Les Paul Upgrades.
Pacomc79
Posts: 9,404
Ok, so yeah I know I'm notoriously slow with this stuff....
but I finally started upgrading the old 87 Les Paul Studio. I put the Planet Waves locking tuners on it last night and they are freaking brilliantly easy to restring.
Next I'm going to switch the incorrect bridge and put on either Callaham or Tone Pros TP6 most likely.
I'm not sure about the tailpiece yet but I sure would love to have locking studs for the tailpiece.
I've decided to keep the 490 and 498 for the time being. Instead of swapping pickups I want to see if upgrading the electronics via an RS kit will clean it up some.
but I finally started upgrading the old 87 Les Paul Studio. I put the Planet Waves locking tuners on it last night and they are freaking brilliantly easy to restring.
Next I'm going to switch the incorrect bridge and put on either Callaham or Tone Pros TP6 most likely.
I'm not sure about the tailpiece yet but I sure would love to have locking studs for the tailpiece.
I've decided to keep the 490 and 498 for the time being. Instead of swapping pickups I want to see if upgrading the electronics via an RS kit will clean it up some.
My Girlfriend said to me..."How many guitars do you need?" and I replied...."How many pairs of shoes do you need?" She got really quiet.
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
Hardware upgrades have a nasty habit of bugging you for a long time, and then when you upgrade, you wonder why you ever waited to do them. I put new tuners on my old beater acoustic (nothing special, a set of plain-jane Pings) and I wish I'd done it 10 years ago. Such an improvement in the livability of that guitar. They can be hard to justify to yourself because they don't make measurable difference in the tone most of the time, and unless the guitar is unplayable, you just don't expect to reap the rewards as much. But it really is worth it.
If you're already pulling the trigger on the bridge, gonna swap in some graphite saddles? It mellows the tone a tad, but it cuts down on string breaks at the bridge by a ton.
57 classics are the balls at the neck.... but the 490 isn't bad just muddy. I think my overall problem with the guitar (besides that my shoulder kills me after a half hour) is that without new strings it lacks clarity. I really would love to try either Lollar Imperials or the Fralin PAF. I would like to hear the new Angus Young SG because I think they overwound his bridge and he's got a 57 at the neck like the old one. I bet that's a nice pairirng.
It was bell clear with pure nickle 11's but I couldn't really bend them as well.
Have you guys notched your own saddles or do you just take them in? I don't want to get string spacing wrong.
I'm kind of wondering if I should replace the nut a the same time, but tuning is pretty solid.
I'm hoping I can try a few alternate slide tunings to see if everything works well.
Did anyone ever try the P-Rails?
If I ever had a nut replaced on a good guitar, I'd go with bone and have it done professionally. I don't have the files to cut slots right, and I'd want the height shaved by a pro to get the best seat.
For a TOM bridge, I'd probably be okay with cutting my own slots, IF I had the files to do so. I'd probably also need a vise, and a whole guitar workbench would be great.
It sounds a lot like you might be in the market for some underwound HB's... or some of the hybrid pups that provide increased clarity. If it was me, I'd probably look for a nice, clean neck pup, and then get a bridge pup that has some raunchy overdrive character (actually, that IS what I look for, most of the time).
Don't know if they have them for your specific task, but Stewart Mac always has some great articles on "how to's". Of course you probably already knew that.
https://www.facebook.com/aghostwritersapology/