Something Positive coming out of AZ - What to do??

Boxes&BooksBoxes&Books USA Posts: 2,672
edited May 2010 in A Moving Train
Something positive coming out of AZ. I still don't know if I can actually watch the game, due to my boycott, but felt this was a thoughtful move by the Suns and the league.
Let me tell you, I love the NBA playoffs and it hurts not to watch any games involving the Phoenix Suns. But it is what it is. Anyways while surfing the net I picked up on this story about the Phoenix Suns..... thought maybe you guys might enjoy reading it.

thanks,


http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/blog/ball_d ... nba,238682

In general, people in the sports world keep their political leanings to themselves. Sure, there are a few guys who regularly speak out on political issues, but for the most part that's considered bad business. As Michael Jordan put it, "Republicans buy shoes too." That's why what the Phoenix Suns are doing is so amazing.

The team will be wearing its "Los Suns" jerseys for Wednesday night's Game 2 against the San Antonio Spurs "to honor [the] Latino community and the diversity of our league, the state of Arizona, and our nation." Awesome.

The decision to wear the jerseys came from way up the corporate ladder, as team owner Robert Sarver suggested the team wear their Noche Latina alternates.

Sarver, who was born and raised in Tucson, said frustration with the federal government's failure to deal with the illegal immigration issue led to the passage of what he called "a flawed state law."

"However intended, the result of passing the law is that our basic principles of equal rights and protection under the law are being called into question," he said, "and Arizona's already struggling economy will suffer even further setbacks at a time when the state can ill-afford them."

The Suns voted on the jerseys and unanimously decided to wear them for Cinco De Mayo. As if he weren't likeable enough, Phoenix guard Steve Nash(notes) succinctly summed up the Suns' feelings on the issue.

"I think it's fantastic," Nash said after Tuesday's practice. "I think the law is very misguided. I think it's, unfortunately, to the detriment of our society and our civil liberties. I think it's very important for us to stand up for things we believe in. As a team and as an organization, we have a lot of love and support for all of our fans. The league is very multicultural. We have players from all over the world, and our Latino community here is very strong and important to us."

And it's not just the Suns who are speaking out on this issue.

Spurs coach Gregg Popovich is on board, and the team even tried to get their "Los Spurs" jerseys, though it was too late to do so. When asked for approval to wear the jerseys, the NBA "was all for it," said Suns general manager Steve Kerr. Furthermore, NBA Players Association executive director Billy Hunter issued a press release, denouncing the law.

The recent passage of the new immigration law in Arizona is disappointing and disturbing. The National Basketball Players Association strongly supports the repeal or immediate modification of this legislation. Any attempt to encourage, tolerate or legalize racial profiling is offensive and incompatible with basic notions of fairness and equal protection. A law that unfairly targets one group is ultimately a threat to all.

We applaud the actions of Phoenix Suns players and management and join them in taking a stand against the misguided efforts of Arizona lawmakers. We are consulting with our members and our player leadership to determine the most effective way for our union to continue to voice our opposition to this legislation.

It's not much, just an extra three letters on the front of a tanktop, but it means a lot more. As Kerr said, the Suns want to "make sure that people understand that we know what's going on and we don't agree with the law itself." For a sports team, that's huge.
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • __ Posts: 6,651
    That's awesome! :thumbup: :D
  • Boxes&BooksBoxes&Books USA Posts: 2,672
    Another article on the subject. I think I just might have to tune in tomorrow- and show the Suns some support.

    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0510/36779.html
  • polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    mlb is also getting more vocal against this law ... the players union will likely boycott the all-star game next year in arizona if this law is not repealed ...

    heck, i was reading that kendrick (owner of the diamond backs) who's a huge republican and supporter of the current state gov is against this law ... that should tell people something ...

    edit: watch the game ... steve nash is awesome ... haha
  • Jason PJason P Posts: 19,158
    polaris_x wrote:
    mlb is also getting more vocal against this law ... the players union will likely boycott the all-star game next year in arizona if this law is not repealed ...

    heck, i was reading that kendrick (owner of the diamond backs) who's a huge republican and supporter of the current state gov is against this law ... that should tell people something ...

    edit: watch the game ... steve nash is awesome ... haha
    Steve Nash is the 2nd best basketball player to ever come out of Canada, trailing only Teen Wolf.
    Be Excellent To Each Other
    Party On, Dudes!
  • polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    Jason P wrote:
    polaris_x wrote:
    mlb is also getting more vocal against this law ... the players union will likely boycott the all-star game next year in arizona if this law is not repealed ...

