NEW VIYNL OLD VIYNL? ITS NOW ABOUT THE VS VIYNL
jamingjamers
Posts: 383
i reckon that 2nd hand viynl from 20 years ago sounds better than brand new 180 gram viynl from today
i just have a middle of the range stereo, but i find even the most paper thin viynl sounds better
anyone elese find this?
cheers
i just have a middle of the range stereo, but i find even the most paper thin viynl sounds better
anyone elese find this?
cheers
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
On top of all of those . i have the same not so great !! goes both ways
My Quadrophenia one from 1973 sounds smashing
Yes, unfortunately I find this all the time - and favour secondhand vintage pressings for this reason (and they're usually cheaper!).
As well as the reasons listed above, there is a shameful and quite secretive practice of using a digital master for A LOT of the current reisssues - in fact I believe only a minority of the 'back to vinyl' 180gm reissues are using the original analog masters. Look into it - you will find I am probably right. Best idea for classic records is to get a nice thick early pressing second hand - sounds so much better.
Send my credentials to the house of detention
Thats a good question.