Vs. seems to be very modern

jwoodcock
jwoodcock Posts: 22
edited March 2008 in The Porch
I listened to the album today going to work and back and I got this sudden feeling that this album would have been just as huge if it came out now. The songs are so different, their up-down, fast-slow, full of rage, and I think the younger music fans would like it now. I was thinking they should re-release it with different artwork or something. I would totally stand in line again and buy it all over.
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • harmless_little_f***
    harmless_little_f*** Posts: 8,005
    I'd rather they released a new album which is as good as Vs. :)
    'We're learning songs for baby Jesus' birthday. His mum and dad were Merry and Joseph. He had a bed made of clay and the three kings bought him Gold, Frankenstein and Merv as presents.'

    - the great Sir Leo Harrison
  • pjfan85
    pjfan85 Posts: 124
    It's timeless. As much as I love "Ten", its production is still in the early 90's, if that makes sense. "Vs." couldn't been made any year.
  • pjfan85
    pjfan85 Posts: 124
    I also think the "no video" policy helps "Vs." seem more timeless. Listening to "Alive, "Even Flow" and "Jeremy" conjures up images of the video in a lot of cases, helping it feel a little more dated than the rest of their albums. Does that make sense to anybody else?
  • 2-feign-reluctance
    2-feign-reluctance TigerTown, USA Posts: 23,462
    best record ever. period. i don't have one in my collection that i enjoy listening to all the way through at much as Vs. the song sequence, the songs, the production, the cover, liner notes.
    www.cluthelee.com

Categories