THE PHILADELPHIA EAGLES...

The Juggler

pjhawks wrote:

The Juggler wrote:

..that is music to pjhawks' ears

you guys should so go cheer for the Broncos and Tim Tebow since you love the run so much. and Jackson's yips on the passes is making people conveniently forget McCoy's 2 awful drops yesterday as well. hey but i'm sure on the 1st 2 drives you guys didn't cheer for the long passes that connected because you wanted to run the ball right?

and kind of ironic to hear about washburn complaining about the Eagles offense not running the ball when there was an article in the Sunday Inquirer about him where he basically says that running the ball in the NFL isn't really important anymore. what a dick. morhingweg should have told him to shut the f up and worry about his defense getting torched by tom brady.

right on cue


yeah man, i loved the deep balls early. plays like those are generally meant to keep the defense honest which opens up the running game (leading nfl rusher, backup qb completing 50% of his passes, starting reciever out). and it did as shady averaged about 5 yards per carry in the first half....on a whopping 6 carries.

way to be andy/marty :thumbup: :roll: oh boy oh boy--- talk about falling asleep at the wheel. what a joke.

eeriepadave

i noticed we are 1-5 at home this year and 3-2 on the road. Also somehow we are still 3-1 in our division :think:

pjhawks

The Juggler wrote:

pjhawks wrote:

The Juggler wrote:

..that is music to pjhawks' ears

you guys should so go cheer for the Broncos and Tim Tebow since you love the run so much. and Jackson's yips on the passes is making people conveniently forget McCoy's 2 awful drops yesterday as well. hey but i'm sure on the 1st 2 drives you guys didn't cheer for the long passes that connected because you wanted to run the ball right?

and kind of ironic to hear about washburn complaining about the Eagles offense not running the ball when there was an article in the Sunday Inquirer about him where he basically says that running the ball in the NFL isn't really important anymore. what a dick. morhingweg should have told him to shut the f up and worry about his defense getting torched by tom brady.

right on cue


yeah man, i loved the deep balls early. plays like those are generally meant to keep the defense honest which opens up the running game (leading nfl rusher, backup qb completing 50% of his passes, starting reciever out). and it did as shady averaged about 5 yards per carry in the first half....on a whopping 6 carries.

way to be andy/marty :thumbup: :roll: oh boy oh boy--- talk about falling asleep at the wheel. what a joke.

league's leading rusher and a 4-7 record. how's that running the ball with the league's top rusher working out for us? love to hear this answer....

The Juggler

pjhawks wrote:

The Juggler wrote:

pjhawks wrote:

you guys should so go cheer for the Broncos and Tim Tebow since you love the run so much. and Jackson's yips on the passes is making people conveniently forget McCoy's 2 awful drops yesterday as well. hey but i'm sure on the 1st 2 drives you guys didn't cheer for the long passes that connected because you wanted to run the ball right?

and kind of ironic to hear about washburn complaining about the Eagles offense not running the ball when there was an article in the Sunday Inquirer about him where he basically says that running the ball in the NFL isn't really important anymore. what a dick. morhingweg should have told him to shut the f up and worry about his defense getting torched by tom brady.

right on cue


yeah man, i loved the deep balls early. plays like those are generally meant to keep the defense honest which opens up the running game (leading nfl rusher, backup qb completing 50% of his passes, starting reciever out). and it did as shady averaged about 5 yards per carry in the first half....on a whopping 6 carries.

way to be andy/marty :thumbup: :roll: oh boy oh boy--- talk about falling asleep at the wheel. what a joke.

league's leading rusher and a 4-7 record. how's that running the ball with the league's top rusher working out for us? love to hear this answer....

way to fail to understand anything that has happened to this team this year... :?

vince young, who according to you "blows", dropped back to throw 54 times yesterday. 83% passes for vince young yesterday including 80% in the first half of a game they led by 10 points and were only down 2 scores at halftime. vince young. yes, that's vince young.

can you justify that for me?

pjhawks

The Juggler wrote:

way to fail to understand anything that has happened to this team this year... :?

vince young, who according to you "blows", dropped back to throw 54 times yesterday. 83% passes for vince young yesterday including 80% in the first half of a game they led by 10 points and were only down 2 scores at halftime. vince young. yes, that's vince young.

can you justify that for me?

of course you're asking the wrong guy this Juggler. you know my feelings that passing the ball is almost always the better option offensively. and the pats had a wide receiver playing in the defensive backfield at times....so yea passing was a better option even with vince young. do you really think the eagles could have scored enough points to beat the patriots running the ball a high majority of the time? anyone who has watched this defense this year knows the patriots were putting up at least 24-28 points on this team without breaking a sweat. eagles weren't scoring 28-30 running the ball a majority of the time.

