Hot Tub Time Machine

2»

Comments

  • spencer958spencer958 Posts: 279
    bigbadbill wrote:
    The funniest part is when they lost the bet from the football game. He shouldn't have barfed on the poor little squirrel. Nice "soap on the face" action.

    Very funny. Funniest line was "it looks like Gary Coleman's forearm" :lol:
  • PJPixie wrote:
    I wanna see it! I was a junior in high school in 1986 so I'm dying to see the shit they got back to in the movie :)
    Yeah, I'm old.

    in '86, i was failing everything but lunch, gym, and band in 8th grade.
    9/1/00, 9/2/00, 9/3/00, 12/31/00, 3/2/01, 4/29/01, 6/21/01, 7/25/01, 8/31/01, 9/1/01, 9/2/01, 4/18/02, 8/30/02, 8/31/02, 8/31/02, 9/1/02, 9/22/02, 3/22/03, 5/6/03, 6/29/03, 8/29/03, 8/30/03, 8/30/03, 8/31/03, 2/21/04, 4/2/04, 4/3/04, 9/3/04, 9/4/04, 9/4/04, 9/5/04, 2/19/05, 7/22/05, 9/2/05, 9/3/05, 9/3/05, 9/4/05, 1/22/06, 6/7/06, 9/1/06, 9/2/06, 9/2/06, 9/3/06, 7/6/07, 8/31/07, 9/1/07, 9/1/07, 9/2/07, 3/7/08, 8/29/08, 8/30/08, 8/30/08, 8/31/08, 7/11/09, 6/4/10, 6/11/11
  • haffajappahaffajappa Posts: 5,955
    Ok I watched this last night and found it pretty funny.
    I liked it better than the Hangover (but also found the Hangover EXTREMELY overrated and probably one of the few who did)

    Okay the hotel receptionist guy as soon as i saw him i'd realised i'd seen him before... turns out he works at a nearby video store and comes in to exchange videos when we get their dvds and they get ours... I was talking to him a few weeks ago about a movie and sold him a few at the shop... It made me laugh.. hes a pretty decent actor, or extra anyways
    live pearl jam is best pearl jam
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    Proof there's no recession.
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • eeriepadaveeeriepadave West Chester, PA Posts: 41,772
    8/28/98- Camden, NJ
    10/31/09- Philly
    5/21/10- NYC
    9/2/12- Philly, PA
    7/19/13- Wrigley
    10/19/13- Brooklyn, NY
    10/21/13- Philly, PA
    10/22/13- Philly, PA
    10/27/13- Baltimore, MD
    4/28/16- Philly, PA
    4/29/16- Philly, PA
    5/1/16- NYC
    5/2/16- NYC
    9/2/18- Boston, MA
    9/4/18- Boston, MA
    9/14/22- Camden, NJ
    9/7/24- Philly, PA
    9/9/24- Philly, PA
    Tres Mts.- 3/23/11- Philly. PA
    Eddie Vedder- 6/25/11- Philly, PA
    RNDM- 3/9/16- Philly, PA
  • JWPearlJWPearl Posts: 19,893
    Didnt have a clue there was even part1 until you showed us 2 this last minute looks funny but naughty
  • eeriepadaveeeriepadave West Chester, PA Posts: 41,772
    8/28/98- Camden, NJ
    10/31/09- Philly
    5/21/10- NYC
    9/2/12- Philly, PA
    7/19/13- Wrigley
    10/19/13- Brooklyn, NY
    10/21/13- Philly, PA
    10/22/13- Philly, PA
    10/27/13- Baltimore, MD
    4/28/16- Philly, PA
    4/29/16- Philly, PA
    5/1/16- NYC
    5/2/16- NYC
    9/2/18- Boston, MA
    9/4/18- Boston, MA
    9/14/22- Camden, NJ
    9/7/24- Philly, PA
    9/9/24- Philly, PA
    Tres Mts.- 3/23/11- Philly. PA
    Eddie Vedder- 6/25/11- Philly, PA
    RNDM- 3/9/16- Philly, PA
  • PJ_SoulPJ_Soul Posts: 49,889
    Wtf, where is John Cusack?? :(
    Still, looks funny enough. I really liked the first one.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • JK_LivinJK_Livin Posts: 7,365
    Looks funny.
    Alright, alright, alright!
    Tom O.
    "I never had any friends later on like the ones I had when I was twelve. Jesus, does anyone?"
    -The Writer
  • 1st one was was funny, hope this lives up to it
    ...got a mind full of questions and a teacher in my soul...
  • badbrainsbadbrains Posts: 10,255
    John said they didn't ask him to do the sequel. Wonder why....
  • The JugglerThe Juggler Posts: 48,473
    badbrains said:

    John said they didn't ask him to do the sequel. Wonder why....

    that sucks. it does look funny though.

    i bet he thought it was beneath him to do a sequel...especially if they are not going back to the 80's again.
    www.myspace.com
  • PJ_SoulPJ_Soul Posts: 49,889

    badbrains said:

    John said they didn't ask him to do the sequel. Wonder why....

    that sucks. it does look funny though.

