red state sex vs. blue state sex

soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
edited November 2009 in A Moving Train
interesting article here about the 'do as i say, not as i do' mentality of american evangelicals:

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008 ... table=true

it's pretty long, but some interesting points:

- evangelicals start having sex younger than any denomination except black protestants
- even the ones that take virgin pledges fare no better than the population at large
- they have babies younger and marry younger
- despite their obsession with the sanctity of marriage, they divorce as much, if not more than, godless liberals
- said liberals talk little about defining marriage, yet have happier marriages, more stable and successful kids, and less divorce

gee, imagine that! now all you values voters can go fuck yourselves. WE are not the problem. YOU are the problem.
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • interesting article here about the 'do as i say, not as i do' mentality of american evangelicals:

    http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008 ... table=true

    it's pretty long, but some interesting points:

    - evangelicals start having sex younger than any denomination except black protestants
    - even the ones that take virgin pledges fare no better than the population at large
    - they have babies younger and marry younger
    - despite their obsession with the sanctity of marriage, they divorce as much, if not more than, godless liberals
    - said liberals talk little about defining marriage, yet have happier marriages, more stable and successful kids, and less divorce

    gee, imagine that! now all you values voters can go fuck yourselves. WE are not the problem. YOU are the problem.



    i'd be VERY curious to know their abortion rates as well, not that i want to turn this into THAT debate.
    Stay with me...
    Let's just breathe...


    I am myself like you somehow


  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    interesting article here about the 'do as i say, not as i do' mentality of american evangelicals:

    http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008 ... table=true

    it's pretty long, but some interesting points:

    - evangelicals start having sex younger than any denomination except black protestants
    - even the ones that take virgin pledges fare no better than the population at large
    - they have babies younger and marry younger
    - despite their obsession with the sanctity of marriage, they divorce as much, if not more than, godless liberals
    - said liberals talk little about defining marriage, yet have happier marriages, more stable and successful kids, and less divorce

    gee, imagine that! now all you values voters can go fuck yourselves. WE are not the problem. YOU are the problem.



    i'd be VERY curious to know their abortion rates as well, not that i want to turn this into THAT debate.

    it's in there. much higher in the blue states. but thanks a lot for making sure we spend the next 10 pages talking about dead babies instead of hot teen sex ;)
  • pandorapandora Posts: 21,855
    really I thought this was gonna a be a good sex competion thread damn
  • interesting article here about the 'do as i say, not as i do' mentality of american evangelicals:

    http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008 ... table=true

    it's pretty long, but some interesting points:

    - evangelicals start having sex younger than any denomination except black protestants
    - even the ones that take virgin pledges fare no better than the population at large
    - they have babies younger and marry younger
    - despite their obsession with the sanctity of marriage, they divorce as much, if not more than, godless liberals
    - said liberals talk little about defining marriage, yet have happier marriages, more stable and successful kids, and less divorce

    gee, imagine that! now all you values voters can go fuck yourselves. WE are not the problem. YOU are the problem.

    You sound like you've just had Christmas dinner with your wife's side of the family who badgered you all night like about how it's people like you who are causing the social downturn in American society.

    I agree with your argument, however, as I said, the manner in which you delivered it was very personal and not very scholarly. I'll give you a hand there.

    Anyone who is interested in learning more about Evangelical values vs. reality should have a look at an essay entitled Inventing Family Values by Matthew D. Lassiter. While it focuses more on the counterculture movement of the 1970's, it gives much insight into the mentality of the Evangelical Christian and how the Evangelical Christian committed many of the same "social crimes" they were convicting the counterculture members of.

    Hope this helps!
    If hope can grow from dirt like me ...
  • interesting article here about the 'do as i say, not as i do' mentality of american evangelicals:

    http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008 ... table=true

    it's pretty long, but some interesting points:

    - evangelicals start having sex younger than any denomination except black protestants
    - even the ones that take virgin pledges fare no better than the population at large
    - they have babies younger and marry younger
    - despite their obsession with the sanctity of marriage, they divorce as much, if not more than, godless liberals
    - said liberals talk little about defining marriage, yet have happier marriages, more stable and successful kids, and less divorce

    gee, imagine that! now all you values voters can go fuck yourselves. WE are not the problem. YOU are the problem.



    i'd be VERY curious to know their abortion rates as well, not that i want to turn this into THAT debate.

    it's in there. much higher in the blue states. but thanks a lot for making sure we spend the next 10 pages talking about dead babies instead of hot teen sex ;)

    i read that, but that still doesn't tell me the rate of abortion for the red states, just that they are lower than the blue. however, it was a VERY interesting read...and especially at the end, who knew that liberals are actually pro-family eh? ;)
    Stay with me...
    Let's just breathe...