    heck, i was reading that kendrick (owner of the diamond backs) who's a huge republican and supporter of the current state gov is against this law ... that should tell people something ...

    edit: watch the game ... steve nash is awesome ... haha
    Steve Nash is the 2nd best basketball player to ever come out of Canada, trailing only Teen Wolf.

    ya ... and teen wolf wouldn't approve this law either as he would be a visible minority as well ... ;)
  • keeponrockinkeeponrockin Posts: 7,446
    The Suns thing is fantastic. Ozzie Guillen made several good points about it as well. The MLB boycotting the All-Star game would be huge, and would show amazing solidarity.
    Believe me, when I was growin up, I thought the worst thing you could turn out to be was normal, So I say freaks in the most complementary way. Here's a song by a fellow freak - E.V
  • cincybearcatcincybearcat Posts: 16,497
    If the feds had been following the law and actually doing something about it the last decade or 2, there would be this stupid AZ law to protest.

    Desperation leads to unfortunate, drastic, and sometimes idiotic ideas.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    If the feds had been following the law and actually doing something about it the last decade or 2, there would be this stupid AZ law to protest.

    Desperation leads to unfortunate, drastic, and sometimes idiotic ideas.

    the feds don't enforce any laws that could inhibit big business ... case in point: pretty much every environmental law there is ...

    if you did an audit of most big businesses - you would see that they all hire illegal workers whether it's cleaning buildings or doing whatever shit job they don't want to pay full wages for ...

    the problem isn't enforcement of any said law, the problem is that the economy is in the shitter because americans have let corporations dictate everything and now when it's gone pear shape ... people in legislative power are looking for a scapegoat ... and it's somewhat sad that republicans continue to prey on the prejudices that exists everywhere to distract people from the real problems ...
  • WaveCameCrashinWaveCameCrashin Posts: 2,929
    I wonder just how many of these players actually live on the border. This would include people like M.Moore,Shakira,and others who don't support this bill. When they go home at night they will be going back to their gated communities.
  • he still standshe still stands Posts: 2,835
    prfctlefts wrote:
    I wonder just how many of these players actually live on the border. This would include people like M.Moore,Shakira,and others who don't support this bill. When they go home at night they will be going back to their gated communities.

    that is kind of like saying I couldn't be against laws that support genocide of jews because I'm not Jewish...

    or against infringement of gay rights because I'm not gay...

    Just because an issue doesn't directly affect someone doesn't mean that person can't be vocal about that issue being an injustice. What an absolutely horrible perspective...
    Everything not forbidden is compulsory and eveything not compulsory is forbidden. You are free... free to do what the government says you can do.
  • g under pg under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,200
    edited May 2010
    prfctlefts wrote:
    I wonder just how many of these players actually live on the border. This would include people like M.Moore,Shakira,and others who don't support this bill. When they go home at night they will be going back to their gated communities.

    Interesting, I didn't know you had to live on or near the border in order to not support this bill. I don't support this bill and I for half a year live in a gated community and now have a home in Arizona. It matters none where these people live it's about the bill and what it says and how it will affect the legal immigrants in Arizona is what they object to. I'll probably have to carry my passport just in case those in authority want to know my citizenship status when I'll spend a month in Phoenix (AZ) . :evil:

    Oh BRAVO for the Phoenix Suns and I'm sure more will follow.

    Peace
    Post edited by g under p on
    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


  • Boxes&BooksBoxes&Books USA Posts: 2,672
    I think I just might have to tune in for this one! :):D

    A lot of new names on this thread , showing some support- Thanks!
  • blackredyellowblackredyellow Posts: 5,889
    polaris_x wrote:
    mlb is also getting more vocal against this law ... the players union will likely boycott the all-star game next year in arizona if this law is not repealed ...

    That is just so far away, and given our (as a society) attention span, this won't be an issue by next summer. There will be some other political crisis or whatever to take our attention. And by then, either parts of the bill will be repealed, or (like is already happening) enforcement guidelines will be relaxed where it's not even noticeable.


    Good move on the Suns though...
    My whole life
    was like a picture
    of a sunny day
    “We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
    ― Abraham Lincoln
  • __ Posts: 6,651
    polaris_x wrote:
    If the feds had been following the law and actually doing something about it the last decade or 2, there would be this stupid AZ law to protest.

