UFO Movie: I Know What I Saw
DriftingByTheStorm
Posts: 8,684
Anyone seen this?
I Know What I Saw
The guy who made this just spent his own money to go down and film the oil spill in the gulf too.
I have previously watched larged chunks of The Disclosure Project testimonies, and there is certainly some overlap in this movie, however I believe this to be a much more concise presentation. Also, unlike Disclosure Project which goes on 1 witness alone for each event, I Know What I Saw presents each case, case by case, with as much background info and multiple witness accounts as this producer could round up.
I still don't know what to make of any of this.
Found out about this movie yesterday. All month I have been trying to figure out the motive and agenda behind History Channel's new "Ancient Aliens" *series* ... not just a 1 off, but a whole fucking series ...
is this just money making ... certain groups "preparing" us for further truths (personally, what i have seen of the Ancient Aliens series has been absolute horseshit, but ...?) ... or are they just using Aliens to push some *OTHER* agenda?
I dunno.
Thoughts from those who have seen the movie?
I personally find the Japan air flight (which i have previously read the files for on MUFON's site, after seeing Disclosure Project) and the 1980's landing at that Army base to be pretty hard to denounce. And what about 1997 Arizona where apparently dozens (hundreds?) of people saw something "huge" in the sky.
My other final thought, upon seeing this, was a constant amazement, why through 50 years of these sitings are SO many of them TRIANGULAR ???
hmm.
Anyone?
I Know What I Saw
The guy who made this just spent his own money to go down and film the oil spill in the gulf too.
I have previously watched larged chunks of The Disclosure Project testimonies, and there is certainly some overlap in this movie, however I believe this to be a much more concise presentation. Also, unlike Disclosure Project which goes on 1 witness alone for each event, I Know What I Saw presents each case, case by case, with as much background info and multiple witness accounts as this producer could round up.
I still don't know what to make of any of this.
Found out about this movie yesterday. All month I have been trying to figure out the motive and agenda behind History Channel's new "Ancient Aliens" *series* ... not just a 1 off, but a whole fucking series ...
is this just money making ... certain groups "preparing" us for further truths (personally, what i have seen of the Ancient Aliens series has been absolute horseshit, but ...?) ... or are they just using Aliens to push some *OTHER* agenda?
I dunno.
Thoughts from those who have seen the movie?
I personally find the Japan air flight (which i have previously read the files for on MUFON's site, after seeing Disclosure Project) and the 1980's landing at that Army base to be pretty hard to denounce. And what about 1997 Arizona where apparently dozens (hundreds?) of people saw something "huge" in the sky.
My other final thought, upon seeing this, was a constant amazement, why through 50 years of these sitings are SO many of them TRIANGULAR ???
hmm.
Anyone?
If I was to smile and I held out my hand
If I opened it now would you not understand?
If I opened it now would you not understand?
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
i liked it, sure alot of it was crap, but some, like that tribe who said the aliens came from that star that couldn't be seen with the naked eye and told the french scientist in the early 1900's and then in like 1980's hubble proved there is a star there and may have been bright enough to see thousands of years ago. neat stuff.
The realer UFOs become from quality programs such as this, the more disturbing it is... but I think whatever they are (whether man-made, or otherwise) will eventually need to be explained.
We are on the low-end of the scale of technology that other planets undoubtedly have, but whether it's even physically possible to visit another planet across the galaxy/universe seems so hopelessly impossible that it puts doubt in my mind even though practically all astronomers belief the universe to be full of life.
I have yet to see the other programs you referenced though.
...anyway, that's my two coppers.
*NYC 9/28/96 *NYC 9/29/96 *NJ 9/8/98 (front row "may i play drums with you")
*MSG 9/10/98 (backstage) *MSG 9/11/98 (backstage)
*Jones Beach 8/23/00 *Jones Beach 8/24/00 *Jones Beach 8/25/00
*Mansfield 8/29/00 *Mansfield 8/30/00 *Nassau 4/30/03 *Nissan VA 7/1/03
*Borgata 10/1/05 *Camden 5/27/06 *Camden 5/28/06 *DC 5/30/06
*VA Beach 6/17/08 *DC 6/22/08 *MSG 6/24/08 (backstage) *MSG 6/25/08
*EV DC 8/17/08 *EV Baltimore 6/15/09 *Philly 10/31/09
*Bristow VA 5/13/10 *MSG 5/20/10 *MSG 5/21/10
Check this out, i love this. Kind of breaks down how small we really are.
But the sightings you mentioned, Pheonix, Rendalsham Army base, and the Japanese pilot, those are the ones that really stand out. When you have thousands of people see the same thing, or when you have recordings of a pilot telling the air traffic controller that he see's something massive in the sky, and the air traffic controller saying "yeah we have it on Radar," that's pretty impressive.
