the intellect and the big bang

sparticlesoup

the intellect can be seen as a light cone. the larger end of the cone would represent earlier times while the smaller end of the cone would show later times, and increasing efficiency in probing nature which may culminate in another big bang. but if one was not completely dedicated to the intellect, what would be it's position relative to the intellect? what is the pattern that the intellect shares will all other forms of life that choose to abandon the intellect at some point, outside time?
the goal of the intellect is never ending. they say you can't fully understand quantum mechanics, even while they attempt just that. light cone gets smaller, probing of nature deeper, with out the slightest hint of fear or apprehension in what they may find. the intellect almost always has the right of way, giving that up only for the big bang itself, which is fully contained and developed by the perfect body the intellect has become. if the intellect did not attain perfection, it could not cause the big bang, and the whole cycle would break down. the necessity of the big bang is based in the decadence of beings with partial intellects basically being bailed out by the ever advancing tide of scrutiny that is the intellect. we are two different types, not at odds, but symbiotic. without the intellect, there would be no big bang,
and that which couldn't bang would be eternally hellish for those trapped inside.
on the other hand, a universe that contained only true intellectuals couldn't exist either because there would be no cause for them to be there. the intellect meets decadence at exactly that point where both sides are in total agreement concerning
how to proceed.

pandora

sparticlesoup wrote:

the intellect can be seen as a light cone. the larger end of the cone would represent earlier times while the smaller end of the cone would show later times, and increasing efficiency in probing nature which may culminate in another big bang. but if one was not completely dedicated to the intellect, what would be it's position relative to the intellect? what is the pattern that the intellect shares will all other forms of life that choose to abandon the intellect at some point, outside time?
the goal of the intellect is never ending. they say you can't fully understand quantum mechanics, even while they attempt just that. light cone gets smaller, probing of nature deeper, with out the slightest hint of fear or apprehension in what they may find. the intellect almost always has the right of way, giving that up only for the big bang itself, which is fully contained and developed by the perfect body the intellect has become. if the intellect did not attain perfection, it could not cause the big bang, and the whole cycle would break down. the necessity of the big bang is based in the decadence of beings with partial intellects basically being bailed out by the ever advancing tide of scrutiny that is the intellect. we are two different types, not at odds, but symbiotic. without the intellect, there would be no big bang,
and that which couldn't bang would be eternally hellish for those trapped inside.
on the other hand, a universe that contained only true intellectuals couldn't exist either because there would be no cause for them to be there. the intellect meets decadence at exactly that point where both sides are in total agreement concerning
how to proceed.

:think: hmmm :think: :think: I don't want to hurt myself though

really, kidding aside, my miracle is directly related to time.... and gave me the answer I was searching.
In the process brought me to a place of peace, a place without fear...because there is no reason to fear.

I will read through many more times, Bright One....

thank you

justam

The trail of your ideas is interesting.

rollings

atoms are the universe
the universe is atoms
and everything contained in the cone
when small is big
and big is small
there will be understanding
until then
the entirety of pinpoints contained in the horizons above us
and the entirety of pinpoints contained in the horizons below us
versus the one pinpoint of understanding at the end of the cone
is what we have to sphere
and even then
it will still just be a figment
zenith
.
understanding quantum physics
is to just look away from it
so just don't

mysticweed

Half Full wrote:

atoms are the universe
the universe is atoms
and everything contained in the cone
when small is big
and big is small
there will be understanding
until then
the entirety of pinpoints contained in the horizons above us
and the entirety of pinpoints contained in the horizons below us
versus the one pinpoint of understanding at the end of the cone
is what we have to sphere
and even then
it will still just be a figment
zenith
.
understanding quantum physics
is to just look away from it
so just don't

"when small is big
and big is small
there will be understanding"

this is what i most want to believe


As knowledge increases
and our understanding broadens
more questions are created
the answers to which
are not understood

i can reconcile evolution of the universe with evolution of the soul
while everyday convinces me that we really
know next to nothing