scientists crack genetic code for 2 kinds of cancer

Pepe SilviaPepe Silvia Posts: 3,758
edited December 2009 in A Moving Train
there's a video on the site. found this interesting
The lung cancer DNA code had more than 23,000 errors largely triggered by cigarette smoke exposure.

From this, the experts estimate a typical smoker acquires one new mutation for every 15 cigarettes they smoke.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8414124.stm

Scientists crack 'entire genetic code' of cancer

Scientists have unlocked the entire genetic code of two of the most common cancers - skin and lung - a move they say could revolutionise cancer care.

Not only will the cancer maps pave the way for blood tests to spot tumours far earlier, they will also yield new drug targets, says the Wellcome Trust team.

Scientists around the globe are now working to catalogue all the genes that go wrong in many types of human cancer.

The UK is looking at breast cancer, Japan at liver and India at mouth.

China is studying stomach cancer, and the US is looking at cancers of the brain, ovary and pancreas.

The International Cancer Genome Consortium scientists from the 10 countries involved say it will take them at least five years and many hundreds of thousands of dollars to complete this mammoth task.

But once they have done this, patients will reap the benefits.

Professor Michael Stratton, who is the UK lead, said: "These catalogues are going to change the way we think about individual cancers.

"By identifying all the cancer genes we will be able to develop new drugs that target the specific mutated genes and work out which patients will benefit from these novel treatments.

"We can envisage a time when following the removal of a cancer cataloguing it will become routine."

It could even be possible to develop MoT-style blood tests for healthy adults that can check for tell-tale DNA patterns suggestive of cancer.

Russian roulette

The scientists found the DNA code for a skin cancer called melanoma contained more than 30,000 errors almost entirely caused by too much sun exposure.

The lung cancer DNA code had more than 23,000 errors largely triggered by cigarette smoke exposure.

From this, the experts estimate a typical smoker acquires one new mutation for every 15 cigarettes they smoke.

Although many of these mutations will be harmless, some will trigger cancer.

Wellcome Trust researcher Dr Peter Campbell, who conducted this research, published in the journal Nature, said: "It's like playing Russian roulette.

"Most of the time the mutations will land in innocent parts of the genome, but some will hit the right targets for cancer."

By quitting smoking, people could reduce their cancer risk back down to "normal" with time, he said.

The suspicion is lung cells containing mutations are eventually replaced with new ones free of genetic errors.

By studying the cancer catalogues in detail, the scientists say it should be possible to find exactly which lifestyle and environmental factors trigger different tumours.

Treatment and prevention

Tom Haswell, who was successfully treated 15 years ago for lung cancer, believes the research will benefit the next generation:

"For future patients I think it's tremendous news because hopefully treatments can be targeted to their particular genome mutations, hopefully... reducing some of the side effects we get".

Cancer experts have applauded the work.

The Institute of Cancer Research said: "This is the first time that a complete cancer genome has been sequenced and similar insights into other cancer genomes are likely to follow.

"As more cancer genomes are revealed by this technique, we will gain a greater understanding of how cancer is caused and develops, improving our ability to prevent, treat and cure cancer."

Professor Carlos Caldas, from Cancer Research UK's Cambridge Research Institute called the research "groundbreaking".

"Like molecular archaeologists, these researchers have dug through layers of genetic information to uncover the history of these patients' disease.

"What is so new in this study is the researchers have been able to link particular mutations to their cause.

"The hope and excitement for the future is that we will eventually have detailed picture of how different cancers develop, and ultimately how better to treat and prevent them."
don't compete; coexist

what are you but my reflection? who am i to judge or strike you down?

"I will promise you this, that if we have not gotten our troops out by the time I am president, it is the first thing I will do. I will get our troops home. We will bring an end to this war. You can take that to the bank." - Barack Obama

when you told me 'if you can't beat 'em, join 'em'
i was thinkin 'death before dishonor'
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • mca47mca47 Posts: 13,300
    As someone who works in cancer research, the report is very interesting...however not groundbreaking.

    Targeted therapies have been under research now for many years. This however is stating exactly what researches have known for the last 25 years.
    The location of a large percentage of these have been known for years. The "complete map" as they are report has not.

    Good news indeed, but nothing to get too excited about.
  • Hmm, that's interesting...but the melanoma info makes me wary: In America, melanoma has skyrocketed in the past couple of decades. Yet we spend so little time in the sun that we are massively deficient in Vitamin D. Our ancestors spent much more time outdoors in the natural sunlight. They did not wear 'sunblock.' Yet skin cancer was relatively rare.

    "Sun = Cancer. Period. End of story. Full Stop." Just doesn't seem logical. It has got to be much more complicated. Perhaps the fact that many people work indoors all day, and only get out on weekends makes the skin react very differently to the sun than it would with regular, daily exposure. Perhaps the aluminum in sunblock is too toxic for some people's skin. Perhaps a modern diet of chemical crap weakens the immune system, causing more cancer. Perhaps several factors combine to cause cancer. And so on.

    Does sunlight cause the same genetic damage to all skin cells? In people who toil on farms near the equator? In prison inmates never allowed outside? In people with high and low Vitamin D levels?
    "May you live in interesting times."
  • Pepe SilviaPepe Silvia Posts: 3,758
    Hmm, that's interesting...but the melanoma info makes me wary: In America, melanoma has skyrocketed in the past couple of decades. Yet we spend so little time in the sun that we are massively deficient in Vitamin D. Our ancestors spent much more time outdoors in the natural sunlight. They did not wear 'sunblock.' Yet skin cancer was relatively rare.

    "Sun = Cancer. Period. End of story. Full Stop." Just doesn't seem logical. It has got to be much more complicated. Perhaps the fact that many people work indoors all day, and only get out on weekends makes the skin react very differently to the sun than it would with regular, daily exposure. Perhaps the aluminum in sunblock is too toxic for some people's skin. Perhaps a modern diet of chemical crap weakens the immune system, causing more cancer. Perhaps several factors combine to cause cancer. And so on.

    Does sunlight cause the same genetic damage to all skin cells? In people who toil on farms near the equator? In prison inmates never allowed outside? In people with high and low Vitamin D levels?


    great points!!

    aluminum isn't good for you at all, it can increase your risk of things like alzheimers. it's in must deodorants, too
    don't compete; coexist

    what are you but my reflection? who am i to judge or strike you down?

    "I will promise you this, that if we have not gotten our troops out by the time I am president, it is the first thing I will do. I will get our troops home. We will bring an end to this war. You can take that to the bank." - Barack Obama

    when you told me 'if you can't beat 'em, join 'em'
    i was thinkin 'death before dishonor'
  • mca47 wrote:
    As someone who works in cancer research, the report is very interesting...however not groundbreaking.

    Targeted therapies have been under research now for many years. This however is stating exactly what researches have known for the last 25 years.
    The location of a large percentage of these have been known for years. The "complete map" as they are report has not.

    Good news indeed, but nothing to get too excited about.


    oh well...bummer.
    i was excited for a moment there.
    thanks.
    :?
    :lol:


    and not to turn this into one of "those" discussions...but i did focus on this for a moment:

    The UK is looking at breast cancer, Japan at liver and India at mouth.

    China is studying stomach cancer, and the US is looking at cancers of the brain, ovary and pancreas.


    just points out, once again...that socialized medicine or not, MANY countries around the globe do ground-breaking research. socialized medicine is not the death knell to medical innovation.


    carry on.......
    Stay with me...
    Let's just breathe...


    I am myself like you somehow


Sign In or Register to comment.