The Juggler

pjhawks wrote:

The Juggler wrote:

way to fail to understand anything that has happened to this team this year... :?

vince young, who according to you "blows", dropped back to throw 54 times yesterday. 83% passes for vince young yesterday including 80% in the first half of a game they led by 10 points and were only down 2 scores at halftime. vince young. yes, that's vince young.

can you justify that for me?

of course you're asking the wrong guy this Juggler. you know my feelings that passing the ball is almost always the better option offensively. and the pats had a wide receiver playing in the defensive backfield at times....so yea passing was a better option even with vince young. do you really think the eagles could have scored enough points to beat the patriots running the ball a high majority of the time? anyone who has watched this defense this year knows the patriots were putting up at least 24-28 points on this team without breaking a sweat. eagles weren't scoring 28-30 running the ball a majority of the time.

do you know what an adjustment is?

and, if so, under what circumstances would you make one?

The Juggler

also, if you're afraid of a high scoring offense, you should want to, you know, try to keep them off the field. and you don't do that by misfiring 50% of the time on 54 pass attempts with your backup quarterback.

pjhawks

The Juggler wrote:

also, if you're afraid of a high scoring offense, you should want to, you know, try to keep them off the field. and you don't do that by misfiring 50% of the time on 54 pass attempts with your backup quarterback.

conveniently you didn't answer the question if you thought we could score 28 or more points running the ball a high majority of the time.

The Juggler

pjhawks wrote:

The Juggler wrote:

also, if you're afraid of a high scoring offense, you should want to, you know, try to keep them off the field. and you don't do that by misfiring 50% of the time on 54 pass attempts with your backup quarterback.

conveniently you didn't answer the question if you thought we could score 28 or more points running the ball a high majority of the time.

sorry. it seemed like the question was rhetorical but i forgot who i was conversing with.

running the ball a lot more than they did would have increased the odds of the patriots scoring less than 28 points because their offense would not have been on the field as much as they were.

we're lucky they didn't put up 50 on us the way that game went. last thing a team with a backup qb who is playing poorly wants to do is get into a shootout with the patriots.

mccoy is the eagles best player and they barely used him.

and i guess i will just assume that you don't know what an adjustment is.

jamminpearls

pjhawks wrote:

The Juggler wrote:

..that is music to pjhawks' ears

you guys should so go cheer for the Broncos and Tim Tebow since you love the run so much. and Jackson's yips on the passes is making people conveniently forget McCoy's 2 awful drops yesterday as well. hey but i'm sure on the 1st 2 drives you guys didn't cheer for the long passes that connected because you wanted to run the ball right?

and kind of ironic to hear about washburn complaining about the Eagles offense not running the ball when there was an article in the Sunday Inquirer about him where he basically says that running the ball in the NFL isn't really important anymore. what a dick. morhingweg should have told him to shut the f up and worry about his defense getting torched by tom brady.

When did u become the fixer? U sound just like him in the Phillies thread,i.e.(Howard/WAR) Your as off base here as he is there.

pjhawks

The Juggler wrote:

pjhawks wrote:

The Juggler wrote:

also, if you're afraid of a high scoring offense, you should want to, you know, try to keep them off the field. and you don't do that by misfiring 50% of the time on 54 pass attempts with your backup quarterback.

conveniently you didn't answer the question if you thought we could score 28 or more points running the ball a high majority of the time.

sorry. it seemed like the question was rhetorical but i forgot who i was conversing with.

running the ball a lot more than they did would have increased the odds of the patriots scoring less than 28 points because their offense would not have been on the field as much as they were.

we're lucky they didn't put up 50 on us the way that game went. last thing a team with a backup qb who is playing poorly wants to do is get into a shootout with the patriots.

mccoy is the eagles best player and they barely used him.

and i guess i will just assume that you don't know what an adjustment is.

still didn't answer the question.

come on dude no way going into the game was there any scenario where we weren't giving up at least 3 or 4 touchdowns to brady no matter how long he had the ball.