    I am myself like you somehow


  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    Big Drop wrote:
    You sound like you've just had Christmas dinner with your wife's side of the family who badgered you all night like about how it's people like you who are causing the social downturn in American society.

    I agree with your argument, however, as I said, the manner in which you delivered it was very personal and not very scholarly. I'll give you a hand there.

    Anyone who is interested in learning more about Evangelical values vs. reality should have a look at an essay entitled Inventing Family Values by Matthew D. Lassiter. While it focuses more on the counterculture movement of the 1970's, it gives much insight into the mentality of the Evangelical Christian and how the Evangelical Christian committed many of the same "social crimes" they were convicting the counterculture members of.

    Hope this helps!

    i dont consider this a place for scholarly debate. it was meant to be personal. ;) the people that believe this family values bullshit aren't bright enough to see the baseline hypocrisy and delusions of it, and an article written beyond their mental capacity won't help anything. but maybe a nice wake up call telling them we're not going to suffer for their ignorant bullshit and trying to pin their problems on us anymore might get somewhere. :)

    had no family problems, hehe. i've just re-entered the arena after a long absence from the theology wars. though come to think, the weekend before i broke up with my gf we did go to church with her family for the first time ever... coincidence?
  • I hear you, as much as I hate to admit it, it's always nice being able to drive the knife to bone. I consider myself very fortunate to have the opportunity to study such topics while at school. I'm in my senior year of earning my BA in History. It really all started in the 1970's when the counterculture started to form.

    A direct quote from Jerry Falwell of NBC's Meet the Press concerning the growing population of Evangelical Christians as a response to the counterculture movement, "We're not trying to jam our moral philosophy down the throats of others. We're simply trying to keep others from jamming their amoral philosophies down our throats." Thanks Jerry, but that couldn't be further from the truth.

    While many women were begging for government help in the form of Universal Child Care so they could leave the home and go to work, women like Phyllis Schlafly were trying to convince America how a child being reared by anyone other than the mother could lead to Homosexuality and Feminism. Anything other than a tight knit nuclear family with a stay at home mother and a breadwinning father would lead to a social fall out in American society.

    Yet somehow, today, we're all still here. Women are in the workplace, there is more gender, race, and sexual equality, and America is still socially doing just fine.

    I'm sure that for every person who believes in the Evangelical thesis for a better America, there are ten Americans who completely disagree with it. There will always be those who cling to straws and wish for a more traditional past, and there will always be those who look to the future as an opportunity to leave the celebrated injustices of the past and create a better tomorrow.

    Tally me in for the latter.
    If hope can grow from dirt like me ...
  • JeanwahJeanwah Posts: 6,363
    I think we should just throw out all statistics based on religion (not to mention differentiating state between red and blue colors) and just admit we're human and shouldn't follow any stupid religious laws, because we end up breaking them anyway. We all do.
  • Jeanwah wrote:
    I think we should just throw out all statistics based on religion (not to mention differentiating state between red and blue colors) and just admit we're human and shouldn't follow any stupid religious laws, because we end up breaking them anyway. We all do.

    I really hate doing this, because I so agree with you. However, the basis, the absolute most fundamental element of any religion is to promote tolerance and understanding. When religion functions in this manner, I have to believe it is a good thing. The problem being every religion seems to have it's own agenda and instead of preaching acceptance and tolerance of others, preaches the superiority of itself and teaches hatred of others. Even if this is not verbatim what the "preacher" says, too many people who attend church, mass, temple, etc., hear their own message.

    "I like your Christ. I do not like your Christians, they are so unlike your Christ." Ghandi
    If hope can grow from dirt like me ...
  • Big Drop wrote:
    I hear you, as much as I hate to admit it, it's always nice being able to drive the knife to bone. I consider myself very fortunate to have the opportunity to study such topics while at school. I'm in my senior year of earning my BA in History. It really all started in the 1970's when the counterculture started to form.

    A direct quote from Jerry Falwell of NBC's Meet the Press concerning the growing population of Evangelical Christians as a response to the counterculture movement, "We're not trying to jam our moral philosophy down the throats of others. We're simply trying to keep others from jamming their amoral philosophies down our throats." Thanks Jerry, but that couldn't be further from the truth.