    i bet he thought it was beneath him to do a sequel...especially if they are not going back to the 80's again.
    I don't think there are many movies beneath him. Sounds like he just wasn't asked. I have no doubt that he would have done it if asked. Given the number of movies he's in that hardly anyone's ever heard of, there is no way he'd turn down one that actually did okay.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • The JugglerThe Juggler Posts: 48,473
    PJ_Soul said:

    badbrains said:

    John said they didn't ask him to do the sequel. Wonder why....

    that sucks. it does look funny though.

    i bet he thought it was beneath him to do a sequel...especially if they are not going back to the 80's again.
    I don't think there are many movies beneath him. Sounds like he just wasn't asked. I have no doubt that he would have done it if asked. Given the number of movies he's in that hardly anyone's ever heard of, there is no way he'd turn down one that actually did okay.
    your definition of what's beneath john cusak and what john cusak thinks is beneath him are probably significantly different.

    he was the star of the first one. i don't know why they wouldn't ask him to return. this article implies he turned it down-
    http://www.avclub.com/article/adam-scott-may-take-john-cusacks-place-in-the-emho-97451
    www.myspace.com
  • badbrainsbadbrains Posts: 10,255

    PJ_Soul said:

    badbrains said:

    John said they didn't ask him to do the sequel. Wonder why....

    that sucks. it does look funny though.

    i bet he thought it was beneath him to do a sequel...especially if they are not going back to the 80's again.
    I don't think there are many movies beneath him. Sounds like he just wasn't asked. I have no doubt that he would have done it if asked. Given the number of movies he's in that hardly anyone's ever heard of, there is no way he'd turn down one that actually did okay.
    your definition of what's beneath john cusak and what john cusak thinks is beneath him are probably significantly different.

    he was the star of the first one. i don't know why they wouldn't ask him to return. this article implies he turned it down-
    http://www.avclub.com/article/adam-scott-may-take-john-cusacks-place-in-the-emho-97451
  • The JugglerThe Juggler Posts: 48,473
    badbrains said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    badbrains said:

    John said they didn't ask him to do the sequel. Wonder why....

    that sucks. it does look funny though.

    i bet he thought it was beneath him to do a sequel...especially if they are not going back to the 80's again.
    I don't think there are many movies beneath him. Sounds like he just wasn't asked. I have no doubt that he would have done it if asked. Given the number of movies he's in that hardly anyone's ever heard of, there is no way he'd turn down one that actually did okay.
    your definition of what's beneath john cusak and what john cusak thinks is beneath him are probably significantly different.

    he was the star of the first one. i don't know why they wouldn't ask him to return. this article implies he turned it down-
    http://www.avclub.com/article/adam-scott-may-take-john-cusacks-place-in-the-emho-97451
    that's weird. not sure i buy it though.
    www.myspace.com
  • eeriepadaveeeriepadave West Chester, PA Posts: 41,772

    badbrains said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    badbrains said:

    John said they didn't ask him to do the sequel. Wonder why....

    that sucks. it does look funny though.

    i bet he thought it was beneath him to do a sequel...especially if they are not going back to the 80's again.
    I don't think there are many movies beneath him. Sounds like he just wasn't asked. I have no doubt that he would have done it if asked. Given the number of movies he's in that hardly anyone's ever heard of, there is no way he'd turn down one that actually did okay.
    your definition of what's beneath john cusak and what john cusak thinks is beneath him are probably significantly different.

    he was the star of the first one. i don't know why they wouldn't ask him to return. this article implies he turned it down-
    http://www.avclub.com/article/adam-scott-may-take-john-cusacks-place-in-the-emho-97451
    that's weird. not sure i buy it though.
    wonder if his character at least gets mentioned in the film?
    8/28/98- Camden, NJ
    10/31/09- Philly
    5/21/10- NYC
    9/2/12- Philly, PA
    7/19/13- Wrigley
    10/19/13- Brooklyn, NY
    10/21/13- Philly, PA
    10/22/13- Philly, PA
    10/27/13- Baltimore, MD
    4/28/16- Philly, PA
    4/29/16- Philly, PA
    5/1/16- NYC
    5/2/16- NYC
    9/2/18- Boston, MA
    9/4/18- Boston, MA
    9/14/22- Camden, NJ
    9/7/24- Philly, PA
    9/9/24- Philly, PA
    Tres Mts.- 3/23/11- Philly. PA
    Eddie Vedder- 6/25/11- Philly, PA
    RNDM- 3/9/16- Philly, PA
  • eeriepadaveeeriepadave West Chester, PA Posts: 41,772
    saw it tonight, it was pretty stupid. I don't even think i laughed once (maybe i chucked once or twice) but overall it was bad.
    8/28/98- Camden, NJ
    10/31/09- Philly
    5/21/10- NYC
    9/2/12- Philly, PA
    7/19/13- Wrigley
    10/19/13- Brooklyn, NY
    10/21/13- Philly, PA
    10/22/13- Philly, PA
    10/27/13- Baltimore, MD
    4/28/16- Philly, PA
    4/29/16- Philly, PA
    5/1/16- NYC
    5/2/16- NYC
    9/2/18- Boston, MA
    9/4/18- Boston, MA
    9/14/22- Camden, NJ
    9/7/24- Philly, PA
    9/9/24- Philly, PA
    Tres Mts.- 3/23/11- Philly. PA
    Eddie Vedder- 6/25/11- Philly, PA
    RNDM- 3/9/16- Philly, PA
Sign In or Register to comment.