Israel OKs new settlement in West Bank

Pepe SilviaPepe Silvia Posts: 3,758
edited March 2010 in A Moving Train
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/ar ... bDzZAr7UBg

Israel OKs new settlement in West Bank: minister
(AFP) – 3 hours ago
JERUSALEM — Israel has given the green light for the building of 112 new homes in a Jewish settlement in the occupied West Bank despite a partial moratorium on such construction, a minister said on Monday.

The houses will be built in the Beitar Ilit settlement near Bethlehem, Environment Minister Gilad Erdan told public radio.

Israel's continued expansion of settlements is one of the biggest obstacles to the resumption of peace talks with the Palestinians, now suspended for more than a year.

The new project came to light the day after the Palestinians agreed to indirect peace talks with Israel but warned that the US-mediated negotiations could collapse if Israel continued expanding settlements.

The Palestinians insist they will only return to direct negotiations if Israel agrees to a complete freeze on settlement construction in the occupied West Bank, including east Jerusalem.

Israel announced a 10-month moratorium on new building permits for settler homes in the occupied West Bank in late November but it excludes east Jerusalem, public buildings and works already under way.

The international community considers all Israeli settlements on occupied Palestinian land illegal.
Copyright © 2010 AFP. All rights reserved
don't compete; coexist

what are you but my reflection? who am i to judge or strike you down?

"I will promise you this, that if we have not gotten our troops out by the time I am president, it is the first thing I will do. I will get our troops home. We will bring an end to this war. You can take that to the bank." - Barack Obama

when you told me 'if you can't beat 'em, join 'em'
i was thinkin 'death before dishonor'
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • badbrainsbadbrains Posts: 10,255
    See, told you Israel wanted "piece".........
  • alivegirlalivegirl Posts: 124
    Yeah they sure do want PIECE, and lots of it, come to think of it, they can't get enough PIECE!


    " A SATIATION,.....WITH OCCUPATION" EV


    " WHERE THEY HAVE MORE,... STILL THEY TAKE MORE" EV
  • catefrancescatefrances Posts: 29,003
    itd be so much easier if the palestinians just stopped wanting to live in their own country then the israeli government could simply build whatever they wanted wherever they wanted... oh wait....
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • badbrainsbadbrains Posts: 10,255
    itd be so much easier if the palestinians just stopped wanting to live in their own country then the israeli government could simply build whatever they wanted wherever they wanted... oh wait....

    how dare the Palestinians!!!! What makes them think it's there land? Don't they know god gave it the Israelis? It says so in one of the many bibles writtten.....which one, I can't seem to remember..... :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
    Everybody should just stop harping on Israel, atleast they haven't charged the Palestinians for the air that they're stealing from them. Those fucken palestinian thieves!!!!! Who the fuck are they to breathe free Israeli air!!!!!!!!! :roll: :roll: :roll:
  • yosiyosi NYC Posts: 3,069
    Wow, all that eye rolling must make your eyes hurt. Maybe it even affected your vision so that you didn't realize when you butchered the word "written" (spelled with only two "t"s, not the three that you gave it). Also, jokes about Jews and money. Poor taste at the very least.
    you couldn't swing if you were hangin' from a palm tree in a hurricane

  • polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    this further proves israelis DO NOT WANT PEACE ... everyone knows that the palestinians want east jerusalem and that it would be theirs under the 1967 border starting point ... so, what is the point of approving these settlements other than grabbing more land and continuing this facade known as the peace process ...

    crimes against humanity
  • yosiyosi NYC Posts: 3,069
    this further proves Palestinians DO NOT WANT PEACE ... everyone knows that the Israelis want not to have rockets fired at them, and that it would be forbidden to do so under any starting point for peace... so, what is the point of firing these rockets other than killing and terrorizing Israelis and continuing this facade known as the peace process ...

    crimes against humanity
    you couldn't swing if you were hangin' from a palm tree in a hurricane

  • polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    yosi wrote:
    this further proves Palestinians DO NOT WANT PEACE ... everyone knows that the Israelis want not to have rockets fired at them, and that it would be forbidden to do so under any starting point for peace... so, what is the point of firing these rockets other than killing and terrorizing Israelis and continuing this facade known as the peace process ...

    crimes against humanity

    whatever allows you to sleep at night i suppose ... how many israeli civilians have died due to rocket attacks and suicide bombings over the last 10 years again?

