JFK conspiracy(Jesse Ventura)

Byrnzie

FredFlintstone wrote:

THERE IS ZERO DOUBT that Oswald shot JFK. ZERO.

This just isn't true. Period.

Bullets don't pass through a human body, change direction in mid-air, pass through a second body and then land on the ground intact.
Also, JFK was shot from the front. There's no dispute about that. The autopsy photo's show that he was shot in the front, as does the Zapruder footage, and the testimony of witnesses who say they heard a shot and a puff of smoke from behind the grassy knoll.

And that's just two points out of hundreds that disprove your claim above.

Byrnzie

FredFlintstone wrote:

His dying words were "There was no one else. Just me". Look it up.

O.k, I'll look it up:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Ke ... y_theories
'[Many]claim that Oswald was not involved at all. Shortly after his arrest, Oswald insisted he was a "patsy". Oswald never admitted any participation in the assassination and was murdered two days after being taken into police custody.'

http://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/wa ... statements
WARREN COMMISSON REPORT: STATEMENTS OF OSWALD DURING DETENTION

'Oswald was questioned intermittently for approximately 12 hours between 2:30 p.m., on November 22, and 11 a.m., on November 24. Throughout this interrogation he denied that he had anything to do either with the assassination of President Kennedy or the murder of Patrolman Tippit.'

FredFlintstone wrote:

THERE IS ZERO DOUBT that Oswald shot JFK. ZERO.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/9751/america ... iracy.aspx
GALLUP NEWS SERVICE

PRINCETON, NJ -- Americans are skeptical of the official conclusion that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone when he assassinated President John F. Kennedy 40 years ago, but there is no consensus about which conspiracy theory to believe.

Three-quarters of Americans recently told Gallup that they think more than one man was involved in Kennedy's assassination. Only 19% of Americans think it was the work of one individual. When asked who else might have been behind the assassination, no more than 37% of the public believes any single entity or individual was involved.

The most commonly believed theory is that the Mafia was involved (37%), followed closely by speculation that the CIA was involved (34%). Only 18% of Americans think that Kennedy's vice president, Lyndon B. Johnson, was involved -- a theory advanced in a History Channel film on Monday, and sharply rebuked by former Johnson aides as a "smear." Even fewer, 15% each, think the Cubans or the Soviet Union were involved.

The Waiting Trophy Man

I always thought it was strange that Oswald started working at the book depository 6 weeks before the assassination. This was before the parade route was made public. Coincidence? What are the odds?

Kel Varnsen

One thing that hurts Oswald's case is that if he wasn't the shooter, then why did he shoot and kill that cop who later tried to arrest him? Doesn't seem like the actions of on innocent man.

FredFlintstone

Byrnzie wrote:

FredFlintstone wrote:

His dying words were "There was no one else. Just me". Look it up.

O.k, I'll look it up:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Ke ... y_theories
'[Many]claim that Oswald was not involved at all. Shortly after his arrest, Oswald insisted he was a "patsy". Oswald never admitted any participation in the assassination and was murdered two days after being taken into police custody.'

http://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/wa ... statements
WARREN COMMISSON REPORT: STATEMENTS OF OSWALD DURING DETENTION

'Oswald was questioned intermittently for approximately 12 hours between 2:30 p.m., on November 22, and 11 a.m., on November 24. Throughout this interrogation he denied that he had anything to do either with the assassination of President Kennedy or the murder of Patrolman Tippit.'

FredFlintstone wrote:

THERE IS ZERO DOUBT that Oswald shot JFK. ZERO.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/9751/america ... iracy.aspx
GALLUP NEWS SERVICE

PRINCETON, NJ -- Americans are skeptical of the official conclusion that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone when he assassinated President John F. Kennedy 40 years ago, but there is no consensus about which conspiracy theory to believe.

Three-quarters of Americans recently told Gallup that they think more than one man was involved in Kennedy's assassination. Only 19% of Americans think it was the work of one individual. When asked who else might have been behind the assassination, no more than 37% of the public believes any single entity or individual was involved.

The most commonly believed theory is that the Mafia was involved (37%), followed closely by speculation that the CIA was involved (34%). Only 18% of Americans think that Kennedy's vice president, Lyndon B. Johnson, was involved -- a theory advanced in a History Channel film on Monday, and sharply rebuked by former Johnson aides as a "smear." Even fewer, 15% each, think the Cubans or the Soviet Union were involved.