The Juggler

pjhawks wrote:

The Juggler wrote:

pjhawks wrote:

conveniently you didn't answer the question if you thought we could score 28 or more points running the ball a high majority of the time.

sorry. it seemed like the question was rhetorical but i forgot who i was conversing with.

running the ball a lot more than they did would have increased the odds of the patriots scoring less than 28 points because their offense would not have been on the field as much as they were.

we're lucky they didn't put up 50 on us the way that game went. last thing a team with a backup qb who is playing poorly wants to do is get into a shootout with the patriots.

mccoy is the eagles best player and they barely used him.

and i guess i will just assume that you don't know what an adjustment is.

still didn't answer the question.

come on dude no way going into the game was there any scenario where we weren't giving up at least 3 or 4 touchdowns to brady no matter how long he had the ball.

pretty sure i answered the question dude.

might want to check how the giants and steelers beat them a few weeks ago too.

i'm sensing if you were coaching you'd have forfeited.

pjhawks

The Juggler wrote:

pretty sure i answered the question dude.

might want to check how the giants and steelers beat them a few weeks ago too.

i'm sensing if you were coaching you'd have forfeited.

i didn't see where you said you thought the eagles could or couldn't have scored 28+ points against the pats running the ball the majority of the time. that was the question i wanted answered because in no scenario did i see the eagles holding them below in the 20s at best. and if our receivers includig mccoy hadn't dropped some of those balls the game would have been within reach for us.

The Juggler

pjhawks wrote:

The Juggler wrote:

pretty sure i answered the question dude.

might want to check how the giants and steelers beat them a few weeks ago too.

i'm sensing if you were coaching you'd have forfeited.

i didn't see where you said you thought the eagles could or couldn't have scored 28+ points against the pats running the ball the majority of the time. that was the question i wanted answered because in no scenario did i see the eagles holding them below in the 20s at best. and if our receivers includig mccoy hadn't dropped some of those balls the game would have been within reach for us.

why do you spend so much time talking about something you know so little about? seriously man. i'm not even trying to give you a hard time here. i'm really not. i feel bad but it's just obvious you don't understand this stuff...

look, you seem like you were scared to death that the patriots were going to put up a ton of points headed into the game. your quarterback is out with an injury. one of your starting receivers was out too. why on earth would you want to try to outscore him with vince young of all quarterbacks? according to you he "blows."

why not put in the hands of your best player? the leading rusher in the nfl? why not follow the same formula that worked for the steelers and giants just a few weeks earlier? the same formula that held the patriots to 17 points and 20 points respectively? (obviously you were not aware of those games).

play to your strengths. there was no way the eagles were going to beat the patriots with vince young dropping back to pass 83% of the time. that sounds funny just typing it out. they hit a few bombs early which was awesome. the deep threat is one of the reasons why our running game has worked so well this year. so frustrating.

pjhawks

The Juggler wrote:

why do you spend so much time talking about something you know so little about? seriously man. i'm not even trying to give you a hard time here. i'm really not. i feel bad but it's just obvious you don't understand this stuff...

look, you seem like you were scared to death that the patriots were going to put up a ton of points headed into the game. your quarterback is out with an injury. one of your starting receivers was out too. why on earth would you want to try to outscore him with vince young of all quarterbacks? according to you he "blows."

why not put in the hands of your best player? the leading rusher in the nfl? why not follow the same formula that worked for the steelers and giants just a few weeks earlier? the same formula that held the patriots to 17 points and 20 points respectively? (obviously you were not aware of those games).

play to your strengths. there was no way the eagles were going to beat the patriots with vince young dropping back to pass 83% of the time. that sounds funny just typing it out. they hit a few bombs early which was awesome. the deep threat is one of the reasons why our running game has worked so well this year. so frustrating.

how many points do you think the eagles coud have scored running the ball the majority of the time this past sunday? answer the damn question. and tell me if you think that would have been enough to win.

and i know you can't win if you don't score and you aren't scoring running the ball a majority of the time. since you won't say how many points you think they could have scored running the ball (and just shrug off that the pats secondary sucks and had a wide receiver playing back there) i can only guess you think not too many.

point's win games, not rushing yards. as has been proven this year.

