conspiracy theory 2

hrd2imgn

Anyone notice there are a lot of oil spills lately we are hearing about?

is it eco-warfare? Are other countries sending in special ops to sabotage our energy supply, and destroy our environment? Destroy the American psyche from within?

Or is it environmental groups intentionally enacting disaster after disaster to prove they are right in their battle against the big polluters? What better aid to their agendas than a big ugly oil spill or 5? Why would they do this, create the very thing they fight against? (think of pawns in a chess game)

why are violations passed over, why are they commonplace? Why does big gov. not do more to stop the blatant mishandling of things???

Or is it just pure accident?


no facts here just posing questions to start conversation. I do not support or believe any one thought so don;t attack me, comment on the idea...try actually giving a reason.

FiveB247x

America is secretly carrying out a plan to destroy itself.. through media, politics, economy and the environment, we're taking ourselves down... but shhh don't tell anyone!

Commy

can guarantee if it were sabatoge the media would be all over it.




any excuse to send out the military right?



its typical.

OutOfBreath

hrd2imgn wrote:

Anyone notice there are a lot of oil spills lately we are hearing about?

Might be because after the big spill, all other spills suddenly become news as media search for related or similar incidents. Kinda like crime going down, but coverage sky-rocketing so we might think crime is more often and worse than before. That we hear of more, doesn't mean more happen.

is it eco-warfare? Are other countries sending in special ops to sabotage our energy supply, and destroy our environment? Destroy the American psyche from within?

I find that highly unlikely in relation to the big one in the gulf. If the Soviet had still been there and the cold war still on, then maybe. As it is now, noone really benefits from small-time sabotage of a nation's oil supply. Too little gain, and much too heavy risk if caught.

Or is it environmental groups intentionally enacting disaster after disaster to prove they are right in their battle against the big polluters? What better aid to their agendas than a big ugly oil spill or 5? Why would they do this, create the very thing they fight against? (think of pawns in a chess game)

Again, highly unlikely on any significant scale. If they were to sabotage oil (which some of them may be liable to do), they sure as hell wouldn't do it like that. Again, too high a cost for too little gain. A huge oil spill is precisely opposed to their agenda, so that doesn't really aid them. But surely, when stuff like this happens, they are all over it, and giving it maximum coverage and importance. As a sidenote I might say that there are more than enough ecological disasters out there, so they dont really need to make their own.

why are violations passed over, why are they commonplace? Why does big gov. not do more to stop the blatant mishandling of things???

Violations as in violations of regulations and such I presume? Well, you just need a pro-business attitude among the regulators to allow for that. As big as big gov is, it can't be everywhere, nor pay attention to everything. And if they also have the attitude not to interfere with business (business is good for growth etc etc), which I note is enormously widespread among american politicians and public, they might not be looking too hard either.

Or is it just pure accident?

Not so much a pure accident as a calculated risk that blew up in their faces.

no facts here just posing questions to start conversation. I do not support or believe any one thought so don;t attack me, comment on the idea...try actually giving a reason.

My reason is I dont see anyone benefitting enough to make the sabotage scenario on the big one in the gulf very likely. You can always find someone benefitting from an event. As complex as the economy and politics is, someone will always have an advantage whatever the outcome. So, it doesn't cross the threshold of probable cause and likelihood for me.

Peace
Dan