Rumsfeld - No Apologies
gabers
Posts: 2,787
Donald Rumsfeld was interviewed on NPR yesterday and I thought I'd share the interview with you all. Ol' Rummy wasn't comfortable with the difficult questions, but ultimately answered questions about the decisions made during the hunt for Bin Laden and early days in Iraq the way we all knew he would - without regret or apology.
http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics ... -decisions
As Donald Rumsfeld might say, there are known knowns and known unknowns. And one known known is that the passage of time doesn't appear to have mellowed Rumsfeld.
In an interview with NPR's Steve Inskeep, the former Bush administration defense secretary was as feisty as ever. He challenged the premises of questions. And he suggested that others were more responsible for U.S. war policy decisions in Afghanistan and Iraq that are now widely viewed as mistakes — mistakes for which he has long been blamed.
The interview, part of his book tour for his new memoir Known and Unknown, wasn't the sort to make critics of the 78-year-old Rumsfeld view him in a new light.
Inskeep asked Rumsfeld why, in 2001, after the invasion of Afghanistan, the U.S. didn't deploy more of its troops to close Osama bin Laden's escape route from Tora Bora, instead of relying on Afghan forces.
INSKEEP: You make a valid point when you say you want to leave decisions to the commander on the ground. And you say the commander on the ground made the decision that it was better to proceed with Afghans.
RUMSFELD: Now, wait a second. There were not just Afghans. There were American forces involved. Special forces, CIA people.
INSKEEP: Fewer than 100.
RUMSFELD: Yeah.
INSKEEP: You say that that was valid to leave that decision to the commander.
RUMSFELD: I agreed with his decision.
INSKEEP: But at the same time, you were a secretary of defense who quite aggressively asked questions and took great pride in challenging people, asking them questions, questioning their assumptions. Did there ever come a time when you questioned Gen. (Tommy) Franks' assumptions in leaving American forces largely out of the picture in trying to close off the exits from Tora Bora?
RUMSFELD: I don't think that's a proper characterization ...
Rumsfeld indicated that while U.S. personnel weren't at Tora Bora in large numbers, an awe-inspiring amount of U.S. ordnance was used there.
In short, he appeared to be clinging to the so-called Rumsfeld Doctrine of relying on air power instead of ground forces. More than a few defense analysts have discredited that strategy.
Rumsfeld called the notion that more U.S. troops would have improved the chances of capturing bin Laden "speculation."
As defense secretary, Rumsfeld had a reputation for paying close attention to details. But he portrayed himself as leaving critical decisions to subordinates.
For instance, he said it was J. Paul Bremer, the U.S. proconsul who ran Iraq after Saddam Hussein's regime fell, who ordered the disbanding of the Iraqi military. Bremer has said he was only following orders from Rumsfeld subordinate Douglas Feith.
RUMSFELD: I don't recall it. But certainly, as secretary of defense, I'm responsible for what takes place in the department.
Inskeep also asked Rumsfeld about troop levels in Iraq, which many experts have for years said were too low to ensure stability in that nation after the U.S. invasion.
Rumsfeld has been blamed for believing too much in his own doctrine and failing to supply the troop numbers that could have kept Iraq from falling into chaos. The military surge of 2007 was meant to reverse that mistake.
But Rumsfeld said that was another area where Inskeep was not providing an "accurate characterization." A war plan was developed up the ranks that had the potential for as many as 400,000 U.S. troops to be deployed, Rumsfeld said.
But it was Franks and other generals who decided they could fight the war with fewer troops, said Rumsfeld, who depicts himself as more of a rubber stamp.
INSKEEP: Didn't you challenge the planners, right down to very small units, about whether this or that unit was needed?
Rumsfeld: No... I can't remember any specific small units I got involved with but one, and I think the documents on Rumsfeld.com will show this...
Rumsfeld said he got the Germans to provide a security unit to protect some assets in a country in the region to spare a U.S. unit from that duty.
Nearly eight years after the U.S. invasion of Iraq, questions persist about whether the conflict was destined to follow the election of President George W. Bush, because Hussein was seen as unfinished business from the administration of the first President Bush.
If that were true for some, Rumsfeld said, it wasn't for him.
INSKEEP: Did you go into your tenure as secretary of defense believing that war with Iraq was coming?
RUMSFELD: Oh, certainly not.
INSKEEP: Not that you were determined to cause it. I'm not asking that. But just that you believed that war was coming?
RUMSFELD: Absolutely not.
http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics ... -decisions
As Donald Rumsfeld might say, there are known knowns and known unknowns. And one known known is that the passage of time doesn't appear to have mellowed Rumsfeld.
In an interview with NPR's Steve Inskeep, the former Bush administration defense secretary was as feisty as ever. He challenged the premises of questions. And he suggested that others were more responsible for U.S. war policy decisions in Afghanistan and Iraq that are now widely viewed as mistakes — mistakes for which he has long been blamed.
The interview, part of his book tour for his new memoir Known and Unknown, wasn't the sort to make critics of the 78-year-old Rumsfeld view him in a new light.
Inskeep asked Rumsfeld why, in 2001, after the invasion of Afghanistan, the U.S. didn't deploy more of its troops to close Osama bin Laden's escape route from Tora Bora, instead of relying on Afghan forces.
INSKEEP: You make a valid point when you say you want to leave decisions to the commander on the ground. And you say the commander on the ground made the decision that it was better to proceed with Afghans.
RUMSFELD: Now, wait a second. There were not just Afghans. There were American forces involved. Special forces, CIA people.
INSKEEP: Fewer than 100.
RUMSFELD: Yeah.
INSKEEP: You say that that was valid to leave that decision to the commander.
RUMSFELD: I agreed with his decision.