    Desperation leads to unfortunate, drastic, and sometimes idiotic ideas.

    the feds don't enforce any laws that could inhibit big business ... case in point: pretty much every environmental law there is ...

    if you did an audit of most big businesses - you would see that they all hire illegal workers whether it's cleaning buildings or doing whatever shit job they don't want to pay full wages for ...

    the problem isn't enforcement of any said law, the problem is that the economy is in the shitter because americans have let corporations dictate everything and now when it's gone pear shape ... people in legislative power are looking for a scapegoat ... and it's somewhat sad that republicans continue to prey on the prejudices that exists everywhere to distract people from the real problems ...

    :clap:
  • __ Posts: 6,651
    prfctlefts wrote:
    I wonder just how many of these players actually live on the border. This would include people like M.Moore,Shakira,and others who don't support this bill. When they go home at night they will be going back to their gated communities.

    Dude - you did see in an article I posted somewhere that the Tuscon police chief is against it too, right? Is Tuscon close enough to the border for you? Does the Chief of Police know enough about the situation for his opinion to get some respect?
  • __ Posts: 6,651
    prfctlefts wrote:
    I wonder just how many of these players actually live on the border. This would include people like M.Moore,Shakira,and others who don't support this bill. When they go home at night they will be going back to their gated communities.

    that is kind of like saying I couldn't be against laws that support genocide of jews because I'm not Jewish...

    or against infringement of gay rights because I'm not gay...

    Just because an issue doesn't directly affect someone doesn't mean that person can't be vocal about that issue being an injustice. What an absolutely horrible perspective...

    First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out--
    because I was not a communist;
    Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out--
    because I was not a socialist;
    Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out--
    because I was not a trade unionist;
    Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out--
    because I was not a Jew;
    Then they came for me--
    and there was no one left to speak out for me.
  • cincybearcatcincybearcat Posts: 16,497
    scb wrote:
    polaris_x wrote:
    If the feds had been following the law and actually doing something about it the last decade or 2, there would be this stupid AZ law to protest.

    Desperation leads to unfortunate, drastic, and sometimes idiotic ideas.

    the feds don't enforce any laws that could inhibit big business ... case in point: pretty much every environmental law there is ...

    if you did an audit of most big businesses - you would see that they all hire illegal workers whether it's cleaning buildings or doing whatever shit job they don't want to pay full wages for ...

    the problem isn't enforcement of any said law, the problem is that the economy is in the shitter because americans have let corporations dictate everything and now when it's gone pear shape ... people in legislative power are looking for a scapegoat ... and it's somewhat sad that republicans continue to prey on the prejudices that exists everywhere to distract people from the real problems ...

    :clap:


    It's obvious only big corporations are to blame...silly me. Man, your rhetoric gets old.

    It's obviously a part...and guess what??? Part of enforcing the law would have been to go after companies using illegal labor. See how that works?
    hippiemom = goodness
  • polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    It's obvious only big corporations are to blame...silly me. Man, your rhetoric gets old.

    It's obviously a part...and guess what??? Part of enforcing the law would have been to go after companies using illegal labor. See how that works?

    soo ... the economy is in shits because of illegal workers? ... the country is at war because of illegal workers? ... the environment is going to shit because of illegal workers? ...

    i'm sorry it's getting old to you but it's the reason why this world is going to shit and it shouldn't take much to realize it ...

    and i really have no clue what your second point is - i'm telling you they aren't enforcing the law because big corporations don't want them ... all the state of arizona is doing is tapping into the systemic prejudices that exists and using these people as scapegoats for what is going on right now ...
  • Godfather.Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    not to change the tune here... but I was just listening to the radio,seems 5 students where sent home on May 5th cinco de mayo for clothing issues, they were wearing T-shirts with the American flag on them..what on earth were they thinking ? has anybody else heard anything on this ?

    Godfather.
  • cincybearcatcincybearcat Posts: 16,497
    polaris_x wrote:
    It's obvious only big corporations are to blame...silly me. Man, your rhetoric gets old.

    It's obviously a part...and guess what??? Part of enforcing the law would have been to go after companies using illegal labor. See how that works?

    soo ... the economy is in shits because of illegal workers? ... the country is at war because of illegal workers? ... the environment is going to shit because of illegal workers? ...

    i'm sorry it's getting old to you but it's the reason why this world is going to shit and it shouldn't take much to realize it ...

    and i really have no clue what your second point is - i'm telling you they aren't enforcing the law because big corporations don't want them ... all the state of arizona is doing is tapping into the systemic prejudices that exists and using these people as scapegoats for what is going on right now ...

    Huh? What the f does the economy...the war..or the environment have to do with illegal immigration? Well, the economy and illegal immigration are mixed, but I'm confused with the rest.