    i thought you said israel should stop its expansion - what is your justification for this?
  • Pepe SilviaPepe Silvia Posts: 3,758
    yosi wrote:
    this further proves Palestinians DO NOT WANT PEACE ... everyone knows that the Israelis want not to have rockets fired at them, and that it would be forbidden to do so under any starting point for peace... so, what is the point of firing these rockets other than killing and terrorizing Israelis and continuing this facade known as the peace process ...

    crimes against humanity


    wait, so it's the Palestinian's fault Israel approved a new illegal settlement??? :?
    don't compete; coexist

    what are you but my reflection? who am i to judge or strike you down?

    "I will promise you this, that if we have not gotten our troops out by the time I am president, it is the first thing I will do. I will get our troops home. We will bring an end to this war. You can take that to the bank." - Barack Obama

    when you told me 'if you can't beat 'em, join 'em'
    i was thinkin 'death before dishonor'
  • yosiyosi NYC Posts: 3,069
    I don't justify it. I disagree with the decision.
    you couldn't swing if you were hangin' from a palm tree in a hurricane

  • polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    yosi wrote:
    I don't justify it. I disagree with the decision.

    but what i wrote was essentially offensive to your nationalistic ears that you had to respond accordingly?
  • Pepe SilviaPepe Silvia Posts: 3,758
    i wonder what the dean of the Bethlehem Bible College would think, given this is what he thought about operation cast lead:

    http://www.middleeastwindow.com/categor ... /alex-awad

    Alex Awad is pastor of East Jerusalem Baptist Church, as well as Professor at Bethlehem Bible College in Palestine. You can read more of his articles at: AlexAwad.Org.

    Regarding Gaza
    By Rev. Alex Awad,
    Dean of Students,
    Bethlehem Bible College

    December 31, 2008

    One hundred tons of bombs are Israel’s way of saying to the captive citizens of Gaza, Merry Christmas, Happy Eid (feast) and Happy New Year. These “gifts” that were showered from US-made F-16 fighter jets demolished government buildings, mosques, a university, hundreds of homes and snuffed out many lives – among them scores of children. Like many in this part of the world and around the globe my heart aches when I read and see pictures of the Israeli bombardment of the Gaza Strip and likewise when I see Israelis killed or injured by Qassam rockets. However, I have a special love for Gaza and its people. Before the strict closure of Gaza, Bethlehem Bible College used to have an extension there. I went to Gaza once every Thursday to teach our students and often I stayed the night there. Interacting with Gazans in class, in church and in the community, I learned much about the kindness and the hospitality of the people of Gaza, both Muslims and Christians. The majority of the people of Gaza are not Hamas militants. They are people like you and I who long to live in peace day in and day out. Regretfully, everyone in the Gaza Strip--men, women, children, civilians and fighters alike—is now feeling the horrible impact and devastation caused by the newest and deadliest Israeli incursion over the Strip in many years.

    The majority of the people of Gaza are not Hamas militants. They are people like you and I who long to live in peace day in and day out. Regretfully, everyone in the Gaza Strip--men, women, children, civilians and fighters alike—is now feeling the horrible impact and devastation caused by the newest and deadliest Israeli incursion over the Strip in many years.


    There is no doubt that the Qassam rockets launched against the western Negev and Ashkelon by Islamic militants linked to Hamas cause great pain and anxiety for many Israelis. Most people agree that Israel, like any other country, has the right to defend itself from outside attacks. However in this unequal conflict between Israel and Hamas, Israel, as usual, has overdone it. When it comes to dealing with its enemies, Israel has a pattern of being extreme. “An eye for an eye” does not satisfy. It has to be more like one hundred eyes for one eye and one hundred teeth for one tooth. When the Israelis attacked Lebanon in June 2006, they sprayed the country with millions of cluster bombs (which are internationally banned) and these bombs continue to kill innocent people even today. What troubles me most in this current war is that most of the victims of this Israeli incursion on Gaza are average people-men, women and children--who are struggling to just to survive under the extreme and harsh conditions that the Israeli siege has created. For 40 years the Gaza Strip has been under Israeli occupation and during the last few years, although the Israelis redeployed their troops from Gaza, they never withdrew the symbols of their dominance and occupation. They continue to control the borders, which mean controlling food, medicine, fuel and goods going in and out of the Strip. In essence, they have turned Gaza into the largest open-air prison in the world.

