After Around the Bend on Benny he talks about the bootlegs and papers...I dont really get it :? :oops:
Care to explain someone?
earlier in the day, Ed had been served with papers on behalf of an individual out of Florida who was suing the band RE: bootlegs,...
To quote the 10C from Newsletter #8: "Please understand we have a lot of members and it is very hard to please everybody. If you are one of those unhappy people...please call 1-900-IDN-TCAR."
"Me knowing the truth, I can not concur."
1996: Toronto - 1998: Chicago, Montreal, Barrie - 2000: Montreal, Toronto - 2002: Seattle X2 (Key Arena) - 2003: Cleveland, Buffalo, Toronto, Montreal, Seattle (Benaroya Hall) - 2004: Reading, Toledo, Grand Rapids - 2005: Kitchener, London, Hamilton, Montreal, Ottawa, Toronto, Quebec City - 2006: Toronto X2, Albany, Hartford, Grand Rapids, Cleveland - 2007: Chicago (Vic Theatre) - 2008: NYC X2, Hartford, Mansfield X2 - 2009: Toronto, Chicago X2, Seattle X2, Philadelphia X4 - 2010: Columbus, Noblesville, Cleveland, Buffalo, Hartford - 2011: Montreal, Toronto X2, Ottawa, Hamilton - 2012: Missoula - 2013: London, Chicago, Buffalo, Hartford - 2014: Detroit, Moline - 2015: NYC (Global Citizen Festival) - 2016: Greenville, Toronto X2, Chicago 1 - 2017: Brooklyn (RRHOF Induction) - 2018: Chicago 1, Boston 1 - 2022: Fresno, Ottawa, Hamilton, Toronto, NYC, Camden - 2023: St. Paul X2, Austin X2 - 2024: Vancouver X2, Portland, Sacramento, Missoula, Noblesville, Philadelphia X2, Baltimore
I always assumed it was an entity that was claiming copyright and/or trademark rights to the technology they were using to create and sell bootlegs in the early 2000s--this entity I assume filed a lawsuit against the band to gain payment for what they argued Pearl Jam "stole." The papers he refers to -- I assume -- were subpoena papers--not to be confused with rolling papers which one uses to roll joints.
Maybe it's the American legal system that is throwing you. If so, Americans are lawsuit happy--that's all you need to know.
Post edited by Smarter_Than_U on
"Goddamn Romans. Sure know how to make a ... drum room." --Matt Cameron
I always assumed it was an entity that was claiming copyright and/or trademark rights to the technology they were using to create and sell bootlegs in the early 2000s--this entity I assume filed a lawsuit against the band to gain payment for what they argued Pearl Jam "stole."
I always assumed it was an entity that was claiming copyright and/or trademark rights to the technology they were using to create and sell bootlegs in the early 2000s--this entity I assume filed a lawsuit against the band to gain payment for what they argued Pearl Jam "stole." The papers he refers to -- I assume -- were subpoena papers--not to be confused with rolling papers which one uses to roll joints.
Maybe it's the American legal system that is throwing you. If so, Americans are lawsuit happy--that's all you need to know.
Yes, someone was suing Pearl Jam, claiming that they came up with the idea of live bootlegs. I remember reading an article about it back in 03 but can't find anything about it now.
2003: San Antonio, Houston, Dallas, Seattle; 2005: Monterrey; 2006: Chicago 1 & 2, Grand Rapids, Cleveland, Detroit; 2008: West Palm Beach, Tampa; 2009: Austin, LA 3 & 4, San Diego; 2010: Kansas City, St. Louis, Columbus, Indianapolis; 2011: PJ20 1 & 2; 2012: Missoula; 2013: Dallas, Oklahoma City, Seattle; 2014: Tulsa; 2016: Columbia, New York City 1 & 2; 2018: London, Seattle 1 & 2; 2021: Ohana; 2022: Oklahoma City
I always assumed it was an entity that was claiming copyright and/or trademark rights to the technology they were using to create and sell bootlegs in the early 2000s--this entity I assume filed a lawsuit against the band to gain payment for what they argued Pearl Jam "stole."
technology?
"software" ... "delivery infrastructure" -- something I really don't know for sure since I didn't file the lawsuit, so if you have a more accurate word to use in place of "technology" then please suggest it.
"Goddamn Romans. Sure know how to make a ... drum room." --Matt Cameron
Comments
earlier in the day, Ed had been served with papers on behalf of an individual out of Florida who was suing the band RE: bootlegs,...
"Me knowing the truth, I can not concur."
1996: Toronto - 1998: Chicago, Montreal, Barrie - 2000: Montreal, Toronto - 2002: Seattle X2 (Key Arena) - 2003: Cleveland, Buffalo, Toronto, Montreal, Seattle (Benaroya Hall) - 2004: Reading, Toledo, Grand Rapids - 2005: Kitchener, London, Hamilton, Montreal, Ottawa, Toronto, Quebec City - 2006: Toronto X2, Albany, Hartford, Grand Rapids, Cleveland - 2007: Chicago (Vic Theatre) - 2008: NYC X2, Hartford, Mansfield X2 - 2009: Toronto, Chicago X2, Seattle X2, Philadelphia X4 - 2010: Columbus, Noblesville, Cleveland, Buffalo, Hartford - 2011: Montreal, Toronto X2, Ottawa, Hamilton - 2012: Missoula - 2013: London, Chicago, Buffalo, Hartford - 2014: Detroit, Moline - 2015: NYC (Global Citizen Festival) - 2016: Greenville, Toronto X2, Chicago 1 - 2017: Brooklyn (RRHOF Induction) - 2018: Chicago 1, Boston 1 - 2022: Fresno, Ottawa, Hamilton, Toronto, NYC, Camden - 2023: St. Paul X2, Austin X2 - 2024: Vancouver X2, Portland, Sacramento, Missoula, Noblesville, Philadelphia X2, Baltimore
What you mean sueing the band i.e bootlegs though? What's wrong with them selling bootlegs?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhKxLgeNNUs
Maybe it's the American legal system that is throwing you. If so, Americans are lawsuit happy--that's all you need to know.
This part made me laugh.
"To question your government is not unpatriotic --
to not question your government is unpatriotic."
-- Sen. Chuck Hagel
technology?
Yes, someone was suing Pearl Jam, claiming that they came up with the idea of live bootlegs. I remember reading an article about it back in 03 but can't find anything about it now.
"software" ... "delivery infrastructure" -- something I really don't know for sure since I didn't file the lawsuit, so if you have a more accurate word to use in place of "technology" then please suggest it.