The Juggler

pjhawks wrote:

The Juggler wrote:

why do you spend so much time talking about something you know so little about? seriously man. i'm not even trying to give you a hard time here. i'm really not. i feel bad but it's just obvious you don't understand this stuff...

look, you seem like you were scared to death that the patriots were going to put up a ton of points headed into the game. your quarterback is out with an injury. one of your starting receivers was out too. why on earth would you want to try to outscore him with vince young of all quarterbacks? according to you he "blows."

why not put in the hands of your best player? the leading rusher in the nfl? why not follow the same formula that worked for the steelers and giants just a few weeks earlier? the same formula that held the patriots to 17 points and 20 points respectively? (obviously you were not aware of those games).

play to your strengths. there was no way the eagles were going to beat the patriots with vince young dropping back to pass 83% of the time. that sounds funny just typing it out. they hit a few bombs early which was awesome. the deep threat is one of the reasons why our running game has worked so well this year. so frustrating.

how many points do you think the eagles coud have scored running the ball the majority of the time this past sunday? answer the damn question. and tell me if you think that would have been enough to win.

point's win games, not rushing yards. as has been proven this year.

points win games. that is insightful. you gonna score a ton of points with vince young throwing 54 times huh? that worked out pretty well....by the way 400 passing yards apparently don't win games either, you knucklehead.


the steelers beat them 25-17. the giants beat them 24-20. both of these teams utilized a ball control offense that was designed to keep the ball away from this high powered pat's offense. giants ran it 26 times. steelers ran it 21 times. both those teams had their starting qb and reciever playing. and both teams don't have a running back nearly good as the one andy and marty gave it to just 10 times.

pjhawks

The Juggler wrote:

points win games. that is insightful. you gonna score a ton of points with vince young throwing 54 times huh? that worked out pretty well.


the steelers beat them 25-17. the giants beat them 24-20. both of these teams utilized a ball control offense that was designed to keep the ball away from this high powered pat's offense. giants ran it 26 times. steelers ran it 21 times. both those teams had their starting qb and reciever playing. and both teams don't have a running back nearly good as the one andy and marty gave it to just 10 times.

1st off those two teams defenses are much better than ours. do you forget our defense sucks? and there is no way we were scoring 24 or 25 points running the ball the majority of the time.

now this week i can see your argument for running the ball because you shouldn't need a high scoring game to beat the seahawks.

Ps: they did put up 20 and if their stud receiver hadn't dropped 2 sure TDs well i don't think i have to do the math for you.

The Juggler

the steelers have a good defense, yes. but their leading rusher is only averaging 3.8 yards per rush. ours is over 5 per rush....yet they stuck with the ground game to keep the ball away from brady.

and the giants defense is much better than the eagles? huh??? in what category? you are so lost you don't even know what you're talking about pjhawks. they just gave up close to 600 yards...last night! did you know there was a game on last night? :?

the giants defense is awful. just awful. they are 26th against the pass. they are 24th against the rush. and 27th in points allowed! the eagles defense, while still bad, is better than the giants defense in literally any possible way you can measure it.


please stop talking about this sport. it's embarrassing. and i'm embarrassed for you.

pjhawks

The Juggler wrote:

the steelers have a good defense, yes. but their leading rusher is only averaging 3.8 yards per rush. ours is over 5 per rush....yet they stuck with the ground game to keep the ball away from brady.

and the giants defense is much better than the eagles? huh??? in what category? you are so lost you don't even know what you're talking about pjhawks. they just gave up close to 600 yards...last night! did you know there was a game on last night? :?

the giants defense is awful. just awful. they are 26th against the pass. they are 24th against the rush. and 27th in points allowed! the eagles defense, while still bad, is better than the giants defense in literally any possible way you can measure it.


please stop talking about this sport. it's embarrassing. and i'm embarrassed for you.

final comment - we scored 20 and our stud receiver dropped 2 sure touchdowns. should have had at least 34 points. again offensive game plan wasn't the issue.

ps: and giants faced a great passing team last night...

The Juggler

pjhawks wrote:

The Juggler wrote:

the steelers have a good defense, yes. but their leading rusher is only averaging 3.8 yards per rush. ours is over 5 per rush....yet they stuck with the ground game to keep the ball away from brady.

and the giants defense is much better than the eagles? huh??? in what category? you are so lost you don't even know what you're talking about pjhawks. they just gave up close to 600 yards...last night! did you know there was a game on last night? :?

the giants defense is awful. just awful. they are 26th against the pass. they are 24th against the rush. and 27th in points allowed! the eagles defense, while still bad, is better than the giants defense in literally any possible way you can measure it.


please stop talking about this sport. it's embarrassing. and i'm embarrassed for you.

final comment - we scored 20 and our stud receiver dropped 2 sure touchdowns. should have had at least 34 points. again offensive game plan wasn't the issue.

ps: and giants faced a great passing team last night...

i don't think it's possible for you to know less of what you're talking about. you cannot even properly respond to me.