I was referring to Jack Zubys last words - Not LHO.
Try again.

FredFlintstone

Byrnzie wrote:

FredFlintstone wrote:

THERE IS ZERO DOUBT that Oswald shot JFK. ZERO.

This just isn't true. Period.

Bullets don't pass through a human body, change direction in mid-air, pass through a second body and then land on the ground intact.
Also, JFK was shot from the front. There's no dispute about that. The autopsy photo's show that he was shot in the front, as does the Zapruder footage, and the testimony of witnesses who say they heard a shot and a puff of smoke from behind the grassy knoll.

And that's just two points out of hundreds that disprove your claim above.

Never said there wasn't another shooter.
What I said was LHO was 100% one of them.

The facts are endless to that point and I don't have the energy to list them all out.

Haha the Grassy Knoll.
At least 10 people sprinted up the hill IMMEDIATELY after the shooting and SAW NO ONE. NO ONE.
There was no one there.

Have you ever been to Dealey Plaza? Just curious.

FredFlintstone

FredFlintstone wrote:

Byrnzie wrote:

FredFlintstone wrote:

His dying words were "There was no one else. Just me". Look it up.

O.k, I'll look it up:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Ke ... y_theories
'[Many]claim that Oswald was not involved at all. Shortly after his arrest, Oswald insisted he was a "patsy". Oswald never admitted any participation in the assassination and was murdered two days after being taken into police custody.'

http://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/wa ... statements
WARREN COMMISSON REPORT: STATEMENTS OF OSWALD DURING DETENTION

'Oswald was questioned intermittently for approximately 12 hours between 2:30 p.m., on November 22, and 11 a.m., on November 24. Throughout this interrogation he denied that he had anything to do either with the assassination of President Kennedy or the murder of Patrolman Tippit.'

FredFlintstone wrote:

THERE IS ZERO DOUBT that Oswald shot JFK. ZERO.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/9751/america ... iracy.aspx
GALLUP NEWS SERVICE

PRINCETON, NJ -- Americans are skeptical of the official conclusion that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone when he assassinated President John F. Kennedy 40 years ago, but there is no consensus about which conspiracy theory to believe.

Three-quarters of Americans recently told Gallup that they think more than one man was involved in Kennedy's assassination. Only 19% of Americans think it was the work of one individual. When asked who else might have been behind the assassination, no more than 37% of the public believes any single entity or individual was involved.

The most commonly believed theory is that the Mafia was involved (37%), followed closely by speculation that the CIA was involved (34%). Only 18% of Americans think that Kennedy's vice president, Lyndon B. Johnson, was involved -- a theory advanced in a History Channel film on Monday, and sharply rebuked by former Johnson aides as a "smear." Even fewer, 15% each, think the Cubans or the Soviet Union were involved.

I was referring to Jack Rubys last words - Not LHO.
Try again.

FredFlintstone

Kel Varnsen wrote:

One thing that hurts Oswald's case is that if he wasn't the shooter, then why did he shoot and kill that cop who later tried to arrest him? Doesn't seem like the actions of on innocent man.

CURTAIN RODS.

dustinpardue

There was a History channel documentary that explained the single bullet theory pretty damn well. I still don't believe the official government story by any means, but actually made that theory plausible. The case they presented were the angles of JFK and Connonly in the car were interpreted incorrectly. They presented that Connoly has in a jumper seat in the car and went on to explain the dimensions of the seat and how far off the floor of the car it was and where a man of Connoly's height would be positioned. It did match the trail of the bullet to the wounds with Connoly positioned differently in the fold out jumper seat. I do think it is a far reach though.
I still believe the more important part of the whole story is the why and not the how.

Byrnzie

dustinpardue wrote:

There was a History channel documentary that explained the single bullet theory pretty damn well. I still don't believe the official government story by any means, but actually made that theory plausible. The case they presented were the angles of JFK and Connonly in the car were interpreted incorrectly. They presented that Connoly has in a jumper seat in the car and went on to explain the dimensions of the seat and how far off the floor of the car it was and where a man of Connoly's height would be positioned. It did match the trail of the bullet to the wounds with Connoly positioned differently in the fold out jumper seat. I do think it is a far reach though.
I still believe the more important part of the whole story is the why and not the how.

Bullets don't pass through two bodies and land intact on the ground. They don't even pass through one body and land intact.

Byrnzie

FredFlintstone wrote:

I was referring to Jack Zubys last words - Not LHO.
Try again.

My mistake.