30 Photos That Changed the World

__ Posts: 6,651
edited May 2010 in All Encompassing Trip
Looks like they're too big to post. Check them out online at http://www.photographyschoolsonline.net/blog/2010/30-photos-that-changed-the-world/.
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • FifthelementFifthelement Posts: 6,959
    Those are all great shots, very iconic. But I think the title is definitely misleading as almost all of the images relate specifically to the US or US opinion/policies ;) Still, the images are very moving and thought provoking, no matter where you're from :) Thanks for the link.
    "What the CANUCK happened?!? - Esquimalt Barber Shop
  • __ Posts: 6,651
    Those are all great shots, very iconic. But I think the title is definitely misleading as almost all of the images relate specifically to the US or US opinion/policies ;) Still, the images are very moving and thought provoking, no matter where you're from :) Thanks for the link.

    That's a great point; I hadn't thought of that. I did think, however, that some of them were great photos of events that changed the world, but the photos themselves didn't necessarily change the world like some of the others probably did, ya know?
  • FifthelementFifthelement Posts: 6,959
    scb wrote:
    Those are all great shots, very iconic. But I think the title is definitely misleading as almost all of the images relate specifically to the US or US opinion/policies ;) Still, the images are very moving and thought provoking, no matter where you're from :) Thanks for the link.

    That's a great point; I hadn't thought of that. I did think, however, that some of them were great photos of events that changed the world, but the photos themselves didn't necessarily change the world like some of the others probably did, ya know?



    Yep, I get what you're saying :) I did some research on the Eddie Adams photo for a paper I did in uni. Very interesting stuff :ugeek: I remember first seeing that photo in a photography book when I was about five or six. It made quite an impact cause I remember being quite upset.
    "What the CANUCK happened?!? - Esquimalt Barber Shop
  • __ Posts: 6,651
    Photos-That-Changed-the-World-1.jpg
    General Nguyen Ngoc Loan executing a Viet Cong prisoner in Saigon; Eddie Adams, 1968
    AP photographer Eddie Adams captured this shot of a South Vietnamese general executing a Viet Cong officer in the Tet Offensive, and it became one of the most iconic shots of the Vietnam War. Sadly, Adams would come to lament the damage the Pulitzer-winning photo did to Nguyen and his family, claiming that the man had killed a “so-called bad guy” and been demonized by people who didn’t understand the scope of the situation.

    Wow, that's intense to see at age 5 or 6. I can imagine that it would make an impression.

    I find the caption interesting. Had I not read it, I wouldn't have known the man being executed was a "bad guy". He doesn't look like a bad guy in the picture; he looks like a terrified human being, about to be brutally murdered by a fellow human being. I guess that's why the picture is so powerful - because it shows how our ideas about good guys and bad guys play out in the real world.

    We hear about how the photo impacted the family of the executioner, and even how it impacted the photographer. I wonder how it affected the family of the executed. And I'm surprised the photographer was even allowed to take this picture.
  • FifthelementFifthelement Posts: 6,959
    Here's a great article on that image and on photographing the Vietnam War in general. I highlighted and underlined a few things :)


    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/stor ... =102112403

    The Vietnam War, Through Eddie Adams' Lens

    by Margot Adler

    March 24, 2009

    The late photographer Eddie Adams took pictures of hundreds of celebrities and politicians — everyone from Fidel Castro to Mother Teresa to Arnold Schwarzenegger (whom he captured in a bathtub with a rubber duck) — but some of his most searing portraits come from his work during the Vietnam War.

    One photo is so iconic that it is the picture most people think of when they think of Vietnam: a Vietnamese general in Saigon executing a Viet Cong suspect. But the Pulitzer Prize Adams won for this photograph left him pained and conflicted for the rest of his life.

    Adams died of Lou Gehrig's disease in 2004. His war photographs were never published in a book during his lifetime — people who knew him say the photographer had an intense desire to be perfect, so book projects were always delayed. Now, four-and-a-half years after his death, Eddie Adams: Vietnam presents a collection of his photographs from the war, and the Umbrage Gallery in Brooklyn is hosting an exhibition of his work, which runs until April 30.

