RIP

Still In Hiding
Posts: 370
i'm sure there are other posts about this today, but RIP Kurt and Layne. Will listen to both of their unpluggeds today in their honor.
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
-
is it just me, or does anybody else feel that its wrong they still have the name "alice in chains"? i feel like they never even acknowledge the fact that the real lead singer isnt alive. i would have given them more of a chance if they came back with a different name. its like a cover band to me, dont like it one bit.0
-
i disagree with you, but thats not what this post is about anyway so ill let it go0
-
Layne died on April 20th.If hope can grow from dirt like me ...0
-
Big Drop wrote:Layne died on April 20th.
his body was found april 20th, they determined he died april 5th0 -
ML181059 wrote:is it just me, or does anybody else feel that its wrong they still have the name "alice in chains"? i feel like they never even acknowledge the fact that the real lead singer isnt alive. i would have given them more of a chance if they came back with a different name. its like a cover band to me, dont like it one bit.
Dont listen then0 -
Get over yourself ya fuckin' poser. The new AIC album is better than anything the band have done from 3 legged dog onwards. Stayley was an ok vocalist but nothing special. AIC haven't lost anything with the new guy, in fact they are probably better off because they don't have to carry a loser like Stayley.ML181059 wrote:is it just me, or does anybody else feel that its wrong they still have the name "alice in chains"? i feel like they never even acknowledge the fact that the real lead singer isnt alive. i would have given them more of a chance if they came back with a different name. its like a cover band to me, dont like it one bit.0
-
RIP Kurt and Layne. We miss you both.The oceans made me, but who came up with love?
"You put some udder cream on that shit?" ~EV 5/17/100 -
ML181059 wrote:is it just me, or does anybody else feel that its wrong they still have the name "alice in chains"? i feel like they never even acknowledge the fact that the real lead singer isnt alive. i would have given them more of a chance if they came back with a different name. its like a cover band to me, dont like it one bit.Thanks EPOTTSIII!
"Vinyl or not, you will need to pay someone to take RA of your hands" - Smile05
424, xxx0 -
JDB wrote:Get over yourself ya fuckin' poser. The new AIC album is better than anything the band have done from 3 legged dog onwards. Stayley was an ok vocalist but nothing special. AIC haven't lost anything with the new guy, in fact they are probably better off because they don't have to carry a loser like Stayley.
BGWB was the most generic crap i ever heard. sounds like they were shamelessly trying to copy Godsmack, who shamelessly tried to copy the original AiC. watered down ass.0 -
actually, I really liked the new AIC. I think they did a really good job of not trying to sound like Layne. I heard so many idiots say "he sounds exactly like Layne". He sounds nothing like him at all! And that's not a bad thing either!!
But I'm also not all hung up on a band using a name. It's a fucking name. Who cares. If you're all hung up on a name of a band then you are buying the cd for the wrong reasons in the first place.Gimli 1993
Fargo 2003
Winnipeg 2005
Winnipeg 2011
St. Paul 20140 -
Still In Hiding wrote:i'm sure there are other posts about this today, but RIP Kurt and Layne. Will listen to both of their unpluggeds today in their honor.
Shine on you crazy diamonds, shine on.
RIP0 -
JDB wrote:Get over yourself ya fuckin' poser. The new AIC album is better than anything the band have done from 3 legged dog onwards. Stayley was an ok vocalist but nothing special. AIC haven't lost anything with the new guy, in fact they are probably better off because they don't have to carry a loser like Stayley.ML181059 wrote:is it just me, or does anybody else feel that its wrong they still have the name "alice in chains"? i feel like they never even acknowledge the fact that the real lead singer isnt alive. i would have given them more of a chance if they came back with a different name. its like a cover band to me, dont like it one bit.
This guys good at calling people names.....Adelaide 17/11/2009, Melbourne 20/11/2009, Sydney 22/11/2009, Melbourne (Big Day Out Festival) 24/01/20140 -
ML181059 wrote:is it just me, or does anybody else feel that its wrong they still have the name "alice in chains"? i feel like they never even acknowledge the fact that the real lead singer isnt alive. i would have given them more of a chance if they came back with a different name. its like a cover band to me, dont like it one bit.
I started a post about this a couple months ago and got a pretty bad response to it. But I agree with you, atleast change the name. It's like Jerry can't make it without using that name. His solo project really didn't go no where.0 -
RIP
I kept the Seattle Times article from the day Kurt was found dead and also the Seattle Times piece from Layne. What bugs me out is that Kurt was on the cover while Layne's notice was really small. It still haunts me to this day that we lost two Seattle area talents like that.
Keep 'em alive by listening0
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help