, especially the hardcore ones, like child murderers and serial rapists should be 'put down' and their organs donated with or without consent. That is how they can repay society instead of sitting in jail and living off taxpayer dollars. But good on him for doing this. I guess it's the least he can do.
    i believe that what you are proposing would require a surgeon to harvest the organs in the midst of an execution. and no surgeon in his right mind and operating within the scope of his license or hippocratic oath would stoop to stealing organs. this hypthetical situation is highly unethical because a surgeon's task is to "do no harm", and harvesting vital organs from a person who is living is tantamount to attempted murder, and taking them from a dead person without consent is stealing.

    also there are religious implications involved with this. some faiths require the body to be complete and undissected when it is prepared for burial, cremation, etc. taking organs from those people would violate their religious rights.

    Fucking liberal. Always thinking about rights & shit! ;)
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    _ wrote:
    Fucking liberal. Always thinking about rights & shit! ;)

    tumblr_l72ocbI6fG1qcwtdzo1_400.jpg



    is that sensitive and defensive enough for you? :lol:


    um, actually yeah, going back and re-reading that makes me kinda sound like a pussy...but hey, we have to remain consistent and stand by what we believe in, right? :mrgreen:
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • __ Posts: 6,651
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    _ wrote:
    Fucking liberal. Always thinking about rights & shit! ;)

    tumblr_l72ocbI6fG1qcwtdzo1_400.jpg



    is that sensitive and defensive enough for you? :lol:

    :lol:
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    um, actually yeah, going back and re-reading that makes me kinda sound like a pussy...but hey, we have to remain consistent and stand by what we believe in, right? :mrgreen:

    I didn't think you sounded like a pussy.... not that there's anything wrong with pussies. ;)
  • catefrancescatefrances Posts: 29,003
    so long as its not hair... cause i saw what happened to homer when he got a hair transplant from snake. 8-)
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • Prince Of DorknessPrince Of Dorkness Posts: 3,763
    Better him than me.

    I refuse to donate my organs. As a gay man, I'm not permitted to donate blood.

    If you won't take my blood when I'm alive, you can lick me where I shit if you think you're getting my gizzard once I'm dead.
    I can't drive without Pearl Jam
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    Prince Of Dorkness wrote:
    Better him than me.

    I refuse to donate my organs. As a gay man, I'm not permitted to donate blood.

    If you won't take my blood when I'm alive, you can lick me where I shit if you think you're getting my gizzard once I'm dead.
    i am sure for some reason they would deny using your organs as well....i mean, if they deny your right to give blood, how can they possibly allow your organs to be used? the blood in question no doubt runs through those organs, so for them to deny you the chance to donate blood, it seems to me that you would automatically be denied the opportunity to donate your organs...because, logically speaking, you can not use the organs if you can not use the blood that runs through those organs.

    personally, i would not be turning down anything, blood, organs, tissue, etc unless it was proven to me beyond a reasonable doubt that your homosexual blood is more contaminated than blood donated from any random heterosexual. blood is blood, if it is disease free, why can we not use it???? :?
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • mysticweedmysticweed Posts: 3,710
    Jeanwah wrote:
    I don't see what the big deal is. Let him donate! I know I will be.

    same here
    and
    same here
    fuck 'em if they can't take a joke

    "what a long, strange trip it's been"
Sign In or Register to comment.