    As I've said in the other thread and this thread actually, companies hiring illegal workers is part of the problem. What I am saying is that AZ just got fed up enough that the fed isn't actually enforcing their own laws so they took the matter into their own hands. Of course, they really screwed it up to the other side of the spectrum, but it's not a surprise that a border state did something like this due to the blind eye from the feds.

    It would be the same if the feds were ignoring environmental issues to such a level that the state came in and made their won laws...oh wait...like CA has done.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    Huh? What the f does the economy...the war..or the environment have to do with illegal immigration? Well, the economy and illegal immigration are mixed, but I'm confused with the rest.

    As I've said in the other thread and this thread actually, companies hiring illegal workers is part of the problem. What I am saying is that AZ just got fed up enough that the fed isn't actually enforcing their own laws so they took the matter into their own hands. Of course, they really screwed it up to the other side of the spectrum, but it's not a surprise that a border state did something like this due to the blind eye from the feds.

    It would be the same if the feds were ignoring environmental issues to such a level that the state came in and made their won laws...oh wait...like CA has done.

    it has everything to do with it (less the environment because people don't really care about it) because when things are shitty such as they are now - the people in power need an excuse ...

    i hear what you are saying and i'm telling you it has nothing to do with the problem of illegal workers ... show me one credible objective source that says illegal aliens in america is a problem ... everyone is focused on the economy now and my point is these republicans are trying to blame the economy on illegal workers when in fact they are not the problem ...

    ultimately, the economy is crux of the issue ... not people working illegally ...
  • __ Posts: 6,651
    Cincy... I think you left out an important part of your analogy. I think it would be like if the state created it's own law to protect the environment... but it was aimed at the individual people who don't recycle rather than the corporations who are polluting... and it allowed the cops to check the trash of anyone who didn't look like a tree-hugger for violations.
  • cincybearcatcincybearcat Posts: 16,497
    scb wrote:
    Cincy... I think you left out an important part of your analogy. I think it would be like if the state created it's own law to protect the environment... but it was aimed at the individual people who don't recycle rather than the corporations who are polluting... and it allowed the cops to check the trash of anyone who didn't look like a tree-hugger for violations.


    That is a valid point...like I said, the AZ law goes way far to the other side of the spectrum vs. the fed's blind eye. It's a terrible law. Not arguing that at all. But one of the main reasons this terrible law is in place is because the feds didn't enforce the laws they already had in place. If they had been, there would have been no need for, and no public support for, a law like they have in AZ.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • __ Posts: 6,651
    scb wrote:
    Cincy... I think you left out an important part of your analogy. I think it would be like if the state created it's own law to protect the environment... but it was aimed at the individual people who don't recycle rather than the corporations who are polluting... and it allowed the cops to check the trash of anyone who didn't look like a tree-hugger for violations.


    That is a valid point...like I said, the AZ law goes way far to the other side of the spectrum vs. the fed's blind eye. It's a terrible law. Not arguing that at all. But one of the main reasons this terrible law is in place is because the feds didn't enforce the laws they already had in place. If they had been, there would have been no need for, and no public support for, a law like they have in AZ.

    That's absolutely no excuse to enact a law that will violate the rights of minorities.
  • cincybearcatcincybearcat Posts: 16,497
    scb wrote:
    scb wrote:
    Cincy... I think you left out an important part of your analogy. I think it would be like if the state created it's own law to protect the environment... but it was aimed at the individual people who don't recycle rather than the corporations who are polluting... and it allowed the cops to check the trash of anyone who didn't look like a tree-hugger for violations.


    That is a valid point...like I said, the AZ law goes way far to the other side of the spectrum vs. the fed's blind eye. It's a terrible law. Not arguing that at all. But one of the main reasons this terrible law is in place is because the feds didn't enforce the laws they already had in place. If they had been, there would have been no need for, and no public support for, a law like they have in AZ.

    That's absolutely no excuse to enact a law that will violate the rights of minorities.


    Didn't say it was. Please show me where I did.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • __ Posts: 6,651
    scb wrote:
    That is a valid point...like I said, the AZ law goes way far to the other side of the spectrum vs. the fed's blind eye. It's a terrible law. Not arguing that at all. But one of the main reasons this terrible law is in place is because the feds didn't enforce the laws they already had in place. If they had been, there would have been no need for, and no public support for, a law like they have in AZ.

    That's absolutely no excuse to enact a law that will violate the rights of minorities.


    Didn't say it was. Please show me where I did.

    Didn't say you said it was. Please show me where I did. ;) Though if you're not trying to defend their reasoning I have no idea what your point is.
Sign In or Register to comment.