Will Israel's Nuclear Program to go Public?

puremagic

The fact that Netanyahu refused to attend the Nuclear Summit everyone knew then that Israel's so-called secret nuclear program, weapons and stock pile, was in question. The fact that Israel has nukes hasn't been a secret for years. The only secret is how many and how much.

Byrnzie

Everyone has known Israel has nuclear weapons since Mordechai Vanunu went public in 1986. But Israel will remain exempt from the same regulations and inspections as every other nation on Earth as long as the U.S continues to shield them from any scrutiny. Afterall, Israel is above the law, and they deserve to be treated differently from everybody else.

redrock

Israel did not sign up to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Neither have India or Pakistan but they do not hide the fact that they have nuclear weapons and, as such, this is regulated. Israel won't deny or confirm anything. Not sure what 'power' they think they have over others by doing this. As possessors of nuclear weapons, they should be under the same regulations as India. And to think we all assume Iran or North Korea are threats.....

Pepe Silvia

and yet Israel and the US demands Iran allow it's sites to be monitored and inspected. it always makes me laugh to see these politicians babble on about all the obligations Iran has to the IAEA and world on this and yet technically it's illegal under US law to give aid to a country with a secret nuclear program....but hey, it's already illegal to give them aid and weapons because of their human rights abuses and use on civilians but we don't care about those laws in regards to Israel or Colombia or anywhere

Pepe Silvia

presumed to???? :roll:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/art ... wD9F2F7FG0

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama gave a surprisingly downbeat assessment Tuesday of the chances for a U.S.-brokered peace settlement in the Middle East, saying that the United States can't help if Israel and the Palestinians decide they cannot negotiate.

The two sides "may say to themselves, 'We are not prepared to resolve these issues no matter how much pressure the United States brings to bear,'" Obama said.

Obama reiterated that peace is a vital goal, but one that may be beyond reach "even if we are applying all of our political capital."

Obama was responding to a question about whether the successful negotiation of a new arms control treaty with Russia and the agreements he won at this week's nuclear summit could help him make gains elsewhere. His words are a recognition that although he pledged to work hard for a deal from his first day in office, Obama has gotten little traction in the decades-old conflict.

The United States is pushing for new Israeli-Palestinian talks in which the U.S. would be a go-between. Previous talks broke off more than a year ago, and despite shuttle diplomacy and unusual pressure on ally Israel, the Obama administration has been unable to reach even the modest goal of new talks.

Obama spoke at the close of a conference on securing nuclear materials. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu skipped the meeting because, a spokesman said, Israel thought it would devolve into "Israel-bashing."

Israel sent a lower-level delegation instead. Israel is presumed to have nuclear weapons.

Netanyahu acknowledged last week that his government has yet to iron out its differences with the U.S. over Israeli construction in east Jerusalem, a dispute that has stymied American efforts to restart peace talks.

Netanyahu said both countries are still working to find a solution but staunchly defended his government's contentious settlement plans in the disputed holy city, calling them a long-standing Israeli policy.

"There are things we agree on, things we don't agree on, things we are closing the gap on," Netanyahu said of his talks with Washington. "We are making an effort."

The worst crisis in U.S.-Israeli ties in years erupted last month when Israel announced plans to build 1,600 new homes for Jews in east Jerusalem during a visit by Vice President Joe Biden, drawing sharp condemnation from Washington and calls to cancel the construction.

The announcement derailed a plan for third-party talks, in which each side would talk to a U.S. mediator, who would relay messages to the other. Obama had wanted a resumption of full, direct talks between the Israeli leader and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas. U.S. officials settled for a pledge from both sides to engage in the awkward indirect talks, saying it was a step toward something better. That lesser goal is now in doubt, with each side blaming the other for delaying the start of talks.

Meanwhile, the top U.S. commander for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan said he never claimed that inaction toward a peace deal puts American soldiers at risk, and that he does not blame Israel for the lack of a deal so far.

Gen. David Petraeus told a Washington audience that a policy statement he submitted to Congress last month was misconstrued and misquoted by media and online commentators. The statement cites the unresolved status of Palestinians as a complicating factor in the region, and says there is a sense among many who live there that the United States is biased toward Israel.

Petraeus did not back off those assertions, but he said that in hindsight he wishes his statement had made clear that Israel is a valued strategic ally and will remain one.

"That's something we should and could have included," Petraeus said during an address to the Woodrow Wilson Center, "just to make sure there was no misperception about what we were implying by this."