INSKEEP: But at the same time, you were a secretary of defense who quite aggressively asked questions and took great pride in challenging people, asking them questions, questioning their assumptions. Did there ever come a time when you questioned Gen. (Tommy) Franks' assumptions in leaving American forces largely out of the picture in trying to close off the exits from Tora Bora?
RUMSFELD: I don't think that's a proper characterization ...
Rumsfeld indicated that while U.S. personnel weren't at Tora Bora in large numbers, an awe-inspiring amount of U.S. ordnance was used there.
In short, he appeared to be clinging to the so-called Rumsfeld Doctrine of relying on air power instead of ground forces. More than a few defense analysts have discredited that strategy.
Rumsfeld called the notion that more U.S. troops would have improved the chances of capturing bin Laden "speculation."
As defense secretary, Rumsfeld had a reputation for paying close attention to details. But he portrayed himself as leaving critical decisions to subordinates.
For instance, he said it was J. Paul Bremer, the U.S. proconsul who ran Iraq after Saddam Hussein's regime fell, who ordered the disbanding of the Iraqi military. Bremer has said he was only following orders from Rumsfeld subordinate Douglas Feith.
RUMSFELD: I don't recall it. But certainly, as secretary of defense, I'm responsible for what takes place in the department.
Inskeep also asked Rumsfeld about troop levels in Iraq, which many experts have for years said were too low to ensure stability in that nation after the U.S. invasion.
Rumsfeld has been blamed for believing too much in his own doctrine and failing to supply the troop numbers that could have kept Iraq from falling into chaos. The military surge of 2007 was meant to reverse that mistake.
But Rumsfeld said that was another area where Inskeep was not providing an "accurate characterization." A war plan was developed up the ranks that had the potential for as many as 400,000 U.S. troops to be deployed, Rumsfeld said.
But it was Franks and other generals who decided they could fight the war with fewer troops, said Rumsfeld, who depicts himself as more of a rubber stamp.
INSKEEP: Didn't you challenge the planners, right down to very small units, about whether this or that unit was needed?
Rumsfeld: No... I can't remember any specific small units I got involved with but one, and I think the documents on Rumsfeld.com will show this...
Rumsfeld said he got the Germans to provide a security unit to protect some assets in a country in the region to spare a U.S. unit from that duty.
Nearly eight years after the U.S. invasion of Iraq, questions persist about whether the conflict was destined to follow the election of President George W. Bush, because Hussein was seen as unfinished business from the administration of the first President Bush.
If that were true for some, Rumsfeld said, it wasn't for him.
INSKEEP: Did you go into your tenure as secretary of defense believing that war with Iraq was coming?
RUMSFELD: Oh, certainly not.
INSKEEP: Not that you were determined to cause it. I'm not asking that. But just that you believed that war was coming?
RUMSFELD: Absolutely not.
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
1998: Barrie
2000: Montreal, Toronto, Auburn Hills
2003: Cleveland, Buffalo, Toronto, Montreal
2004: Boston X2, Grand Rapids
2005: Kitchener, London, Hamilton, Montreal, Ottawa, Toronto
2006: Toronto X2
2009: Toronto
2011: PJ20, Montreal, Toronto X2, Hamilton
2012: Manchester X2, Amsterdam X2, Prague, Berlin X2, Philadelphia, Missoula
2013: Pittsburg, Buffalo
2014: Milan, Trieste, Vienna, Berlin, Stockholm, Oslo, Detroit
2016: Ottawa, Toronto X2
2018: Padova, Rome, Prague, Krakow, Berlin, Barcelona
2023: Chicago X2
2024: New York X2
Need I say more.
Fuckin' goof
1998: Barrie
2000: Montreal, Toronto, Auburn Hills
2003: Cleveland, Buffalo, Toronto, Montreal
2004: Boston X2, Grand Rapids
2005: Kitchener, London, Hamilton, Montreal, Ottawa, Toronto
2006: Toronto X2
2009: Toronto
2011: PJ20, Montreal, Toronto X2, Hamilton
2012: Manchester X2, Amsterdam X2, Prague, Berlin X2, Philadelphia, Missoula
2013: Pittsburg, Buffalo
2014: Milan, Trieste, Vienna, Berlin, Stockholm, Oslo, Detroit
2016: Ottawa, Toronto X2
2018: Padova, Rome, Prague, Krakow, Berlin, Barcelona
2023: Chicago X2
2024: New York X2
most stuff is unknown or they'll keep it unknown from most :?
most people are terrible at apologies...always a 'but' followed by defending their actions
very few 'I'm sorry's' in this world...at least not enough for the hurt and deception
Everyone's right and no one is sorry
That's the beginning and end of the story
Something like that.
yes, that pretty much sums it up .... pride gets in the way
I like this one
'Play fair. Don’t hit people. Say you’re sorry when you hurt somebody.'
1998: Barrie
2000: Montreal, Toronto, Auburn Hills
2003: Cleveland, Buffalo, Toronto, Montreal
2004: Boston X2, Grand Rapids
2005: Kitchener, London, Hamilton, Montreal, Ottawa, Toronto
2006: Toronto X2
2009: Toronto
2011: PJ20, Montreal, Toronto X2, Hamilton
2012: Manchester X2, Amsterdam X2, Prague, Berlin X2, Philadelphia, Missoula
2013: Pittsburg, Buffalo
2014: Milan, Trieste, Vienna, Berlin, Stockholm, Oslo, Detroit
2016: Ottawa, Toronto X2
2018: Padova, Rome, Prague, Krakow, Berlin, Barcelona
2023: Chicago X2
2024: New York X2
The manager then took the book from me and said he'd look into it, or words to that effect.
He probably did nothing about it, but It still felt good at the time.
To some apologies are a sign of weakness and these politicians don't want to appear to be weak.
Peace
*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti
*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)