    If the Israeli leaders assume that they can assure the security of their citizens by the might and the power of their superior army and air force, they are mistaken. The outrage caused among the peoples in the Arab and Islamic world by these horrible attacks will most likely blow dark clouds over the skies of Israel or elsewhere in the world.

    Israel should learn to negotiate with its neighbors in good faith. Negotiating in good faith means implementing UN resolutions, ending the occupation of the West Bank, opening the borders of the Gaza Strip to the rest of the world and stopping military incursions into the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. The rise of Hamas and militancy in Gaza is directly related to a vacuum that Israel and the United States have created by dragging their feet in never-ending and fruitless peace negotiations with moderate Palestinians. As long as Israel continues to place obstacles on the path of the peace process and as long as the US continues to allow it to do so, we can expect new outbursts of violence in the Middle East that will cause more horrors and waste more lives on both sides of the political divide.

    The Israelis have the right to live in peace and security and so do the people of Gaza. I call on you, friends, to pray for the civilians on both sides who are caught in this nightmare. In addition to praying, let us protest these lethal bombs with a barrage of our own letters to our elected leaders calling for an end to this human tragedy.

    don't compete; coexist

    what are you but my reflection? who am i to judge or strike you down?

    "I will promise you this, that if we have not gotten our troops out by the time I am president, it is the first thing I will do. I will get our troops home. We will bring an end to this war. You can take that to the bank." - Barack Obama

    when you told me 'if you can't beat 'em, join 'em'
    i was thinkin 'death before dishonor'
  • yosiyosi NYC Posts: 3,069
    polaris_x wrote:
    yosi wrote:
    I don't justify it. I disagree with the decision.

    but what i wrote was essentially offensive to your nationalistic ears that you had to respond accordingly?

    What you wrote had the tone of a child throwing a tantrum. I responded accordingly.
    you couldn't swing if you were hangin' from a palm tree in a hurricane

  • Pepe SilviaPepe Silvia Posts: 3,758
    yosi wrote:
    polaris_x wrote:
    yosi wrote:
    I don't justify it. I disagree with the decision.

    but what i wrote was essentially offensive to your nationalistic ears that you had to respond accordingly?

    What you wrote had the tone of a child throwing a tantrum. I responded accordingly.


    what did he write that was incorrect?
    don't compete; coexist

    what are you but my reflection? who am i to judge or strike you down?

    "I will promise you this, that if we have not gotten our troops out by the time I am president, it is the first thing I will do. I will get our troops home. We will bring an end to this war. You can take that to the bank." - Barack Obama

    when you told me 'if you can't beat 'em, join 'em'
    i was thinkin 'death before dishonor'
  • rebornFixerrebornFixer Posts: 4,901
    yosi wrote:
    polaris_x wrote:
    yosi wrote:
    I don't justify it. I disagree with the decision.

    but what i wrote was essentially offensive to your nationalistic ears that you had to respond accordingly?

    What you wrote had the tone of a child throwing a tantrum. I responded accordingly.

    I am not sure which I prefer, the overgeneralizations about everyone in Israel or Byrnzie pretending that he doesn't know what Hezbollah does wrong.
  • polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    yosi wrote:
    What you wrote had the tone of a child throwing a tantrum. I responded accordingly.

    honestly? ... i understand it is not to your liking ... but a tantrum!? ... i think that is a bit of a stretch ...

    anyways - it has been my contention on this issue that Israel does not want peace (at least the people the gov't) and i think this is yet another example that reinforces my point ... of which you clearly have no rebuttal ...
  • polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    I am not sure which I prefer, the overgeneralizations about everyone in Israel or Byrnzie pretending that he doesn't know what Hezbollah does wrong.

    :?: :?:
  • rebornFixerrebornFixer Posts: 4,901
    polaris_x wrote:
    yosi wrote:
    What you wrote had the tone of a child throwing a tantrum. I responded accordingly.

    honestly? ... i understand it is not to your liking ... but a tantrum!? ... i think that is a bit of a stretch ...

    anyways - it has been my contention on this issue that Israel does not want peace (at least the people the gov't) and i think this is yet another example that reinforces my point ... of which you clearly have no rebuttal ...

