Gitmo closed yet?
unsung
I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
Just checking if this is still in the works since the order was signed Jan 22 2009. That one year sure went by fast, tick tock tick tock.
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
yeah, that did go by fast...I'm really surprised gitmo hasn't closed...ya know, since it's such an easy process...other countries are stepping up to take those folks off our hands...people here in the US have been more that willing to take prisoners and house them close to home...
damn that o bama...
Hail, Hail!!!
so this administration should take responsibility and clean up the freaking mess right? give them a fair trial, and if convicted, and the charges warrant it, then sentence them to max security prisons. If there is no evidence, or if they are found innocent, set them free. and hurry the hell up about it.
just a thought of course.
...are those who've helped us.
Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
That is something I don't really understand. I mean if you live next to a high security prison you are already probably living next to hard core gangbangers, hitmen mafia types and serial killers. Yet they don't want possible terrorist detainees living anywhere near them. What exactly do people think these guys are Bond villians, or Cobra Commander or something?
I feel exactly the same way. I saw a news report a few years ago about a prisoner in California... who ATE his victim!!! Those detainees are nothing compared to neo-Nazi with swastikas tattooed on their faces or hardcore, cold blooded killers we have here. Hell, Charles Manson is in a prison in the U.S. and we're okay with that.
It's all a game of fear.
Hail, Hail!!!
The very problem with Gitmo is that we don't even know for sure who the hell is there! A few of these guys could be dangerous fanatics, but who knows? Unfortunately, a lack of decent info probably helps breed the fear. The lack of transparency is not only fundamentally inconsistent with American judicial principles ... It also fuels this boogeyman image that makes it even harder to place these prisoners elsewhere.
maybe they will.....maybe they will not, regardless, it was a point of view that i had not even considered.
Isn't the whole standard procedure for terrorist to indoctronate people who are easy to mainpulate and are pretty expendable (like the underwear bomber) and then using them to attack targets that don't have super high security? Because of that I can't see the "terrorist homies" of these guys attacking a supermax prison in the middle of like South Dakota or something to break these guys out. Like I said these guys aren't Bond villians with super complex plans.
gitmo has not been closed yet due to irrational fears that it is safer to have them illegally locked up in cuba instead of tried, convicted, and thrown in a supermax here in the states. its all well and good, yet nobody wants the prisoners "in their neighborhood"...frankly i lived near a supermax called Tamms in southern illinios and they had the worst of the worst there. my roommate at the time was a guard there and he said one of the guys shoved a shotgun up a woman's vagina and pulled the trigger. i would be way more concerned about having guys like that get out than some lone alleged terrorist getting out and being on the lam in southern illinois, i mean what's he gonna really do??
as an aside, my roommate later lost his job due to "cruel and unusual punishment on multiple prisoners", so maybe a supermaxx like Tamms would be better for these terrorists??
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
You must have some good roommate stories ...
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
Tell your friend that these guys are not al Qaeda Delta Forces... there is no such thing as al Qaeda Delta Forces... in fact, the al Qaeda Delta Forces strap explosives to their balls.
And these maximum security prisons can keep high level gang bangers from trying to spring them... they are pretty secure facilities.
As for the worst of the worst... like that Sheik that looks like John Belushi... put him with the worst of the worst our American prisoners at Pelican Bay. Bunking with neo-Nazi psychos and Crip Cop Killers... That'll make Camp Delta look like a YMCA Summer Camp to him.
Hail, Hail!!!
what people? who is in there?
Who is 'showing sympathy' for them?
And there are killers in our prisions that would plunge a phillips screwdriver in your ear, just to see what would happen... then, eat you as their meal at 12:05 instead of 12:00.
So... what is your point?
Hail, Hail!!!
i know for a fact about them wanting to use our justice system against us.
i take him for his word.
I'm sorry but some of the posts here just sound so cold and numb, it's sad...
again, i guess I'm slightly off the topic here, but i had to say this...
the question in this thread is if gitmo is still open and the answer is yes and people tried to explain why it is...
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
to your private message, i thought I'd bring it on the main page, no harm in that... I'm sure serving in the army, you've seen a lot of things, but I should hope that in so doing you've also realized that in invading foreign countries you ain;t exactly "liberating" anyone either ... it's all war and killing at the end of the day...
with respect to Islamic rebellion, US foreign policy since the 70's is exactly what caused people to get pissed in this part of the world, so no shit, the US has to pay the price for that. The acts that the US forces have committed in all parts ofthe world that they've invaded aren't exactly "compassionate" either so...
great point...
I hate it when my lunch is late...noon means noon, damn it...
http://blog.nj.com/njv_editorial_page/2011/04/the_only_decision_holder_could.html
It doesn't surprise me as the political fallout would have killed those that supported civilian trials. If O.J. could be found innocent, just imagine how ten years of being held in purgatory could be used by a defense lawyer to get someone off on a technicality.
Pretty sure asking for the law to be followed isn't the same as sympathizing with criminals. Though it's not the first time you've made that claim on this board, so I don't expect it to sink in this time either.
If you asked the question, then you must surely know the 'real' answer. Its not President Obama's fault that Gitmo is still open. The 2009/2010 Republican controlled Senate with the help of Democrat crossover votes inserted a provision in the Defense Department's appropriations NOT TO FUND the closing of Gitmo. Bottom line is they are afraid of having the American public sentence these detainees to death on US soil because of retaliations. Yet, ADX currently houses suspected terrorists.
http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/05/c ... s-in-2010/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/2 ... 05797.html
There's no bleeding hearts, maybe some pissed off American citizens who had to forefeet their civil liberties because our politicians talk tough when it comes to sending US soldiers into battle, yet they're candy-asses are too afraid to be in the same courtroom as these fucks. They're willing to let them rot in Gitmo because they are too afraid to sentence these facks to death face-to-face, so they again hid behind our military to do their dirty work.
...are those who've helped us.
Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.