    While many women were begging for government help in the form of Universal Child Care so they could leave the home and go to work, women like Phyllis Schlafly were trying to convince America how a child being reared by anyone other than the mother could lead to Homosexuality and Feminism. Anything other than a tight knit nuclear family with a stay at home mother and a breadwinning father would lead to a social fall out in American society.

    Yet somehow, today, we're all still here. Women are in the workplace, there is more gender, race, and sexual equality, and America is still socially doing just fine.

    I'm sure that for every person who believes in the Evangelical thesis for a better America, there are ten Americans who completely disagree with it. There will always be those who cling to straws and wish for a more traditional past, and there will always be those who look to the future as an opportunity to leave the celebrated injustices of the past and create a better tomorrow.

    Tally me in for the latter.

    +1

    Nice post. I'd just like to add that there seems to be a lot of hatred from both groups you describe in the last paragraph. The "I'm okay, you're not okay" syndrome which = aggressive weakness.
    Everything not forbidden is compulsory and eveything not compulsory is forbidden. You are free... free to do what the government says you can do.
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    Big Drop wrote:
    Jeanwah wrote:
    I think we should just throw out all statistics based on religion (not to mention differentiating state between red and blue colors) and just admit we're human and shouldn't follow any stupid religious laws, because we end up breaking them anyway. We all do.

    I really hate doing this, because I so agree with you. However, the basis, the absolute most fundamental element of any religion is to promote tolerance and understanding. When religion functions in this manner, I have to believe it is a good thing. The problem being every religion seems to have it's own agenda and instead of preaching acceptance and tolerance of others, preaches the superiority of itself and teaches hatred of others. Even if this is not verbatim what the "preacher" says, too many people who attend church, mass, temple, etc., hear their own message.

    "I like your Christ. I do not like your Christians, they are so unlike your Christ." Ghandi

    if every religion has its own agenda and preaches its own superiority, how can you say the fundamental element of religion is tolerance? many religions preach the opposite of that and have throughout history, openly. seems to me that you're talking about what you think religion should be like, more so than what it actually is or means.
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    Jeanwah wrote:
    I think we should just throw out all statistics based on religion (not to mention differentiating state between red and blue colors) and just admit we're human and shouldn't follow any stupid religious laws, because we end up breaking them anyway. We all do.

    that's why we need these statistics. it's time we shame our less evolved fellows into joining the modern world ;)
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    Big Drop wrote:
    I hear you, as much as I hate to admit it, it's always nice being able to drive the knife to bone. I consider myself very fortunate to have the opportunity to study such topics while at school. I'm in my senior year of earning my BA in History. It really all started in the 1970's when the counterculture started to form.

    A direct quote from Jerry Falwell of NBC's Meet the Press concerning the growing population of Evangelical Christians as a response to the counterculture movement, "We're not trying to jam our moral philosophy down the throats of others. We're simply trying to keep others from jamming their amoral philosophies down our throats." Thanks Jerry, but that couldn't be further from the truth.

    While many women were begging for government help in the form of Universal Child Care so they could leave the home and go to work, women like Phyllis Schlafly were trying to convince America how a child being reared by anyone other than the mother could lead to Homosexuality and Feminism. Anything other than a tight knit nuclear family with a stay at home mother and a breadwinning father would lead to a social fall out in American society.

    Yet somehow, today, we're all still here. Women are in the workplace, there is more gender, race, and sexual equality, and America is still socially doing just fine.

    I've done a lot of research on American fundamentalism as well, though more from the legal, sociological, and political science end of things than pure history. You're spot on, this movement did not really exist until more recently. hell, early 20th century evangelicals were some of the strongest supporters of women's suffrage and the like. somewhere around the 70s though, this whole conservative values movement was born and has taken root. the hippies were rightly decimated for the impracticality of their views, but the values reactionaries have grown like weeds. it's time to pull them like they did the hippies.
  • if every religion has its own agenda and preaches its own superiority, how can you say the fundamental element of religion is tolerance? many religions preach the opposite of that and have throughout history, openly. seems to me that you're talking about what you think religion should be like, more so than what it actually is or means.

