Any Comments??

Boxes&BooksBoxes&Books USA Posts: 2,672
edited May 2010 in A Moving Train
I recently finished up a Zinn book- and there was a part at the end of the book that really reminded me of the folks on this board............ All of the going back and forth on here is really a let down, mainly because no real solutions are made or even encouraged -- I spend a lot of time reading comments made here and made on other various forums ........ It's all the same.... is that really what life is about? It's actually pretty sad..
Anyways.... even if you make a comment with real substance, the comment eventually gets lost in all the rest of the junk being posted.....so its pretty much a lose lose situation......(i know i post junk too)
Are we trying to prove who is the most intellectual mind? Who should have the most entitlements? ..... I would suggest that we search out solutions and that we try and actually open our minds and experience what we have never before....that we encourage each other to break down our reasoning and ad more reasoning to it....so that maybe one of these days we can actually agree on something....and do something about it. ... blah ..blah..blah......blah...
So here is the part that reminded me of you folks....and also made me wonder......should I have an egg sandwich or a bowl of corn flakes?? :? :?

(I am sure there is plenty of other good material out there related to this- but like i said this reminded me of you good folks)


"1% of the nation owns a third of the wealth. The rest of the wealth is distributed in such a way as to turn those in the 99% against one another: small property-owners against the property-less, black against white, native-born against foreign-born, intellectuals and professionals against the uneducated and unskilled. These groups have resented one another and warred against one another with such vehemence and violence as to obscure their common position as sharers of leftovers in a very wealthy country.

Against the reality of that desperate, bitter battle for resources made scarce by elite control, I am taking the liberty of uniting those 99 percent of “the people”. I have been writing a history that attempts to represent their submerged, deflected, common interest. To emphasize the commonality of the 99%, to declare deep enmity of interest with the 1%, is to do exactly what the governments of the United States, and the wealthy elite allied to them- from the founding fathers to now- have tried their best to prevent. Madison feared a “majority faction” and hoped the new constitution would control it. He and his colleagues began the Preamble to the Constitution with the words “We the people……,” pretending that the new government stood for everyone, and hoping that this myth, accepted as fact, would ensure “domestic tranquillity”"

H.Z
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • FiveB247xFiveB247x Posts: 2,330
    I don't discount your comments or Howard Zinn's (I'm a fan of his), but many people and justly so feel that sorta talk in many regards is mere class warfare commentary rather than political and historical fact. I don't agree with most of it, nor do I agree completely with Zinn, but it is a fair argument against it in the proper context.
    CONservative governMENt

    Our government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a law-breaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. - Louis Brandeis
  • Boxes&BooksBoxes&Books USA Posts: 2,672
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GeMXx7Ldxfw



    i remember watching this song live in AZ (its only been performed a handful of times) ....I miss you AZ....
  • Godfather.Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    lots to think about,opens up the doors of preseption. (foregive my spelling).

    Godfather.
  • mikepegg44mikepegg44 Posts: 3,353
    FiveB247x wrote:
    I don't discount your comments or Howard Zinn's (I'm a fan of his), but many people and justly so feel that sorta talk in many regards is mere class warfare commentary rather than political and historical fact. I don't agree with most of it, nor do I agree completely with Zinn, but it is a fair argument against it in the proper context.


    I would definitely agree. The conflict perspective is far to easily applied to every situation implying some sort of sinister plot.
    That being said, I don't think a thread is the place you will ever find a solution to anything. I think of it more as a place to share ideas and the questions we have about others ideas and possibly get some insight into how a person reached a conclusion. Not so much to find a solution to a problem(especially the serious topics that can be discussed) but to share new ideas with others that they might not have thought about. I sometimes get a little heated when I feel that my ideas are called something they aren't meant to be and I definitely need to remind myself of what these threads are for, but if you are looking for answers you need look no further than your own mind. You will never convince all the people all the time to act in a certain way.
    that’s right! Can’t we all just get together and focus on our real enemies: monogamous gays and stem cells… - Ned Flanders
    It is terrifying when you are too stupid to know who is dumb
    - Joe Rogan
  • FiveB247xFiveB247x Posts: 2,330
    Absolutely, I always think that no one is really going to convince or change anyone's mind on an issue or topic on here, but they may question the logic, fact or make the person think enough to have them look into it further or even simply give them a greater perspective. If you can't find the holes in your own beliefs, you're not being honest with yourself or them. Bias and absolutes never accomplish beneficial results in life.
    mikepegg44 wrote:
    FiveB247x wrote:
    I don't discount your comments or Howard Zinn's (I'm a fan of his), but many people and justly so feel that sorta talk in many regards is mere class warfare commentary rather than political and historical fact. I don't agree with most of it, nor do I agree completely with Zinn, but it is a fair argument against it in the proper context.


    I would definitely agree. The conflict perspective is far to easily applied to every situation implying some sort of sinister plot.
    That being said, I don't think a thread is the place you will ever find a solution to anything. I think of it more as a place to share ideas and the questions we have about others ideas and possibly get some insight into how a person reached a conclusion. Not so much to find a solution to a problem(especially the serious topics that can be discussed) but to share new ideas with others that they might not have thought about. I sometimes get a little heated when I feel that my ideas are called something they aren't meant to be and I definitely need to remind myself of what these threads are for, but if you are looking for answers you need look no further than your own mind. You will never convince all the people all the time to act in a certain way.
    CONservative governMENt

    Our government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a law-breaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. - Louis Brandeis
  • mikepegg44mikepegg44 Posts: 3,353
    FiveB247x wrote:
    Absolutely, I always think that no one is really going to convince or change anyone's mind on an issue or topic on here, but they may question the logic, fact or make the person think enough to have them look into it further or even simply give them a greater perspective. If you can't find the holes in your own beliefs, you're not being honest with yourself or them. Bias and absolutes never accomplish beneficial results in life.
    mikepegg44 wrote:
    FiveB247x wrote:
    I don't discount your comments or Howard Zinn's (I'm a fan of his), but many people and justly so feel that sorta talk in many regards is mere class warfare commentary rather than political and historical fact. I don't agree with most of it, nor do I agree completely with Zinn, but it is a fair argument against it in the proper context.


    I would definitely agree. The conflict perspective is far to easily applied to every situation implying some sort of sinister plot.
    That being said, I don't think a thread is the place you will ever find a solution to anything. I think of it more as a place to share ideas and the questions we have about others ideas and possibly get some insight into how a person reached a conclusion. Not so much to find a solution to a problem(especially the serious topics that can be discussed) but to share new ideas with others that they might not have thought about. I sometimes get a little heated when I feel that my ideas are called something they aren't meant to be and I definitely need to remind myself of what these threads are for, but if you are looking for answers you need look no further than your own mind. You will never convince all the people all the time to act in a certain way.
    +111111111
    that’s right! Can’t we all just get together and focus on our real enemies: monogamous gays and stem cells… - Ned Flanders
    It is terrifying when you are too stupid to know who is dumb
    - Joe Rogan
Sign In or Register to comment.