    Hal Buell, who ran The Associated Press photo service for 23 years, says the Vietnam War was a turning point for war photographers like Adams.

    "No war was ever photographed the way Vietnam was, and no war will ever be photographed again the way Vietnam was photographed," he says. There was no censorship. All a photographer had to do, says Buell, "is convince a helicopter pilot to let him get on board a chopper going out to a battle scene. So photographers had incredible access, which you don't get anymore."

    Adams' close-up portraits and emphasis on intimate storytelling presented a new way to photograph war. One portrait shows a marine with an intense expression out in the field on the phone, perhaps calling for air support. There's a picture of soldiers coming into a village — your eyes focus on a woman and her child trying to flee. There's a young Vietnamese man being interrogated, a spear pointed at his throat.

    Former AP and CNN correspondent Peter Arnett was with Adams in Vietnam. He says that some 60 journalists and photographers were killed in Vietnam, but even so, there were always enthusiastic young reporters and photographers eager to take their places.

    "This was the last great wire service war, and there was enormous competition between UPI and AP," explains Arnett.

    Because of the draft, says Arnett, most journalists chronicling Vietnam had been in the military. They could relate to the troops and had a better understanding of what was going on. Adams, who had been a combat photographer with the U.S. Marine Corps in Korea, loved the Marines, and many of his best photographs are of Marine operations.

    But his most famous and most disturbing photograph was shot on the streets of Cholon, the Chinese section of Saigon. The incident took place on the second day of the Tet Offensive in 1968, a watershed battle that changed public perceptions of the war. Adams saw a soldier drag a man in a checkered shirt out of a building. In the documentary An Unlikely Weapon: The Eddie Adams Story, Adams describes what happened.

    "They were taking him by the hand and pulled him out in the street," he said. "Now any photographer, when you grab a prisoner, in New York or something, you just follow him, and it's a picture. You follow until he is put into a wagon and driven away."

    But walking into the frame of his camera was Brig. Gen. Nguyen Ngoc Loan, raising a pistol. Normally, that was a method of interrogation — holding a weapon to a suspect's head and asking questions. As Buell tells it, "This man just raised the pistol and Eddie made a picture of an interrogation, but the man pulled the trigger."

    One of Adams' frames was the very instant the bullet entered the man's head — the moment of death.

    The picture went around the world. It was held up at demonstrations by members of the intensifying anti-war movement and became one of the two or three iconic photos that symbolized the war for many people. Ironically, there are films of that same execution. But Buell and Arnett both argue that the still photo had more of an impact.

    "You can see the gun, you can see the expression on the man's face as the bullet enters his head, and you see the soldier on the left who is wincing at the thing that has happened," says Buell. "With the still picture, you have time to consider all these factors."

    Arnett calls the picture a "brilliant piece of photography. He had the courage to stand a foot or two away from a murderous officer who had his pistol out and shot the man in front of him."

    But Adams, who considered himself a patriot and a Marine, never came to terms with the fact that the anti-war movement saw that photograph as proof that the Vietnam War was unjustified. In fact, he believed to the end of his life that the picture only told part of the truth. The untold story was that on the day of the execution, an aid to Loan was killed by insurgents. After Loan pulled the trigger, he walked by Adams and said, "They killed many of our people and many of yours."

    In An Unlikely Weapon, Adams said he found the attention given to this photo disturbing: "I still don't understand to this day why it was so important, because I have heard so many different versions of what this picture did, like it helped end the war in Vietnam."
    "What the CANUCK happened?!? - Esquimalt Barber Shop
  • FifthelementFifthelement Posts: 6,959
    scb wrote:
    Wow, that's intense to see at age 5 or 6. I can imagine that it would make an impression.