    I think you're right. I was raised Catholic and even though I have gotten away from it, formulated my own values and morals, I still think about it sometimes. I know there are good people who practice religion, I've met them. I think that religion should be more about tolerance and acceptance. I don't want to talk myself into a corner after what I already had said about Evangelicals but I can say this: to this day there are few men I respect more than how I respect Fred Rogers. Everyday, in the same mild-mannered voice, he said, "Everyone is special for who they are." When I run into a moral or ethical conundrum, that's usually the very first thing I think of when trying to resolve it.
    If hope can grow from dirt like me ...
  • Big Drop wrote:
    I hear you, as much as I hate to admit it, it's always nice being able to drive the knife to bone. I consider myself very fortunate to have the opportunity to study such topics while at school. I'm in my senior year of earning my BA in History. It really all started in the 1970's when the counterculture started to form.

    A direct quote from Jerry Falwell of NBC's Meet the Press concerning the growing population of Evangelical Christians as a response to the counterculture movement, "We're not trying to jam our moral philosophy down the throats of others. We're simply trying to keep others from jamming their amoral philosophies down our throats." Thanks Jerry, but that couldn't be further from the truth.

    While many women were begging for government help in the form of Universal Child Care so they could leave the home and go to work, women like Phyllis Schlafly were trying to convince America how a child being reared by anyone other than the mother could lead to Homosexuality and Feminism. Anything other than a tight knit nuclear family with a stay at home mother and a breadwinning father would lead to a social fall out in American society.

    Yet somehow, today, we're all still here. Women are in the workplace, there is more gender, race, and sexual equality, and America is still socially doing just fine.

    I've done a lot of research on American fundamentalism as well, though more from the legal, sociological, and political science end of things than pure history. You're spot on, this movement did not really exist until more recently. hell, early 20th century evangelicals were some of the strongest supporters of women's suffrage and the like. somewhere around the 70s though, this whole conservative values movement was born and has taken root. the hippies were rightly decimated for the impracticality of their views, but the values reactionaries have grown like weeds. it's time to pull them like they did the hippies.

    :thumbup:
    If hope can grow from dirt like me ...
  • catefrancescatefrances Posts: 29,003
    Jeanwah wrote:
    I think we should just throw out all statistics based on religion (not to mention differentiating state between red and blue colors) and just admit we're human and shouldn't follow any stupid religious laws, because we end up breaking them anyway. We all do.

    i dont break any 'stupid religious laws' cause i dont live under any to break. so no we all dont.
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • ClaireackClaireack Posts: 13,561
    Ok, I'm here, where's the sex? ;)
  • JeanwahJeanwah Posts: 6,363
    Jeanwah wrote:
    I think we should just throw out all statistics based on religion (not to mention differentiating state between red and blue colors) and just admit we're human and shouldn't follow any stupid religious laws, because we end up breaking them anyway. We all do.

    i dont break any 'stupid religious laws' cause i dont live under any to break. so no we all dont.
    I was talking about those who do.
  • catefrancescatefrances Posts: 29,003
    Jeanwah wrote:
    Jeanwah wrote:
    I think we should just throw out all statistics based on religion (not to mention differentiating state between red and blue colors) and just admit we're human and shouldn't follow any stupid religious laws, because we end up breaking them anyway. We all do.

    i dont break any 'stupid religious laws' cause i dont live under any to break. so no we all dont.
    I was talking about those who do.

    so by we all do you didnt actually mean we all. the we was specific. gotcha. ;)
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • OffHeGoes29OffHeGoes29 Posts: 1,240
    interesting article here about the 'do as i say, not as i do' mentality of american evangelicals:

    http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008 ... table=true

    it's pretty long, but some interesting points:

    - evangelicals start having sex younger than any denomination except black protestants
    - even the ones that take virgin pledges fare no better than the population at large
    - they have babies younger and marry younger
    - despite their obsession with the sanctity of marriage, they divorce as much, if not more than, godless liberals
    - said liberals talk little about defining marriage, yet have happier marriages, more stable and successful kids, and less divorce

    gee, imagine that! now all you values voters can go fuck yourselves. WE are not the problem. YOU are the problem.

    Are you feeling repressed by Southern Evangelicals lately? Thats a lot of hate you got going on there.

    Honestly, who gives a shit. There is more important stuff to worry about.
    BRING BACK THE WHALE
  • JeanwahJeanwah Posts: 6,363
    Jeanwah wrote:
    i dont break any 'stupid religious laws' cause i dont live under any to break. so no we all dont.
    I was talking about those who do.

    so by we all do you didnt actually mean we all. the we was specific. gotcha. ;)
    I should just take that last sentence off.
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    Claireack wrote:
    Ok, I'm here, where's the sex? ;)

    a-fucking-men.
Sign In or Register to comment.