    The last poll I came across suggested that around 60% of Israelis oppose a total settlement freeze ... Leaving about 40% who SUPPORT such a notion. 40% is a pretty important proportion, and thus saying that "Israel is not interested in peace" (not to mention the all-caps usage to emphasize said point) is an overgeneralization.
  • polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    The last poll I came across suggested that around 60% of Israelis oppose a total settlement freeze ... Leaving about 40% who SUPPORT such a notion. 40% is a pretty important proportion, and thus saying that "Israel is not interested in peace" (not to mention the all-caps usage to emphasize said point) is an overgeneralization.

    first of all - i have always said that I believe most Israelis want peace ... i have always inferred to the gov't specifically the right wing faction that controls much of the policy when i say they do not want peace ...

    secondly - how can you have peace if 60% of the population will not stop expansion!??
  • yosiyosi NYC Posts: 3,069
    My rebuttal is that some people in the Israeli government probably don't want peace, and most people in the government are just too shortsighted to see the stupidity of their actions, or they're too gutless to stand up to the idiots when they do see it. That said, the population wants peace, which is the more important thing in the long run, since Israel is a democracy, and the government will be made to follow the people's wishes once the people can be convinced that there is a real chance for peace, rather than simply another Oslo retread that will see security measures lifted, and a return to constant terrorism.
    you couldn't swing if you were hangin' from a palm tree in a hurricane

  • polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    yosi wrote:
    My rebuttal is that some people in the Israeli government probably don't want peace, and most people in the government are just too shortsighted to see the stupidity of their actions, or they're too gutless to stand up to the idiots when they do see it. That said, the population wants peace, which is the more important thing in the long run, since Israel is a democracy, and the government will be made to follow the people's wishes once the people can be convinced that there is a real chance for peace, rather than simply another Oslo retread that will see security measures lifted, and a return to constant terrorism.

    haha ... well, that isn't a rebuttal as that it pretty much is what i said! ...
  • rebornFixerrebornFixer Posts: 4,901
    polaris_x wrote:
    secondly - how can you have peace if 60% of the population will not stop expansion!??

    This is a good question, and I do believe that someone in Israel will have to make a potentially unpopular decision to do so, if peace is ever going to occur. I won't dispute the numbers, this 60% figure is a problem. But not an insurmountable one. If you don't fall into the category, fine, my apologies ... I am really defensive because whenever I post, someone tells me that I am an idiot, essentially, for viewing as complex situation as ... complex.
  • yosiyosi NYC Posts: 3,069
    I think the 60% number is probably more indicative of Israelis' distrust of, and anger at the Palestinians. It's probably not that they are against a freeze per se, but that they see a freeze as a concession to the Palestinians, and they are unwilling at this point to make concessions without getting anything in return. Not saying that I think it's the right position to take (I don't think it is), but it is psychologically understandable.
    you couldn't swing if you were hangin' from a palm tree in a hurricane

  • polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    This is a good question, and I do believe that someone in Israel will have to make a potentially unpopular decision to do so, if peace is ever going to occur. I won't dispute the numbers, this 60% figure is a problem. But not an insurmountable one. If you don't fall into the category, fine, my apologies ... I am really defensive because whenever I post, someone tells me that I am an idiot, essentially, for viewing as complex situation as ... complex.

    it's obviously a complex situation however, the fundamentals are quite simple ... i know Yosi likes to point out that there are nuances ... but let's just take this recent expansion (which made news only because of Biden's visit) ... there is a consensus even amongst us that this was not good ...

    the Israeli parliamentary is made up of a gazillion parties ... the right have dominated for a long time now and those people are not interested in peace - what is done at glorified meetings with some US official is lip service ... when was the last rocket attack or suicide bombing? ... the expansions have NOT stopped ... how are they acting in good faith? ...
  • rebornFixerrebornFixer Posts: 4,901
    yosi wrote:
    I think the 60% number is probably more indicative of Israelis' distrust of, and anger at the Palestinians. It's probably not that they are against a freeze per se, but that they see a freeze as a concession to the Palestinians, and they are unwilling at this point to make concessions without getting anything in return. Not saying that I think it's the right position to take (I don't think it is), but it is psychologically understandable.

    Exactly. This number could reflect genuine expansionist views, or it could reflect mistrust, fear, and a demand that some form of negotiation happen, rather than something unilateral.
Sign In or Register to comment.