    Yeah, that picture and one of an African lady with an extended neck (she had all those rings around it to extend it), made me ask my parents a lot of questions. But, the book also really gave me a love for photography :? :)
    "What the CANUCK happened?!? - Esquimalt Barber Shop
  • __ Posts: 6,651
    Here's a great article on that image and on photographing the Vietnam War in general. I highlighted and underlined a few things :)

    Wait - so is this the picture that shows the bullet? I don't see it. Regardless, thanks for posting this article! It's quite interesting to hear more of the story. I find it quite interesting that the General told the photographer, after shooting the guy, that "they" had killed many people - not necessarily HIM, this particular guy. Not only had he not been proven guilty, I'm not sure they even thought he was guilty of anything except for being one of "them". I wonder how old he was.
  • FifthelementFifthelement Posts: 6,959
    There was a sequence of shots captured by Adams.

    Here is another article written by the AP photo editor about the situation in Saigon at the time.

    http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue0410/faas.html

    In regards to what you were wondering about what the family of Nguyen Van Lam thought, he touches on that as well.

    The stories surrounding the victim in Eddie Adams' execution photo differed. Lt. Colonel Loan had said that the man had killed many South Vietnamese and even Americans. Vietnamese photographers said that he was a traitor, working for both sides - the Vietcong and the South Vietnamese police. Others said he was a small-time Vietcong who had put on a fresh shirt hoping to slip away.

    Thirty-two years later, I met his widow, who still lived in their home in a southern Saigon suburb and mourned him. In a corner of the living room, behind plastic flowers, was a heavily retouched photograph of Nguyen Van Lam, who, as a Viet Cong, had the "secret name" (alias) Bay Lap. Yes, he had been a member of the National Liberation Front, the Vietcong. He just disappeared shortly before the Tet Offensive, and never came back.

    Eddie Adams' photograph made him a martyr, but, no, she does not have and does not want to see the photograph of her husband's death. She will mourn Nguyen Van Lam until his body is found, she said in 2000, when the Vietnam government celebrated the 25th anniversary of the end of the war.

    General Nguyen Ngoc Loan continued to take the fight to the Vietcong and, despite his notoriety after the execution, U.S. commanders and newsmen who knew him respected him for his bravery and determination. Eddie Adams felt that his famous photo unfairly maligned Loan, who lived in Virginia after the war and died in 1998.
    "What the CANUCK happened?!? - Esquimalt Barber Shop
  • __ Posts: 6,651
    There was a sequence of shots captured by Adams.

    Here is another article written by the AP photo editor about the situation in Saigon at the time.

    http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue0410/faas.html

    In regards to what you were wondering about what the family of Nguyen Van Lam thought, he touches on that as well.

    The stories surrounding the victim in Eddie Adams' execution photo differed. Lt. Colonel Loan had said that the man had killed many South Vietnamese and even Americans. Vietnamese photographers said that he was a traitor, working for both sides - the Vietcong and the South Vietnamese police. Others said he was a small-time Vietcong who had put on a fresh shirt hoping to slip away.

    Thirty-two years later, I met his widow, who still lived in their home in a southern Saigon suburb and mourned him. In a corner of the living room, behind plastic flowers, was a heavily retouched photograph of Nguyen Van Lam, who, as a Viet Cong, had the "secret name" (alias) Bay Lap. Yes, he had been a member of the National Liberation Front, the Vietcong. He just disappeared shortly before the Tet Offensive, and never came back.

    Eddie Adams' photograph made him a martyr, but, no, she does not have and does not want to see the photograph of her husband's death. She will mourn Nguyen Van Lam until his body is found, she said in 2000, when the Vietnam government celebrated the 25th anniversary of the end of the war.

    General Nguyen Ngoc Loan continued to take the fight to the Vietcong and, despite his notoriety after the execution, U.S. commanders and newsmen who knew him respected him for his bravery and determination. Eddie Adams felt that his famous photo unfairly maligned Loan, who lived in Virginia after the war and died in 1998.

    Thanks so much for posting! I read the whole article and looked at his other pictures. He's an amazing photographer. It's interesting to me, though, how he became such a hero of sorts for taking the picture.
Sign In or Register to comment.