O.K. i'm bumping myself, it's the the Ultimate Sin, but you Need to hear this!!!
that was very cool ! but I still can't rap my mind around the E.T thing yet.
Godfather.
1997 : U.S. Air Force reports on Roswell
On this day in 1997, U.S. Air Force officials release a 231-page report dismissing long-standing claims of an alien spacecraft crash in Roswell, New Mexico, almost exactly 50 years earlier.
Public interest in Unidentified Flying Objects, or UFOs, began to flourish in the 1940s, when developments in space travel and the dawn of the atomic age caused many Americans to turn their attention to the skies. The town of Roswell, located near the Pecos River in southeastern New Mexico, became a magnet for UFO believers due to the strange events of early July 1947, when ranch foreman W.W. Brazel found a strange, shiny material scattered over some of his land. He turned the material over to the sheriff, who passed it on to authorities at the nearby Air Force base. On July 8, Air Force officials announced they had recovered the wreckage of a "flying disk." A local newspaper put the story on its front page, launching Roswell into the spotlight of the public's UFO fascination.
The Air Force soon took back their story, however, saying the debris had been merely a downed weather balloon. Aside from die-hard UFO believers, or "ufologists," public interest in the so-called "Roswell Incident" faded until the late 1970s, when claims surfaced that the military had invented the weather balloon story as a cover-up. Believers in this theory argued that officials had in fact retrieved several alien bodies from the crashed spacecraft, which were now stored in the mysterious Area 51 installation in Nevada. Seeking to dispel these suspicions, the Air Force issued a 1,000-page report in 1994 stating that the crashed object was actually a high-altitude weather balloon launched from a nearby missile test-site as part of a classified experiment aimed at monitoring the atmosphere in order to detect Soviet nuclear tests.
On July 24, 1997, barely a week before the extravagant 50th anniversary celebration of the incident, the Air Force released yet another report on the controversial subject. Titled "The Roswell Report, Case Closed," the document stated definitively that there was no Pentagon evidence that any kind of life form was found in the Roswell area in connection with the reported UFO sightings, and that the "bodies" recovered were not aliens but dummies used in parachute tests conducted in the region. Any hopes that this would put an end to the cover-up debate were in vain, as furious ufologists rushed to point out the report's inconsistencies. With conspiracy theories still alive and well on the Internet, Roswell continues to thrive as a tourist destination for UFO enthusiasts far and wide, hosting the annual UFO Encounter Festival each July and welcoming visitors year-round to its International UFO Museum and Research Center.
Godfather.
Obviously you haven't watched Battlestar Galactica.
original series or remake???
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
I watched the original as a kid, but it seems a little silly now.
have you ever looked up into the night sky at a passing airplane and noticed the configuration of their navigational lights is triangular??? :think:
my theory is that these foos are us visiting from the future.
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
its against my religion to bother with remakes.
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
hmm adam sandler made me cry yesterday so maybe... just maybe...
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
when was the last time hollywood came up with an original idea???
EJO.. always loved his work on miami vice.
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
Several points of note.
The pilot reports white, yellow and amber (red) lights ... this is identical to the colors reported at the Rendelsham incident by the military officers who went to investigate. Radio transmissions from that confirm this, "i saw red lights." ... "yeah, they were yellow." ... "Yeah i saw yellow in there too!"
Also, its interesting that the radar was picking up INTERMITTENT primary objects. This seems like it would be consistent with an object whose primary propulsion was some sort of antigravity technology ... i suppose, bluntly speaking, that if you were displacing space time, this would interfere with radar tracking.
All in all it's just an intriguing "encounter".
There are other videos that have other bits of the JAL 1628 radio transmissions, including more direct comments from the pilot about the position of the object, and confirmation from the radar tower of those coordinates. Try "JAL 1628 know what i saw" and you can probably get the video from the movie with these quotes.
Other striking similarities to different "credible" encounters (including the mass siting in arizona) include the incredibly large size ... in fact both withnesses in Arizona AND this JAL pilot compare it directly to the size of an "air craft carrier" ... also the "blury" or indistinct nature of the object, even at close range ... likely (if this is even real) do to the antigravity or interdimensional(?) propulsion oft hese craft ... you would expect to obsever very peculiar optical conditions around an object that was displacing space\time, i assume.
And of course there is the ever present "walnut" shape, or essentially the double convexed\parabolic "saucer" shape of oh so many "sitings".
I'm just saying, it's very intriguing when you have visual confirmation BACKED by RADAR tracking at MULTIPLE source points (both civilian\FAA AND Military radar were picking this "thing" up) and the pilot who reported the incident was so concerned as to request alternate air space, and he had several decades of flight experience.
???
If I opened it now would you not understand?